Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 204-886-1 | CAS number: 128-44-9
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
Administrative data
Link to relevant study record(s)
- Endpoint:
- short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 202 (Daphnia sp. Acute Immobilisation Test)
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Analytical monitoring:
- yes
- Details on sampling:
- the specificity reference standard solution (100 mg/L), the serial dilutions were made by using acetonitrile, to prepare further concentrations such as 1, 5, 10, 15, 20 and 25 mg/L separately, These reference standard solutions were injected into HPLC and a linear curve was plotted for the concentration of reference standard versus observed peak area and the correlation coefficient was determined. The linearity of method was established by injecting six different concentrations of reference standard by HPLC and plotting the respective concentration (mg/L) against their respective peak area and the coefficient of correlation (r) was 0.999, the coefficient of determination (R2) was 0.997.
- Vehicle:
- no
- Details on test solutions:
- Aroud 25.4 mg of the test item in a 100 ml volumetric flask dissolved and made up to the mark using natural water and the resulting concentration is 254 mg/L, coded as stock. Test solutions of the selected concentrations were prepared by dilution of a stock solution.
- Test organisms (species):
- Daphnia magna
- Details on test organisms:
- TEST ORGANISM
- Common name: Water Flea
- Age at study initiation (mean and range, SD): mean Aged less than 24 hours.
- Source: Test system was obtained from microworms, wihch further subcultured at ecotoxicity laboratory of CRO
- Feeding during test : no feed was given during test
ACCLIMATION
- Acclimation period: Sufficient number of healthy, brood Daphnia was collected from stock for at least two days before start of test and kept in separate container under test conditions with feed. The first progeny of daphnids collected on day 1 was discarded. Daphnids produced on day 2 (Aged less than 24 hours old) was used for testing.
- Acclimation conditions (same as test or not): same as test conditions
- Health during acclimation (any mortality observed): All the daphina were healthy
METHOD FOR PREPARATION AND COLLECTION OF EARLY INSTARS OR OTHER LIFE STAGES, INCLUDING CULTURING CONDITIONS: - Test type:
- static
- Water media type:
- freshwater
- Limit test:
- yes
- Total exposure duration:
- 48 h
- Hardness:
- 170 mg/L, CaCO3
- Test temperature:
- 20 - 21°C
- pH:
- 6.8 - 7.5
- Dissolved oxygen:
- 7.8 - 8.7
- Conductivity:
- 0.221 mS/cm
- Nominal and measured concentrations:
- Nominal concentrations and measured concentrations: 100mg/L
- Details on test conditions:
- TEST SYSTEM
- Test vessel: 25ml glass beaker
- Type (delete if not applicable): loosly covered with glass lid to reduce loss of evopration and entry of dust
- Material, size, headspace, fill volume: glass beaker, 25 ml beaker, head soace of 5 ml and fill volume is 20 ml
- Volume of solution: 20 ml
- Aeration: no aerration was provided
- No. of organisms per vessel: 5 organism/ vessel
- No. of vessels per concentration (replicates): 4 vessel/ conc
- No. of vessels per control (replicates): 4 vessels
- No. of vessels per vehicle control (replicates): no vehicle control
VEHICLE CONTROL PERFORMED: no
RANGE-FINDING STUDY
- Test concentrations: 6.25, 12.5, 25, 50 and 100 mg/L
- Results used to determine the conditions for the definitive study:There was no immobilization (percent) and any abnormal behaviour observed in exposed Daphnids in control group and in all the tested concentrations of 6.25, 12.5, 25, 50 and 100 mg/L for a period of 48 hours. - Reference substance (positive control):
- yes
- Remarks:
- Potassium Dichromate
- Key result
- Duration:
- 48 h
- Dose descriptor:
- EC50
- Effect conc.:
- > 100 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- mobility
- Details on results:
- - Mortality of control:
No mortaliity in control
- Immobilisation of control: no immobilisation in control
- Abnormal responses: no abnormal responses - Results with reference substance (positive control):
- the immobilisation potential of daphnids with test item Potassium dichromate, a definitive test was conducted with 5 test concentrations of 0.2, 0.4, 0.8, 1.6 and 3.2 mg/L along with a control group without test item. The selected concentrations were in a geometric series with a sepration factor of 2.0. Each concentration contained four replicates and 5(five) Daphnids per replicate. The treated Daphnids were maintained in a test condition.
