Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 238-339-3 | CAS number: 14367-46-5
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Genetic toxicity in vitro
Description of key information
Gene mutation in vitro:
Ames test:
Gene mutation toxicity wad predicted for 2-(N-ethylamino)-1-(4-methoxyphenil propane) using data from structurally and functionally similar read across chemicals. The studies are as mentioned below:
Gene mutation toxicity was predicted for 2-(N-ethylamino)-1-(4-methoxyphenil propane) using the battery approach from Danish QSAR database (2018). The study assumed the use of Salmonella typhimurium bacteria in the Ames test. The end point for gene mutation has been modeled in the Danish QSAR using the three software systems Leadscope, CASE Ultra and SciQSAR. Based on predictions from these three systems, a fourth and overall battery prediction is made. The battery prediction is made using the so called Battery algorithm. With the battery approach it is in many cases possible to reduce “noise” from the individual model estimates and thereby improve accuracy and/or broaden the applicability domain. Gene mutation toxicity study as predicted by Danish QSAR for2-(N-ethylamino)-1-(4-methoxyphenil propane)is negative and hence the chemical is predicted to classify as a gene mutant in vitro.
Gene mutation toxicity study (Plate incorporation method) was performed to determine the mutagenic nature of the 60 -70% test chemical. The method was designed to meet the requirements of the OECD Guidelines for testing of the Chemicals No. 471 “Bacterial Reverse Mutation Test”, Method B13/14 of Commission Directive 2000/32/EC and the USA, EPA (TSCA) OPPTS harmonised guidelines. Salmonella typhimurium strains TA1535, TA1537, TA102, TA98 and TA100 were treated with the test material using both the Ames plate incorporation and pre-incubation methods at five dose levels, in triplicate, both with and without the addition of a rat liver homogenate metabolising system (10% liver S9 in standard co-factors). The dose range for the first experiment (plate incorporation) was determined in a preliminary toxicity assay and was 100 to 5000µg/plate. The experiment was repeated on a separate day using the same dose range as Experiment 1, fresh cultures of the bacterial strains and fresh test material formulations. The vehicle (dimethyl sulphoxide) control plates gave counts of revertant colonies within the normal range. All of the positive control chemicals used in the test induced marked increases in the frequency of revertant colonies, both with or without metabolic activation. Thus, the sensitivity of the assay and the efficacy of the S9-mix were validated. The test material caused no visible reduction in the growth of the bacterial background lawn at any dose level. The test material was, therefore, tested up to the maximum recommended dose level of 5000µg/plate. No test material precipitate was observed on the plates at any of the doses tested in either the presence or absence of S9-mix. No significant increases in the frequency of revertant colonies were recorded for any of the bacterial strains, with any dose of the test material, either with or without metabolic activation. Based on the observations made, the test chemical was considered to be non mutagenic to Salmonella typhimurium strains TA1535, TA1537, TA102, TA98 and TA100 with and without metabolic activation in the Plate incorporation assay and hence is likely to be non-mutagenic.
In the same study, gene mutation toxicity study (Pre-incubation method) was also performed to determine the mutagenic nature of the 60 -70% test chemical . The method was designed to meet the requirements of the OECD Guidelines for testing of the Chemicals No. 471 “Bacterial Reverse Mutation Test”, Method B13/14 of Commission Directive 2000/32/EC and the USA, EPA (TSCA) OPPTS harmonised guidelines. Salmonella typhimurium strains TA1535, TA1537, TA102, TA98 and TA100 were treated with the test material using both the Ames plate incorporation and pre-incubation methods at five dose levels, in triplicate, both with and without the addition of a rat liver homogenate metabolising system (10% liver S9 in standard co-factors). The dose range for the first experiment (plate incorporation) was determined in a preliminary toxicity assay and was 100 to 5000µg/plate. The experiment was repeated on a separate day using the same dose range as Experiment 1, fresh cultures of the bacterial strains and fresh test material formulations. The pre-incubation modification was employed for the second experiment. The vehicle (dimethyl sulphoxide) control plates gave counts of revertant colonies within the normal range. All of the positive control chemicals used in the test induced marked increases in the frequency of revertant colonies, both with or without metabolic activation. Thus, the sensitivity of the assay and the efficacy of the S9-mix were validated. The test material caused no visible reduction in the growth of the bacterial background lawn at any dose level. The test material was, therefore, tested up to the maximum recommended dose level of 5000µg/plate. No test material precipitate was observed on the plates at any of the doses tested in either the presence or absence of S9-mix. No significant increases in the frequency of revertant colonies were recorded for any of the bacterial strains, with any dose of the test material, either with or without metabolic activation. Based on the observations made, the test chemical was considered to be non mutagenic to Salmonella typhimurium strains TA1535, TA1537, TA102, TA98 and TA100 with and without metabolic activation in the pre-incubation assay and hence is likely to be non-mutagenic.
