Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: - | CAS number: -
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Toxicity to reproduction
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- screening for reproductive / developmental toxicity
- Remarks:
- Combined 28-Day Repeated Dose Toxicity Study with the Reproduction/Developmental Toxicity Screening Test
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 2022-FEB-16 to 2022-APR-20
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 2 022
Materials and methods
Test guidelineopen allclose all
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: EPA Health Effects Test Guideline OPPTS 870.3550: Reproduction/Developmental Toxicity Screening Test
- Version / remarks:
- July 2000
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 422 (Combined Repeated Dose Toxicity Study with the Reproduction / Developmental Toxicity Screening Test)
- Version / remarks:
- July 2016
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: EPA Health Effects Test Guideline OPPTS 870.3650: Combined Repeated Dose Toxicity Study with the Reproduction/Developmental Toxicity Screening Test.
- Version / remarks:
- July 2000
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Limit test:
- no
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- Petroleum diesel/gas oil fraction, co-processed with renewable hydrocarbons derived from thermally cracked plastics
- IUPAC Name:
- Petroleum diesel/gas oil fraction, co-processed with renewable hydrocarbons derived from thermally cracked plastics
- Test material form:
- liquid
- Remarks:
- Light Yellow
Constituent 1
Test animals
- Species:
- rat
- Strain:
- Wistar
- Remarks:
- Crl: WI(Han)
- Details on species / strain selection:
- The Wistar Han rat was chosen as the animal model for this study as it is an accepted rodent species for toxicity testing by regulatory agencies. The CRO has general and reproduction/developmental historical data in this species from the same strain and source. This animal model has been proven to be susceptible to the effects of reproductive toxicants.
- Sex:
- male/female
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Charles River Deutschland, Sulzfeld, Germany
- Females (if applicable) nulliparous and non-pregnant: yes
- Age at study initiation: Males: 10-11 weeks; Females: 13-14 weeks
- Weight at study initiation: Males: 291- 340 g; Females: 206 - 261 g
- Housing: On arrival and during the pre-test (females only) and pre-mating period animals were group housed (up to 5 animals of the same sex and same dosing group together) in polycarbonate cages (Makrolon, MIV type, height 18 cm).
During the mating phase, males and females were cohabitated on a 1:1 basis in Makrolon plastic cages (MIII type, height 18 cm).
During the post-mating phase, males were housed in their home cage (Makrolon plastic cages, MIV type, height 18 cm) with a maximum of 5 males/cage. Females were individually housed in Makrolon plastic cages (MIII type, height 18 cm).
During the lactation phase, females were housed in Makrolon plastic cages (MIII type, height 18 cm). Pups were housed with the dam, except during locomotor activity monitoring of the dams.
During locomotor activity monitoring, F0-animals were housed individually in a Hi-temp polycarbonate cage (Ancare corp., USA; dimensions: 48.3 x 26.7 x 20.3 cm) without cage-enrichment, bedding material, food and water.
- Diet: pellets (SM R/M-Z from SSNIFF® Spezialdiäten GmbH (Soest, Germany) ad libitum except during designated procedures. During motor activity measurements, animals did not have access to food for a maximum of 2 hours.
- Water: Municipal tap water via water bottles ad libitum. During motor activity
measurements, animals did not have access to water for a maximum of
2 hours.
- Acclimation period: 7 days prior to start of the pretest period (females) or 7 days before the commencement of dosing (males).
DETAILS OF FOOD AND WATER QUALITY: Results of analysis for nutritional components and environmental contaminants were provided by the supplier. It was considered that there were no known contaminants in the feed that would interfere with the objectives of the study. Periodic analysis of the water was performed and it was considered that there were no known contaminants in the water that could interfere with the outcome of the study.
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): Targeted: 18 to 24°C; Actual: 20 to 22°C
- Humidity (%): Targeted: 40 to 70%; Actual: 23 to 55%
- Air changes (per hr): Ten or more air changes per hour
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12 hours light and 12 hours dark (except during designated procedures)
IN-LIFE DATES: 2022- FEB- 16 TO 2022-APRIL-20
Administration / exposure
- Route of administration:
- oral: gavage
- Vehicle:
- corn oil
- Remarks:
- Sigma-Aldrich (Steinheim, Germany)
- Details on exposure:
- PREPARATION OF DOSING SOLUTIONS:
Test material dosing formulations (w/w) were homogenized to visually acceptable levels at appropriate concentrations to meet dose level requirements. The dosing formulations were prepared weekly, filled out in daily portions and stored in the refrigerator. The dosing formulations were removed from the refrigerator and stirred at room temperature for at least 30 minutes before dosing and dosed within 24 hours after removal from the refrigerator. Test material dosing formulations were kept at room temperature until dosing. If practically possible, the dosing formulations and vehicle were continuously stirred until and during dosing. Adjustment was made for specific gravity of the vehicle and test material. No correction was made for the purity/composition of the test material.
VEHICLE
- Justification for use and choice of vehicle (if other than water): Corn oil; Trial preparations (not part of this study) were performed to select the suitable vehicle and to establish a suitable formulation procedure. Specific gravity: 0.92
- Concentration in vehicle: 0, 25, 75, 250 mg/mL for the control, 100, 300, and 1000 mg/kg/day dose groups, respectively
- Amount of vehicle (if gavage): 4 mL/kg
- Lot/batch no. (if required): Not specified
- Purity: not specified - Details on mating procedure:
- - M/F ratio per cage: 1:1
- Length of cohabitation: Until detection of mating was confirmed by evidence of sperm in the vaginal lavage or by the appearance of an intravaginal copulatory plug
- Proof of pregnancy: vaginal plug or sperm in vaginal smear referred to as day 0 of pregnancy
- Further matings after two unsuccessful attempts: Not specified
- After successful mating each pregnant female was caged (how): Individually
- Any other deviations from standard protocol: No
Detection of mating was not confirmed in first instance for Female No. 54 (100 mg/kg/day). Evidence of mating was obtained indirectly by delivery of a litter. Apparently, mating was overlooked in the assessment of the vaginal lavage, which explained the continued di-estrus during the mating in this female. The mating date of this animal was estimated at 21 days prior to the actual delivery date. This day was designated Day 0 post coitum. - Analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
- yes
- Details on analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
- Concentration and Homogeneity Analysis:
Analyses were performed using a validated analytical procedure (Test Facility Study No. 20296912).
Concentration analysis:
Dose formulation samples (2 x 500 mg) were collected (from approximately Middle of the dosing container) for analysis from all dose groups during Week 1 of treatment. Mean sample concentration results within or equal to ± 10% of theoretical concentration were considered acceptable.
Homogeneity analysis:
Dose formulation samples (2 x 500 mg) were collected (from approximately Top, Middle, and Bottom of dosing container) for analysis from dose groups 2 and 4 during Week 1 of treatment. Relative standard deviation (RSD) of concentrations of ≤ 10% for each group were considered acceptable. - Duration of treatment / exposure:
- Males: 7 days a week for a minimum of 28 days, including at least 2 weeks of treatment prior to mating and during the mating period up to and including the day before scheduled necropsy.
Females: 7 days a week for at least 14 days prior to mating (with the objective of covering at least two complete estrous cycles), the variable time to conception, the duration of pregnancy and at least 13 days after delivery, up to and including the day before scheduled necropsy.
Male Nos. 15 (100 mg/kg/day) and 30 (300 mg/kg/day) had reflux on Day 11 and 12, respectively. As this was noted only once in each animal over the course of the study, this was considered not to affect the toxicological evaluation.
Female Nos. 61, 62, 67, (300 mg/kg/day), 79 and 80 (1000 mg/kg/day), were not dosed on one occasion as these females were littering at the moment of dosing. The omission of one day of dosing over a period of several weeks was considered not to affect the toxicological evaluation.
Pups were not treated directly but were potentially exposed to the test material in utero, via maternal milk, or from exposure to maternal urine/feces. - Frequency of treatment:
- Once dailiy
Doses / concentrationsopen allclose all
- Dose / conc.:
- 0 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- Remarks:
- Goup 1 - Control (Corn oil)
- Dose / conc.:
- 100 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- Remarks:
- Group 2 - Low dose
- Dose / conc.:
- 300 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- Remarks:
- Group 3 - Mid dose
- Dose / conc.:
- 1 000 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- Remarks:
- Group 4 - High dose
- No. of animals per sex per dose:
- 10/sex/dose
- Control animals:
- yes, concurrent vehicle
- Details on study design:
- - Dose selection rationale: The dose levels were selected based on the results of a 10 Day Dose Range Finder with oral gavage administration of Petroleum diesel/gas oil fraction, co-processed with renewable hydrocarbons derived from thermally cracked plastics (EC 941-803-4) in rats (Test Facility Reference No. 20296913), and in an attempt to produce graded responses to the test material.
- Rationale for animal assignment (if not random): Animals were randomly assigned to groups at arrival. Males and females were randomized separately.
- Fasting period before blood sampling for clinical biochemistry: F0-males were fasted overnight with a maximum of 24 hours. F0-females were not fasted
- Dose range finding studies: In the 10-day dose range finder (Test Facility Reference No. 20296913), performed with dose levels of 300 and 1000 mg/kg/day, no clinical signs were noted. No relevant changes were noted in body weights and food consumption. No macroscopic findings were noted. Increased liver weights were noted in 1/3 animals at 300 mg/kg/day and in 3/3 animals at 1000 mg/kg/day. Based on these esults, dose levels of 0, 100, 300 and 1000 mg/kg/day were selected for the current study. - Positive control:
- No positive control was used.
Examinations
- Parental animals: Observations and examinations:
- CAGE SIDE OBSERVATIONS: Yes
- Time schedule: Throughout the study, all animals were observed for general health/mortality and moribundity twice daily, in the morning and at the end of the working day (except on days of receipt and necropsy where frequency was at least once daily).
DETAILED CLINICAL OBSERVATIONS: Yes
- Time schedule: All animals were observed once daily, beginning during the first administration of the test material up to the day prior to necropsy. During the Dosing Period, observations were performed after dosing at no specific time point, but within a similar time period after dosing for the respective animals. Animals were observed for specific clinical signs. The time of onset, grade and duration of any observed sign was recorded. Signs were graded for severity and the maximum grade was predefined at 3 or 4. Grades were coded as slight (grade 1), moderate (grade 2), severe (grade 3) and very severe (grade 4). For certain signs, only its presence (grade 1) or absence (grade 0) was scored.
