Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Skin irritation / corrosion

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
skin irritation / corrosion
Remarks:
in vitro
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
other information
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: Guideline study, available as unpublished report, no restrictions, fully adequate for assessment

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
2013
Report date:
2013

Materials and methods

Test guidelineopen allclose all
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 431 (In Vitro Skin Corrosion: Human Skin Model Test)
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 439 (In Vitro Skin Irritation: Reconstructed Human Epidermis Test Method)
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
other: Commission Regulation (EC) No 440/2008
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
other: Commission Regulation (EU) Nº 640/2012
GLP compliance:
no

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
Hexyl chloroformate
EC Number:
228-036-4
EC Name:
Hexyl chloroformate
Cas Number:
6092-54-2
Molecular formula:
C7H13ClO2
IUPAC Name:
hexyl carbonochloridate
Details on test material:
- Name of test material (as cited in study report): n-Hexylchloroformate
- Physical state: liquid

Test animals

Species:
other: EpiDerm™ tissues (reconstructed three dimensional human epidermis model)

Test system

Vehicle:
unchanged (no vehicle)
Controls:
other: negative and positive controls
Amount / concentration applied:
TEST MATERIAL
- Amount applied: 50 μL (corrosion test) or 30 μL (irritation test)
Duration of treatment / exposure:
3 minutes and 1 hour (corrosion test) or 1 hour with 42 hours post incubation (irritation test).
Details on study design:
The test consists of a single topical exposure of the test substance to the surface of a human reconstituted epidermis model for 3 minutes and 1 hour (corrosion test) or 1 hour with 42 hours post incubation (irritation test) followed by a cell viability test. Cell viability is measured by dehydrogenase conversion of the yellow, water-soluble MTT (3-[4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl]-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide), present in cell mitochondria, into a blue formazan salt that is measured quantitatively after isopropanol –extraction from the tissues. The optical density of the extracts of test substance treated tissues is compared to negative control values from tissue treated with de-ionized water or PBS and is expressed as relative tissue viability.
- Negative control (NC): de-ionized water (corrosion test) / PBS, sterile (irritation test)
- Positive control (PC): 8 N KOH (corrosion test) / 5% SDS in de-ionized water, sterile (irritation test)

- The corrosion test was performed in duplicate.
- The irritation test in triplicate.

Evaluation criteria:
- Corrosion test (viability as % of negative control): 3 min: <50 = Corrosive; 3 min ≥50 and 1 hour <15 = Corrosive; 3 min: ≥ 50 and 1 hour ≥15 = Non-corrosive
- Irritation test (viability as % of negative control): ≤ 50 = Irritant; >50 = Non-irritant

Results and discussion

In vivo

Resultsopen allclose all
Irritation parameter:
other: Cell viablity
Basis:
mean
Time point:
other: 3 minutes exposure
Score:
99
Remarks on result:
other: Corrosion test (% viablity relative to control)
Irritation parameter:
other: Cell viability
Basis:
mean
Time point:
other: 1 hour exposure
Score:
97
Remarks on result:
other: Corrosion test (% viablity relative to control)
Irritation parameter:
other: Cell viabilty
Basis:
mean
Time point:
other: 1 h exposure, 42 hours postincubation
Score:
104
Remarks on result:
other: Irritation test (% viablity relative to control)

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
not irritating
Remarks:
Migrated information