During the test period, all the beaker was incubated in the room under controlled temperature and light. The room temperature during the test period was between 18.4ºC and 20.1ºC, the average light intensity was between 1384 and 1417 Lux. The pH of the control at the beginning and at the termination of the experiment was between 7.1 and 7.0, respectively. The pH of the test concentrations was between 7.2 and 7.3 at the beginning of the test and 7.0 to 7.5 at test termination. The Dissolved oxygen of the control at the beginning and at the termination of the experiment was between 7.9 and 7.6 mg/L, respectively. The Dissolved oxygen of the test concentrations was between 8.2 and 8.6 mg/L at the beginning of the test and 7.7 to 7.9 mg/L at test termination.
No cumulative immobilization (percent) observed in control group and 0.2 mg/L whereas, 25% and 70% in the tested concentration of 0.4, and 0.8 mg/L for a period of 48 hours. The tested concentration of 1.6 and 3.2 mg/L, showed 100% immobilization. No Daphnids exhibited any abnormal behaviour in control group and in all the tested concentrations for a period of 48 hours.
Based on the results of this study, the EC50 value for 24 hours of Potassium Dichromate was found to be 0.690 mg/L with 95% confidence interval between 0.631 mg/L and 0.749 mg/L.
Mean Immobilization (%) data–Definitive test
Concentration
(mg/L) Immobilization (%) Cumulative Immobilization (%)
24 hours 48 hours 48 hours
Control 0 0 0
0.2 0 0 0
0.4 15 10 25
0.8 55 15 70
1.6 100 - 100
3.2 100 - 100 - Validity criteria fulfilled:
- yes
- Remarks:
- In the control, not more that 10 percent (0%) of the Daphnids should have been immobilised. The dissolved oxygen concentration at the end of the test was ≥ 3 mg/ L (4.9 to 8.2 mg/ L) in control and test vessels.
- Conclusions:
- Based on the results of the study, the test item, EC50 value at 48 hours was found to be greater than 100 mg/L.
- Executive summary:
The objective of this study was conducted to evaluate the Acute toxicity of test chemical to the Daphnia sp., (Daphnia magna). The study was performed in compliance with following regulatory guideline: OECD Guideline for Testing of chemicals OECD NO. 202, Adopted by the Council on 13 April 2004, Daphnia sp. Acute Immobilization Test.
Solubility of test item was performed by dissolving in the natural water (ground water) at 254 mg/L. Based on the solubility test, a vehicle was selected as a natural water for the test in the study.
Stability of the test item in natural water determined by analyzing the test concentrations of 1 and 100.0 mg/L at 0 hour, 24 hour and 48 hour showed that the test item concentration remained 80% to 120%(96.81 to 98.34 %) with respect to initial measured concentration and hence the dose verification for limit test was performed at the beginning and at the termination of the test.
The brood daphnids were acclimatized 48 hours prior to the test item exposure in dilution water. Less than 24 hours old daphnids were collected from the acclimatized gravid females and exposed to the test item. After exposure on day 0, daphnids were observed for Immobilization at 24 and 48 hours.
Range finding test was conducted with test concentration of 6.25, 12.5, 25, 50 and 100 mg/L along with a control group without test item by static method. Each concentration contained two replicates and 5(five) Daphnids per replicate. Test item was formulated in natural water. The treated Daphnids were maintained in a condition. No immobilization (percent) and any abnormal behaviour observed in control group and in all the tested concentrations of 6.25, 12.5, 25, 50 and 100 mg/L for a period of 48 hours.
Based on the results of range finding test, the limit test was conducted with a test concentration of 100 mg/L along with a control group without test item by static method. A limit test concentration contained four replicates and 5(five) Daphnids per replicate. Test item was formulated in natural water. The treated Daphnids were maintained in a test condition. No immobilization (percent) and any abnormal behaviour observed in control group and a limit tested concentration of 100 mg/L for a period of 48 hours.
During thelimit test period, all the beakers were incubated in the roomunder test condtion.The pH of the control at the start and at termination of the study was 6.8 and therefore did not vary more than 1.5 units during the study. The pH of the limit test concentrations was 6.9 at the beginning of the test and 7.0 at test termination. The room temperature was between 19.0°C and 20.9°C. The temperature of the control and a limit test concentrationat the beginning of the test and at test termination was 20°C and 21°C. The Dissolved oxygen of the control at the start and at termination of the study was 8.2 and 5.2 mg/L. The Dissolved oxygen of the limit test concentration was 8.1 at the beginning of the test and 4.9 mg/L at test termination. The mean intensity of light ranged from 1425 to 1443 Lux.
The test item available in the test medium (natural water) was determined by a validated HPLC system. The test item concentration of test chemical in the test medium at the initiation (0 hour) 97.12% and after 48 hours 96.40 % of the nominal test concentrations. As the measured concentration was within 80 to 120% of the nominal concentration during the exposure period.
