Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Environmental fate & pathways

Bioaccumulation: aquatic / sediment

Currently viewing:

Some information in this page has been claimed confidential.

Administrative data

Endpoint:
bioaccumulation in aquatic species: fish
Type of information:
(Q)SAR
Adequacy of study:
supporting study
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
results derived from a valid (Q)SAR model, but not (completely) falling into its applicability domain, with adequate and reliable documentation / justification
Cross-referenceopen allclose all
Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
other: EAWAG-BBD PPS prediction of the biodegradation products of the registered substance (CAS 9046-10-0) used in this QSAR analysis to estimate the biodegradation potential.
Reference
Endpoint:
biodegradation in water: simulation testing on ultimate degradation in surface water
Type of information:
(Q)SAR
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
November 2020
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
results derived from a valid (Q)SAR model and falling into its applicability domain, with adequate and reliable documentation / justification
Guideline:
other: REACH guidance on QSARs R.6
Principles of method if other than guideline:
- Software tool(s) used including version: EAWAG-BBD (last update: January 2016)
- Model(s) used: EAWAG-BBD Pathway Prediction System
- Model description: see field 'Justification for non-standard information', see attached QMRF
- Justification of QSAR prediction: see field 'Justification for type of information', see attached QPRF
GLP compliance:
no
Specific details on test material used for the study:
SMILES codes for calculation: see attached QPRF.
Oxygen conditions:
aerobic
Inoculum or test system:
other: model calculation
Details on source and properties of surface water:
The model makes predictions for chemicals exposed to air, moist soil or water at moderate temperature and pH
Parameter followed for biodegradation estimation:
other: The model predicts formation of metabolites via known microbial biodegradation pathways, and provides a likelihood that this would occur under aerobic conditions.
Details on study design:
For the purpose of this QSAR analysis, only products formed through "Very likely" and "Likely" reactions were included.
Key result
Remarks on result:
other: none of the 18 potential metabolites of the substance predicted by the EAWAG-BBD Pathway Prediction System model were predicted to be readily biodegradable by the EPI Suite model.
Transformation products:
no
Validity criteria fulfilled:
yes
Conclusions:
The relevant degradation products of D230 were identified by means of the EAWAG-BBD Pathway Prediction System model. The biodegradability of each of these degradation products was predicted using the EPI Suite model. All of the identified degradation products were predicted to be not readily biodegradable.
Executive summary:

A QSAR exercise was completed to for the endpoint coverage. Given the complex, partly unknown and variable composition of the parent compound D230 (CAS9046-10-0), accurate assessment and experimental testing of all individual UVCB constituents is challenging. A QSAR exercise was performed aiming to identify the potential biodegradation pathway each “representative” component of UVCB D230 could follow. Once these potential pathways were constructed, the intermediates and end products were assessed for their P (B and T) properties in view of the PBT/vPvB assessment. For this supporting QSAR exercise, freely available tools and software were used (i.e. the EAWAG-BBD Pathway Prediction System model and a number of models available in EPISuite).

Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
other: KOWWIN v1.68 prediction of log Kow of the compounds used in this QSAR analysis as input to estimate the bioconcentration factor in fish..
Reference
Endpoint:
partition coefficient
Type of information:
(Q)SAR
Adequacy of study:
supporting study
Study period:
April 2021
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
results derived from a valid (Q)SAR model and falling into its applicability domain, with adequate and reliable documentation / justification
Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
other: EAWAG-BBD PPS prediction of the biodegradation products of the registered substance (CAS 9046-10-0) are used in this QSAR analysis to estimate the biodegradation potential.
Principles of method if other than guideline:
Estimation of the octanol-water partition coefficient (Log) Kow using KOWWIN v1.68.
GLP compliance:
no
Type of method:
calculation method (fragments)
Partition coefficient type:
octanol-water
Specific details on test material used for the study:
Log Kow estimation were made for 8 constituents as well as for the 18 biodegradation products predicted by the EAWAG-BBD PPS.

The table below lists all Log Kow values predicted by KOWWIN v1.68.


