Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 701-203-3 | CAS number: -
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Genetic toxicity: in vitro
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in mammalian cells
- Remarks:
- Type of genotoxicity: gene mutation
- Type of information:
- migrated information: read-across from supporting substance (structural analogue or surrogate)
- Adequacy of study:
- weight of evidence
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: see 'Remark'
- Remarks:
- GLP - Guideline study, tested with the source substance Sorbitan monolaurate, ethoxylated, < 2.5 EO (CAS 9005-64-5). According to the ECHA guidance document “Practical guide 6: How to report read-across and categories (March 2010)”, the reliability was changed from RL1 to RL2 to reflect the fact that this study was conducted on a read-across substance.
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 2 012
Materials and methods
Test guidelineopen allclose all
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 476 (In Vitro Mammalian Cell Gene Mutation Test)
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method B.17 (Mutagenicity - In Vitro Mammalian Cell Gene Mutation Test)
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Type of assay:
- mammalian cell gene mutation assay
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- Sorbitan monolaurate, ethoxylated
- EC Number:
- 500-018-3
- EC Name:
- Sorbitan monolaurate, ethoxylated
- Cas Number:
- 9005-64-5
- Molecular formula:
- Molecular formula cannot be given as substance is a mixture.
- IUPAC Name:
- Sorbitan monolaurate, ethoxylated (1-6.5 moles ethoxylated)
- Test material form:
- liquid: viscous
- Details on test material:
- - Name of test material: PC-2012-412
- Molecular formula: UVCB
- Physical state: yellow viscous liquid
- Analytical purity: 100%
- Batch No.: ES61C86614
- Expiration date of the batch: 05 January 2014
- Storage condition of test material: at room temperature in the dark
Constituent 1
Method
- Target gene:
- TK locus
Species / strain
- Species / strain / cell type:
- mouse lymphoma L5178Y cells
- Details on mammalian cell type (if applicable):
- - Type and identity of media:
Basic medium
RPMI 1640 Hepes buffered medium containing penicillin/streptomycin (50 U/mL and 50 μg/mL, respectively), 1 mM sodium pyruvate and 2 mM L-glutamin.
Growth medium
Basic medium, supplemented with 10% (v/v) heat-inactivated horse serum.
Exposure medium
For 3 hour exposure:
Cells were exposed to the test substance in basic medium supplemented with 5% (v/v) heat-inactivated horse serum.
For 24 hour exposure:
Cells were exposed to the test substance in basic medium supplemented with 10% (v/v) heat-inactivated horse serum.
Selective medium
Selective medium consisted of basic medium supplemented with 20% (v/v) heat-inactivated horse serum (total amount of serum = 20%, R20) and 5 µg/mL trifluorothymidine (TFT).
Non-selective medium
Non-selective medium consisted of basic medium supplemented with 20% (v/v) heat-inactivated horse serum (total amount of serum = 20%, R20).
- Properly maintained: yes
- Periodically checked for Mycoplasma contamination: yes
- Periodically "cleansed" against high spontaneous background: yes
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- co-factor supplemented post-mitochondrial fraction (S9 mix), prepared from the livers of rats treated with phenobarbital and ß-naphthoflavone
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- First experiment:
Without S9-mix: 0.3, 1, 3, 10, 33, 100, 125, 150, 175, 200, 225, 250 and 275 μg/mL (analysed concentrations: 0.3, 1, 3, 10, 33, 100 and 125 μg/mL)
With 8% (v/v) S9-mix: 0.3, 1, 3, 10, 33, 100, 200 and 300 μg/mL
Second experiment:
Without S9-mix: 0.3, 1, 3, 10, 33, 66, 100, 110, 120, 130, 140 and 150 µg/mL (analysed concentrations: 0.3, 3, 10, 33, 100, 150 and 190 μg/mL)
With 12% (v/v) S9-mix: 0.3, 1, 3, 10, 33, 100, 200, 300 and 350 μg/mL - Vehicle / solvent:
- - Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: ethanol (test substance), Hanks’ balanced salt solution (positive controls)
Controls
- Untreated negative controls:
- no
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- cyclophosphamide
- methylmethanesulfonate
- Remarks:
- -S9: methylmethansulfonate (15 and 5 μg/mL for the 3 and 24 hours treatment period, respectively); +S9: cyclophosphamide (10 µg/mL)
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- METHOD OF APPLICATION: in medium
DURATION
- Exposure duration: 3 h (first experiment), 3 and 24h (second experiment)
- Selection time (if incubation with a selection agent): 48h
- Fixation time (start of exposure up to fixation or harvest of cells): after 3 to 4 days, depending on exposure
SELECTION AGENT (mutation assays): 5 µg/mL trifluorothymidine (TFT)
NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: two independent experiments
NUMBER OF CELLS EVALUATED: 10E+006 cells
DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY
- Method: cloning efficiency; relative total growth; relative survival - Evaluation criteria:
- Acceptability of the assay
A mutation assay was considered acceptable if it met the following criteria:
a) The absolute cloning efficiency of the solvent controls was between 65 and 120%. An acceptable number of surviving cells could be analysed for expression of the TK mutation.
b) The spontaneous mutation frequency in the solvent control is ≥ 50 per 10E+006 survivors and ≤ 170 per 10E+006 survivors.
c) The growth rate (GR) over the 2-day expression period for the negative controls should be between 8 and 32 (3 hours treatment) and between 32-180 (24 hours treatment).
d) The mutation frequency of methylmethanesulfonate should not be below 500 per 10E+006 survivors, and for cyclophosphamide not below 700 per 106 survivors.
Data evaluation and statistical procedures
In addition to the statistical criteria, any increase of the mutation frequency should be evaluated for its biological relevance including a comparison of the results with the historical control data range.
