Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Eye irritation

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
eye irritation: in vivo
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
1990
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: well performed GLP compliant OECD guideline study

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
1990
Report date:
1990

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 405 (Acute Eye Irritation / Corrosion)
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
yes

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
1,4-bis(mesitylamino)anthraquinone
EC Number:
204-155-7
EC Name:
1,4-bis(mesitylamino)anthraquinone
Cas Number:
116-75-6
Molecular formula:
C32H30N2O2
IUPAC Name:
1,4-bis(mesitylamino)anthraquinone

Test animals / tissue source

Species:
rabbit
Strain:
New Zealand White
Details on test animals or tissues and environmental conditions:
TEST ANIMALS
- Source: David Percival Ltd., Moston, Sandbach, Cheshire, U.K.
- Age at study initiation: 12 - 16 weeks
- Weight at study initiation: 2.28 - 2.81 kg
- Housing: individually housed in suspended metal cages
- Diet: Rabbit Diet, Preston Farmers, Limited, New Leake, Boston, Lincolnshire, U.K. (ad libitum):
- Water: Drinking Water (ad libitum):
- Acclimation period: at least five days

ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 20 - 23
- Humidity (%): 65 - 67
- Air changes (per hr): approximately 15
- Photoperiod: 12 hrs dark /12 hrs light

Test system

Vehicle:
unchanged (no vehicle)
Controls:
other: untreated left eye served as control
Amount / concentration applied:
0.1 ml of the test material, weighing approximately 64 mg
Duration of treatment / exposure:
single application without removal by washing
Observation period (in vivo):
72 hours
Number of animals or in vitro replicates:
3 (females)
Details on study design:
REMOVAL OF TEST SUBSTANCE
- Washing (if done): no

- SCORING SYSTEM:
CONJUNCTIVAE Redness: 0 - 3; Chemosis: 0 - 4; Discharge: 0 - 3
IRIS: 0 - 2;
CORNEA Degree of Opacity: 0 - 4; Area of cornea involved: 0 - 4

- TOOL USED TO ASSESS SCORE: Examination of the eye was facilitated by use of the light source from a standard ophthalmoscope

Results and discussion

In vivo

Resultsopen allclose all
Irritation parameter:
cornea opacity score
Basis:
animal: # 1-3 each
Time point:
other: mean of 24, 48, 72 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
4
Reversibility:
other: Reversibility: no signs of irritation at any time
Irritation parameter:
iris score
Basis:
animal: # 1-3 each
Time point:
other: mean of 24, 48, 72 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
2
Reversibility:
other: Reversibility: initial signs of slight irritation - if any - were fully reversible within 24 h
Irritation parameter:
conjunctivae score
Remarks:
redness
Basis:
animal: # 1-3 each
Time point:
other: mean of 24, 48, 72 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
3
Reversibility:
other: Reversibility: initial signs of slight irritation - if any - were fully reversible within 24 h
Irritation parameter:
conjunctivae score
Remarks:
chemosis
Basis:
animal: # 1-3 each
Time point:
other: mean of 24, 48, 72 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
4
Reversibility:
other: Reversibility: initial signs of slight irritation - if any - were fully reversible within 24 h
Irritant / corrosive response data:
No adverse corneal effects were noted during the study.
Iridial inflammation was noted in two treated eyes one hour after treatment.
Minimal conjunctival irritation was noted in all treated eyes one hour after treatment.
All treated eyes appeared normal at the 24-hour observation.
Other effects:
No other effects reported.

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
not irritating
Remarks:
Migrated information Criteria used for interpretation of results: EU
Conclusions:
Based on the test result, it is concluded that the test substance is not irritating to eyes.
Executive summary:

A study was performed to assess the irritancy potential of the test material to the eye of the New Zealand White rabbit. The method used followed that described in the OECD Guidelines for Testing of Chemicals (1987) No. 405 "Acute Eye Irritation/Corrosion" referenced as Method B5 in Commission Directive 84/449/EEC.

A single application of the test material to the non-irrigated eye of three rabbits produced slight iridial inflammation and minimal conjunctival irritation. All treated eyes appeared normal 24 hours after treatment.

Based on these findings it is concluded that the test item is not irritating to eyes.