Arena Observations: All animals were observed once before the first administration of the test material and weekly thereafter during the Treatment Period. Animals were observed outside the home cage in a standard arena after dosing.
BODY WEIGHT: Yes
- Time schedule for examinations: All animals were weighed on On Day 1 of treatment (prior to dosing) and weekly thereafter. Mated females: on Days 0, 4, 7, 11, 14, 17, and 20 Post Coitum and during lactation on PND 1, 4, 7, and 13. A terminal weight was recorded on the day of scheduled necropsy.
FOOD CONSUMPTION AND COMPOUND INTAKE (if feeding study):
- Food consumption for each animal determined and mean daily diet consumption calculated as g food/kg body weight/day: No
- Compound intake calculated as time-weighted averages from the consumption and body weight gain data: Yes (quantitatively measured per cage); Weekly except for males and females which were housed together for mating and for females without evidence of mating.
Mated females: on Days 0, 4, 7, 11, 14, 17, and 20 Post Coitum and during lactation on PND 1, 4, 7, and 13.
FOOD EFFICIENCY:
- Body weight gain in kg/food consumption in kg per unit time X 100 calculated as time-weighted averages from the consumption and body weight gain data: Not specified
WATER CONSUMPTION AND COMPOUND INTAKE (if drinking water study): Yes
- Time schedule for examinations: Regular basis throughout the study; Monitored by visual inspection of the water bottles. No quantitative investigation was introduced as no effect was suspected.
OTHER:
HAEMATOLOGY: Yes
- Time schedule for collection of blood: On the day of scheduled necropsy
- Anaesthetic used for blood collection: Yes (isoflurane); Sampled from the retro-orbital sinus under anesthesia using isoflurane between 07.00 and 10.30 a.m
- Animals fasted: Males fasted overnight (maximum of 24 hours), females: No
- How many animals: 5/sex/group
- Parameters checked in table [No.2] were examined.
CLINICAL CHEMISTRY: Yes
- Time schedule for collection of blood: On the day of scheduled necropsy
- Animals fasted: Males fasted overnight (maximum of 24 hours), females non-fasted
- How many animals: 5/sex/group
- Parameters checked in table [No.3] were examined.
PLASMA/SERUM HORMONES/LIPIDS: Yes (Thyroid hormones)
- Time of blood sample collection:On the day of scheduled necropsy
- Animals fasted: F0-males: Yes (overnight with a maximum of 24 hours) ; F0-females: No
- How many animals: Selected F0 animals (5/sex/dose) and Non-selectd F0 animals (≤ 5/sex/group)
Blood samples (1.0 mL) were processed for serum, and serum was analyzed for Triiodothyronine (T3); Thyroxine (T4); and Thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH). After clotting and centrifugation, the serum was used for T3, T4 and TSH analysis. The serum derived from the F0-animals was divided in two aliquots. One aliquot was used for measurement of TSH using the IMMULITE® 1000 analyser and the other aliquot was used for measurement of T3 and T4 using LC-MS.
NEUROBEHAVIOURAL EXAMINATION: Yes
- Time schedule for examinations: F0-males: during Week 4 of treatment; F0-females: during the last week of lactation (i.e., PND 8).
- Dose groups that were examined: selected 5 males per group and selected 5 females per group for all dose groups
- Battery of functions tested: Hearing ability; Pupillary reflex; Static righting reflex; Fore- and hind-limb grip strength; and Locomotor activity - Oestrous cyclicity (parental animals):
- Estrous cycles were evaluated by examining the vaginal cytology of samples obtained by vaginal lavage.
Daily vaginal lavage was performed for all females beginning 14 days prior to treatment (pretest period), the first 14 days of treatment and during mating until evidence of copulation was observed. Vaginal lavage was continued for those females with no evidence of copulation until termination of the mating period.
On the day of necropsy, a vaginal lavage was also taken to determine the stage of estrous. This was done for all females, except for the female that died spontaneously. - Sperm parameters (parental animals):
- For the testes of all selected males of Group 1 (control) and Group 4 (1000 mg/kg bw/day), and all males that failed to sire, a detailed qualitative examination was made, taking into account the tubular stages of the spermatogenic cycle. The following tissues were collected and persevered for examination: Gland, seminal vesicle including coagulation gland and fluid, testes and epididymides.
- Litter observations:
- STANDARDISATION OF LITTERS
- Performed on day 4 postpartum: yes
- If yes, maximum of 8 pups/litter (4/sex/litter as nearly as possible); excess pups were killed and discarded.
PARAMETERS EXAMINED
The following parameters were examined in F1 offspring: number and sex of pups, stillbirths, live births, postnatal mortality, presence of gross anomalies, weight gain, physical or behavioural abnormalities, anogenital distance (AGD), pup weight on the day of AGD, presence of nipples/areolae in male pups.
GROSS EXAMINATION OF DEAD PUPS: yes, for external and internal abnormalities; possible cause of death was determined for pups born or found dead.
ASSESSMENT OF DEVELOPMENTAL NEUROTOXICITY: No
ASSESSMENT OF DEVELOPMENTAL IMMUNOTOXICITY: No - Postmortem examinations (parental animals):
- GROSS PATHOLOGY: Yes (see Tables 4 and 5)
All animals were subjected to a full post mortem examination, with special attention being paid to the reproductive organs. The numbers of former implantation sites were recorded for all paired females.
Unscheduled Deaths/Euthanasia:
Female No. 51 (100 mg/kg/day) was dead. A necropsy was conducted for animals that died on study, and specified tissues were saved.
Scheduled Euthanasia:
Animals surviving until scheduled euthanasia were weighed, and deeply anesthetized using isoflurane and subsequently exsanguinated and subjected to a full post mortem examination. Scheduled necropsies were conducted for for males (which sired or failed to sire) following completion of the mating period (a minimum of 28 days of administration); on PND 14-16 for females which delivered; and post-coitum Day 25 for females (with evidence of mating) which failed to deliver (Nos. 49, 59, and 78).
All males were fasted overnight with a maximum of 24 hours before necropsy (water was available). F0 females were not fasted.
ORGAN WEIGHTS:
Organs identified in tables 5 and 6 were weighed at necropsy for all scheduled euthanasia animals and females with total litter loss. Paired organs were weighed together and organ to body weight ratios (using the terminal body weight) were calculated.
HISTOPATHOLOGY: Yes (see Tables 7 and 8)
Representative samples of the tissues identified in tables 7 and 8 were collected from all animals and preserved in 10% neutral buffered formalin (neutral phosphate buffered 4% formaldehyde solution, Klinipath, Duiven, The Netherlands), unless otherwise indicated. Tissues were embedded in paraffin, sectioned, mounted on glass slides, and stained with hematoxylin and eosin as follows:
- Selected animals and unscheduled deaths (found dead): Tissues identified in Text Table 7 (except animal identification, aorta, nasopharynx, esophagus, harderian gland, lacrimal gland, salivary gland, larynx, optic nerve, pancreas, skin and tongue).
- Males that failed to sire (except for males which were selected) and females that failed to deliver pups:: Cervix, epididymides. coagulation gland, prostate gland, seminal vesicles, ovaries, testes, uterus, and vagina.
- Remaining animals: Gross lesions/masses.
Alpha-2u-globulin staining:
Two slides per animal (i.e., one selected control male, one selected control female and five selected Group 4 males) were analyzed for HRP-polymer based chromogenic immunostaining of alpha-2uglobulin.
Microscopic Evaluation:
For the testes of all selected males of Groups 1 and 4, and males that failed to sire, a detailed qualitative examination was made, taking into account the tubular stages of the spermatogenic cycle. - Postmortem examinations (offspring):
- SACRIFICE
- The F1 offspring not selected as parental animals were sacrificed at PND 14-16 days of age.
- These animals were subjected to postmortem examinations: macroscopic examination as follows:
Pups, younger than 7 days were euthanized by decapitation. All remaining pups (PND 14-16), except for the two pups per litter selected for blood collection were euthanized by an intraperitoneal injection of sodium pentobarbital. The pups selected for blood collection on PND 14-16 were anesthetized using isoflurane followed by exsanguination.
GROSS NECROPSY
- Gross necropsy consisted of external and internal examinations including the cervical, thoracic, and abdominal viscera.
Unscheduled Deaths – F1 Generation:
Pups that died or were euthanized before scheduled termination were examined externally and sexed (both externally and internally).
Pups found dead during the weekend were fixed in identified containers containing 70% ethanol as they were not necropsied on the same day.
The stomach of pups not surviving to the scheduled necropsy date was examined for the presence of milk, if possible. If possible, defects or cause of death were evaluated.
Scheduled Euthanasia – F1 Generation:
On PND 4, the surplus pups were euthanized by decapitation. Sex was determined both externally and internally. Descriptions of all external abnormalities were recorded. From two surplus pups per litter, blood was collected, if possible.
All remaining pups were euthanized on PND 14-16. Sex was determined both externally and internally. Descriptions of all external abnormalities were recorded. Particular attention was paid to the external reproductive genitals to examine signs of altered development.
Additionally, blood was collected from two pups per litter and the thyroid as well from two pups per litter (if possible one male and one female pup) was preserved in 10% buffered formalin. Serum derived from the PND 4 (decapitated; 0.5 mL sample) and PND 14-16 pups (aorta puncture under anesthesia using isoflurane; 1.0 mL sample) was divided in two aliquots. One aliquot was used for measurement of TSH using the IMMULITE® 1000 analyser and the other aliquot was used for measurement of T3 and T4 using LC-MS.
HISTOPATHOLOGY / ORGAN WEIGTHS
Not evaluated - Statistics:
- Please see 'Any other information on materials and methods incl. tables' for information on statistics.