Gene mutation toxicity study was also performed to determine the mutagenic nature of another 50 -60% test chemical. The study was performed using S. typhimurium strains TA92, TA1535, TA100, TA1537, TA94 and TA98 with and without S9 metabolic activation system. The test was performed as per the preincubation assay at six different concentrations with 5.0 mg/plate being the maximum concentration. The chemical was dissolved in DMSO. Preincubation was performed for 20 mins and the exposure duration was for 48 hrs. The result was considered positive if the number of colonies found was twice the number in the control (exposed to the appropriate solvent or untreated). The test chemical did not induce a doubling of revertant colonies over the control using S. typhimurium strains TA92, TA1535, TA100, TA1537, TA94 and TA98 in the presence and absence of S9 metabolic activation system and hence the chemical is not likely to classify as a gene mutant in vitro.
Based on the predicted data available for the target chemical and data from its structurally and functionally similar read across chemicals, 2-(N-ethylamino)-1-(4-methoxyphenil propane) (CAS no 14367 -46 -5) does not exhibit gene mutation in vitro. Hence the test chemical is not likely to classify as a gene mutant as per the criteria mentioned in CLP regulation.
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
- Type of information:
- read-across from supporting substance (structural analogue or surrogate)
- Adequacy of study:
- weight of evidence
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- data from handbook or collection of data
- Remarks:
- experimental data of read across substances
- Justification for type of information:
- Data for the target chemical is summarized based on the structurally similar read across chemicals
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- read-across source
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- read-across source
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- read-across source
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- read-across source
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: Refer below principle
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- WoE derived based on the predicted data for the target chemical and experimental data from structurally and functionally similar read across chemicals
- GLP compliance:
- not specified
- Type of assay:
- bacterial reverse mutation assay
- Target gene:
- Histidine
- Species / strain / cell type:
- S. typhimurium, other:
- Remarks:
- 1. Predicted data/Target
- Details on mammalian cell type (if applicable):
- Not applicable
- Additional strain / cell type characteristics:
- not specified
- Species / strain / cell type:
- S. typhimurium, other: TA100, 1535, 102, 98, 1537
- Remarks:
- RA 2/3
- Details on mammalian cell type (if applicable):
- Not applicable
- Additional strain / cell type characteristics:
- not specified
- Species / strain / cell type:
- S. typhimurium, other: TA92, TA1535, TA100, TA1537, TA94 and TA98
- Details on mammalian cell type (if applicable):
- Not applicable
- Additional strain / cell type characteristics:
- not specified
- Cytokinesis block (if used):
- No data
- Metabolic activation:
- not applicable
- Metabolic activation system:
- No data
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- 1. No data
2/3. 0, 100, 333, 1000, 2500 and 5000 µg/plate
4. 6 different concentrations were used; 5.0 mg/plate was the maximum concentration - Vehicle / solvent:
- 1. No data
2/3/4.
- Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: Dimethyl suphoxide (DMSO)
- Justification for choice of solvent/vehicle: The test chemical was soluble in DMSO - Untreated negative controls:
- not specified
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- not specified
- True negative controls:
- not specified
- Positive controls:
- not specified
- Positive control substance:
- not specified
- Remarks:
- 1. Target predicted data
- Untreated negative controls:
- not specified
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- DMSO
- True negative controls:
- not specified
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- 9-aminoacridine
- N-ethyl-N-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine
- Remarks:
- RA 2/3
- Untreated negative controls:
- not specified
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- DMSO
- True negative controls:
- not specified
- Positive controls:
- not specified
- Positive control substance:
- not specified
- Remarks:
- RA 4
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- 1. No data
2.