Based on the results of this study, the EC50value for 48 hours of Sodium 1,1,3-trioxo-2,3-dihydro-1H-11ambda6, 2-benzothiazol-2-ide was found to be greater than 100 mg/L.The results observed in the present study meets all the validity criteria as per OECD 202 Test guideline. Based on the outcomes test chemcial cannot be classified
Reference
TABLES
Table1: Percentage of DaphniaImmobilization
Concentration (mg/L) |
Daphnia Immobilization (%) |
||
24 hours |
48 hours |
Cumulative Immobilization(%) |
|
Range finding test |
|||
Control |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
6.25 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
12.5 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
25 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
50 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
100 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
Limit test |
|||
Control |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
100 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
Table 2: LC50Valueof test item
Parameters |
24 hours |
48 hours |
|||
EC50 |
Greater than 100 mg/L |
Greater than 100 mg/L |
|||
95% confidence interval- Lower Fiducial limit |
NA |
NA |
|||
95% confidence interval - Upper Fiducial limit |
NA |
NA |
Note:EC50- Median Effective Concentration, Note: mg/L – milligram per liter, NA-Not applicable
Individual Daphnia Immobilization
Concentration (mg/L) |
Replication |
Immobilization (Numbers) |
Cumulative Immobilization (Numbers) for period of 48 hours |
||||
24 hours |
48 hours |
||||||
Range finding test |
|||||||
Control |
R1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|||
R2 |
0 |
0 |
|||||
6.25 |
R1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|||
R2 |
0 |
0 |
|||||
12.5 |
R1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|||
R2 |
0 |
0 |
|||||
25 |
R1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|||
R2 |
0 |
0 |
|||||
50 |
R1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|||
R2 |
0 |
0 |
|||||
100 |
R1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|||
R2 |
0 |
0 |
|||||
Limit test |
|||||||
Concentration (mg/L) |
Replication |
Immobilization (Numbers) |
Cumulative Immobilization (Numbers) for period of 48 hours |
||||
24 hours |
48 hours |
||||||
Control |
R1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|||
R2 |
0 |
0 |
|||||
R3 |
0 |
0 |
|||||
R4 |
0 |
0 |
|||||
100 |
R1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|||
R2 |
0 |
0 |
|||||
R3 |
0 |
0 |
|||||
R4 |
0 |
0 |
Daphnia Abnormal Behaviour
Concentration (mg/L) |
Replication |
Abnormal Behaviour |
||||
24 hours |
48 hours |
|||||
Range finding test |
||||||
Control |
R1 |
N(5) |
N(5) |
|||
R2 |
N(5) |
N(5) |
||||
6.25 |
R1 |
N(5) |
N(5) |
|||
R2 |
N(5) |
N(5) |
||||
12.5 |
R1 |
N(5) |
N(5) |
|||
R2 |
N(5) |
N(5) |
||||
25 |
R1 |
N(5) |
N(5) |
|||
R2 |
N(5) |
N(5) |
||||
50 |
R1 |
N(5) |
N(5) |
|||
R2 |
N(5) |
N(5) |
||||
100 |
R1 |
N(5) |
N(5) |
|||
R2 |
N(5) |
N(5) |
||||
Limit test |
||||||
Concentration (mg/L) |
Replication |
Abnormal Behaviour |
||||
24 hours |
48 hours |
|||||
Control |
R1 |
N(5) |
N(5) |
|||
R2 |
N(5) |
N(5) |
||||
R3 |
N(5) |
N(5) |
||||
R4 |
N(5) |
N(5) |
||||
100 |
R1 |
N(5) |
N(5) |
|||
R2 |
N(5) |
N(5) |
||||
R3 |
N(5) |
N(5) |
||||
R4 |
N(5) |
N(5) |
||||
Key: N – Normal
Physicochemical Parameters (pH, Temperature (oC) and DO (mg/L)
Concentration (mg/L) |
pH |
Temperature (⁰C) |
Dissolved oxygen (mg/L) |
|||
0 hour |
48 hour |
0 hour |
48 hour |
0 hour |
48 hour |
|
Range finding test |
||||||
Control |
6.8 |
6.9 |
20 |
20 |
8.0 |
7.8 |
6.25 |
6.9 |
7.2 |
20 |
20 |
8.5 |
8.3 |
12.5 |
7.0 |
7.3 |
21 |
20 |
8.5 |
8.4 |
25 |
7.0 |
7.4 |
20 |
20 |
8.8 |
8.6 |
50 |
7.1 |
7.5 |
20 |
21 |
8.7 |
8.5 |
100 |
7.1 |
7.5 |
20 |
21 |
8.7 |
8.5 |
Limit test |
||||||
Control |
6.8 |
6.8 |
20 |
21 |
8.2 |
5.2 |
100 |
6.9 |
7.0 |
20 |
21 |
8.1 |
4.9 |
Total hardness |
170 mg/L, CaCO3 |
Description of key information
The objective of this study was conducted to evaluate the Acute toxicity of test chemical to the Daphnia sp., (Daphnia magna). The study was performed in compliance with following regulatory guideline: OECD Guideline for Testing of chemicals OECD NO. 202, Adopted by the Council on 13 April 2004, Daphnia sp. Acute Immobilization Test.