- Reproductive indices:
- 1. Mating index (%): (Number of females mated / Number of females paired) x 100
2. Fertility index (%): (Number of pregnant females / Number of females mated) x 100 - Offspring viability indices:
- 1. Gestation index (%): (Number of females with living pups on Day 1 / Number of pregnant females) x 100
2. Post-implantation survival index (%): (Total number of offspring born / Total number of uterine implantation sites) x 100
3. Live birth index (%): (Number of live offspring on Day 1 after littering / Total number of offspring born) x 100
4. Percentage live males at First Litter Check (%): (Number of live male pups at First Litter Check / Number of live pups at First Litter Check) x 100
5. Percentage live females at First Litter Check (%): (Number of live female pups at First Litter Check / Number of live pups at First Litter Check) x 100
6. Viability index 1 (%): (Number of live offspring on Day 4 before culling / Number live offspring on Day 1 after littering) x 100
7. Viability index 2 (%): (Number of live offspring on Day 7 after littering / Number live offspring on Day 4 (after culling)) x 100
8. Viability index 3 (%): (Number of live offspring on Day 13 after littering / Number live offspring on Day 7 after littering) x 100
9. Lactation index (%): (Number of live offspring on Day 13 after littering / Number live offspring on Day 4 (after culling)) x 100
10. Cumulative survival index: ((Number of live offspring on Day 13 / Number of live offspring on Day 4 (after culling)) x (Number of live offspring on Day 4 (before culling) / Total number of offspring born)) x 100
Results and discussion
Results: P0 (first parental generation)
General toxicity (P0)
- Clinical signs:
- effects observed, non-treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- No treatment-related clinical signs were observed during the daily detailed clinical observations or during the weekly arena observations.
Salivation was observed post-dosing from the second week of the premating period and onwards in all male and female rats treated at 300 and 1000 mg/kg/day. Taking into account the nature and minor severity of the effect and its time of occurrence (i.e., after dosing), this sign was considered to be a physiological response rather than a sign of systemic toxicity.
Any other clinical signs observed during the dosing period occurred within the range of background findings to be expected for rats of this age and strain which are housed and treated under the conditions in this study and did not show any apparent dose-related trend. At the incidence observed, these were considered to be unrelated to treatment. - Dermal irritation (if dermal study):
- not examined
- Mortality:
- mortality observed, non-treatment-related
- Description (incidence):
- No treatment-related mortality was observed through the study period.
One female rat (No. 51) in the100 mg/kg/day dose group was found dead on Day 7 post-coitum (Day 26 of treatment). No clinical signs were observed prior to death, however, a slightly lower food consumption was noted over Days 4-7 post-coitum. Pathologic findings of note in this animal consisted of watery-clear content with accumulation of gray-white material in the thoracic cavity and microscopic acute bronchioalveolar inflammation with alveolar necrosis and foreign material in the lungs, which was related to the macroscopic finding of not collapsed lungs at necropsy. Moderate extramedullary hematopoiesis was seen in the spleen but considered secondary to the inflammation in the lung. The findings were considered to be gavage procedure-related and not treatment-related. - Body weight and weight changes:
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- Body weights and body weight gain of male and female rats in the 100 and 300 mg/kg/day dose groups were comparable to concurrent controls.
In male rats treated at 1000 mg/kg/day, body weight gain was slightly lower when compared to controls throughout the dosing period (occasionally statistically significant), resulting in a 4% lower final mean body weight at the end of the dosing period (not statistically significant).
In female rats treated at 1000 mg/kg/day, body weight gain was slightly lower at the end of the post-coitum period only, with a 4% lower mean body weight at the end of the post-coitum and lactation periods (all not statistically significant).
Given the small magnitude and transience, and in the absence of corroborative changes in food consumption during those periods, these effects on body weight (gain) were considered to be nonadverse. - Food consumption and compound intake (if feeding study):
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- Food consumption before or after correction for body weight was unaffected by treatment in male rats at all dose levels and in female rats at doses up to 300 mg/kg/day.
In female rats treated at 1000 mg/kg/day, food consumption (before and after correction for body weight) was lower in the first week of the dosing period and in the last week of the lactation period when compared to control animals. Given the small magnitude and transience, the effects on food consumption were considered to be non-adverse.
In the absence of a dose-response trend, any other changes in food consumption (after correction for body weight) were considered to be unrelated to treatment, but rather a result of slightly lower body weights. - Food efficiency:
- not specified
- Water consumption and compound intake (if drinking water study):
- not examined
- Description (incidence and severity):
- Monitored by visual inspection of the water bottles. No quantitative investigation was introduced as no effect was suspected.
- Ophthalmological findings:
- not examined
- Haematological findings:
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- Hematological parameters in female rats were unaffected by treatment at all dose levels tested and up to 100 mg/kg/day in male rats.
In male rats, higher total white blood cell, neutrophil, and lymphocyte counts were observed at 1000 mg/kg/day (1.32, 1.28, and 1.33x of control, respectively, not statistically significant for neutrophil and lymphocyte counts). Higher red blood cell distribution width at 300 and 1000 mg/kg/day (1.06 and 1.10x of control, respectively), accompanied by higher reticulocyte count were also observed in male rats at 1000 mg/kg/day (1.17x of control, not statistically significant).
Considering the small magnitude of changes and in the absence of corroborative histopathology findings, the above changes were determined to be non-adverse.
Coagulation parameters in male and female rats remained unaffected by treatment through the study period. - Clinical biochemistry findings:
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- Clinical chemistry parameters in male and fame rats were unaffected by treatment at 100 mg/kg/day.
Higher potassium levels were observed in male rats from 300 mg/kg/day onwards (1.11 and 1.16x of control at 300 and 1000 mg/kg/day, respectively) while higher creatinine levels were observed in male rats at 1000 mg/kg/day (1.35x of control). Higher total bilirubin levels were observed in female rats at 1000 mg/kg/day (1.58x of control).
Considering the small magnitude of changes and in the absence of corroborative histopathology findings, the above changes were determined to be non-adverse. Any other changes observed in clinical chemistry parameters were considered to be unrelated to treatment as these occurred in the absence of a dose-related trend. - Endocrine findings:
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- Serum levels of T3 and TSH were considered unaffected by treatment at 100 mg/kg/day in male rats and at all dose levels in female rats. Serum levels of T4 were considered unaffected by treatment in either sex at all dose levels tested.
T3 levels were observed to be lower than the control mean in male rats at 300 and 1000 mg/kg/day (0.73 and 0.67x, respectively) with an associated increase in serum levels of TSH. Mean TSH values were 2.14 and 2.31x of control at 300 and 1000 mg/kg/day, respectively. The mean TSH values fell above the historical control range, while mean T3 values remained within the historical control range. In the absence of a relevant microscopic correlate in the thyroid gland, these findings were consider ed to be non-adverse.
The lower mean T3 level observed in female rats at 300 mg/kg/day (0.73x of control), was considered unrelated to treatment due to a general overlap in individual values. - Urinalysis findings:
- not examined
- Behaviour (functional findings):
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- Hearing ability, pupillary reflex, static righting reflex, and grip strength were observed to be normal in all examined animals.
Motor activity was unaffected by treatment up to 300 mg/kg/day. At 1000 mg/kg/day, the number of total movements was lower than the concurrent control mean in both male and female rats (0.81 and 0.76x of control, respectively; not statistically significant), without notable effect on ambulation’s. These findings were not considered to be an adverse effect on neurobehavior since these results were not supported by clinical observations or other functional observation tests (including ambulations), were slight in nature, and had no supportive morphological correlates in examined neuronal tissues.
All groups exhibited a similar motor activity habituation profile with a decreasing trend in activity over the duration of the test period. - Immunological findings:
- not examined
- Organ weight findings including organ / body weight ratios:
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Histopathological findings: non-neoplastic:
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- Treatment-related microscopic findings were observed in the liver, spleen, and thyroid gland of both sexes and in the kidney of male rats.
Liver: A dose-related increased incidence and severity in centrilobular hepatocellular hypertrophy (up to a slight degree) was observed in male rats starting at 100 mg/kg/day and in female rats (at minimal degree) starting at 300 mg/kg/day. Based on the low severity of the hepatocellular hypertrophy and in the absence of any other additional microscopic degenerative findings or related enzyme changes, the liver findings were considered to be non-adverse.
Spleen: An increased incidence and severity in extramedullary hematopoiesis was observed in the spleen of male (up to moderate degree) and female (up to slight degree) rats at 1000 mg/kg/day. This is a common finding in the rat and given the low magnitude and in the absence of changes in hematology, was considered to be non-adverse.
Thyroid gland: An increased incidence and/or severity of follicular cell hypertrophy (up to a slight degree) was observed in male and female rats starting at 300 mg/kg/day. Based on the nature and severity, the thyroid gland findings were considered to be non-adverse.
Kidney: A dose-dependent increase in hyaline droplet accumulation was observed in male rats at 100 and 300 mg/kg/day progressing to hyaline droplet nephropathy (an increase in hyaline droplet accumulation, increased tubular basophilia and the presence of granular casts) up to a moderate degree in male rats at 1000 mg/kg/day. After immunohistochemistry using alpha 2u-globulin antibodies, the hyaline droplets stained positive for alpha 2u-globulin. The control male showed small alpha 2u-globulin dots in the proximal tubules and the control female was alpha 2u-globulin negative. Based on the degenerative nature of some of the kidney findings (granular casts), the hyaline droplet nephropathy observed at 1000 mg/kg/day was considered adverse. However, this effect is male rat-specific and not relevant to humans.
Any other observed microscopic findings were within the range of background pathology encountered in rats of this age and strain. There was no treatment-related alteration in the prevalence, severity, or histologic character of those incidental tissue alterations. - Histopathological findings: neoplastic:
- not examined
- Other effects:
- not examined
Reproductive function / performance (P0)
- Reproductive function: oestrous cycle:
- no effects observed
- Description (incidence and severity):
- Length and regularity of the estrous cycle were not affected by treatment and all females had regular cycles of 4 days.
- Reproductive function: sperm measures:
- no effects observed
- Description (incidence and severity):
- Stage dependent qualitative evaluation of spermatogenesis in the testes revealed normal progression of the spermatogenic cycle and the expected cell associations and proportions in the various stages of spermatogenesis were present.
- Reproductive performance:
- effects observed, non-treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- 1/10 couples of the control group (Male No. 09 and Female No. 49), 1/10 couples of the 100 mg/kg/day group (Male No. 19 and Female No. 59) and 1/10 couples of the 1000 mg/kg/day treatment group (Male No. 38 and Female No. 78) had no offspring. For these couples, no abnormalities were observed in the reproductive organs which could account for their lack of offspring.
There were no morphological findings in the reproductive organs of either sex which could be attributed to the test material.
Mating Index:
Mating index was not affected by treatment with all females showing evidence of mating.
Precoital Time:
Precoital time was unaffected by treatment with all females (except for one control female
(No. 45), for which mating took 14 days) showing evidence of mating after 4 days. As this occurred in the control group, this was unrelated to treatment with the test material.
