Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Endpoint:
eye irritation, other
Remarks:
Primary Eye IrritationICorrosion in Rabbits
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
2004
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: according to EC Directive 92/69/EEC and Regulation EC/440/2008 guideline methods under GLP conditions

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
2004
Report date:
2004

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 405 (Acute Eye Irritation / Corrosion)
GLP compliance:
yes

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
-
EC Number:
473-730-4
EC Name:
-
Cas Number:
928768-73-4
Molecular formula:
C13H28SO3
IUPAC Name:
1-Octanol reaction products with epichlorhydrin and 2-mercaptoethanol
Test material form:
liquid: viscous
Details on test material:
Lot/batch #19381-92

Test animals / tissue source

Species:
rabbit
Strain:
New Zealand White
Details on test animals or tissues and environmental conditions:
New Zealand White rabbits were received from Millbrook Breeding Labs, Amherst, MA on 10/27/04 and equilibrated for at least five days. Only animals in apparent good health were made available for study assignment. Prior to being selected for this study, both eyes of each animal were examined according to the Draize technique for any evidence of irritation or abnormalities of the cornea, iris andlor conjunctiva.
A Mini-Maglite flashlight equipped with a high intensity bulb was used to aid in the examination. Three rabbits (males), free from evidence of ocular irritation or abnormalities, were assigned to this study without conscious bias.
The animals were born the week of 08/08/04. The pretest body weight range was 2.4 - 2.7 kg. The animals were identified by cage notation and a uniquely numbered metal eartag. The animals were housed 1/cage in suspended cages. Bedding was placed beneath the cages and changed at least three
times/week. Fresh PMI Rabbit Chow (Diet #5321) was provided daily. Water was available ad libitum.
The animal room, reserved exclusively for rabbits on acute tests, was temperature controlled, had a 12
hour lightidark cycle and was kept clean and vermin free.

Test system

Vehicle:
unchanged (no vehicle)
Controls:
no
Amount / concentration applied:
One eye of each rabbit was dosed. The contralateral eye served as a control. The test article (0.1 ml) was placed by syringe into the conjunctival sac which was formed by gently pulling the lower eyelid away from the eye. After instillation, the lids were held together for approximately one second to insure adequate distribution of the test article.
Observation period (in vivo):
7 days
Number of animals or in vitro replicates:
three males
Details on study design:
Initially, one healthy New Zealand White rabbit (male), free from evidence of ocular irritation and corneal abnormalities, was dosed with the test substance.
The test
article (0.1 ml) was placed into the conjunctival sac of one eye. Based on the reactions of the initial animal, two additional animals (males) were added to the study and dosed in the same manner. The eyes were examined and scored by the Draize technique at 1, 24, 48 and 72 hours and on day 7 postdose in all animals and again on day 14 in the additional two animals. Sodium fluorescein dye procedures were used at the 24, 48 and 72 hour and day 7 observation intervals and again on day 14.
The primary eye irritation score for each rabbit, each day, was calculated.
Body weights were recorded pretest.

Results and discussion

In vivo

Resultsopen allclose all
Irritation parameter:
overall irritation score
Basis:
animal #1
Time point:
7 d
Score:
0
Max. score:
59
Reversibility:
fully reversible
Irritation parameter:
overall irritation score
Basis:
animal #2
Time point:
14 d
Score:
0
Max. score:
55
Reversibility:
fully reversible
Irritation parameter:
overall irritation score
Basis:
animal #3
Time point:
14 d
Score:
0
Max. score:
55
Reversibility:
fully reversible

Any other information on results incl. tables

Corneal opacity, iritis and conjunctival irritation, noted in 3/3 eyes, cleared by day 7 in the initial animal and by day 14 in the additional animals. There were no abnormal physical signs noted during the observation period.

There were no abnormal physical signs noted during the observation period.

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
other: ocular irritant, but not corrosive
Remarks:
Criteria used for interpretation of results: expert judgment
Conclusions:
The tested substance is an ocular irritant, but not corrosive.
Executive summary:

The tested substance is an ocular irritant, but not corrosive.