Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 700-661-1 | CAS number: -
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Effects on fertility
Effect on fertility: via oral route
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Effect on fertility: via inhalation route
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Effect on fertility: via dermal route
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Additional information
Scientific and animal welfare merits of conducting a 407 + 414 in comparison to the 407 + 421 approach utilised at Annex VIII under REACH
In order to satisfy US regulatory requirements, Ecolab have conducted a Repeat Dose 28-Day Oral Toxicity Study (OECD 407) and a Prenatal Developmental Toxicity Study (OECD 414) in rats (total 120 animals) in place of a Combined Repeat Dose Toxicity Study with the Reproduction/Developmenatl Toxicity Screening Test (OECD 422) (80 animals) or a Repeat Dose 28-Day Oral Toxicity Study (OECD 407) + Reproduction/Developmental Toxicity Screening Test (OECD 421) (120 animals).
Table 1 below, adapted from Aulmann (2012)[1], indicates that the for 407 + 414 approach, which is an acceptable approach for Annex VIII registrations under REACH, does not necessarily use more animals than those required for the 407 + 421 approach.
Table 1: Comparing the utilities of OECD 407 and 414 with OECD 422 or OECD 407 and 421.
|
407 |
414 |
422 |
421 |
General observations (including body weight and food consumption determinations) |
X |
X |
X |
X |
Functional observations for neurotoxicity |
X |
|
X |
|
Haematology and Clinical chemistry |
X |
|
X |
|
Offspring growth, development and viability |
|
|
X until day 4 |
X until day 4 |
Pregnancy length and birth outcome |
|
|
X |
X |
Histopathology of organs of reproductive system and target organs |
X |
|
X |
X (repro organs only in 421) |
Functional evaluation of fertility |
|
|
X |
X |
Litter composition |
|
X |
|
|
Embryonic development |
|
X |
|
|
Foetal growth |
|
X |
|
|
Morphological variations and malformations |
|
X |
|
|
Foetal and pup growth and survival |
|
|
X until day 4 |
X until day 4 |
Minimum number of experimental animals |
40 |
80 |
80 |
80 |
Table 2 illustrates the status and quality of information of the OECD 421/422 versus 414 studies. The OECD 414 provides definitive information on developmental toxicity, whereas the OECD 421/422 studies give very little information on developmental toxicity.
Table 2: Status and quality of information of the OECD 421/422 versus OECD 414 studies
Test method |
Developmental toxicity |
Effects on fertility |
407 + 421 / 422 |
Limited relevance |
Screening |
407 + 414 |
Definitive |
Screening |
414 |
Definitive |
No relevance assessment |
Aulmann (2012) argues that, in contrast, the 407 provides effective screening information for functional reproductive capability based on the pathology and histopathology and organ weight examinations conducted on the organs of the reproductive system. The crux of Aulmann’s argument relies on the premise that there is seldom an effect on functional reproductive parameters, without these organs being affected in manner that can be observed in a fully compliant 407 study.
Therefore it might be argued the overall quality of reproductive and developmental toxicity information provided by an OECD 407 in conjunction with an OECD 414 is greater than that provided by OECD 407 + 421studies (an acceptable approach under REACH), and at no greater cost in animal life (120 animals minimum for each approach).
Conclusion
Where OECD 414 and 407 studies have already been conducted to satisfy another regulatory regime elsewhere in the world, little further functionally useful information is to be gained by using another 80 animals in an OECD 421 study. The OECD 414 provides definitive developmental toxicological information whereas the OECD 421 or OECD 422 would not; the OECD 407 is informative on possible effects to the reproductive system of both males and females at a degree similar to that can gathered with OECD 421 or OECD 422.
[1]Aulmann, W (2012) Assessment of reproductive toxicity under REACH. Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology 63 (2012) 286 - 290
Short description of key information:
In accordance with Column 2, Annex VIII Section 8.7.1 of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006, it is considered justified to omit this study a pre-natal developmental toxicity study is available.