Number of Implantation Sites:
Number of implantation sites were not affected by treatment up to 300 mg/kg/day.
At 1000 mg/kg/day, mean number of implantation sites was lower than the concurrent control mean (10.3 vs. 13.3 , respectively, not statistically significant). This could be attributed to two female rats (Nos. 76 and 79), with only 2 and 5 implantation sites, respectively (below the concurrent control and historical control range). When these two females are excluded from the calculation, the mean implantation sites was 12.0. At the incidence and severity observed, this effect was considered to be non-adverse.
Fertility Index:
Fertility index was not considered to be affected by treatment with fertility indices being 90, 90, 100, and 90% for the control, 100, 300, and 1000 mg/kg/day dose groups, respectively.
One control female, two females at 100 mg/kg/day, and one female at 300 mg/kg/day were not pregnant. Since these cases of non-pregnancy showed no dose-related incidence across the dose groups, this was not considered to be treatment-related.
Parturition/Maternal Care:
No signs of difficult or prolonged parturition were observed in the pregnant females and examination of cage debris of pregnant females revealed no signs of abortion or premature birth. No deficiencies in maternal care were observed.
Effect levels (P0)
open allclose all
- Key result
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Effect level:
- ca. 300 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Sex:
- male
- Basis for effect level:
- other: Systemic Toxicity
- Key result
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Effect level:
- >= 1 000 mg/kg bw/day
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Sex:
- male/female
- Basis for effect level:
- other: Systemic Toxicity
- Key result
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Effect level:
- >= 1 000 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Sex:
- male/female
- Basis for effect level:
- other: Reproductive Toxicity
Target system / organ toxicity (P0)
- Key result
- Critical effects observed:
- yes
- Lowest effective dose / conc.:
- 1 000 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- System:
- urinary
- Organ:
- kidney
- Treatment related:
- yes
- Dose response relationship:
- yes
- Relevant for humans:
- no
Results: F1 generation
General toxicity (F1)
- Clinical signs:
- effects observed, non-treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- No clinical signs of treatment-related toxicity were observed in the pups.
The nature and incidence of the observed clinical signs remained within the range considered normal for pups of this age and were therefore not considered to be treatment-related. - Dermal irritation (if dermal study):
- not examined
- Mortality / viability:
- mortality observed, non-treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- Viability Index:
Viability index 1 (number of live offspring on PND 4 (before culling) as percentage of the number of live offspring on PND 1) was unaffected by treatment and Viability index 1 was 98, 100, 99, and 100% for the control, 100, 300, and 1000 mg/kg/day groups, respectively.
Two pups in the control group and one pup at 300 mg/kg/day were found missing between PND 2 and 4 and were most likely cannibalized. No clinical observations were observed for these pups before they were noted missing. These missing pups were considered to be unrelated to treatment since the mortality incidence did not show a dose related trend and remained within the range considered normal for pups of this age.
Viability index 2 (number of live offspring on PND 7 as percentage of the number of live offspring on PND 4 (after culling)) was also not affected by treatment andViability index 2 was determined to be 100% for all dose groups.
Viability index 3 (number of live offspring on PND 13 as percentage of the number of live offspring on PND 7) was not affected by treatment and Viability index 3 was determined to be 100% for all dose groups.
Lactation Index:
The lactation index (the number of live offspring on Day 13 after littering as percentage of live offspring on Day 4 (after culling)) was not affected by treatment. No pups were found dead/missing between lactation Days 5 and 13, resulting in a lactation index of 100% for all groups.
Cumulative Survival Index:
The cumulative survival index (((number of live offspring on Day 13 after litter / the number of live offspring on Day 4 (after culling)) x (number of live offspring on Day 4 (before culling) / the total number of offspring born)) x 100%) was not affected by treatment. Cumulative survival index was 97, 96, 98, and 100% for the control, 100, 300, and 1000 mg/kg/day dose groups, respectively. - Body weight and weight changes:
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- Body weights of pups were unaffected by treatment up to 300 mg/kg/day.
At 1000 mg/kg/day, mean pup body weight was lower on PND 13 than the concurrent control mean (not statistically significant for females alone). Additionally, body weight gain over PND 1-13 was 14% lower at 1000 mg/kg/day when compared to control for combined pup body weights. Considering the magnitude of change, this finding was determined to be adverse. - Food consumption and compound intake (if feeding study):
- not examined
- Food efficiency:
- not examined
- Water consumption and compound intake (if drinking water study):
- not examined
- Ophthalmological findings:
- not examined
- Haematological findings:
- not examined
- Clinical biochemistry findings:
- effects observed, non-treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- T4 levels in PND 4 and PND 14-16 pups were unaffected by treatment while T3 levels in PND 4 pups up to 300 mg/kg/day and in PND 14-16 pups at all dose levels were considered unaffected by treatment. At 1000 mg/kg/day, T3 levels in PND 4 pups were lower when compared to controls (0.78x of control, not statistically significant). The mean T3 values remained within the historical control range. The individual values for control ranged from 0.12 to 0.22 with one value LLOQ and for Group 4, values ranged from 0.12 to 0.16.
TSH levels in PND 14-16 pups were not considered to be affected by treatment with the test material. - Urinalysis findings:
- not examined
- Sexual maturation:
- no effects observed
- Anogenital distance (AGD):
- no effects observed
- Description (incidence and severity):
- Anogenital distance (absolute and corrected for body weight) in male and female pups was not affected by treatment.
- Nipple retention in male pups:
- no effects observed
- Description (incidence and severity):
- Treatment with the test material had no effect on areola/nipple retention. No nipples were observed at PND 13 in any of the male pups examined.
- Organ weight findings including organ / body weight ratios:
- not examined
- Gross pathological findings:
- effects observed, non-treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- Gross necropsy of pups did not reveal any remarkable treatment-related findings. The nature and incidence of macroscopic findings remained within the range considered normal for pups of this age and were therefore not considered to be treatment-related.
- Histopathological findings:
- not examined
- Other effects:
- effects observed, non-treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- Litter Size:
Litter size was not affected by treatment with the test material up to 300 mg/kg/day.
At 1000 mg/kg/day, mean litter size was lower than the concurrent control mean ((9.7 vs. 12.7 living pups/litter; not statistically significant). This was mainly attributed to two females (Nos. 76 and 79) with only 2 and 5 living pups, respectively. When these females are excluded, the mean litter size was 11.4 living pups/litter at 1000 mg/kg/day.
Sex Ratio:
Sex ratio was not affected by treatment with the test material.
Gestation Index and Duration:
Gestation index (females with living pups on Day 1 compared to the number of pregnant females) and duration of gestation were not affected by treatment. The gestation indices were 100, 89, 100, and 100% for the control, 100, 300, and 1000 mg/kg/day dose groups, respectively.
Except for one female (No. 51) in the 100 mg/kg/day dose group which was found dead on Day 7 post-coitum, all pregnant females had live offspring.
Post-Implantation Survival Index:
Post-implantation survival index (total number of offspring born as percentage of total number of uterine implantation sites) was unaffected by treatment with post-implantation survival indices being 96, 93, 91, and 94% for the control, 100, 300, and 1000 mg/kg/day dose groups, respectively.
Live Birth Index:
Live birth index (number of live offspring on PND 1 as percentage of total number of offspring born) was not affected by treatment with live birth indices being 99, 96, 99, and 100% for the control, 100, 300, and 1000 mg/kg/day groups, respectively.
One pup of the control group, four pups at 100 mg/kg/day (of which three from Litter No. 52), and one pup at 300 mg/kg/day were found dead at first litter check. At necropsy, the three pups from Litter No. 52 showed either the beginning of autolysis or were partially cannibalized. These dead pups were considered to be unrelated to treatment since the mortality incidence did not show a dose-related trend.
Developmental neurotoxicity (F1)
- Behaviour (functional findings):
- not examined
Developmental immunotoxicity (F1)
- Developmental immunotoxicity:
- not examined
Effect levels (F1)
- Key result
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Generation:
- F1
- Effect level:
- ca. 300 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Sex:
- male/female
- Basis for effect level:
- other: Developmental Toxicity
Target system / organ toxicity (F1)
- Key result
- Critical effects observed:
- no
Overall reproductive toxicity
- Key result
- Reproductive effects observed:
- no
Any other information on results incl. tables
0Formulation analysis:
Concentration analysis:
The concentrations analyzed in the formulations of Groups 2, 3, and 4 were in agreement with target concentrations (i.e., mean sample concentration results were within or equal to 90%-110% of target concentration).
No test material was detected in the Group 1 (control) formulation.
Homogeneity analysis:
The formulations of Groups 2 and 4 were homogeneous (i.e., coefficient of variation ≤ 10%).