METHOD OF APPLICATION: in agar (plate incorporation)
- Cell density at seeding (if applicable): No data
DURATION
- Preincubation period: No data
- Exposure duration: 48 hrs
- Expression time (cells in growth medium): 48 hrs
- Selection time (if incubation with a selection agent): No data
- Fixation time (start of exposure up to fixation or harvest of cells): No data
SELECTION AGENT (mutation assays): No data
SPINDLE INHIBITOR (cytogenetic assays): No data
STAIN (for cytogenetic assays): Triplicate
METHODS OF SLIDE PREPARATION AND STAINING TECHNIQUE USED: No data
NUMBER OF CELLS EVALUATED: No data
NUMBER OF METAPHASE SPREADS ANALYSED PER DOSE (if in vitro cytogenicity study in mammalian cells): No data
CRITERIA FOR MICRONUCLEUS IDENTIFICATION: No data
DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY
- Method: mitotic index; cloning efficiency; relative total growth; other: No data
- Any supplementary information relevant to cytotoxicity: No data
OTHER EXAMINATIONS:
- Determination of polyploidy: No data
- Determination of endoreplication: No data
- Methods, such as kinetochore antibody binding, to characterize whether micronuclei contain whole or fragmented chromosomes (if applicable): No data
- OTHER: No data
3.
METHOD OF APPLICATION: preincubation
- Cell density at seeding (if applicable): No data
DURATION
- Preincubation period: 20 mins
- Exposure duration: 48 hrs
- Expression time (cells in growth medium): 48 hrs
- Selection time (if incubation with a selection agent): No data
- Fixation time (start of exposure up to fixation or harvest of cells): No data
SELECTION AGENT (mutation assays): No data
SPINDLE INHIBITOR (cytogenetic assays): No data
STAIN (for cytogenetic assays): No data
NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: Triplicate
METHODS OF SLIDE PREPARATION AND STAINING TECHNIQUE USED: No data
NUMBER OF CELLS EVALUATED: No data
NUMBER OF METAPHASE SPREADS ANALYSED PER DOSE (if in vitro cytogenicity study in mammalian cells): No data
CRITERIA FOR MICRONUCLEUS IDENTIFICATION: No data
DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY
- Method: mitotic index; cloning efficiency; relative total growth; other: No data
- Any supplementary information relevant to cytotoxicity: No data
OTHER EXAMINATIONS:
- Determination of polyploidy: No data
- Determination of endoreplication: No data
- Methods, such as kinetochore antibody binding, to characterize whether micronuclei contain whole or fragmented chromosomes (if applicable): No data
- OTHER: No data
4. METHOD OF APPLICATION: preincubation
DURATION
- Preincubation period: 20 mins
- Exposure duration: 48 hrs
- Expression time (cells in growth medium): 48 hrs
- Selection time (if incubation with a selection agent): No data
- Fixation time (start of exposure up to fixation or harvest of cells): No data
SELECTION AGENT (mutation assays): No data
SPINDLE INHIBITOR (cytogenetic assays): No data
STAIN (for cytogenetic assays): No data
NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: Duplicate
NUMBER OF CELLS EVALUATED: No data
DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY
- Method: mitotic index; cloning efficiency; relative total growth; other: No data
OTHER EXAMINATIONS:
- Determination of polyploidy: No data
- Determination of endoreplication: No data
- Other: No data
OTHER: No data - Rationale for test conditions:
- 1. No data
2/3. No data.
4. No data - Evaluation criteria:
- 1. Prediction was done considering a dose dependent increase in the number of revertants/plate
2/3. The test material may be considered positive in this test system if the following criteria are met :
The test material should have induced a reproducible, dose related and statistically(Dunnett’s method of linear regression) significant increase in the revertant count in at least one strain of bacteria.
4. The result was considered positive if the number of colonies found was twice the number in the control (exposed to the appropriate solvent or untreated). - Statistics:
- 1. No data
2/3. Dunnett’s method of linear regression
4. No data - Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium, other:
- Remarks:
- Target predicted data
- Metabolic activation:
- not specified
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- not specified
- Vehicle controls validity:
- not specified
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not specified
- Positive controls validity:
- not specified
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium, other: TA10, 98, 1535, 1537, 102
- Remarks:
- RA 2/3
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- not specified
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not specified
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium, other: TA92, TA1535, TA100, TA1537, TA94 and TA98
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- not specified
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not specified
- Positive controls validity:
- not specified
- Additional information on results:
- 1. No data
2/3. No data
4. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON CYTOTOXICITY: The maximum dose for negative results represents the highest non-cytotoxic dose used in the experiment - Remarks on result:
- no mutagenic potential (based on QSAR/QSPR prediction)
- Conclusions:
- Gene mutation toxicity study for 2-(N-ethylamino)-1-(4-methoxyphenil propane) as predicted using data from read across chemicals for Salmonella typhimurium bacterial strains in the presence and absence of S9 metabolic activation system is negative and hence the chemical is predicted to not classify as a gene mutant in vitro.
