Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 203-470-7 | CAS number: 107-18-6
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Description of key information
For the endpoint skin sensitization three different, scientifically valid QSAR models were applied within a weight-of-evidence approach.
Profiling (OECD QSAR Toolbox)
As a first step, profiling with the OECD QSAR Toolbox (version 4.0) was performed. Since protein-binding is a crucial step for a molecule to elicit skin sensitisation as described in the ‘Adverse Outcome Pathway for skin sensitisation’ (OECD, 2014), profilers detecting structural alerts for protein-binding have been analysed. This allows an initial assessment of skin sensitising potential. Six profilers for protein-binding (one endpoint-specific profiler and five general profilers) were analysed. No structural alert associated with protein-binding was detected by any of the six profilers. This provides evidence that no skin sensitising potential can be expected for Allyl alcohol.
Read-across (OECD QSAR Toolbox)
Read-across on Allyl alcohol was performed with the OECD QSAR Toolbox (version 4.0). In this read-across Allyl alcohol was predicted negative. The descriptor used in this category approach is the partition coefficient log KoW. The target chemical Allyl alcohol has a calculated log KoW value of 0.21 (calculated by Epiwin, which is implemented in the Toolbox). With this value the target substance builds the lower limit of the category. Therefore, it is classified to lie outside of the applicability domain of this model. The estimation of a value for a member of a category that is near or at the category boundary using measured values from internal category members is defined as "extrapolation" in the ‘ECHA Guidance on information requirements and chemical safety assessment Chapter R.6: QSARs and grouping of chemicals, 2008’. Although interpolation between category members is preferred to extrapolation, extrapolation is also advised as a possible approach to fill data-gaps in a read-across (ECHA Guidance on information requirements and chemical safety assessment Chapter R.6: QSARs and grouping of chemicals, 2008). Therefore, this prediction is accepted within the frame of a weight-of-evidence approach. It provides evidence that Allyl alcohol is not sensitizing. This prediction is in concordance with a negative sensitisation result derived from an experimental GMPT study (OECD 406) conducted with the registered substance Allyl alcohol (prop-2 -en-1 -ol, CAS 107 -18 -6), as provided by the OECD QSAR Toolbox.
QSAR (CAESAR 2.1.6 provided by VEGA)
To provide further evidence, skin sensitisation of Allyl alcohol was predicted with the Skin Sensitization model CAESAR 2.1.6, which is implemented in the QSAR tool VEGA (version 1.1.4.). Allyl alcohol is predicted to be "non sensitiser". This prediction is reliable and lies within the applicability domain of the model. This gives strong evidence that Allyl alcohol is not sensitising.
QSAR (MultiCASE CASE Ultra commercial model A33)
Finally the Skin Sensitization model CASE Ultra was used to predict the skin sensitisation of Allyl alcohol. Allyl alcohol is predicted to be "non sensitiser". This prediction is reliable and lies within the applicability domain of the model. This gives strong evidence that Allyl alcohol is not sensitising.
Conclusion
The predictions of the applied silico methods are consistent, reliable and are in line with a mechanistic understanding of the Adverse Outcome Pathway of skin sensitisation. As a conclusion, Allyl alcohol is not sensitising. These predictions are also in line with a negative sensitisation result derived from an experimental GMPT study (OECD 406) conducted with the registered substance Allyl alcohol, as provided by the OECD QSAR Toolbox.
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Skin sensitisation
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- skin sensitisation, other
- Remarks:
- QSAR prediction for skin sensitisation (CAESAR)
- Type of information:
- (Q)SAR
- Adequacy of study:
- weight of evidence
- Study period:
- 2017-09-05
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- results derived from a valid (Q)SAR model and falling into its applicability domain, with adequate and reliable documentation / justification
- Justification for type of information:
- Please refer to the OPRF and QMRF report attached in section Attached Justification.
- Guideline:
- other: REACH Guidance on QSARs R.6
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- Skin sensitisation of Allyl alcohol was predicted with CAESAR model implemented in the VEGA tool.