Table 9. Results of Formulation Analysis | |||||
Date of analysis | Concentration (mg/mL) | Recovery (%) | |||
Target | Nominal | Analyzed | Individual | Mean | |
2022-FEB-16 | 25 | 27.2 | 25.0 | 92 | 92 |
25.8 | 24.9 | 97 | |||
25.2 | 22.3 | 88 | |||
250 | 249 | 264 | 106 | 108 | |
250 | 283 | 113 | |||
253 | 263 | 104 |
Table 10. Body Weights (grams) Result Summary | |||||
|
| Group 1 (Control – 0 mg/kg/day) | Group 2 (100 mg/kg/day) | Group 3 (300 mg/kg/day) | Group 4 (1000 mg/kg/day) |
Males | |||||
Pre-mating |
| ||||
Day 1 Week 1 | Mean | 319 | 317 | 328 | 321 |
SD | 8.7 | 14.3 | 8.9 | 10.6 | |
N | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | |
| |||||
Day 8 Week 2 | Mean | 348 | 344 | 353 | 341 |
SD | 10.6 | 13.7 | 10.0 | 11.0 | |
N | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | |
Mating Period |
| ||||
Day 1 Week 1 | Mean | 367 | 364 | 373 | 359 |
SD | 12.0 | 17.4 | 15.5 | 12.8 | |
N | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | |
| |||||
Day 8 Week 2 | Mean | 378 | 375 | 384 | 367 |
SD | 14.8 | 20.1 | 16.5 | 14.2 | |
N | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | |
| |||||
Day 15 Week 3 | Mean | 395 | 391 | 398 | 381 |
SD | 15.1 | 20.6 | 18.2 | 16.2 | |
N | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | |
Females | |||||
Pre-mating |
| ||||
Day 1 Week 1 | Mean | 236 | 226 | 223 | 232 |
SD | 15.0 | 13.8 | 7.3 | 8.5 | |
N | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | |
| |||||
Day 8 Week 2 | Mean | 234 | 229 | 225 | 235 |
SD | 15.4 | 16.0 | 6.4 | 8.1 | |
N | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | |
Mating Period |
| ||||
Day 1 Week 1 | Mean | 236 | 228 | 231 | 238 |
SD | 15.9 | 12.6 | 7.8 | 6.7 | |
N | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | |
| |||||
Day 8 Week 2 | Mean | 251 | --- |
|
|
SD | --- | --- |
|
| |
N | 1 | 0 x |
|
| |
| |||||
Day 15 Week 3 | Mean |
| --- |
|
|
SD |
| --- |
|
| |
N |
| 0 x |
|
| |
| |||||
Day 22 Week 4 | Mean |
| --- |
|
|
SD |
| --- |
|
| |
N |
| 0 x |
|
| |
| |||||
Post Coitum |
| ||||
Day 0 | Mean | 239 | 235 | 233 | 239 |
SD | 12.6 | 14.3 | 6.0 | 11.7 | |
N | 9 | 8 | 10 | 9 | |
| |||||
Day 4 | Mean | 252 | 250 | 245 | 251 |
SD | 13.2 | 17.2 | 7.0 | 12.1 | |
N | 9 | 8 | 10 | 9 | |
| |||||
Day 7 | Mean | 259 | 255 | 253 | 259 |
SD | 12.9 | 17.8 | 9.1 | 13.0 | |
N | 9 | 7 | 10 | 9 | |
| |||||
Day 11 | Mean | 275 | 269 | 269 | 273 |
SD | 13.6 | 17.7 | 10.6 | 14.9 | |
N | 9 | 7 | 10 | 9 | |
| |||||
Day 14 | Mean | 286 | 281 | 278 | 282 |
SD | 13.9 | 19.1 | 11.5 | 15.0 | |
N | 9 | 7 | 10 | 9 | |
| |||||
Day 17 | Mean | 310 | 305 | 303 | 302 |
SD | 14.5 | 19.2 | 15.4 | 19.7 | |
N | 9 | 7 | 10 | 9 | |
| |||||
Day 20 | Mean | 349 | 345 | 341 | 336 |
SD | 19.6 | 24.7 | 22.9 | 28.9 | |
N | 9 | 7 | 10 | 9 | |
Lactation |
| ||||
Day 1 | Mean | 275 | 265 | 266 | 267 |
SD | 17.8 | 18.1 | 10.8 | 14.0 | |
N | 9 | 8 | 10 | 9 | |
| |||||
Day 4 | Mean | 280 | 276 | 277 | 275 |
SD | 14.0 | 15.3 | 12.4 | 14.2 | |
N | 9 | 8 | 10 | 9 | |
| |||||
Day 7 | Mean | 288 | 283 | 284 | 281 |
SD | 12.4 | 17.7 | 10.4 | 14.3 | |
N | 9 | 8 | 10 | 9 | |
| |||||
Day 13 | Mean | 303 | 294 | 296 | 291 |
SD | 16.1 | 18.1 | 12.9 | 16.3 | |
N | 9 | 8 | 10 | 9 |
*/** Dunnett-test based on pooled variance significant at 5% (*) or 1% (**) level
Explanations for excluded data are listed in the tables of the individual values presented in the final study report available with the registrant/CRO
Table 11. Body Weight Gain (%) Result Summary | |||||
|
| Group 1 (Control – 0 mg/kg/day) | Group 2 (100 mg/kg/day) | Group 3 (300 mg/kg/day) | Group 4 (1000 mg/kg/day) |
Males | |||||
Pre-mating |
| ||||
Day 1 Week 1 | Mean | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
SD | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | |
N | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | |
| |||||
Day 8 Week 2 | Mean | 9 | 9 | 8 | 6* |
SD | 1.9 | 2.7 | 2.1 | 1.7 | |
N | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | |
Mating Period |
| ||||
Day 1 Week 1 | Mean | 15 | 15 | 14 | 12 |
SD | 2.7 | 3.2 | 4.2 | 2.2 | |
N | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | |
| |||||
Day 8 Week 2 | Mean | 19 | 18 | 17 | 15 |
SD | 3.8 | 4.1 | 4.4 | 2.8 | |
N | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | |
| |||||
Day 15 Week 3 | Mean | 24 | 23 | 22 | 19* |
SD | 3.6 | 4.1 | 4.4 | 2.8 | |
N | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | |
Females | |||||
Pre-mating |
| ||||
Day 1 Week 1 | Mean | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
SD | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | |
N | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | |
| |||||
Day 8 Week 2 | Mean | -1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
SD | 3.0 | 1.8 | 2.4 | 2.6 | |
N | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | |
Mating Period |
| ||||
Day 1 Week 1 | Mean | 0 | 1 | 3 | 2 |
SD | 3.5 | 3.0 | 2.7 | 2.8 | |
N | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | |
| |||||
Day 8 Week 2 | Mean | 14 |
|
|
|
SD | --- | --- |
|
| |
N | 1 x | 0 x |
|
| |
| |||||
Day 15 Week 3 | Mean |
| --- |
|
|
SD |
| --- |
|
| |
N |
| 0 x |
|
| |
| |||||
Day 22 Week 4 | Mean |
| --- |
|
|
SD |
| --- |
|
| |
N |
| 0 x |
|
| |
| |||||
Post Coitum |
| ||||
Day 0 | Mean | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
SD | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | |
N | 9 | 8 | 10 | 9 | |
| |||||
Day 4 | Mean | 5 | 6 | 5 | 5 |
SD | 1.3 | 1.9 | 1.5 | 2.5 | |
N | 9 | 8 | 10 | 9 | |
| |||||
Day 7 | Mean | 8 | 10 | 9 | 9 |
SD | 1.8 | 2.3 | 2.5 | 2.8 | |
N | 9 | 7 | 10 | 9 | |
| |||||
Day 11 | Mean | 15 | 16 | 15 | 14 |
SD | 1.2 | 2.6 | 3.3 | 3.7 | |
N | 9 | 7 | 10 | 9 | |
| |||||
Day 14 | Mean | 20 | 21 | 19 | 18 |
SD | 2.0 | 3.2 | 3.7 | 3.1 | |
N | 9 | 7 | 10 | 9 | |
| |||||
Day 17 | Mean | 30 | 31 | 30 | 26 |
SD | 1.8 | 3.5 | 5.5 | 4.4 | |
N | 9 | 7 | 10 | 9 | |
| |||||
Day 20 | Mean | 46 | 48 | 46 | 41 |
SD | 3.9 | 4.8 | 8.8 | 7.1 | |
N | 9 | 7 | 10 | 9 | |
Lactation |
| ||||
Day 1 | Mean | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
SD | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | |
N | 9 | 8 | 10 | 9 | |
| |||||
Day 4 | Mean | 2 | 4 | 4 | 3 |
SD | 4.2 | 3.2 | 2.7 | 2.9 | |
N | 9 | 8 | 10 | 9 | |
| |||||
Day 7 | Mean | 5 | 7 | 7 | 5 |
SD | 4.3 | 3.1 | 2.5 | 3.4 | |
N | 9 | 8 | 10 | 9 | |
| |||||
Day 13 | Mean | 10 | 11 | 11 | 9 |
SD | 5.9 | 3.2 | 3.3 | 3.9 | |
N | 9 | 8 | 10 | 9 |
*/** Dunnett-test based on pooled variance significant at 5% (*) or 1% (**) level
Explanations for excluded data are listed in the tables of the individual values presented in the final report available with the registrant/CRO
Table 12. Food Consumption (g/animal/day) Result Summary | |||||
|
| Group 1 (Control – 0 mg/kg/day) | Group 2 (100 mg/kg/day) | Group 3 (300 mg/kg/day) | Group 4 (1000 mg/kg/day) |
Males | |||||
Pre-mating |
| ||||
Days 1-8 Weeks 1-2 | Mean | 24 | 23 | 24 | 22 |
SD | 0.7 | 0.7 | 0.2 | 1.0 | |
N (Cage) | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | |
| |||||
Days 8-15 Weeks 2-3 | Mean | 23 | 22 | 24 | 23 |
SD | 0.5 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.2 | |
N (Cage) | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | |
Mean of means over Pre-mating | Mean | 23 | 23 | 24 | 22 |
Mating Period |
| ||||
Days 1-8 Weeks 1-2 | Mean | 22 | 23 | 23 | 24 |
SD | 0.8 | 1.2 | 0.2 | 1.0 | |
N (Cage) | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | |
| |||||
Days 8-15 Weeks 2-3 | Mean | 21 | 22 | 22 | 23 |
SD | 0.3 | 0.4 | 0.5 | 0.7 | |
N (Cage) | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | |
Mean of means over Mating Period | Mean | 22 | 22 | 22 | 23 |
Females | |||||
Pre-mating |
| ||||
Days 1-8 Weeks 1-2 | Mean | 15 | 16 | 15 | 14* |
SD | 0.1 | 0.2 | 0.3 | 0.3 | |
N (Cage) | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | |
| |||||
Days 8-15 Weeks 2-3 | Mean | 15 | 15 | 15 | 16 |
SD | 0.7 | 0.6 | 0.4 | 0.2 | |
N (Cage) | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | |
Mean of means over Pre-mating | Mean | 15 | 15 | 15 | 15 |
Mating Period |
| ||||
Days 1-8 Weeks 1-2 | Mean |
| --- |
|
|
SD |
| --- |
|
| |
N (Cage) |
| 0 |
|
| |
Post-Coitum |
| ||||
Days 0-4 | Mean | 20 | 20 | 20 | 21 |
SD | 1.7 | 1.9 | 1.9 | 1.6 | |
N | 9 | 8 | 10 | 9 | |
| |||||
Days 4-7 | Mean | 18 | 17 | 18 | 19 |
SD | 1.3 | 2.9 | 1.8 | 1.2 | |
N | 9 | 8 | 10 | 9 | |
| |||||
Days 7-11 | Mean | 18 | 18 | 18 | 19 |
SD | 1.4 | 1.8 | 1.9 | 1.1 | |
N | 9 | 7 | 10 | 9 | |
| |||||
Days 11-14 | Mean | 19 | 20 | 19 | 21 |
SD | 1.6 | 2.8 | 2.1 | 2.0 | |
N | 9 | 7 | 10 | 9 | |
| |||||
Days 14-17 | Mean | 20 | 21 | 21 | 22 |
SD | 1.3 | 2.4 | 2.0 | 2.2 | |
N | 9 | 7 | 10 | 9 | |
| |||||
Days 17-20 | Mean | 22 | 23 | 23 | 24 |
SD | 1.9 | 2.5 | 3.1 | 2.4 | |
N | 9 | 7 | 10 | 9 | |
Mean of means |
| 19 | 20 | 20 | 21 |
Lactation |
| ||||
Days 1-4 | Mean | 26 | 28 | 29 | 28 |
SD | 2.3 | 4.7 | 5.0 | 4.8 | |
N | 9 | 8 | 10 | 9 | |
| |||||
Days 4-7 | Mean | 38 | 39 | 38 | 35 |
SD | 1.9 | 4.7 | 3.5 | 6.1 | |
N | 9 | 8 | 10 | 9 | |
| |||||
Days 7-13 | Mean | 52 | 51 | 48 | 43* |
SD | 2.9 | 5.9 | 5.2 | 9.2 | |
N | 9 | 8 | 10 | 9 | |
Mean of means |
| 39 | 39 | 38 | 35 |
*/** Dunnett-test based on pooled variance significant at 5% (*) or 1% (**) level
Explanations for excluded data are listed in the tables of the individual values presented in the final report available with the registrant/CRO.
