Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 229-782-3 | CAS number: 6731-36-8
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Carcinogenicity
Administrative data
Description of key information
Feeding Study: Dose dependent inhibition of growth and food consumption in both sexes at 0.25 & 0.5% when administered in feed for 78-weeks. No significant differences in survival rates and mean survival times between dose groups, compared either to each other or to controls. Swelling of centrilobular hepatocytes, as observed in the subchronic toxicity study, was evident only in male mice at 0.5%. No significant differences in total tumor incidences were observed between groups of either sex. All “tumours were considered to be spontaneous because their incidences were essentially similar to those of spontaneous neoplastic lesions reported previously…” Compound administration “neither increased the incidences of such spontaneous tumours nor induced any unusual neoplasms.” The study authors concluded that under the conditions of this bioassay, the test compound “exerts no carcinogenic activity in B6C3F1mice.
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Carcinogenicity: via oral route
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- carcinogenicity: oral
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- weight of evidence
- Study period:
- 83 weeks total duration; 78 weeks active feeding of test substance.
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: No GLP statement. Insufficient details of experimental conduct/results. Not a Guideline study.
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- Administration of test material in the daily diet over a range of concentrations for more than 80% of the expected lifetime of the test animals, combined with daily, weekly and end of life observations for clinical signs. at end of life, necropsy and microscopic evaluation of selected tissue.
- GLP compliance:
- not specified
- Remarks:
- Though no statement of GLP compliance is addressed in the published report, this study was conducted by the Division of Pathology of the Japanese National Institiute of Health Sciences with funding from the Grant-in-Aid for Safety Evaluation of Existing C
- Species:
- mouse
- Strain:
- B6C3F1
- Sex:
- male/female
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- M/F B6C3F1 mice; Charles River ; 6wk at start of study. Maintained on basal diet (MF Oriental) & tap water, ad lib, up to start of study. Housed 10/plastic cage, with soft-wood chips as bedding. Room Temp. 23±2 C°, humidity 55±5%, 12hr light cycle.
- Route of administration:
- oral: feed
- Details on exposure:
- Test substance added to powdered basal diet (MF Oriental) at 0, 0.25, or 0.5%, available, along with water, ad lib, throughout the study. Feeding with test substance continued for 78 weeks. Test article administration was discontinued at 78 weeks, but surviving animals were maintained on basal diet through 83 weeks, at which point survivors were euthanized.
- Analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
- not specified
- Duration of treatment / exposure:
- 78 weeks.
- Frequency of treatment:
- Daily. (though not explicitly stated, this would appear to have been 7 days per week.
- Post exposure period:
- 5 weeks ("After 78 wk, the administration of BBTC was stopped and mice were then maintained on the powdered basal diet until wk 83 when all surviving animals were killed.")
- Remarks:
- Doses / Concentrations:
0, 0.25, or 0.5%
Basis:
nominal in diet
based on animal weight and food consumption data, the authors reported the following mean test substance intake: Males - 0, 187, and 373 g/kg body weight/78wk; Females - 0, 280, 576 g/kg body weight/78wk. Precisely how these figures were derived is not st - No. of animals per sex per dose:
- 50 males and 50 females (100 total per dose group).
- Control animals:
- yes, plain diet
- Details on study design:
- Mice divided randomly into three groups of 50 males and 50 females (100 total per dose group). Test substance added to powdered basal diet (MF) at 0, 0.25, or 0.5%, available, along with water, ad lib, throughout the study. Feeding with test substance continued for 78 weeks, with food intake monitoring to calculate actual intake of test article. Daily observations for clinical signs. Body wt monitored throughout study. Test article administration was discontinued at 78 weeks, but surviving animals were maintained on basal diet through 83 weeks, at which point survivors were euthanized. All mice were necropsied and ‘organs’ fixed in 10% formalin, sectioned, and stained with hematoxylin & eosin.
- Positive control:
- none
- Observations and examinations performed and frequency:
- Daily observations for clinical signs. Body wt monitored throughout study. All mice were necropsied and ‘organs’ fixed in 10% formalin, sectioned, and stained with hematoxylin & eosin.
- Sacrifice and pathology:
- All mice, those dying or sacrificed in extremis or that survived till week 83, were necropsied and ‘organs’ fixed in 10% formalin, sectioned, and stained with hematoxylin & eosin. no specific list of tissues examined is provided. however, see Table 2 (attached report) of tumors identified as a partial list of the breadth of histopathology.
- Statistics:
- Data were analysed for statistical significance by Fisher's exact probability test and the chi-square test.