Solubility of test item was performed by dissolving in the natural water (ground water) at 254 mg/L. Based on the solubility test, a vehicle was selected as a natural water for the test in the study.
Stability of the test item in natural water determined by analyzing the test concentrations of 1 and 100.0 mg/L at 0 hour, 24 hour and 48 hour showed that the test item concentration remained 80% to 120%(96.81 to 98.34 %) with respect to initial measured concentration and hence the dose verification for limit test was performed at the beginning and at the termination of the test.
The brood daphnids were acclimatized 48 hours prior to the test item exposure in dilution water. Less than 24 hours old daphnids were collected from the acclimatized gravid females and exposed to the test item. After exposure on day 0, daphnids were observed for Immobilization at 24 and 48 hours.
Range finding test was conducted with test concentration of 6.25, 12.5, 25, 50 and 100 mg/L along with a control group without test item by static method. Each concentration contained two replicates and 5(five) Daphnids per replicate. Test item was formulated in natural water. The treated Daphnids were maintained in a condition. No immobilization (percent) and any abnormal behaviour observed in control group and in all the tested concentrations of 6.25, 12.5, 25, 50 and 100 mg/L for a period of 48 hours.
Based on the results of range finding test, the limit test was conducted with a test concentration of 100 mg/L along with a control group without test item by static method. A limit test concentration contained four replicates and 5(five) Daphnids per replicate. Test item was formulated in natural water. The treated Daphnids were maintained in a test condition. No immobilization (percent) and any abnormal behaviour observed in control group and a limit tested concentration of 100 mg/L for a period of 48 hours.
During thelimit test period, all the beakers were incubated in the roomunder test condtion.The pH of the control at the start and at termination of the study was 6.8 and therefore did not vary more than 1.5 units during the study. The pH of the limit test concentrations was 6.9 at the beginning of the test and 7.0 at test termination. The room temperature was between 19.0°C and 20.9°C. The temperature of the control and a limit test concentrationat the beginning of the test and at test termination was 20°C and 21°C. The Dissolved oxygen of the control at the start and at termination of the study was 8.2 and 5.2 mg/L. The Dissolved oxygen of the limit test concentration was 8.1 at the beginning of the test and 4.9 mg/L at test termination. The mean intensity of light ranged from 1425 to 1443 Lux.
The test item available in the test medium (natural water) was determined by a validated HPLC system. The test item concentration of test chemical in the test medium at the initiation (0 hour) 97.12% and after 48 hours 96.40 % of the nominal test concentrations. As the measured concentration was within 80 to 120% of the nominal concentration during the exposure period.
Based on the results of this study, the EC50value for 48 hours of Sodium 1,1,3-trioxo-2,3-dihydro-1H-11ambda6, 2-benzothiazol-2-ide was found to be greater than 100 mg/L.The results observed in the present study meets all the validity criteria as per OECD 202 Test guideline. Based on the outcomes test chemcial cannot be classified
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Fresh water invertebrates
Fresh water invertebrates
- Effect concentration:
- 100 mg/L
Additional information
Various short term studies available for the test chemical were reviewed to determine the toxic nature of test chemical on the growth and mobility of aquatic invertebrates. The studies are as mentioned below:
The objective of this study was conducted to evaluate the Acute toxicity of test chemical to the Daphnia sp., (Daphnia magna). The study was performed in compliance with following regulatory guideline: OECD Guideline for Testing of chemicals OECD NO. 202, Adopted by the Council on 13 April 2004, Daphnia sp. Acute Immobilization Test.
Solubility of test item was performed by dissolving in the natural water (ground water) at 254 mg/L. Based on the solubility test, a vehicle was selected as a natural water for the test in the study.
Stability of the test item in natural water determined by analyzing the test concentrations of 1 and 100.0 mg/L at 0 hour, 24 hour and 48 hour showed that the test item concentration remained 80% to 120%(96.81 to 98.34 %) with respect to initial measured concentration and hence the dose verification for limit test was performed at the beginning and at the termination of the test.
