Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Link to relevant study record(s)

Reference
Endpoint:
oxidising solids
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
2012
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: Follows EU Method A.17 (Oxidizing properties)
Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
reference to same study
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
EU Method A.17 (Oxidising Properties (Solids))
Version / remarks:
These deviations do not have any impact on the results
Deviations:
yes
Remarks:
1) Due to the agglomeration of the powder, the test item was sieved at 500 μm instead of 125 μm. 2) No intermediate weighing was made during the cellulose drying procedure. However, cellulose was dried at a mean temperature of 106 °C during 5 days.
Principles of method if other than guideline:
Deviations
No. 1: Due to the agglomerationof the powder, the test item was sieved at 500 µm instead of 125µm.
No. 2: No intermediate weighing was made during the cellulose drying procedure. However, cellulose was dried at a mean temperature of 108 °C du ring 5 days.
GLP compliance:
yes
Remarks:
certificate in study report
Contact with:
powdered cellulose
Sample tested:
test mixture (not specified)
Remarks:
migrated information
Parameter:
maximum burning rate
Result:
< 3.39 other: mm/s (migrated information)
Sample tested:
reference mixture (not specified)
Remarks:
migrated information
Parameter:
maximum burning rate
Result:
< 3.92 other: mm/s (migrated information)
Interpretation of results:
other: no oxidising properties
Remarks:
Migrated information
Conclusions:

The maximum burning rate obtained with the test item was:

3.39 mm/s for the test item / cellulose mixture (10/90%).

The maximum burning rate obtained with the reference item was:

3.92 mm/s for the reference item / cellulose mixture (50/50%).

The maximum burning rate of test item / cellulose mixture was slower than the maximum burning rate with reference item / cellulose mixture.


The test item was not considered to have oxidizing properties under the experimental conditions used.
Executive summary:

In compliance with

Commission Directive 92/69/EEC, Commission Regulation (EC) No. 440/2008
EC A17 Method (2008)

 

Preliminary test

 Inflammation and combustion were observed during 3 minutes 40 seconds.

 

Train test

 The maximum burning rate obtained with the test item was:

 3.39 mm/s for the test item / cellulose mixture (10/90%).

 

The maximum burning rate obtained with the reference item was:

 3.92mm/s for the reference item / cellulose mixture (50/50%).

 

The maximum burning rate of test item / cellulose mixture was slowerthan the maximum burning rate with reference item / cellulose mixture.

 

 The test item wasnot considered to have oxidizing properties under the experimental conditions used.

Description of key information

In compliance with Commission Directive 92/69/EEC, Commission Regulation (EC) No. 440/2008 

EC A17 Method (2008)

The maximum burning rate obtained with the test item was:

 3.39 mm/s for the test item / cellulose mixture (10/90%).

 

The maximum burning rate obtained with the reference item was:

 3.92mm/s for the reference item / cellulose mixture (50/50%).

 

The maximum burning rate of test item / cellulose mixture was slower than the maximum burning rate with reference item / cellulose mixture.

 

 The test item was not considered to have oxidizing properties under the experimental conditions used.

Key value for chemical safety assessment

Oxidising properties:
non oxidising

Additional information

Justification for classification or non-classification