- Parameter:
- other: QSAR
- Remarks on result:
- no indication of skin sensitisation
- Remarks:
- Allyl alcohol is predicted 'negative'.
- Conclusions:
- Allyl alcohol is not sensitising.
- Executive summary:
Skin sensitisation of Allyl alcohol was predicted with the Skin Sensitization model CAESAR 2.1.6, which is implemented in the QSAR tool VEGA (version 1.1.4.). Allyl alcohol is predicted to be "non sensitiser". This prediction is reliable, it is generated by a scientifically valid model and lies within the applicability domain (please refer also to the QPRF and QMRF attached in the section 'Attached Justification').
- Endpoint:
- skin sensitisation, other
- Remarks:
- QSAR: read-across performed with the OECD QSAR Toolbox
- Type of information:
- (Q)SAR
- Adequacy of study:
- weight of evidence
- Study period:
- 2017-09-05
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- results derived from a valid (Q)SAR model, but not (completely) falling into its applicability domain, with adequate and reliable documentation / justification
- Justification for type of information:
- 1. SOFTWARE
OECD QSAR Toolbox
2. MODEL (incl. version number)
version 4.0
3. SMILES OR OTHER IDENTIFIERS USED AS INPUT FOR THE MODEL
CAS: 107-18-6
4. SCIENTIFIC VALIDITY OF THE (Q)SAR MODEL
Please refer to the attached QPRF report
5. APPLICABILITY DOMAIN
Please refer to the attached QPRF report
6. ADEQUACY OF THE RESULT
Please refer to the attached QPRF report - Guideline:
- other: REACH Guidance on QSARs R.6
- Version / remarks:
- Read-across was performed with the QSAR Toolbox 4.0
- Parameter:
- other: QSAR
- Remarks on result:
- no indication of skin sensitisation
- Remarks:
- Allyl alcohol is predicted 'negative'
- Conclusions:
- There is great evidence that Allyl alcohol is not sensitising.
- Executive summary:
Read-across on Allyl alcohol was performed with the OECD QSAR Toolbox (version 4.0). In this read-across Allyl alcohol is predicted negative (please refer to the attached QPRF in Section Attached Justification). The descriptor used in this category approach is the partition coefficient log KoW. The target chemical Allyl alcohol has a calculated log KoW value of 0.21. With this value it builds the lower limit of the category. Therefore, it is classified to lie outside of the applicability domain of this model. The estimation of a value for a member of a category that is near or at the category boundary using measured values from internal category members is defined as "extrapolation" in the "ECHA Guidance on information requirements and chemical safety assessment Chapter R.6: QSARs and grouping of chemicals". Although interpolation is preferred to extrapolation between category members, extrapolation is also a possible approach to fill data-gaps in a read-across (ECHA Guidance on information requirements and chemical safety assessment Chapter R.6: QSARs and grouping of chemicals). Therefore, this prediction is accepted within the frame of a weight of evidence approach. It provides strong evidence that Allyl alcohol is not sensitizing. Importantly, this prediction is in concordance with a negative sensitisation result derived from an experimental GMPT study conducted with the registered substance Allyl alcohol (prop-2 -en-1 -ol, CAS 107 -18 -6), as provided by the OECD QSAR Toolbox.
- Endpoint:
- skin sensitisation, other
- Remarks:
- SAR-Profiling of structural alerts for skin sensitisation (OECD QSAR Toolbox)
- Type of information:
- (Q)SAR
- Adequacy of study:
- weight of evidence
- Study period:
- 2017-09-05
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- results derived from a (Q)SAR model, with limited documentation / justification, but validity of model and reliability of prediction considered adequate based on a generally acknowledged source
- Justification for type of information:
- 1. SOFTWARE
OECD QSAR Toolbox
2. MODEL (incl. version number)
version 4.0
3. SMILES OR OTHER IDENTIFIERS USED AS INPUT FOR THE MODEL
CAS: 107-18-6
4. SCIENTIFIC VALIDITY OF THE (Q)SAR MODEL
Name of profilers:
Protein binding alerts for skin sensitization by OASIS v1.4
Protein binding alerts by OASIS v1.4
Protein binding alerts by OECD
Protein binding potency Cys (DPRA 13%)
Protein binding potency Lys (DPRA 13%)
Protein binding potency
5. APPLICABILITY DOMAIN
The aim of these profilere is to investigate the presence of alerts within the target molecules responsible for interaction or covalent bindings with proteins. For detailed information, please refer to the attached reports about the specific profilers.
