Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Endpoint:
short-term repeated dose toxicity: oral
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
From 23 October, 1990 to 19 November 1990
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
1990
Report date:
1991

Materials and methods

Test guidelineopen allclose all
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 407 (Repeated Dose 28-Day Oral Toxicity Study in Rodents)
Version / remarks:
1981
Deviations:
no
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
EU Method B.7 (Repeated Dose (28 Days) Toxicity (Oral))
Version / remarks:
1984
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
yes
Limit test:
no

Test material

Constituent 1
Reference substance name:
A mixture of: trisodium (2,4(or 2,6 or 4,6)-bis(3,5-dinitro-2-oxidophenylazo)-5-hydroxyphenolato)(2(or 4 or 6)-(3,5-dinitro-2-oxidophenylazo)-5-hydroxy-4(or 2 or 6)-(4-(4-nitro-2-sulfonatoanilino)phenylazo)phenolato)ferrate(1-); trisodium bis(2,4(or 2,6 or 4,6)-bis(3,5-dinitro-2-oxidophenylazo)-5-hydroxyphenolato)ferrate(1-); trisodium (2,4(or 2,6 or 4,6)-bis(3,5-dinitro-2-oxidophenylazo)-5-hydroxyphenolato)(2(or 4 or 6)-(3,5-dinitro-2-oxidophenylazo)-5-hydroxy-4(or 2 or 6)-(4-nitro-2-sulfonatophenylazo)phenolato)ferrate(1-); trisodium (2,4(or 2,6 or 4,6)-bis(3,5-dinitro-2-oxidophenylazo)-5-hydroxyphenolato)(2(or 4 or 6)-(3,5-dinitro-2-oxidophenylazo)-5-hydroxy-4(or 2 or 6)-(3-sulfonatophenylazo)phenolato)ferrate(1-); disodium 3,3'-(2,4-dihydroxy-1,3(or 1,5 or 3,5)-phenylenediazo)dibenzenesulfonate
EC Number:
406-870-1
EC Name:
A mixture of: trisodium (2,4(or 2,6 or 4,6)-bis(3,5-dinitro-2-oxidophenylazo)-5-hydroxyphenolato)(2(or 4 or 6)-(3,5-dinitro-2-oxidophenylazo)-5-hydroxy-4(or 2 or 6)-(4-(4-nitro-2-sulfonatoanilino)phenylazo)phenolato)ferrate(1-); trisodium bis(2,4(or 2,6 or 4,6)-bis(3,5-dinitro-2-oxidophenylazo)-5-hydroxyphenolato)ferrate(1-); trisodium (2,4(or 2,6 or 4,6)-bis(3,5-dinitro-2-oxidophenylazo)-5-hydroxyphenolato)(2(or 4 or 6)-(3,5-dinitro-2-oxidophenylazo)-5-hydroxy-4(or 2 or 6)-(4-nitro-2-sulfonatophenylazo)phenolato)ferrate(1-); trisodium (2,4(or 2,6 or 4,6)-bis(3,5-dinitro-2-oxidophenylazo)-5-hydroxyphenolato)(2(or 4 or 6)-(3,5-dinitro-2-oxidophenylazo)-5-hydroxy-4(or 2 or 6)-(3-sulfonatophenylazo)phenolato)ferrate(1-); disodium 3,3'-(2,4-dihydroxy-1,3(or 1,5 or 3,5)-phenylenediazo)dibenzenesulfonate
Cas Number:
115100-55-5
Molecular formula:
not applicable
IUPAC Name:
triiron(3+) nonasodium 2-(2-{4-hydroxy-2-oxido-5-[2-(3-sulfophenyl)diazen-1-yl]phenyl}diazen-1-yl)-4,6-dinitrobenzen-1-olate 2-(2-{5-[2-(3,5-dinitro-2-oxidophenyl)diazen-1-yl]-2-hydroxy-4-oxidophenyl}diazen-1-yl)-4,6-dinitrobenzen-1-olate tris(2-(2-{5-[2-(3,5-dinitro-2-oxidophenyl)diazen-1-yl]-4-hydroxy-2-oxidophenyl}diazen-1-yl)-4,6-dinitrobenzen-1-olate) 2-{2-[4-hydroxy-5-(2-{4-[(4-nitro-2-sulfophenyl)amino]phenyl}diazen-1-yl)-2-oxidophenyl]diazen-1-yl}-4,6-dinitrobenzen-1-olate
Test material form:
solid: particulate/powder

