Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Description of key information

Ther result of LLNA is negative.

Key value for chemical safety assessment

Skin sensitisation

Link to relevant study records
Reference
Endpoint:
skin sensitisation: in vivo (LLNA)
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 429 (Skin Sensitisation: Local Lymph Node Assay)
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
EU Method B.42 (Skin Sensitisation: Local Lymph Node Assay)
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
EPA OPPTS 870.2600 (Skin Sensitisation)
GLP compliance:
yes
Type of study:
mouse local lymph node assay (LLNA)
Species:
mouse
Strain:
CBA
Sex:
female
Vehicle:
propylene glycol
Concentration / amount:
10%, 25% and 50%
Vehicle:
propylene glycol
Concentration / amount:
10%, 25% and 50%
Vehicle:
propylene glycol
Positive control substance(s):
hexyl cinnamic aldehyde (CAS No 101-86-0)
Parameter:
SI
Remarks on result:
other: The SI for 10, 25 and 50% were 1.9, 2.2 and 2.4. For a positive response, SI needs to be equal or more than 3.
Parameter:
other: disintegrations per minute (DPM)
Remarks on result:
other: see Remark
Remarks:
No irritation was observed in any of the animals examined. Brown test substance remnants prevented scoring for erythema in all animals treated with the test substance. No oedema was observed in any of the animals examined. All nodes of the experimental and control groups were considered normal in size. No macroscopic abnormalities of the surrounding area were noted. Body weights and body weight gain of experimental animals remained in the same range as controls over the study period. The slight body weight loss, noted in some animals, was considered not toxicologically significant. Mean DPM/animal values for the experimental groups treated with test substance concentrations 10, 25 and 50% were 595, 677 and 721 respectively. The mean DPM/animal value for the vehicle control group was 306. No mortality occurred and no symptoms of systemic toxicity were observed in the animals of the main study. The SI values calculated for the substance concentrations 10, 25 and 50% were 1.9, 2.2 and 2.4 respectively. Test substance is not a sensitiser.

Comments:
The six monthly reliability check with Hexylcinnamaldehyde,
indicates that the Local Lymph Node Assay as performed at
NOTOX is an appropriate model for testing for contact
hypersensitivity.

Interpretation of results:
not sensitising
Remarks:
Migrated information
Executive summary:

Test substance concentrations selected for the main study were based on the results of a preliminary study.

In the main study, three groups of five experimental animals were treated with test substance concentration concentrations of 10 %, 25 % or 50 % on three consecutive days, by open application on the ears. Five vehicle control animals were animals were similarly treated, but with vehicle alone (propylene glycol).

Three days after the last exposure, all animals were injected with 3H-methyl thymidine and after 5 hours the draining (auricular) lymph nodes were excised. After precipitating the DNA of the lymph node cells, radioactivity measurements were performed. The activity was expressed as the number of Disintegrations Per Minute (DPM) and a stimulation index (SI) was subsequently calculated for each group.

No irritation was observed in all of the animals examined. Brown test substance remnants prevented scoring for erythema in all animals treated with the test substance. No oedema was observed in any of the animals examined.

All nodes of the experimental and control groups were considered normal in size. No macroscopic abnormalities of the surrounding area were noted.

Mean DPM/animal values for the experimental groups treated with test substance concentrations 10, 25, and 50 % were 596, 677 and 721 respectively. The mean DPM/animal value for the vehicle control group was 306.

The SI values calculated for the substance concentrations 10, 25 and 50% were 1.9, 2.2 and 2.4 respectively.

Since there was no indication that the test substance could elicit an SI>= 3 when tested up to 50 %, it was established that the EC3 value (if any) exceeds 50 %.

The six monthly reliability checks with Hexylcinnamaldehyde, indicates that the Local Lymph Node Assay as performed at NOTOX is an appropriate model for testing for contact hypersensitivity.

Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no adverse effect observed (not sensitising)
Additional information:

Test substance concentrations selected for the main study were based on the results of a preliminary study.

In the main study, three groups of five experimental animals were treated with test substance concentration concentrations of 10 %, 25 % or 50 % on three consecutive days, by open application on the ears. Five vehicle control animals were animals were similarly treated, but with vehicle alone (propylene glycol).

Three days after the last exposure, all animals were injected with 3H-methyl thymidine and after 5 hours the draining (auricular) lymph nodes were excised. After precipitating the DNA of the lymph node cells, radioactivity measurements were performed. The activity was expressed as the number of Disintegrations Per Minute (DPM) and a stimulation index (SI) was subsequently calculated for each group.

No irritation was observed in all of the animals examined. Brown test substance remnants prevented scoring for erythema in all animals treated with the test substance. No oedema was observed in any of the animals examined.

All nodes of the experimental and control groups were considered normal in size. No macroscopic abnormalities of the surrounding area were noted.

Mean DPM/animal values for the experimental groups treated with test substance concentrations 10, 25, and 50 % were 596, 677 and 721 respectively. The mean DPM/animal value for the vehicle control group was 306.

The SI values calculated for the substance concentrations 10, 25 and 50% were 1.9, 2.2 and 2.4 respectively.

Since there was no indication that the test substance could elicit an SI>= 3 when tested up to 50 %, it was established that the EC3 value (if any) exceeds 50 %.

The six monthly reliability checks with Hexylcinnamaldehyde, indicates that the Local Lymph Node Assay as performed at NOTOX is an appropriate model for testing for contact hypersensitivity

Respiratory sensitisation

Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no study available
Additional information:

No study available.

Justification for classification or non-classification

Everzol Orange ED-G Crude does not have to be classified for sensitization by skin contact according to CLP (EC1272/2008) and DSD (67/548/EEC).