- Executive summary:
Gene mutation toxicity wad predicted for 2-(N-ethylamino)-1-(4-methoxyphenil propane) using data from structurally and functionally similar read across chemicals. The studies are as mentioned below:
Gene mutation toxicity was predicted for 2-(N-ethylamino)-1-(4-methoxyphenil propane) using the battery approach from Danish QSAR database (2018). The study assumed the use of Salmonella typhimurium bacteria in the Ames test. The end point for gene mutation has been modeled in the Danish QSAR using the three software systems Leadscope, CASE Ultra and SciQSAR. Based on predictions from these three systems, a fourth and overall battery prediction is made. The battery prediction is made using the so called Battery algorithm. With the battery approach it is in many cases possible to reduce “noise” from the individual model estimates and thereby improve accuracy and/or broaden the applicability domain. Gene mutation toxicity study as predicted by Danish QSAR for2-(N-ethylamino)-1-(4-methoxyphenil propane)is negative and hence the chemical is predicted to classify as a gene mutant in vitro.
Gene mutation toxicity study (Plate incorporation method) was performed to determine the mutagenic nature of the 60 -70% test chemical. The method was designed to meet the requirements of the OECD Guidelines for testing of the Chemicals No. 471 “Bacterial Reverse Mutation Test”, Method B13/14 of Commission Directive 2000/32/EC and the USA, EPA (TSCA) OPPTS harmonised guidelines. Salmonella typhimurium strains TA1535, TA1537, TA102, TA98 and TA100 were treated with the test material using both the Ames plate incorporation and pre-incubation methods at five dose levels, in triplicate, both with and without the addition of a rat liver homogenate metabolising system (10% liver S9 in standard co-factors). The dose range for the first experiment (plate incorporation) was determined in a preliminary toxicity assay and was 100 to 5000µg/plate. The experiment was repeated on a separate day using the same dose range as Experiment 1, fresh cultures of the bacterial strains and fresh test material formulations. The vehicle (dimethyl sulphoxide) control plates gave counts of revertant colonies within the normal range. All of the positive control chemicals used in the test induced marked increases in the frequency of revertant colonies, both with or without metabolic activation. Thus, the sensitivity of the assay and the efficacy of the S9-mix were validated. The test material caused no visible reduction in the growth of the bacterial background lawn at any dose level. The test material was, therefore, tested up to the maximum recommended dose level of 5000µg/plate. No test material precipitate was observed on the plates at any of the doses tested in either the presence or absence of S9-mix. No significant increases in the frequency of revertant colonies were recorded for any of the bacterial strains, with any dose of the test material, either with or without metabolic activation. Based on the observations made, the test chemical was considered to be non mutagenic to Salmonella typhimurium strains TA1535, TA1537, TA102, TA98 and TA100 with and without metabolic activation in the Plate incorporation assay and hence is likely to be non-mutagenic.