Test animals

Species:
rat
Strain:
Wistar
Sex:
male/female
Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
TEST ANIMALS
-Source: BRL Ltd., Basel, Switzerland
-Age at study initiation: approximately 6 weeks
-Weight at study initiation:
males : 158 to 177 grams
females: 122 to 152 grams
-Fasting period before study:
-Housing: Animals were housed 5 to a cage (same sex) in stainless steel suspended cages with wire mesh floors.
-Diet: Free access to standard pelleted laboratory animal diet (Kliba, Klingentalmueble AG, 4303, Kaiseraugst, Switzerland). Each batch was analysed for contaminants and results were examined and archived.
-Water: Tap water, ad libitum. Results of chemical and contaminants analyses are examined and archived quarterly.
-Acclimation period: At least 7 days. Veterinary examinatlon was performed prior to commencement of treatment to ensure that the animáis were in a good State of health.

ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
-Temperature (°C): 21 °C
-Humidity (%): 55 %
-Air changes (per hr): Air-conditioned room 15 air changes per hour
-Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): Lighting was 12 hours artificial fluorescent light and 12 hours dark per day.

Administration / exposure

Route of administration:
oral: gavage
Vehicle:
water
Remarks:
Distilled water
Details on oral exposure:
-PREPARATION OF DOSING SOLUTIONS:
The test article was weighed into a glass flask on an analyticaí balance and the vehicle (w/w) added.

-VEHICLE
-Amount of vehicle (if gavage): 5 ml/kg body weight.
Analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
not specified
Details on analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
Samples of formulations prepared during week 1 were analysed to check the accuracy of preparation.
Duration of treatment / exposure:
28 days
Frequency of treatment:
Once daily, approximately the same time each day, 7 days per week
Doses / concentrationsopen allclose all
Dose / conc.:
50 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
Dose / conc.:
200 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
Dose / conc.:
1 000 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
No. of animals per sex per dose:
5 per sex x doses
Control animals:
yes, concurrent no treatment

Examinations

Observations and examinations performed and frequency:
DETAILED CLINICAL OBSERVATIONS: Yes
At least once daily. Severity of observations were graded.

BODY WEIGHT: Yes

FOOD CONSUMPTION: yes

OPHTHALMOSCOPIC EXAMINATION: Yes

HAEMATOLOGY: Yes
- Time schedule for collection of blood:
Blood samples were collected under light ether anaesthesia on day 29, between 8.00 and 10.00 a.m.. The animals were fasted overnight before blood sampling, but water was provided. Blood samples were drawn from the retro-orbital sinus of all rats/sex/group and collected into tubes prepared with EDTA for haematological parameters (0.6 ml) and untreated tubes for dinical biochemistry parameters (>2.0 ml). All samples were dispatched to "Bergschot Centrum voor Onderzoek" (BCO), Breda, The Netherlands for analysis.

The following haematology parameters were determined from blood containing EDTA as an anti-coagulant using the methods listed:
Erythrocyte count/RBC
Haemoglobin/HB
Haematocrit/HCT
Mean corpuscular
volume/MCV
Mean corpuscular
haemoglobin/MCH
Mean corpuscular
haemoglobin concentration/MCHC
Red cell distribution
width/RDW
Platelet count/ PLATELETS
Total leucocyte count/ WBC
Differential leucocyte count/(Neutrophi1s/SEG,
Eosinophils/EO, Basophils /BASO, Lymphocytes/LYMPH
Monocytes/MONO, Large Unstained Cells/L.UNST.CEL)