Table 13. Relative Food Consumption (g/Kg body weight/day) Result Summary | |||||
|
| Group 1 (Control – 0 mg/kg/day) | Group 2 (100 mg/kg/day) | Group 3 (300 mg/kg/day) | Group 4 (1000 mg/kg/day) |
Males | |||||
Pre-mating |
| ||||
Days 1-8 Weeks 1-2 | Mean | 68 | 68 | 68 | 64 |
SD | 0.8 | 2.6 | 0.2 | 2.2 | |
N (Cage) | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | |
| |||||
Days 8-15 Weeks 2-3 | Mean | 65 | 65 | 67 | 67 |
SD | 0.3 | 1.5 | 1.3 | 1.4 | |
N (Cage) | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | |
Mean of means over Pre-mating | Mean | 67 | 66 | 67 | 65 |
Mating Period |
| ||||
Days 1-8 Weeks 1-2 | Mean | 58 | 61 | 59 | 64 |
SD | 2.9 | 1.9 | 0.8 | 3.3 | |
N (Cage) | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | |
| |||||
Days 8-15 Weeks 2-3 | Mean | 54 | 56 | 54 | 60* |
SD | 1.3 | 0.0 | 1.4 | 2.3 | |
N (Cage) | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | |
Mean of means over Mating Period | Mean | 56 | 59 | 57 | 62 |
Females | |||||
Pre-mating |
| ||||
Days 1-8 Weeks 1-2 | Mean | 64 | 68** | 67* | 59** |
SD | 0.9 | 0.2 | 0.9 | 0.3 | |
N (Cage) | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | |
| |||||
Days 8-15 Weeks 2-3 | Mean | 63 | 65 | 66 | 70* |
SD | 2.0 | 1.7 | 1.1 | 1.1 | |
N (Cage) | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | |
Mean of means over Pre-mating | Mean | 63 | 67 | 67 | 64 |
Mating Period |
| ||||
Days 1-8 Weeks 1-2 | Mean |
| --- |
|
|
SD |
| --- |
|
| |
N (Cage) |
| 0 x |
|
| |
Post-Coitum |
| ||||
Days 0-4 | Mean | 78 | 80 | 83 | 85 |
SD | 7.7 | 8.3 | 6.4 | 5.7 | |
N | 9 | 8 | 10 | 9 | |
| |||||
Days 4-7 | Mean | 70 | 70 | 73 | 75 |
SD | 6.6 | 7.8 | 5.4 | 4.2 | |
N | 9 | 7 | 10 | 9 | |
| |||||
Days 7-11 | Mean | 64 | 68 | 65 | 68 |
SD | 4.2 | 6.7 | 5.0 | 1.2 | |
N | 9 | 7 | 10 | 9 | |
| |||||
Days 11-14 | Mean | 67 | 73 | 69 | 75* |
SD | 4.8 | 7.9 | 5.9 | 6.7 | |
N | 9 | 7 | 10 | 9 | |
| |||||
Days 14-17 | Mean | 64 | 69 | 68 | 72** |
SD | 3.7 | 6.9 | 3.6 | 4.6 | |
N | 9 | 7 | 10 | 9 | |
| |||||
Days 17-20 | Mean | 62 | 67 | 67 | 71** |
SD | 5.4 | 6.6 | 5.0 | 3.5 | |
N | 9 | 7 | 10 | 9 | |
Mean of means |
| 68 | 71 | 71 | 74 |
Lactation |
| ||||
Days 1-4 | Mean | 93 | 102 | 106 | 101 |
SD | 8.4 | 15.2 | 14.6 | 14.8 | |
N | 9 | 8 | 10 | 9 | |
| |||||
Days 4-7 | Mean | 133 | 136 | 132 | 124 |
SD | 5.5 | 15.2 | 8.4 | 18.9 | |
N | 9 | 8 | 10 | 9 | |
| |||||
Days 7-13 | Mean | 171 | 173 | 162 | 148* |
SD | 6.1 | 16.3 | 13.6 | 27.2 | |
N | 9 | 8 | 10 | 9 | |
Mean of means |
| 132 | 137 | 133 | 125 |
*/** Dunnett-test based on pooled variance significant at 5% (*) or 1% (**) level
Explanations for excluded data are listed in the tables of the individual values presented in the final report available with the registrant/CRO.
Table 14. Functional Observations Summary | |||||
|
| Group 1 (Control – 0 mg/kg/day) | Group 2 (100 mg/kg/day) | Group 3 (300 mg/kg/day) | Group 4 (1000 mg/kg/day) |
Males | |||||
End of Treatment |
| ||||
Hearing Score 0/1 | Median | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
N | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | |
| |||||
Pupil L Score 0/1 | Median | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
N | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | |
| |||||
Pupil R Score 0/1 | Median | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
N | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | |
| |||||
Static R Score 0/1 | Median | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
N | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | |
| |||||
Grip Fore gram | Mean | 1574 | 1485 | 1551 | 1474 |
SD | 287 | 293 | 197 | 197 | |
N | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | |
| |||||
Grip Hind gram | Mean | 847 | 672 | 743 | 710 |
SD | 153 | 167 | 146 | 76 | |
N | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | |
Females | |||||
Hearing Score 0/1 | Median | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
N | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | |
| |||||
Pupil L Score 0/1 | Median | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
N | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | |
| |||||
Pupil R Score 0/1 | Median | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
N | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | |
| |||||
Static R Score 0/1 | Median | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
N | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | |
| |||||
Grip Fore gram | Mean | 1191 | 979 | 1200 | 1086 |
SD | 147 | 176 | 128 | 208 | |
N | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | |
| |||||
Grip Hind gram | Mean | 496 | 431 | 471 | 438 |
SD | 60 | 86 | 58 | 82 | |
N | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 |
+/++ Steel-test significant at 5% (+) or 1% (++) level
*/** Dunnett-test based on pooled variance significant at 5% (*) or 1% (**) level
Table 15. Summary of Select Hemaology Values: F0 Generation (Males) | |||||
Day: 30 Relative to Start Date (Males) |
| Reporting Hematology | |||
WBC (10^9/L) | MONO (10^9/L) | RBC (10^12/L) | RDWG (%) | ||
Statistical Test | [G] | [G] | [G] | [G] | |
Group 1 (Control – 0 mg/kg/day) | Mean | 7.992 | 0.116 | 8.880 | 12.24 |
SD | 1.173 | 0.021 | 0.331 | 0.27 | |
N | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | |
| |||||
Group 2 (100 mg/kg/day) | Mean | 7.584 | 0.110 | 8.242* | 12.12 |
SD | 1.693 | 0.035 | 0.487 | 0.33 | |
N | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | |
tCtrl | 0.95 | 0.95 | 0.93 | 0.99 | |
| |||||
Group 3 (300 mg/kg/day) | Mean | 9.044 | 0.182* | 8.848 | 12.94* |
SD | 1.276 | 0.058 | 0.208 | 0.30 | |
N | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | |
tCtrl | 1.13 | 1.57 | 1.00 | 1.06 | |
| |||||
Group 4 (1000 mg/kg/day) | Mean | 10.538* | 0.130 | 8.566 | 13.42** |
SD | 1.716 | 0.037 | 0.354 | 0.48 | |
N | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | |
tCtrl | 1.32 | 1.12 | 0.96 | 1.10 |
[G] - Anova & Dunnett: * = p ≤ 0.05; ** = p ≤ 0.01
WBC: White blood cell count
MONO: Monocyte count
RBC: Red blood cell count
RDWG: Red blood cell distribution width
Table 16. Summary of Select Biochemistry Values: F0 Generation (Males) | ||||||
Day: 30 Relative to Start Date (Males) |
| Reporting Biochemistry | ||||
CREAT (umol/L) |
K (mmol/L) |
T3 (ng/mL) |
T4 (ng/mL) |
TSH (mU/L) | ||
Statistical Test | [G1] | [G] | [G1] | [G1] | [G] | |
Group 1 (Control – 0 mg/kg/day) | Mean | 27.4 | 4.02 | 0.447 | 48.55 | 0.2622 |
SD | 1.5 | 0.15 | 0.102 | 6.66 | 0.1379 | |
N | 5 | 5 | 10 | 10 | 10 | |
| ||||||
Group 2 (100 mg/kg/day) | Mean | 31.2 | 4.20 | 0.398 | 55.40 | 0.3797 |
SD | 1.3 | 0.21 | 0.093 | 8.85 | 0.3177 | |
N | 5 | 5 | 10 | 10 | 10 | |
tCtrl | 1.14 | 1.05 | 0.89 | 1.14 | 1.45 | |
| ||||||
Group 3 (300 mg/kg/day) | Mean | 30.8 | 4.45* | 0.328** | 53.56 | 0.5601* |
SD | 2.6 | 0.21 | 0.063 | 8.91 | 0.2386 | |
N | 5 | 5 | 10 | 10 | 10 | |
tCtrl | 1.13 | 1.11 | 0.73 | 1.10 | 2.14 | |
| ||||||
Group 4 (1000 mg/kg/day) | Mean | 36.9** | 4.67* | 0.300** | 45.40 | 0.6059 |
SD | 5.0 | 0.61 | 0.071 | 6.86 | 0.4265 | |
N | 5 | 5 | 10 | 10 | 10 | |
tCtrl | 1.35 | 1.16 | 0.67 | 0.94 | 2.31 |
[G] - Anova & Dunnett: * = p ≤ 0.05
[G1] - Kruskal-Wallis & Dunn: ** = p ≤ 0.01
CREAT: Creatinine
K: Potassium
T3: Triiodothyronine
T4: Thyroxine
TSH: Thyroid stimulating hormone
Table 17. Summary of Select Biochemistry Values: F0 Generation (Females) | |||||
Day: 14 Relative to Start Date (Females) |
| Reporting Biochemistry | |||
TBIL (umol/L) | K (mmol/L) | CL (mmol/L) | T3 (ng/mL) | ||
Statistical Test | [G] | [G] | [G] | [G] | |
Group 1 (Control – 0 mg/kg/day) | Mean | 1.68 | 5.47 | 107.6 | 0.277 |
SD | 0.66 | 0.44 | 1.7 | 0.044 | |
N | 5 | 5 | 5 | 10 | |
| |||||
Group 2 (100 mg/kg/day) | Mean | 1.90 | 5.07 | 104.2* | 0.231 |