In the same study, gene mutation toxicity study (Pre-incubation method) was also performed to determine the mutagenic nature of the 60 -70% test chemical . The method was designed to meet the requirements of the OECD Guidelines for testing of the Chemicals No. 471 “Bacterial Reverse Mutation Test”, Method B13/14 of Commission Directive 2000/32/EC and the USA, EPA (TSCA) OPPTS harmonised guidelines. Salmonella typhimurium strains TA1535, TA1537, TA102, TA98 and TA100 were treated with the test material using both the Ames plate incorporation and pre-incubation methods at five dose levels, in triplicate, both with and without the addition of a rat liver homogenate metabolising system (10% liver S9 in standard co-factors). The dose range for the first experiment (plate incorporation) was determined in a preliminary toxicity assay and was 100 to 5000µg/plate. The experiment was repeated on a separate day using the same dose range as Experiment 1, fresh cultures of the bacterial strains and fresh test material formulations. The pre-incubation modification was employed for the second experiment. The vehicle (dimethyl sulphoxide) control plates gave counts of revertant colonies within the normal range. All of the positive control chemicals used in the test induced marked increases in the frequency of revertant colonies, both with or without metabolic activation. Thus, the sensitivity of the assay and the efficacy of the S9-mix were validated. The test material caused no visible reduction in the growth of the bacterial background lawn at any dose level. The test material was, therefore, tested up to the maximum recommended dose level of 5000µg/plate. No test material precipitate was observed on the plates at any of the doses tested in either the presence or absence of S9-mix. No significant increases in the frequency of revertant colonies were recorded for any of the bacterial strains, with any dose of the test material, either with or without metabolic activation. Based on the observations made, the test chemical was considered to be non mutagenic to Salmonella typhimurium strains TA1535, TA1537, TA102, TA98 and TA100 with and without metabolic activation in the pre-incubation assay and hence is likely to be non-mutagenic.
Gene mutation toxicity study was also performed to determine the mutagenic nature of another 50 -60% test chemical. The study was performed using S. typhimurium strains TA92, TA1535, TA100, TA1537, TA94 and TA98 with and without S9 metabolic activation system. The test was performed as per the preincubation assay at six different concentrations with 5.0 mg/plate being the maximum concentration. The chemical was dissolved in DMSO. Preincubation was performed for 20 mins and the exposure duration was for 48 hrs. The result was considered positive if the number of colonies found was twice the number in the control (exposed to the appropriate solvent or untreated). The test chemical did not induce a doubling of revertant colonies over the control using S. typhimurium strains TA92, TA1535, TA100, TA1537, TA94 and TA98 in the presence and absence of S9 metabolic activation system and hence the chemical is not likely to classify as a gene mutant in vitro.
Based on the predicted data available for the target chemical and data from its structurally and functionally similar read across chemicals, 2-(N-ethylamino)-1-(4-methoxyphenil propane) (CAS no 14367 -46 -5) does not exhibit gene mutation in vitro. Hence the test chemical is not likely to classify as a gene mutant as per the criteria mentioned in CLP regulation.
Reference
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (negative)
Genetic toxicity in vivo
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Additional information
Genetic toxicity in vitro:
Prediction model based estimation for the target chemical and data from read across chemicals have been reviewed to determine the mutagenic nature of 2-(N-ethylamino)-1-(4-methoxyphenil propane) (CAS no 14367 -46 -5). The studies are as mentioned below:
Gene mutation toxicity was predicted for 2-(N-ethylamino)-1-(4-methoxyphenil propane) using the battery approach from Danish QSAR database (2018). The study assumed the use of Salmonella typhimurium bacteria in the Ames test. The end point for gene mutation has been modeled in the Danish QSAR using the three software systems Leadscope, CASE Ultra and SciQSAR. Based on predictions from these three systems, a fourth and overall battery prediction is made. The battery prediction is made using the so called Battery algorithm. With the battery approach it is in many cases possible to reduce “noise” from the individual model estimates and thereby improve accuracy and/or broaden the applicability domain. Gene mutation toxicity study as predicted by Danish QSAR for2-(N-ethylamino)-1-(4-methoxyphenil propane)is negative and hence the chemical is predicted to classify as a gene mutant in vitro.