Key to observed quantitative parameters and scores in haematology
a) OPM. DlFf, (Remark.Differentiation)
Code/Differentiation
343/No Abnormalities
58/Platelet agregates
40/Atypical Lymphocytes
b) OPM. GRAD. (Remark.Grading)
Code/Description
0000/Not Applicable
2055/Many
2063/Occasional
c) THROMBOCYTES
Score/Description
2/normal

CLINICAL BIOCHEMISTRY: Yes
The following clinical biochemistry parameters were determined from serum samples after clotting and centrifugation using the methods Usted:
Parameter/Abbreviation
Glucose/GLUCOSE
Urea/UREA
Creatinine/CREATININE
Bilirubin, total/ BILI T.
Aspartate aminotransferase/(ASAT/GOT)
Alanine aminotransferase/(ALAT/GPT)
Gamma-glutamyltransferase/G-GT
Sodium/SODIUM
Potassium/POTASSIUM
Chloride/CHLORIOE
Calclum/CALCIUM
Phosphorus/INORG PHOSPH
Protein, total/ PROTEIN T.
Protein, albumin/ ALBUMIN

URINALYSIS: No

NEUROBEHAVIOURAL EXAMINATION: No

IMMUNOLOGY:No
Sacrifice and pathology:
GROSS PATHOLOGY: Yes
All animals surviving to the end of the observation period (day 30) were deeply anaesthetised by Intraperitoneal injection of sodium pentobarbital and subsequently exsanguinated. All animals assigned to the study were necropsied and descriptions of all macroscopic abnormalities recorded.
Samples of the following tissues and organs were collected from all animals at necropsy and fixed in neutral phosphate buffered 4% formaldehyde solution:
Adrenal glands
Aorta
Brain
Cecum
Cervix
Clitoral gland
Colon
Duodenum
Epididymides
Esophagus
Eyes with optic nerve and Harderian gland Female mammary gland area
Femur including joint
Heart
Ileum
Jejunum
Kldneys
Larynx
Lacrimal gland, exorbital
Liver
Lung, infused with formalin
Lymph nodes - mandibular, mesenteric
Nasopharynx
Ovarles
Páncreas
Pituitary gland
Preputial gland
Prostate gland
Rectum
Salivary glands - mandibular, sublingual
Sciatic nerve
Seminal vesicles
Skeletal muscle
Skin
Spinal cord -cervical, midthoracic, lumbar
Spleen
Sternum with bone marrow
Stomach
Testes
Thymus
Thyroid including parathyroid
Tongue
Trechea
Urinary bladder
Uterus
Vagina
All gross lesions

ORGAN WEIGHTS
The following organ weights (and terminal body weight) were recorded at termination:
Adrenal glands
Brain
Heart
Kidneys
Liver
Spleen
Testes

HISTOTECHNOLOGY
All organ and tissue samples, as defined under Histopathology (following), were processed, embedded and cut at a thickness of 2-4 micrometres and stained with haematoxylin and eosin. Sections of the spleen of all animals were stained with Perl’s staining method for iron pigment.
All slides were histopathologically examined at RCC NOTOX B,V. instead of at RCC (UK) Ltd., Hereford, England, as per original protocol.
HISTOPATHOLOGY : yes
Slides of adrenals, heart, kidneys, liver and spleen, collected at termination from all animals of the control and high dose group as well as from all gross lesions of all animals were examined by a pathologist.
Based on the treatment related morphologic changes, spleen was also examined from all rats of group 2 {50 mg/kg/day) and 3 (200 mg/kg/day).
Statistics:
The following statistical methods were used to analyse the body weight, organ weights and clinical laboratory data:
Univariate one-way analysis of variance was used to assess the significance of intergroup differences.
If the variables could be assumed to follow a normal distribution, the Dunnett-test (many to one t-test) based on a pooled variance estimate was applied for the comparison of the treated groups and the control groups.
The Steel-test (many-one rank test) was applied when the data could not be assumed to follow a normal distribution.
All tests were two-sided and in all cases p<0.05 was accepted as the lowest level of significance.
Group means were calculated for continuous data and medians were calculated for discrete data (scores) in the summary tables.
Individual values, means, standard deviations and statistics were rounded off before printing. For example, test statistics were calculated on the basis of exact values for means and pooled valances and then rounded off to two decimal places. Therefore, two groups may display the same printed means for a given parameter, yet display different test statistics values

