Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Skin sensitisation

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
skin sensitisation: in vivo (non-LLNA)
Remarks:
in vivo
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
weight of evidence
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: Acceptable, well documented study which meets basic scientific principles.

Data source

Referenceopen allclose all

Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
1970
Report date:
1970
Reference Type:
secondary source
Title:
Final Report on the Safety Assessment for Isopropyl Lanolate
Author:
CIR
Year:
1980
Bibliographic source:
Journal of environmental pathology, toxicology and oncology;4/4, 121-132, 1980

Materials and methods

Principles of method if other than guideline:
A 0.1 % solution/suspension of the tests substance is injected intra-cutaneously 10 times (three times a week). 24 hours after each injection scorings are recorded. A re-injection (challenge) is done 2 weeks after the tenth injection.
GLP compliance:
no
Type of study:
other: Landsteiner and Jacobs procedure (1935)
Justification for non-LLNA method:
The study was performed before REACH entered into force.

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
Fatty acids, lanolin, iso-Pr esters
EC Number:
264-119-1
EC Name:
Fatty acids, lanolin, iso-Pr esters
Cas Number:
63393-93-1
Molecular formula:
UVCB
IUPAC Name:
Fatty acids, lanolin, isopropyl esters
Details on test material:
- Name of test material (as cited in study report): Distilled Isopropyl Lanolate
- Analytical purity: no data

In vivo test system

Test animals

Species:
guinea pig
Strain:
other: white
Sex:
male
Details on test animals and environmental conditions:
TEST ANIMALS
- Weight at study initiation: 300 - 500 g
- Housing: individually
- Diet: commercial rabbit pellets, greens and carrots, ad libitum
- Water: ad libitum

Study design: in vivo (non-LLNA)

Inductionopen allclose all
Route:
intradermal
Vehicle:
corn oil
Concentration / amount:
0.1 %
Challengeopen allclose all
Route:
intradermal
Vehicle:
corn oil
Concentration / amount:
0.1 %
No. of animals per dose:
10
Details on study design:
RANGE FINDING TESTS: no data

MAIN STUDY
A. INDUCTION EXPOSURE
- No. of exposures: 10
- Exposure period: 24 hours, (injections were done 3 times weekly)
- Test groups: 10 single injections, 1st injection: 0.05 mL, 2nd - 10th injection: 0.1 mL
- Control group: 10 single injections, same procedure as test group but using just vehicle
- Site: back of the animals (hair was removed by electric clipper if necessary)
- Frequency of applications: 3 times a week
- Concentrations: 0.1 %

B. CHALLENGE EXPOSURE
- No. of exposures: one
- Day(s) of challenge: 2 weeks after 10th induction exposure
- Exposure period: 24 hours
- Test groups: test substance in vehicle
- Control group: vehicle only
- Site: on the back, just below the ten sensitizing injections
- Concentrations: 0.1 %
- Evaluation (hr after challenge): 24

OTHER: 24 hours after each injection scoring were recorded for the diameter, height and redness of the reaction (if any).
Challenge controls:
The control group is actually a challenge control.
Positive control substance(s):
no

Results and discussion

In vivo (non-LLNA)

Resultsopen allclose all
Reading:
1st reading
Hours after challenge:
24
Group:
test chemical
Dose level:
0.1 %
No. with + reactions:
0
Total no. in group:
10
Remarks on result:
other: Reading: 1st reading. . Hours after challenge: 24.0. Group: test group. Dose level: 0.1 %. No with. + reactions: 0.0. Total no. in groups: 10.0.
Group:
negative control
Remarks on result:
other: No information available
Group:
positive control
Remarks on result:
other: No information available

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
not sensitising
Remarks:
Migrated information Criteria used for interpretation of results: expert judgment
Conclusions:
DSD: not classified
CLP: not classified