The brood daphnids were acclimatized 48 hours prior to the test item exposure in dilution water. Less than 24 hours old daphnids were collected from the acclimatized gravid females and exposed to the test item. After exposure on day 0, daphnids were observed for Immobilization at 24 and 48 hours.
Range finding test was conducted with test concentration of 6.25, 12.5, 25, 50 and 100 mg/L along with a control group without test item by static method. Each concentration contained two replicates and 5(five) Daphnids per replicate. Test item was formulated in natural water. The treated Daphnids were maintained in a condition. No immobilization (percent) and any abnormal behaviour observed in control group and in all the tested concentrations of 6.25, 12.5, 25, 50 and 100 mg/L for a period of 48 hours.
Based on the results of range finding test, the limit test was conducted with a test concentration of 100 mg/L along with a control group without test item by static method. A limit test concentration contained four replicates and 5(five) Daphnids per replicate. Test item was formulated in natural water. The treated Daphnids were maintained in a test condition. No immobilization (percent) and any abnormal behaviour observed in control group and a limit tested concentration of 100 mg/L for a period of 48 hours.
During thelimit test period, all the beakers were incubated in the roomunder test condtion.The pH of the control at the start and at termination of the study was 6.8 and therefore did not vary more than 1.5 units during the study. The pH of the limit test concentrations was 6.9 at the beginning of the test and 7.0 at test termination. The room temperature was between 19.0°C and 20.9°C. The temperature of the control and a limit test concentrationat the beginning of the test and at test termination was 20°C and 21°C. The Dissolved oxygen of the control at the start and at termination of the study was 8.2 and 5.2 mg/L. The Dissolved oxygen of the limit test concentration was 8.1 at the beginning of the test and 4.9 mg/L at test termination. The mean intensity of light ranged from 1425 to 1443 Lux.
The test item available in the test medium (natural water) was determined by a validated HPLC system. The test item concentration of test chemical in the test medium at the initiation (0 hour) 97.12% and after 48 hours 96.40 % of the nominal test concentrations. As the measured concentration was within 80 to 120% of the nominal concentration during the exposure period.
Based on the results of this study, the EC50value for 48 hours of Sodium 1,1,3-trioxo-2,3-dihydro-1H-11ambda6, 2-benzothiazol-2-ide was found to be greater than 100 mg/L.The results observed in the present study meets all the validity criteria as per OECD 202 Test guideline. Based on the outcomes test chemcial cannot be classified
Aim of this study was to assess the short term toxicity of test chemical to aquatic invertebrates daphnia magna. Study was performed according to the OECD Guideline 202 (Daphnia sp. Acute Immobilisation Test) in a static system for the total exposure period of 48 hrs. The solution of white crystalline powder 100 mg/l was prepared by dissolving the substance in reconstituted test water. 100 mg/l concentration were used in the study. Effects on immobilisation were observed for 48 hours. With the test substance one positive control Potassium dichromate (K2Cr2O7) was also run simultaneously. After the exposure of chemical, effect concentration EC50 was calculated using nonlinear regression by the software Prism 4.0. The median effective concentration (EC50) for the test substance, in Daphnia magna was determined to be > 100 mg/L on the basis of mobility inhibition effects in a 48 hour study. After the exposure period of 48 hrs, only 8% inhibition were observed at 100 mg/l. Based on the EC50 value, substance is likely to be non-hazardous to aquatic invertebrate and cannot classified as per the CLP classification criteria.
Above study was supported by the second supporting study. Acute Immobilization Study of test chemical was performed on Daphnia magna in a Semi-Static System for 48 hrs. Test performed according to the OECD Guideline 202 (Daphnia sp. Acute Immobilisation Test). The test substance was soluble in water. Therefore, the test solution was prepared by dissolving 100 mg of the test substance in 100 ml of ADaM’s media. Achieving test concentrations of 1 g/L, respectively. And test Daphnia magna were exposed to these concentration for 48 hours. Study consider to be valid as it performs according to the guideline. 1. In the control, including the control containing the solubilizing agent, not more that 10 percent of the daphnids should have been immobilized as per the guideline and the same results were obtain in the test. 2. The dissolved oxygen concentration at the end of the test should be 3 mg/l in control and test vessels. The median lethal concentration (EC50) for test chemical on Daphnia magna in a 48 hours study on the basis of immobilization effect was determine to be > 100 mg/l. Thus, on the basis of this EC50 value and according to CLP criteria for aquatic classification of the substance, it is concluded that the substance does not exhibit short term toxicity to Daphnia and thus not classified as per the CLP classification criteria.
Thus based on the above studies, chemical consider to be nontoxic and not classified as per the CLP classification criteria.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.