Results and discussion

Results of examinations

Clinical signs:
effects observed, non-treatment-related
Description (incidence and severity):
Dark coloured faeces was noted in males and females treated at 200 or 1000 mg/kg/day from day 3 of treatment onwards until termination of the study.
Excessive salivation was noted intermittently in animals receiving 1000 mg/kg/day and on one occasion in males receiving 200 mg/kg/day. Since excessive salivation may be attributed to a bad taste of the test substance, it was considered not to represent a sign of toxicity.
Alopecia was noted at various locations and over transient periods in 3/5 males receiving 1000 mg/kg/day. As alopecia is commonly noted in rats of this age and strain, this finding was considered not to be an adverse effect.
Other incidental findings noted among animals receiving 1000 mg/kg/day, i.e. hunched posture, rales, laboured breathing, and regurgitation of test substance, were considered not to be of toxicological significance.
Mortality:
no mortality observed
Description (incidence):
No mortality occurred during the study period
Body weight and weight changes:
no effects observed
Description (incidence and severity):
Body weights and body weight gain of treated animals were considered to be in the same range as controls over the 4 week study period.
Statistically significantly decreased body weights between males receiving 50 mg/kg/day and control males were, in the absence of a dose-related response, considered not to be a sign of toxicity.
Food consumption and compound intake (if feeding study):
no effects observed
Description (incidence and severity):
There were no differences in food consumption before or after allowance for body weight between treated and control animals.
Food efficiency:
not examined
Water consumption and compound intake (if drinking water study):
not examined
Ophthalmological findings:
no effects observed
Description (incidence and severity):
There were no ophthalmoscopical changes noted at the pretest examination and the examination at week 4.
Haematological findings:
no effects observed
Description (incidence and severity):
Red blood cell parameters of treated animals were all in the same range as control animals.
White blood cell counts of males receiving 1000 mg/kg/day were statistically significantly increased when compared to controls. White blood cell counts of females receiving 1000 mg/kg/day were also slightly higher than controls, but this difference did not attain statistical significance.
The number of white blood cells in animals receiving 200 or 50 mg/kg/day were comparable to control animals.
Differential white blood cell profiles of treated males or females did not differ from the white blood cell profile of control animals. Statistically significantly decreased lymphocytes among females receiving 1000 mg/kg/day were, as this was not supported by a clear shift in other white blood cell types, considered to have arisen fortuitously.
Clinical biochemistry findings:
no effects observed
Description (incidence and severity):
There were no differences noted between control and treated rats that could be related to treatment with test substance.
Sodium values of females receiving 1000 mg/kg/day were noted to be statistically significantly decreased in comparison with control females.
However, as sodium values were still within the normal biological range for rats of this age and strain, it was considered to have occurred by chance.
Urinalysis findings:
not examined
Behaviour (functional findings):
not examined
Immunological findings:
not examined
Organ weight findings including organ / body weight ratios:
effects observed, treatment-related
Description (incidence and severity):
Spleen weights of animals receiving 1000 mg/kg/day were noted to be higher than controls before and after correction for body weight (although this difference did not achieve a level of statistical significance between controls and males receiving 1000 mg/kg/day before adjustment for body weight). Spleen weights of animals receiving 200 or 50 mg/kg/day did not differ from those of control animals,
Kidney weights, which are related to body weight, were slight but statistically significantly higher in males receiving 1000 mg/kg/day when compared to control weights. Kidney weights of females receiving 1000
mg/kg/day or animals receiving 200 or 50 mg/kg/day were not thus affected. Other organ weights and relative organ weights of treated animals were indistinguishable from those of control animals.
Gross pathological findings:
no effects observed
Description (incidence and severity):
Macroscopic observations at necropsy did not reveal any alterations that were considered to have arisen as an effect of treatment. The incidentally noted crateriform lesions and thickening of the caecum wall in 1 female receiving 1000 mg/kg/day, was considered not to have arisen as an effect of treatment.
Neuropathological findings:
not examined
Histopathological findings: non-neoplastic:
effects observed, treatment-related
Description (incidence and severity):
Compared to controls, a slightly increased incidence of haemopoietic foci was noted in the spleen of animals receiving 1000 mg/kg/day. This was not apparent in the spleen of animals receiving 200 or 50 mg/kg/day.
Spleens of animals receiving 200 or 1000 mg/kg/day showed an increase in accumulated iron pigments, which was dose-related.
There were no other microscopic findings noted that were considered to be treatment-related. The small number of changes recorded in treated animals were within the range commonly seen for rats of this age and strain.