A test substance is considered positive (mutagenic) in the mutation assay if it induces a mutation frequency (MF) of more than MF(controls) + 126 in a dose-dependent manner. An observed increase should be biologically relevant and will be compared with the historical control data range.
A test substance is considered equivocal (questionable) in the mutation assay if no clear conclusion for positive or negative result can be made after an additional confirmation study.
A test substance is considered negative (not mutagenic) in the mutation assay if:
a) None of the tested concentrations reached a mutation frequency of MF(controls) + 126.
b) The results are confirmed in an independently repeated test. - Statistics:
- The global evaluation factor (GEF) has been defined by the IWGT as the mean of the negative/solvent MF distribution plus one standard deviation. For the micro well version of the assay the GEF is 126.
Results and discussion
Test results
- Species / strain:
- mouse lymphoma L5178Y cells
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity, but tested up to precipitating concentrations
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not examined
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- TEST-SPECIFIC CONFOUNDING FACTORS
- Precipitation: The test substance precipitated in the exposure medium at concentrations of 100 μg/mL and above.
RANGE-FINDING/SCREENING STUDIES:
In order to select appropriate dose levels for mutagenicity testing, cytotoxicity data were obtained by treating 8 x 10E+006 cells (10E+006 cells/mL for 3 hours treatment) or 5 x 10E+006 cells (1.25 x 10E+005 cells/mL for 24 hours treatment) with different test substance concentrations increasing with approximately half log steps. Since the test substance was poorly soluble in exposure medium, the highest tested concentration was 2500 μg/mL exposure medium. Cell cultures were exposed to the test substance in exposure medium for 3 hours in the presence of S9-mix and for 3 and 24 hours in the absence of S9-mix. For determination of the cytotoxicity, the surviving cells of the 3 hours treatment were subcultured twice. After 24 hours of subculturing, the cells were counted and subcultured again for another 24 hours before the cells were counted. The surviving cells of the 24 hours treatment were subcultured once. After 24 hours of subculturing, the cells were counted. If less than 1.25 x 10E+005 cells/mL were counted no subculture was performed.
The suspension growth expressed as the reduction in cell growth after approximately 24 and 48 hours or only 24 hours cell growth, compared to the cell growth of the solvent control, was used to determine an appropriate dose range for the mutagenicity tests. - Remarks on result:
- other: all strains/cell types tested
- Remarks:
- Migrated from field 'Test system'.
Any other information on results incl. tables
Table 1: Experiment I - 3 h exposure - Without Metabolic Activation
Concentration |
Cloning efficiency [%] |
Relative Total Growth [%] |
Mutants per 1E+06 surviving cells |
Mutation factor |
0 (Ethanol) |
101 |
100 |
56 |
1 |
0.3 |
79 |
83 |
67 |
1.20 |
1 |
98 |
108 |
50 |
0.89 |
3 |
93 |
112 |
54 |
0.96 |
10 |
97 |
110 |
49 |
0.88 |
33 |
84 |
83 |
64 |
1.14 |
100* |
104 |
95 |
47 |
0.84 |
125* |
93 |
53 |
46 |
0.82 |
MMS, 15 |
77 |
62 |
811 |
14.48 |
MMS: methylmethanesulfonate
*: precipitation
Table 2: Experiment I - 3 h exposure - With Metabolic Activation (8% S9)
Concentration |
Cloning efficiency [%] |
Relative Total Growth [%] |
Mutants per 1E+06 surviving cells |
Mutation factor |
0 (DMSO) |
100 |
100 |
59 |
1 |
0.3 |
111 |
93 |
80 |
1.36 |
1 |
88 |
67 |
79 |
1.34 |
3 |
98 |
82 |
93 |
1.58 |
10 |
80 |
79 |
88 |
1.49 |
33 |
95 |
71 |
84 |
1.42 |
100* |
95 |
71 |
100 |
1.69 |
300* |
139 |
52 |
127 |
2.15 |
CP, 10 |
50 |
26 |
1165 |
19.75 |
CP: cyclophosphamide
*: precipitation
Table 3: Experiment II - 24 h exposure - Without Metabolic Activation
Concentration |
Cloning efficiency [%] |
Relative Total Growth [%] |
Mutants per 1E+06 surviving cells |
Mutation factor |
0 (Ethanol) |
100 |
100 |
53 |
1 |
0.3 |
101 |
114 |
93 |
1.75 |
3 |
101 |
102 |
81 |
1.53 |
10 |
81 |
80 |
100 |
1.89 |
33 |
118 |
90 |
66 |
1.25 |
100* |
118 |
67 |
71 |
1.34 |
150* |
95 |
53 |
85 |
1.60 |
190* |
121 |
40 |
88 |
1.66 |
MMS, 5 |
86 |
65 |
840 |
15.85 |
MMS: methylmethanesulfonate
*: precipitation
Table 4: Experiment II - 3 h exposure - With Metabolic Activation
Concentration |
Cloning efficiency [%] |
Relative Total Growth [%] |
Mutants per 1E+06 surviving cells |
Mutation factor |
0 (DMSO) |
100 |
100 |
85 |
1 |
0.3 |
99 |
122 |
80 |
0.94 |
3 |
89 |
99 |
50 |
0.59 |
10 |
93 |
101 |
81 |
0.95 |
33 |
90 |
101 |
100 |
1.18 |
100* |
70 |
66 |
102 |
1.2 |
200* |
83 |
82 |
91 |
1.07 |
300* |
102 |
94 |
77 |
0.91 |
350* |
75 |
66 |
114 |
1.34 |
CP, 10 |
48 |
31 |
1093 |
12.86 |
CP: cyclophosphamide
*: precipitation
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- Interpretation of results (migrated information):
negative
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.