Effects on developmental toxicity
Description of key information
The developmental toxicity of the test material was investigated in accordance to OECD (2001) Guideline 414. The study was conducted with rats exposed to test material from Day 6 to Day 19 of gestation and revealed a maternal NOEL of 15 and a developmental NOEL of 50 mg/kg/day.
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- developmental toxicity
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 2012-08-03 to 2012-09-25
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: GLP and guideline study.
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- reference to other study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 414 (Prenatal Developmental Toxicity Study)
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Limit test:
- no
- Species:
- rat
- Strain:
- Sprague-Dawley
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Charles River (UK) Limited, Margate, UK
- Age at study initiation: 9 - 10 weeks (P)
- Weight at study initiation: 207 - 273 g (P)
- Housing: individually
- Diet: ad libitum
- Water: ad libitum
- Acclimation period: 3 - 5 days
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 19 - 23 °C
- Humidity (%): 40 - 70 %
- Air changes (per hr): 10 air changed per hour (minimum)
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12 hours dark / 12 hours light - Route of administration:
- oral: gavage
- Vehicle:
- water
- Details on exposure:
- PREPARATION OF DOSING SOLUTIONS:
Test material dosing formulations were prepared daily by dilution of PSOA in deionised water. Dosing formulations were stored at 4 °C until use.
The dose volume (10 mL/kg) was based on the most recent body weight measurement. - Analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
- yes
- Details on analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
- Duplicate top, middle and bottom samples for each sampling time point were collected for analysis by UV-spectrometry. Samples were stored at 4 °C until analysis.
- Details on mating procedure:
- - Time mated female rats were used in the study that had previously been inseminated by males.
- Detection of mating referred to as Day 0 - Duration of treatment / exposure:
- Day 6 to Day 19 of gestation
- Frequency of treatment:
- Daily
- Duration of test:
- All surviving animals were killed on Day 20 of gestation
- Remarks:
- Doses / Concentrations:
0, 5, 15, 50 mg/kg/day
Basis:
nominal conc. - No. of animals per sex per dose:
- 24 females per dose level
- Control animals:
- yes, concurrent vehicle
- Details on study design:
- - Dose selection rationale: dose levels were selected folowing a review of the data obtained from a 28-day repeat dose toxicity study where no adverse effects were observed.
- Maternal examinations:
- CAGE SIDE OBSERVATIONS: Yes
- Time schedule: twice daily
- Cage side observations included checks for mortality/moribundity
DETAILED CLINICAL OBSERVATIONS: Yes
- Time schedule: once pre-trial and daily during dosing period
BODY WEIGHT: Yes
- Time schedule for examinations: once pre-trial then daily throughout treatment period
FOOD CONSUMPTION: Yes
- Time schedule: daily from Day 4 of gestation,
WATER CONSUMPTION: No
POST-MORTEM EXAMINATIONS: Yes
- Sacrifice on gestation day 20
- Gross necropsy consisted of external and internal examinations including the cranial, thoracic, and abdominal contents
- Representative samples of abnormal tissues, together with any other tissues considered apropriate, were fixed in neutral buffered 10 % formalin. the reproductive tract was evaluated. - Ovaries and uterine content:
- The ovaries and uterine content was examined after termination: Yes
Examinations included:
- Gravid uterus weight: Yes
- Number of corpora lutea: Yes
- Number of implantations: Yes
- Number of early resorptions: Yes
- Number of late resorptions: Yes
- Live and dead foetuses: Yes
- Foetus weights: Yes
- Observations of placentae (size, colour, shape): Yes - Fetal examinations:
- - External examinations: Yes: [all per litter]
- Soft tissue examinations: Yes [half per litter]
- Skeletal examinations: Yes [half per litter]
- Head examinations: Yes [half per litter] - Statistics:
- All statistical tests were two-sided and performed at the 5% significance level.
