Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 606-172-9 | CAS number: 1893-33-0
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Additional information
Ames test
Gene mutation as microbialin vitroSalmonella of the target Pipamperone was estimated by using four predictors: Leadscope, ACD/Percepta, Vega and Toxtree decision rule system.
The four predictors were employed in order to apply a weight of evidence (WoE) approach to enhance the reliability of the prediction. In the weight of evidence assessment only reliable predictions are to be taken into account. In the case of Pipamperone, ACD/Percepta and Toxtree predictions were not taken into account in the weight of evidence prediction, being undefined and not reliable, respectively. The other two predictors, i.e. Leadscope and Vega, were in agreement providing a negative prediction although with a different level of confidence (borderline Leadscope; high Vega). Therefore, it was concluded that Pipamperone was predicted with a high level of confidence as negative formicrobial in vitroSalmonella.
Chromosome aberrationin vitrocomposite
ACD/Percepta model for chromosome aberrationin vitro(composite) estimates probability (“p-value”) that a compound will result positive in the chromosome aberrationin vivoassay.
ACD/Percepta prediction resulted to be negative, and the prediction was assessed as moderate reliable being the reliability index equal to 0.53. ACD/Percepta displays up to 5 most structurally similar structures from the training set along with their experimental test results. The information on the structurally similar compounds in the training set was used to further assess the reliability of the prediction. Five compounds were identified as analogues of Pipamperone. These training compounds exhibit moderate to high similarity with respect to Pipamperone (similarity index ranging from 0.64 to 1) and four out of the five analogues exhibit experimental negative chromosome aberrationin vitrotest results. It has to be noted that among the analogues, the target itself was identified in the training set of the model with an experimental negative test result.These considerations further supported the reliability of the prediction.
Micronucleus in vivorodent
Genotoxicity asmicronucleusin vivoon rodent predictions were generated employing three predictors: ACD/Percepta, Leadscope Model Applier and Toxtree decision rule system.
In the weight of evidence assessment only reliable predictions are to be taken into account. In the case of Pipamperone, the weight of evidence assessment was based only on Toxtree prediction and lead to a positive borderline reliable prediction for genotoxicity asmicronucleusin vivoon rodent.
Justification for selection of genetic toxicity endpoint
In silco prediction
Short description of key information:
Four predictors were used: ACD/Percepta, Leadscope, Vega and Toxtree decision rule system.
Endpoint Conclusion: No adverse effect observed (negative)
Justification for classification or non-classification
Based on the weight of evidence assessments Pipamperone was predicted as negative for microbial in vitroSalmonella (Ames test) (high reliable), negative for chromosome aberration in vitro composite (moderate reliable), and positive for micronucleus in vivo on rodent (borderline reliable). Taking into account the higher reliability of microbial in vitroSalmonella and chromosome aberration in vitro composite predictions and the fact that the toxic micronucleus potential of the H-acceptor-path3-H-acceptor structural alert is only limited translated into actual toxicity in the experimental system, it was concluded that Pipamperone was predicted as negative for genotoxicity and the prediction was assessed as moderate reliable.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.