6. ADEQUACY OF THE RESULT
These profiling results are used in a weight-of-evidenc approach to assess the skin sensitising potential of allyl alcohol. The selected profilers detect structural alerts, which are associated with the potential to bind to or interact with proteins. The binding to skin proteins is the first step of the Adverse Outcome Pathway for skin sensitisation. Binding to skin proteins is essentiel to induce a specific memory T-cell response associated with skin sensitisation. - Guideline:
- other: REACH Guidance on QSARs R.6
- Version / remarks:
- Profiling was performed with the QSAR Toolbox Version 4.0
- Parameter:
- other: Profiling
- Remarks on result:
- no indication of skin sensitisation
- Conclusions:
- The profiling results of Allyl alcohol in the OECD QSAR Toolbox revealed that no structural alert associated with binding to proteins was detected. Binding of skin proteins is the first essentiel step to elicit skin sensitisation. Therefore, the fact that six different profilers do not detect any structural alert associated with protein-binding, provides evidence that no skin sensitising potential can be expected for Allyl alcohol.
- Executive summary:
Allyl alcohol has been profiled with the OECD QSAR Toolbox, version 4.0. The relevant profilers associated with the Adverse Outcome Pathway of skin sensitisation are evaluated. The profiling results of Allyl alcohol in the OECD QSAR Toolbox revealed that no structural alert associated with binding to proteins was detected. Binding of skin proteins is the first essentiel step to elicit skin sensitisation. Therefore, the fact that six different profilers do not detect any structural alert associated with protein-binding, provides evidence that no skin sensitising potential can be expected for Allyl alcohol.
- Endpoint:
- skin sensitisation, other
- Remarks:
- QSAR prediction for skin sensitisation (CASE Ultra)
- Type of information:
- (Q)SAR
- Adequacy of study:
- weight of evidence
- Study period:
- 2017-09-05
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- results derived from a valid (Q)SAR model and falling into its applicability domain, with adequate and reliable documentation / justification
- Justification for type of information:
- Please refer to the OPRF and QMRF report attached in section 'Attached Justification'.
- Guideline:
- other: REACH Guidance on QSARs R.6
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- A prediction was performed with the QSAR model CASE Ultra.
- Parameter:
- other: QSAR
- Remarks on result:
- no indication of skin sensitisation
- Remarks:
- Allyl alcohol is predicted 'negative'
- Conclusions:
- Allyl alcohol is not sensitising.
- Executive summary:
Skin sensitisation of Allyl alcohol was predicted with the Skin Sensitization model CASE Ultra, which is implemented in the 'Danish QSAR Database'. Allyl alcohol is predicted to be "non sensitiser". This prediction is reliable, it was generated by a scientifically valid model and lies within the applicability domain (please refer also to the QPRF and QMRF attached in the section 'Attached Justification').
Referenceopen allclose all
Allyl alcohol is predicted to be a non-sensitiser by the skin sensitization model CAESAR.
No structural alert for protein-binding was detected by any of the six relevant profilers.
Allyl alcohol is predicted to be a non-sensitiser by the skin sensitization model CASE Ultra.
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (not sensitising)
Respiratory sensitisation
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Justification for classification or non-classification
Allyl alcohol is not classified as a skin sensitiser according to Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008, because there is no evidence for a skin sensitising mode of action. This is underlined by three scientifically valid QSAR models making the consistent prediction that Allyl alcohol is not sensitising.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.