Data were analysed for homogeneity of variance using the F-Max test. If the group variances appeared homogeneous, a parametric ANOVA was used and pairwise comparisons were made using Fisher's F protected LSD method via Student's t-test. If the variances were heterogeneous, log or square root transformations were used. If the variances remained heterogeneous, then a Kruskal-Wallis nonparametric ANOVA was used and pairwise comparisons made using chi squared protection. In circumstances where it was not possible to perform the F Max test, the non-parametric ANOVA results were reported. - Details on maternal toxic effects:
- Maternal toxic effects:yes
Details on maternal toxic effects:
MORTALITY
One animals dosed at 15 mg/kg/day was found dead on Day 18 of gestation. Prior to this clinical signs of pale eyes, cold skin, intermittent tremors, gasping/irregular respiration, clear discharge from the eyes and subdued behaviour were observed but the animal died before it could be euthanised. Necropsy findings included red fluid in the thoracic cavity, dark discolouration of the lungs, dark viscous material in the stomach and a hole in the trachea (2 mm diameter). This early death was considered to be due to a gavage injury and not related to treatment with the test material.
CLINICAL OBSERVATIONS
There were no treatment-related clinical observation noted in animals dosed at 0, 5 or 15 mg/kg/day. At 50 mg/kg/day one animals showed signs of piloerection on Days 19 and 20 of gestation. Subcutaneous masses observed on the ventral thorax of this animal correlated with enlarged lymph nodes found at necropsy. Another animal dosed at 50 mg/kg/day showed signs of hunched posture, piloerection and weight loss between Days 15 and 20 of gestation. At necropsy pale discoloured kidneys with pelvic dilation were noted. There were no treatment-related clinical observations or necropsy findings noted in any other animal at this dose level.
BODY WEIGHT CHANGES
There was a slight reduction in group mean body weight gain (ca. -9 %) over the course of the study at 50 mg/kg/day when compared to controls, but this change did not achieve statistical significance.
FOOD CONSUMPTION
Group mean food consumption was slightly decreased at 50 mg/kg/day when compared to controls for the duration of the study, particularly between Days 13 to 20 of gestation, but this change did not achieve statistical significance.
PREGNANCY PERFORMANCE
Pregnancy performance and foetal weights were comparable throughout the groups and slight intergroup differences in pregnancy performance and foetal weights were considered not to be related to treatment with the test material. - Dose descriptor:
- NOEL
- Effect level:
- 15 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect level:
- other: maternal toxicity
- Dose descriptor:
- NOEL
- Effect level:
- 50 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect level:
- other: developmental toxicity
- Details on embryotoxic / teratogenic effects:
- Embryotoxic / teratogenic effects:no effects
Details on embryotoxic / teratogenic effects:
There was one incidence of kinked ribs at both 15 and 50 mg/kg/day, however minimally kinked ribs were present in similar instances at 50 mg/kg/day and in controls and there was no evidence of a dose-related increase in incidence or severity for this finding.
There was one incidence of omphalocele at 50 mg/kg/day but as only one animal from one litter was affected it was considered to be incidental.
Cervical remnant of thymus was present in more litters at 50 mg/kg/day than in other groups but in the same number of foetuses as for animals dosed at 5 mg/kg/day so was considered not to be significant.
Tendinous region of diaphragm locally thinned with protrusion of the median liver lobe was present at a slightly higher incidence (9 foetuses (6 litters) for minimal protrusion and 8 foetuses (5 litters) for protrusion) and severity at 50 mg/kg/day when compared to controls. This is slightly outside the background control range (up to 8 foetuses (6 litters) for minimal protrusion and 6 foetuses (5 litters) for protrusion) seen in similar studies conducted at the same test laboratory but in the absence of any other findings was considered unlikely to be of any toxicological significance.
The number of foetuses with a minor visceral abnormality/variant was slightly higher at 50 mg/kg/day when compared to controls but there was no pattern with the number of litters affected and therefore the changes are likely to be incidental and not directly related to treatment.
Several slight intergroup differences in the distribution of skeletal ossification parameters were noted, however due to the absence of any dose related response in the type and distribution of ossification parameters, these differences were considered to be incidental and not associated with treatment.