SD | 0.42 | 0.34 | 2.6 | 0.038 | |
N | 5 | 5 | 5 | 8 | |
tCtrl | 1.13 | 0.93 | 0.97 | 0.84 | |
| |||||
Group 3 (300 mg/kg/day) | Mean | 1.94 | 4.77* | 108.0 | 0.203** |
SD | 0.38 | 0.33 | 2.3 | 0.043 | |
N | 5 | 5 | 5 | 10 | |
tCtrl | 1.15 | 0.87 | 1.00 | 0.73 | |
| |||||
Group 4 (1000 mg/kg/day) | Mean | 2.66* | 4.89* | 105.0 | 0.226 |
SD | 0.34 | 0.29 | 1.4 | 0.060 | |
N | 5 | 5 | 5 | 9 | |
tCtrl | 1.58 | 0.89 | 0.98 | 0.82 |
[G] - Anova & Dunnett: * = p ≤ 0.05; ** = p ≤ 0.01
TBIL: Total bilirubin
K: Potassium
CL: Chloride
T3: Triiodothyronine
Table 18. Summary of Macroscopic Findings (F0 Generation) | ||||
| Group 1 (Control – 0 mg/kg/day) | Group 2 (100 mg/kg/day) | Group 3 (300 mg/kg/day) | Group 4 (1000 mg/kg/day) |
Males | ||||
End of Treatment |
| |||
Animals examined | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 |
Animals without findings | 9 | 9 | 9 | 4 |
Animals affected | 1 | 1 | 1 | 6 |
| ||||
Liver |
| |||
Discolouration | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
Kidneys |
| |||
Pelvic dilation | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Enlarged | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Epididymides |
| |||
Nodule(s) | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
Coagulating Glands |
| |||
Enlarged | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
Seminal Vesicles |
| |||
Enlarged | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
Thyroid Gland |
| |||
Enlarged | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
Reduced in size | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Females | ||||
Intercurrent Death |
| |||
Animals examined |
| 1 |
|
|
Animals affected |
| 1 |
|
|
| ||||
General observations |
| |||
Beginning autolysis |
| 1 |
|
|
Lungs |
| |||
Not collapsed |
| 1 |
|
|
Body Cavities |
| |||
Thoracic cavity material accumulation many, |
| 1 |
|
|
Contents: |
| 1 |
|
|
| ||||
End of Treatment |
| |||
Animals examined | 9 | 8 | 10 | 9 |
Animals without findings | 7 | 7 | 10 | 8 |
Animals affected | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| ||||
Liver |
| |||
Enlarged | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Thymus |
| |||
Focus/foci | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
Mesenteric lymph node |
| |||
Focus/foci | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Non Pregnant |
| |||
Animals examined | 1 | 1 |
| 1 |
Animals without findings | 1 | 1 |
| 1 |
# / ## Fisher's Exact test significant at 5% (#) or 1% (##) level
Table 19. Select Organ Weights (grams) Summary | |||||
End of Treatment | Group 1 (Control – 0 mg/kg/day) | Group 2 (100 mg/kg/day) | Group 3 (300 mg/kg/day) | Group 4 (1000 mg/kg/day) | |
Males | |||||
Liver (Gram) | Mean | 9.36 | 9.46 | 10.70* | 11.69** |
SD | 0.50 | 0.63 | 0.66 | 1.23 | |
N | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | |
| |||||
Kidneys (Gram) | Mean | 2.38 | 2.53 | 2.63 | 2.79** |
SD | 0.15 | 0.13 | 0.17 | 0.24 | |
N | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | |
| |||||
Testes (Gram) | Mean | 3.36 | 3.69* | 3.65 | 3.82** |
SD | 0.21 | 0.36 | 0.34 | 0.26 | |
N | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | |
| |||||
Prostate Gland (Gram) | Mean | 0.830 | 0.944* | 0.917 | 0.834 |
SD | 0.052 | 0.117 | 0.098 | 0.115 | |
N | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | |
Females | |||||
Liver (Gram) | Mean | 12.09 | 12.69 | 13.45 | 14.48* |
SD | 1.31 | 1.17 | 0.82 | 1.97 | |
N | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 |
*/** Dunnett-test based on pooled variance significant at 5% (*) or 1% (**) level
Table 20. Select Organ/Body Weight Ratios (%) Summary | |||||
End of Treatment | Group 1 (Control – 0 mg/kg/day) | Group 2 (100 mg/kg/day) | Group 3 (300 mg/kg/day) | Group 4 (1000 mg/kg/day) | |
Males | |||||
Liver (%) | Mean | 2.52 | 2.55 | 2.88** | 3.33** |
SD | 0.03 | 0.18 | 0.12 | 0.21 | |
N | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | |
| |||||
Thyroids (%) | Mean | 0.0042 | 0.0041 | 0.0046 | 0.0056* |
SD | 0.0010 | 0.0006 | 0.0010 | 0.0017 | |
N | 10 | 9 | 9 | 10 | |
| |||||
Kidneys (%) | Mean | 0.64 | 0.68 | 0.71 | 0.80** |
SD | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.06 | 0.05 | |
N | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | |
| |||||
Testes (%) | Mean | 0.91 | 1.01* | 0.99 | 1.09** |
SD | 0.04 | 0.12 | 0.09 | 0.08 | |
N | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | |
| |||||
Prostate Gland (%) | Mean | 0.225 | 0.258* | 0.248 | 0.237 |
SD | 0.019 | 0.031 | 0.026 | 0.032 | |
N | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | |
Females | |||||
Liver (%) | Mean | 4.11 | 4.32 | 4.67* | 5.02** |
SD | 0.25 | 0.19 | 0.19 | 0.49 | |
N | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 |
*/** Dunnett-test based on pooled variance significant at 5% (*) or 1% (**) level
Table 21. Reproduction Data Summary | ||||
| Group 1 (Control – 0 mg/kg/day) | Group 2 (100 mg/kg/day) | Group 3 (300 mg/kg/day) | Group 4 (1000 mg/kg/day) |
Females paired | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 |
Females mated | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 |
Pregnant females | 9 | 9 | 10 | 9 |
Females dead on post coitum Day 7 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
Females with living pups on Day 1 | 9 | 8 | 10 | 9 |
| ||||
Mating index (%): (Females mated / Females paired) * 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 |
Fertility index (%): (Pregnant females / Females mated) * 100 | 90 | 90 | 100 | 90 |
Gestation index (%): (Females with living pups on Day 1 / Pregnant females) * 100 | 100 | 89 | 100 | 100 |
Table 22. Precoital Time (F0 – Generation: Post Coitum) | ||||
Day of the Pairing Period | Group 1 (Control – 0 mg/kg/day) | Group 2 (100 mg/kg/day) | Group 3 (300 mg/kg/day) | Group 4 (1000 mg/kg/day) |
Number of Females Mated | ||||
Day 1 | 2 | 4 | 5 | 3 |
Day 2 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 |
Day 3 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 |
Day 4 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 4 |
Day 14 | 1 | - | - | - |
| ||||
Median Precoital Time | 3 | 3 | 2 | 3 |
Mean Precoital Time | 3.8 | 2.5 | 1.9 | 2.6 |
N | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 |
+/++ Steel-test significant at 5% (+) or 1% (++) level
Table 23. Summary of Implantation Sites | |||||
| Group 1 (Control – 0 mg/kg/day) | Group 2 (100 mg/kg/day) | Group 3 (300 mg/kg/day) | Group 4 (1000 mg/kg/day) | |
At necropsy |
| ||||
Implantations | Mean | 13.3 | 12.1 | 11.9 | 10.3 |
Std Dev | 2.6 | 2.4 | 3.5 | 4.2 | |
N | 9 | 9 | 10 | 9 |
+/++ Steel-test significant at 5% (+) or 1% (++) level
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- Based on the alpha 2µ-globulin nephropathy observed in the kidneys of male rats at 1000 ,g/kg/day, the systemic toxicity No Observed Adverse Effect Level (NOAEL) for Petroleum diesel/gas oil fraction, co-processed with renewable hydrocarbons derived from thermally cracked plastics was determined to be 300 mg/kg/day in male rats. However, this effect is male rat specific and of no relevance to humans. Therefore, not considering the alpha 2µ-globulin nephropathy, and in the absence of any other treatment-related toxicity effects observed through the study period, the systemic and reproductive toxicity NOAELs were determined to be ≥1000 mg/kg/day in male and female rats.
- Executive summary:
A key OECD Guideline 422 combined 28-Day repeated dose toxicity study with the reproduction / developmental toxicity screening test was conducted to determine the potential toxic effects of the test material (Petroleum diesel/gas oil fraction, co-processed with renewable hydrocarbons derived from thermally cracked plastics (EC 941-803-4)) when administered orally to Wistar Han rats for a minimum of 28 days.