- Body weight and weight changes:
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Food consumption and compound intake (if feeding study):
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Histopathological findings: non-neoplastic:
- not specified
- Histopathological findings: neoplastic:
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Details on results:
- Dose dependent inhibition of growth and food consumption in both sexes at 0.25 & 0.5%. No significant differences in survival rates and mean survival times between dose groups, compared either to each other or to controls. Swelling of centrilobular hepatocytes, as observed in the subchronic toxicity study, was evident only in male mice at 0.5%. No significant differences in total tumor incidences were observed between groups of either sex. All “tumours were considered to be spontaneous because their incidences were essentially similar to those of spontaneous neoplastic lesions reported previously…” Compound administration “neither increased the incidences of such spontaneous tumours nor induced any unusual neoplasms.” The study authors concluded that under the conditions of this bioassay, the test compound “exerts no carcinogenic activity in B6C3F1 mice.
- Effect level:
- > 0.5 other: percent in diet
- Sex:
- male/female
- Basis for effect level:
- other: No significant differences in total tumor incidences were observed between groups of either sex. The study authors concluded that under the conditions of this bioassay, the test compound “exerts no carcinogenic activity in B6C3F1 mice.
- Remarks on result:
- other: Effect type: carcinogenicity (migrated information)
- Conclusions:
- No significant differences in total tumor incidences were observed between groups of either sex. The study authors concluded that under the conditions of this bioassay, the test compound “exerts no carcinogenic activity in B6C3F1 mice.
- Executive summary:
Dose dependent inhibition of growth and food consumption in both sexes at 0.25 & 0.5%. No significant differences in survival rates and mean survival times between dose groups, compared either to each other or to controls. Swelling of centrilobular hepatocytes, as observed in the subchronic toxicity study, was evident only in male mice at 0.5%. No significant differences in total tumor incidences were observed between groups of either sex. All “tumours were considered to be spontaneous because their incidences were essentially similar to those of spontaneous neoplastic lesions reported previously…” Compound administration “neither increased the incidences of such spontaneous tumours nor induced any unusual neoplasms.” The study authors concluded that under the conditions of this bioassay, the test compound “exerts no carcinogenic activity in B6C3F1mice.
Reference
Dose dependent inhibition of growth and food consumption in both sexes at 0.25 & 0.5%. No significant differences in survival rates and mean survival times between dose groups, compared either to each other or to controls. Swelling of centrilobular hepatocytes, as observed in the subchronic toxicity study, was evident only in male mice at 0.5%. No significant differences in total tumor incidences were observed between groups of either sex. All “tumours were considered to be spontaneous because their incidences were essentially similar to those of spontaneous neoplastic lesions reported previously…” Compound administration “neither increased the incidences of such spontaneous tumours nor induced any unusual neoplasms.” The study authors concluded that under the conditions of this bioassay, the test compound “exerts no carcinogenic activity in B6C3F1 mice.
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed
- Quality of whole database:
- No GLP statement. Insufficient details of experimental conduct/results. Not a Guideline study. However, it confirms the lack of carcinogenic lesions in a 52-week repeat dose oral gavage rat study.
Justification for classification or non-classification
In a 78-week feeding study at 0.25 and 0.5% in feed, no significant differences in total tumor incidences were observed between groups of either sex.All “tumours were considered to be spontaneous because their incidences were essentially similar to those of spontaneous neoplastic lesions reported previously…”Compound administration “neither increased the incidences of such spontaneous tumours nor induced any unusual neoplasms.” The study authors concluded that under the conditions of this bioassay, the test compound “exerts no carcinogenic activity in B6C3F1mice.
Additional information
Feeding Study: Dose dependent inhibition of growth and food consumption in both sexes at 0.25 & 0.5% when administered in feed for 78-weeks. No significant differences in survival rates and mean survival times between dose groups, compared either to each other or to controls. Swelling of centrilobular hepatocytes, as observed in the subchronic toxicity study, was evident only in male mice at 0.5%. No significant differences in total tumor incidences were observed between groups of either sex. All “tumours were considered to be spontaneous because their incidences were essentially similar to those of spontaneous neoplastic lesions reported previously…” Compound administration “neither increased the incidences of such spontaneous tumours nor induced any unusual neoplasms.” The study authors concluded that under the conditions of this bioassay, the test compound “exerts no carcinogenic activity in B6C3F1mice.
Justification for selection of carcinogenicity via oral route endpoint:
Only available carcinogenicity study.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.