Incidences of rib costal cartilages asymmetrically aligned appeared to increase in a dose dependent manner, however the incidence seen at 50 mg/kg/day (12 foetuses from 9 litters) is still within the range of control background data (up to 13 foetal (9 litters)) obtained at the test laboratory and therefore this change is considered to be incidental. The total number of foetuses per treated group with a minor skeletal abnormality/variant was comparable to controls and no dose related response could be seen overall. - Abnormalities:
- not specified
- Developmental effects observed:
- not specified
- Conclusions:
- Under the conditions of the study, the maternal NOEL was determined to be 15 mg/kg/day and the developmental NOEL was determined to be 50 mg/kg/day.
- Executive summary:
The prenatal developmental toxicity of the test material was determined in accordance with the standardised guideline OECD 414. During the study pregnant rats were dosed test material orally, by gavage, from Day 6 to Day 19 of gestation at 0, 5, 15 and 50 mg/kg/day. Animals were regularly monitored during gestation for clinical signs of toxicity, body weight and food consumption performance and were killed on Day 20 of gestation. The status of each implantation was recorded and the viable foetuses examined for visceral and skeletal abnormalities, including the state of skeletal ossification.
Under the conditions of the study, there was no treatment-related mortality. One animal dosed at 15 mg/kg/day was found dead on Day 18 of gestation but this early death was considered to be due to a gavage injury and not related to treatment with the test material. There was a slight increase in incidences of clinical observations such as piloerection and hunched posture in the high dose group, but as the findings were transient and only 2/24 animals were affected these findings are considered not to be adverse. Slight reductions in maternal body weight and food consumption seen at 50 mg/kg/day were considered to be related to treatment, but due to the small magnitude of these changes they were considered not to be adverse.The type and distribution of foetal abnormalities and variants did not indicate any relationship to treatment with the test material. There were no differences in foetal weight which were considered to be related to treatment with the test material.
In conclusion, administration of test material by once daily oral gavage for Days 6 to 19 of gestation was well tolerated in rats at levels of 5, 15 and 50 mg/kg/day. Based on these results, the developmental no observed effect level (NOEL) was considered to be 50 mg/kg/day and the maternal NOEL was considered to be 15 mg/kg/day.
Reference
Effect on developmental toxicity: via oral route
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed
- Study duration:
- subacute
- Species:
- rat
- Quality of whole database:
- The study was conducted in line with GLP and to a standardised guideline with a high level of reporting. The study was assigned a reliability score or 1 in accordance with the criteria of Klimisch (1997).
Effect on developmental toxicity: via inhalation route
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Effect on developmental toxicity: via dermal route
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Additional information
The prenatal developmental toxicity of the test material was determined in accordance with the standardised guideline OECD 414. During the study pregnant rats were dosed test material orally, by gavage, from Day 6 to Day 19 of gestation at 0, 5, 15 and 50 mg/kg/day. Animals were regularly monitored during gestation for clinical signs of toxicity, body weight and food consumption performance and were killed on Day 20 of gestation. The status of each implantation was recorded and the viable foetuses examined for visceral and skeletal abnormalities, including the state of skeletal ossification.
Under the conditions of the study, there was no treatment-related mortality. One animal dosed at 15 mg/kg/day was found dead on Day 18 of gestation but this early death was considered to be due to a gavage injury and not related to treatment with the test material. There was a slight increase in incidences of clinical observations such as piloerection and hunched posture in the high dose group, but as the findings were transient and only 2/24 animals were affected these findings are considered not to be adverse. Slight reductions in maternal body weight and food consumption seen at 50 mg/kg/day were considered to be related to treatment, but due to the small magnitude of these changes they were considered not to be adverse.The type and distribution of foetal abnormalities and variants did not indicate any relationship to treatment with the test material. There were no differences in foetal weight which were considered to be related to treatment with the test material.
In conclusion, administration of test material by once daily oral gavage for Days 6 to 19 of gestation was well tolerated in rats at levels of 5, 15 and 50 mg/kg/day. Based on these results, the developmental no observed effect level (NOEL) was considered to be 50 mg/kg/day and the maternal NOEL was considered to be 15 mg/kg/day.
Justification for selection of Effect on developmental toxicity: via oral route:
Only one study is available.
Justification for classification or non-classification
In line with Directive 67/548/EEC and Regulation 1272/2008, PSOA is considered to be unclassified for reproductive and developmental oxicity.
Additional information
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.