Gene mutation toxicity study (Plate incorporation method) was performed to determine the mutagenic nature of the 60 -70% test chemical. The method was designed to meet the requirements of the OECD Guidelines for testing of the Chemicals No. 471 “Bacterial Reverse Mutation Test”, Method B13/14 of Commission Directive 2000/32/EC and the USA, EPA (TSCA) OPPTS harmonised guidelines. Salmonella typhimurium strains TA1535, TA1537, TA102, TA98 and TA100 were treated with the test material using both the Ames plate incorporation and pre-incubation methods at five dose levels, in triplicate, both with and without the addition of a rat liver homogenate metabolising system (10% liver S9 in standard co-factors). The dose range for the first experiment (plate incorporation) was determined in a preliminary toxicity assay and was 100 to 5000µg/plate. The experiment was repeated on a separate day using the same dose range as Experiment 1, fresh cultures of the bacterial strains and fresh test material formulations. The vehicle (dimethyl sulphoxide) control plates gave counts of revertant colonies within the normal range. All of the positive control chemicals used in the test induced marked increases in the frequency of revertant colonies, both with or without metabolic activation. Thus, the sensitivity of the assay and the efficacy of the S9-mix were validated. The test material caused no visible reduction in the growth of the bacterial background lawn at any dose level. The test material was, therefore, tested up to the maximum recommended dose level of 5000µg/plate. No test material precipitate was observed on the plates at any of the doses tested in either the presence or absence of S9-mix. No significant increases in the frequency of revertant colonies were recorded for any of the bacterial strains, with any dose of the test material, either with or without metabolic activation. Based on the observations made, the test chemical was considered to be non mutagenic to Salmonella typhimurium strains TA1535, TA1537, TA102, TA98 and TA100 with and without metabolic activation in the Plate incorporation assay and hence is likely to be non-mutagenic.
In the same study, gene mutation toxicity study (Pre-incubation method) was also performed to determine the mutagenic nature of the 60 -70% test chemical . The method was designed to meet the requirements of the OECD Guidelines for testing of the Chemicals No. 471 “Bacterial Reverse Mutation Test”, Method B13/14 of Commission Directive 2000/32/EC and the USA, EPA (TSCA) OPPTS harmonised guidelines. Salmonella typhimurium strains TA1535, TA1537, TA102, TA98 and TA100 were treated with the test material using both the Ames plate incorporation and pre-incubation methods at five dose levels, in triplicate, both with and without the addition of a rat liver homogenate metabolising system (10% liver S9 in standard co-factors). The dose range for the first experiment (plate incorporation) was determined in a preliminary toxicity assay and was 100 to 5000µg/plate. The experiment was repeated on a separate day using the same dose range as Experiment 1, fresh cultures of the bacterial strains and fresh test material formulations. The pre-incubation modification was employed for the second experiment. The vehicle (dimethyl sulphoxide) control plates gave counts of revertant colonies within the normal range. All of the positive control chemicals used in the test induced marked increases in the frequency of revertant colonies, both with or without metabolic activation. Thus, the sensitivity of the assay and the efficacy of the S9-mix were validated. The test material caused no visible reduction in the growth of the bacterial background lawn at any dose level. The test material was, therefore, tested up to the maximum recommended dose level of 5000µg/plate. No test material precipitate was observed on the plates at any of the doses tested in either the presence or absence of S9-mix. No significant increases in the frequency of revertant colonies were recorded for any of the bacterial strains, with any dose of the test material, either with or without metabolic activation. Based on the observations made, the test chemical was considered to be non mutagenic to Salmonella typhimurium strains TA1535, TA1537, TA102, TA98 and TA100 with and without metabolic activation in the pre-incubation assay and hence is likely to be non-mutagenic.
Gene mutation toxicity study was also performed to determine the mutagenic nature of another 50 -60% test chemical. The study was performed using S. typhimurium strains TA92, TA1535, TA100, TA1537, TA94 and TA98 with and without S9 metabolic activation system. The test was performed as per the preincubation assay at six different concentrations with 5.0 mg/plate being the maximum concentration. The chemical was dissolved in DMSO. Preincubation was performed for 20 mins and the exposure duration was for 48 hrs. The result was considered positive if the number of colonies found was twice the number in the control (exposed to the appropriate solvent or untreated). The test chemical did not induce a doubling of revertant colonies over the control using S. typhimurium strains TA92, TA1535, TA100, TA1537, TA94 and TA98 in the presence and absence of S9 metabolic activation system and hence the chemical is not likely to classify as a gene mutant in vitro.
Based on the predicted data available for the target chemical and data from its structurally and functionally similar read across chemicals, 2-(N-ethylamino)-1-(4-methoxyphenil propane) (CAS no 14367 -46 -5) does not exhibit gene mutation in vitro. Hence the test chemical is not likely to classify as a gene mutant as per the criteria mentioned in CLP regulation.
Justification for classification or non-classification
Based on the data available for the target chemical and its read across, 2-(N-ethylamino)-1-(4-methoxyphenil propane) (CAS no 14367 -46 -5) does not exhibit gene mutation in vitro. Hence the test chemical is not likely to classify as a gene mutant as per the criteria mentioned in CLP regulation.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.