The test material in a corn oil vehicle was administered to Wistar Han rats (10/sex/dose) at doses of 0, 100, 300, or 1000 mg/kg/day. Male rats were exposed 7 days a week for a minimum of 28 days, including at least 2 weeks of treatment prior to mating and during the mating period up to and including the day before scheduled necropsy. Female rats were exposed 7 days a week for at least 14 days prior to mating (with the objective of covering at least two complete estrous cycles), the variable time to conception, the duration of pregnancy and at least 13 days after delivery, up to and including the day before scheduled necropsy. Mortality/ moribundity, clinical signs, functional observations, body weight and food consumption, clinical pathology, measurement of thyroid hormones T3, T4 and TSH (F0 males and females), gross necropsy findings, organ weights and histopathologic examinations were parameters evaluated in the study.
No treatment-related mortality or clinical signs of toxicity were observed during the daily detailed clinical observations or during the weekly arena observations. Salivation was observed post-dosing from the second week of the premating period and onwards in all male and female rats treated at 300 and 1000 mg/kg/day. Taking into account the nature and minor severity of the effect and its time of occurrence (i.e., after dosing), this sign was considered to be a physiological response rather than a sign of systemic toxicity.
Body weights and body weight gain of male and female rats in the 100 and 300 mg/kg/day dose groups were comparable to concurrent controls. In male rats treated at 1000 mg/kg/day, body weight gain was slightly lower when compared to controls throughout the dosing period (occasionally statistically significant), resulting in a 4% lower final mean body weight at the end of the dosing period (not statistically significant). In female rats treated at 1000 mg/kg/day, body weight gain was slightly lower at the end of the post-coitum period only, with a 4% lower mean body weight at the end of the post-coitum and lactation periods (all not statistically significant). Given the small magnitude and transience, and in the absence of corroborative changes in food consumption during those periods, these effects on body weight (gain) were considered to be non-adverse.
Food consumption before or after correction for body weight was unaffected by treatment in male rats at all dose levels and in female rats at doses up to 300 mg/kg/day. In female rats treated at 1000 mg/kg/day, food consumption (before and after correction for body weight) was lower in the first week of the dosing period and in the last week of the lactation period when compared to control animals. Given the small magnitude and transience, the effects on food consumption were considered to be non-adverse. In the absence of a dose-response trend, any other changes in food consumption (after correction for body weight) were considered to be unrelated to treatment, but rather a result of slightly lower body weights.
Hematological parameters in female rats were unaffected by treatment at all dose levels tested and up to 100 mg/kg/day in male rats. In male rats, higher total white blood cell, neutrophil, and lymphocyte counts were observed at 1000 mg/kg/day (1.32, 1.28, and 1.33x of control, respectively, not statistically significant for neutrophil and lymphocyte counts). Higher red blood cell distribution width at 300 and 1000 mg/kg/day (1.06 and 1.10x of control, respectively), accompanied by higher reticulocyte count were also observed in male rats at 1000 mg/kg/day (1.17x of control, not statistically significant). Considering the small magnitude of changes and in the absence of corroborative histopathology findings, the above changes were determined to be non-adverse. Coagulation parameters in male and female rats remained unaffected by treatment through the study period.
Clinical chemistry parameters in male and fame rats were unaffected by treatment at 100 mg/kg/day. Higher potassium levels were observed in male rats from 300 mg/kg/day onwards (1.11 and 1.16x of control at 300 and 1000 mg/kg/day, respectively) while higher creatinine levels were observed in male rats at 1000 mg/kg/day (1.35x of control). Higher total bilirubin levels were observed in female rats at 1000 mg/kg/day (1.58x of control). Considering the small magnitude of changes and in the absence of corroborative histopathology findings, the above changes were determined to be non-adverse. Any other changes observed in clinical chemistry parameters were considered to be unrelated to treatment as these occurred in the absence of a dose-related trend.
Serum levels of T3 and TSH were considered unaffected by treatment at 100 mg/kg/day in male rats and at all dose levels in female rats. Serum levels of T4 were considered unaffected by treatment with the test material in either sex at all dose levels tested. T3 levels were observed to be lower than the control mean in male rats at 300 and 1000 mg/kg/day (0.73 and 0.67x, respectively) with an associated increase in serum levels of TSH. Mean TSH values were 2.14 and 2.31x of control at 300 and 1000 mg/kg/day, respectively. The mean TSH values fell above the historical control range, while mean T3 values remained within the historical control range. In the absence of a relevant microscopic correlate in the thyroid gland, these findings were considered to be non-adverse. The lower mean T3 level observed in female rats at 300 mg/kg/day (0.73x of control), was considered unrelated to treatment due to a general overlap in individual values.
Hearing ability, pupillary reflex, static righting reflex, and grip strength were observed to be normal in all examined animals. Motor activity was unaffected by treatment up to 300 mg/kg/day. At 1000 mg/kg/day, the number of total movements was lower than the concurrent control mean in both male and female rats (0.81 and 0.76x of control, respectively; not statistically significant), without notable effect on ambulation’s. These findings were not considered to be an adverse effect on neurobehavior since these results were not supported by clinical observations or other functional observation tests (including ambulations), were slight in nature, and had no supportive morphological correlates in examined neuronal tissues. All groups exhibited a similar motor activity habituation profile with a decreasing trend in activity over the duration of the test period.
Gross necropsy revealed enlarged thyroid glands (3/10 males), black-brown discoloration of the liver (3/10 males), enlarged kidneys (1/10 males) and enlarged liver (1/10 females) at 1000 mg/kg/day. These effects were considered to be treatment-related but based on the low magnitude of the weight difference, the low severity of the hepatocellular hypertrophy and the absence of any other additional microscopic degenerative findings or related enzyme changes, the liver and thyroid findings were considered to be non-adverse. The remainder of the recorded macroscopic findings were within the range of background gross observations encountered in rats of this age and strain.
Treatment-related higher liver weights (males and females), thyroid gland weight (males) and kidney weight (males) were observed. Dose-related higher liver weights (absolute and/or relative to body weights) were observed in in male and female rats starting at 300 mg/kg/day. Based on the low magnitude of the weight difference and in the absence of any other additional microscopic degenerative findings or related enzyme changes, the liver findings were considered to be non-adverse. Higher thyroid gland weights (relative to body weights) were observed in male rats at 1000 mg/kg/day. Based on nature and severity, the thyroid gland findings were considered to be non-adverse. Higher kidney weights (absolute and relative to body weights) were observed in male rats at 1000 mg/kg/day. Higher kidney weights in male rats at 1000 mg/kg/day correlated to microscopic hyaline droplet nephropathy, which although treatment-related and adverse, was considered to be male rat-specific and not relevant to humans. Any other differences, including those that reached statistical significance (higher absolute and relative prostate gland weight at 100 mg/kg/day and higher absolute and relative testes weight at 100 and 1000 mg/kg/day) were not considered to be treatment-related due to the direction of the change and lack of dose-related pattern.
Treatment-related microscopic findings were observed in the liver, spleen, and thyroid gland of both sexes and in the kidney of male rats. A dose-related increased incidence and severity in centrilobular hepatocellular hypertrophy (up to a slight degree) was observed in male rats starting at 100 mg/kg/day and in female rats (at minimal degree) starting at 300 mg/kg/day. Based on the low severity of the hepatocellular hypertrophy and in the absence of any other additional microscopic degenerative findings or related enzyme changes, the liver findings were considered to be non-adverse. An increased incidence and severity in extramedullary hematopoiesis was observed in the spleen of male (up to moderate degree) and female (up to slight degree) rats at 1000 mg/kg/day. This is a common finding in the rat and given the low magnitude and in the absence of changes in hematology, was considered to be non-adverse. An increased incidence and/or severity of follicular cell hypertrophy (up to a slight degree) was observed in male and female rats starting at 300 mg/kg/day. Based on the nature and severity, the thyroid gland findings were considered to be non-adverse.
A dose-dependent increase in hyaline droplet accumulation was observed in male rats at 100 and 300 mg/kg/day progressing to hyaline droplet nephropathy (an increase in hyaline droplet accumulation, increased tubular basophilia and the presence of granular casts) up to a moderate degree in male rats at 1000 mg/kg/day. After immunohistochemistry using alpha 2u-globulin antibodies, the hyaline droplets stained positive for alpha 2u-globulin. The control male showed small alpha 2u-globulin dots in the proximal tubules and the control female was alpha 2u-globulin negative. Based on the degenerative nature of some of the kidney findings (granular casts), the hyaline droplet nephropathy observed at 1000 mg/kg/day was considered adverse. However, this effect is male rat-specific and not relevant to humans.
No signs of difficult or prolonged parturition were observed in pregnant females and examination of cage debris of pregnant females revealed no signs of abortion or premature birth. No deficiencies in maternal care were observed either. Length and regularity of the estrous cycle were not affected by
treatment and all females had regular cycles of 4 days. 1/10 couples of the control group (Male No. 09 and Female No. 49), 1/10 couples of the 100 mg/kg/day group (Male No. 19 and Female No. 59) and 1/10 couples of the 1000 mg/kg/day treatment group (Male No. 38 and Female No. 78) had no offspring. For these couples, no abnormalities were observed in the reproductive organs which could account for their lack of offspring and there were no morphological findings in the reproductive organs of either sex which could be attributed to the test material. Stage dependent qualitative evaluation of spermatogenesis in the testes revealed normal progression of the spermatogenic cycle and the expected cell associations and proportions in the various stages of spermatogenesis were present.
No treatment-related changes were observed in any of the following reproductive parameters investigated: mating and fertility indices, precoital time, estrous cycle, and histopathological examination of reproductive organs. At 1000 mg/kg/day, the number of implantation sites was lower and subsequently, litter size was reduced in 2/9 females. These findings were considered to be non-adverse.
Overall, no reproductive toxicity was observed up to the highest dose tested (1000 mg/kg/day).
Based on the alpha 2µ-globulin nephropathy observed in the kidneys of male rats at 1000 ,g/kg/day, the systemic toxicity No Observed Adverse Effect Level (NOAEL) for Petroleum diesel/gas oil fraction, co-processed with renewable hydrocarbons derived from thermally cracked plastics was determined to be 300 mg/kg/day in male rats. However, this effect is male rat specific and of no relevance to humans. Therefore, not considering the alpha 2µ-globulin nephropathy, and in the absence of any other treatment-related toxicity effects observed through the study period, the systemic and reproductive toxicity NOAELs were determined to be ≥1000 mg/kg/day in male and female rats.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.