Effect levels

Dose descriptor:
NOEL
Effect level:
50 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
Based on:
test mat.
Sex:
male/female
Basis for effect level:
histopathology: non-neoplastic

Target system / organ toxicity

Critical effects observed:
no

Any other information on results incl. tables

Principle toxicologically significant changes noted as a result of repeated oral treatment were located in the spleen of animals receiving 200 or 1000 mg/kg/day. At microscopic examination, spleens of animals receiving 1000 mg/kg/day were noted with an increased incidence of haemopoietic foci. In addition, animals receiving 200 or 1000 mg/kg/day showed a dose dependent increase in accumulated iron pigments.

These microscopically observed changes may be associated with the increase of spleen weights which was apparent in animals receiving 1000 mg/kg/day.

Increased white blood cells, as noted in these high dose animals, also may be correlated with increased production of myeloid cells. However, as there was no apparent shift in differential white blood cell profile, a clear biological explanation can not be given.

Increased relative kidney weights were noted among males receiving 1000 mg/kg/day only. Given the isolated occurrence and lack of clinicopathological and histopathological evidence, the toxicological

significance of this finding was considered doubtful.

Dark appearance of the faeces was noted in animals receiving 1000 or 200 mg/kg/day. No microscopic correlates were observed in the gastrointestinal tract of these animals, leading to the hypothesis that this finding can be attributed to the staining properties of the test substance and may not be considered a sign of toxicity.

There were no changes in body weights, food consumption, ophthalmoscopic examination and acroscopic examination that were considered to be an effect of treatment.

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Conclusions:
NOEL = 50 mg/kg/day
Executive summary:

The repeated dose toxicity of the substance was evaluated in a subacute 28-day toxicity study, according to the OECD Guideline 407 (1981) and method B.7 of the EEC-Directive 92/69 EEC.

A 5-day range finding study was performed (with 3 rats/sex/group at dose levels of 50, 200 and 1000 mg/kg/day) to provide a basis for selection of dose levels for a study of longer duration.

With the exception of dark appearance of the feces, no differences of biological significance were apparent between animals of the 3 treatment groups.

Based on these observations, a high treatment level of 1000 mg/kg/day was selected for a study of 28 days duration.

In the main study, the test item was administered dally by gavage to SPF-bred Wistar rats. The study comprised of four groups. The number of rats assigned to toxicity testing per group as well as the dose levels administered were as follows:

group Dose level mg/kg males females
1 0 1-5 21-25
2 50 6-10 26-30
3 200 11-15 31-35
4 1000 16-20 36-40

The following findins were observed.

At 50 mg/kg/day: No treatment-related changes detected.

At 200 mg/kg/day:

1)  Dark appearance of the faeces was noted in males and females.

2)  Microscopically observed accumulatlon of iron pigments were noted in the spleen of males and females.

At 1000 mg/kg/day:

1)  Dark appearance of the faeces was noted in males and females

2)  Increased total white blood cell counts were noted in males and females,

3)  Increased spleen weights and relative spleen weights were noted in males and females and increased relative kidney weights were noted in males only.

3)  Microscopically observed accumulatlon of iron pigments and increased number of haemopoletic foci were noted in the spleen of males and females.

From the results presented in this report a definitive no observed effect level (NOEL) of 50 mg/kg/day was established.