 

















































































































NameKOWWIN v1.68 predicted Log Kow
Tripropylene glycol diamine-0.9144
Tetrapropylene glycol diamine-0.7712
Pentapropylene glycol diamine-0.628
Hexapropylene glycol diamine-0.4848
Heptapropylene glycol diamine-0.3416
Tripropylene glycol monoamine-0.9082
Tetrapropylene glycol monoamine-0.765
Pentapropylene glycol monoamine-0.6218
1-{[1-(2-aminopropoxy)propan-2-yl]oxy}propan-2-one-0.9196
1-[2-(2-aminopropoxy)propoxy]propan-2-one-0.9196
1-{[1-(2-oxopropoxy)propan-2-yl]oxy}propan-2-one-0.9248
1-[2-(2-hydroxypropoxy)propoxy]propan-2-one-0.9134
1-{2-[2-(2-aminopropoxy)propoxy]propoxy}propan-2-one-0.7764
1-[(1-{[1-(2-aminopropoxy)propan-2-yl]oxy}propan-2-yl)oxy]propan-2-one-0.7764
1-[(1-{[1-(2-oxopropoxy)propan-2-yl]oxy}propan-2-yl)oxy]propan-2-one-0.7816
1-{2-[2-(2-hydroxypropoxy)propoxy]propoxy}propan-2-one-0.7702
15-amino-6,9,12-trimethyl-4,7,10,13-tetraoxahexadecan-2-one-0.6332
15-amino-5,8,11-trimethyl-4,7,10,13-tetraoxahexadecan-2-one-0.6332
5,8,11-trimethyl-4,7,10,13-tetraoxahexadecane-2,15-dione-0.6384
15-hydroxy-6,9,12-trimethyl-4,7,10,13-tetraoxahexadecan-2-one-0.627
18-amino-6,9,12,15-tetramethyl-4,7,10,13,16-pentaoxanonadecan-2-one-0.49
18-amino-5,8,11,14-tetramethyl-4,7,10,13,16-pentaoxanonadecan-2-one-0.49
5,8,11,14-tetramethyl-4,7,10,13,16-pentaoxanonadecane-2,18-dione-0.4952
21-amino-6,9,12,15,18-pentamethyl-4,7,10,13,16,19-hexaoxadocosan-2-one-0.3468
21-amino-5,8,11,14,17-pentamethyl-4,7,10,13,16,19-hexaoxadocosan-2-one-0.3468
5,8,11,14,17-pentamethyl-4,7,10,13,16,19-hexaoxadocosane-2,21-dione-0.352
Conclusions:
The Log Kow values predicted for the compounds with KOWWIN v1.68 can all be considered very reliable. All predicted values were very low, with a maximum value of -0.34. Given the high reliability of the estimations, the substances can be considered not to fulfill the B criterion based on a Log Kow << 4.5.

Data source

Materials and methods

Principles of method if other than guideline:
Estimation of the bioconcentration factor in fish using BCFBAF v3.01, using Model 1 - Bioconcentration factor (BCF): calculates a generic BCF for fish based on a linear regression model.
GLP compliance:
no

Test material

Specific details on test material used for the study:
The QSAR analysis was performed on 8 constituents of the substance.

Test organisms

Details on test organisms:
BCF calculations in BCFBAF v3.01 are made for freshwater fish.

Results and discussion

Bioaccumulation factor
Value:
3.16 L/kg
Basis:
whole body w.w.
Calculation basis:
other: QSAR estimation
Remarks on result:
other: This value was estimated by the BCFBAF v3.01 sub-model Bioconcentration (BCF), which predicts a constant BCF below a log Kow of 1. All compounds had a calculated BCF of 3.16 L/kg when using this model, which is the maximum BCF obtained with BCFBAF v3.01.

Any other information on results incl. tables

The table below lists the estimated BCF values obtained with the BCFBAF v3.01 sub-model Bioconcentration (BCF). These values represent the most conservative values obtained with the BCFBAF v3.01 model. More detailed results are available in the QPRF document and associated files. 


 









































Substance nameBCFBAF v3.01 regression BCF (L/kg)
Tripropylene glycol diamine3.16
Tetrapropylene glycol diamine3.16
Pentapropylene glycol diamine3.16
Hexapropylene glycol diamine3.16
Heptapropylene glycol diamine3.16
Tripropylene glycol monoamine3.16
Tetrapropylene glycol monoamine3.16
Pentapropylene glycol monoamine3.16

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Conclusions:
The QSAR analysis on 8 constituents of the substance, indicated for each a very low potential for bioaccumulation.