Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 944-067-2 | CAS number: -
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Eye irritation
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- eye irritation: in vivo
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- February 18, 1980 - March 3, 1980
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- comparable to guideline study
- Remarks:
- non-GLP
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 1 980
- Report date:
- 1980
Materials and methods
Test guideline
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 405 (Acute Eye Irritation / Corrosion)
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- no
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- Reaction mass of 2,4-dimethyl-3a,4,5,6,7,7a-hexahydro-1H-4,7-methanoinden-5-ol and 3,4-dimethyl-3a,4,5,6,7,7a-hexahydro-1H-4,7-methanoinden-5-ol
- EC Number:
- 944-067-2
- Molecular formula:
- C12H18O
- IUPAC Name:
- Reaction mass of 2,4-dimethyl-3a,4,5,6,7,7a-hexahydro-1H-4,7-methanoinden-5-ol and 3,4-dimethyl-3a,4,5,6,7,7a-hexahydro-1H-4,7-methanoinden-5-ol
- Test material form:
- liquid
1
Test animals / tissue source
- Species:
- rabbit
- Strain:
- New Zealand White
- Details on test animals or tissues and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Weight at study initiation: Body weights were 2.0 to 3.5 kg
- Housing: Individually, according to the 'Guide for the care and use of laboratory anminals' (DHEW Publication no. (NIH) 78-23, 1978).
- Diet: daily 100 grams Purina Rabbit Chow supplemented by whole oats
- Water: ad libitum
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS: standard laboratory conditions
Test system
- Vehicle:
- unchanged (no vehicle)
- Controls:
- yes, concurrent no treatment
- Amount / concentration applied:
- Amount applied (volume or weight with unit): 0.1 mL into the right eye of each animal.
- Duration of treatment / exposure:
- Single instillation on day 1
- Observation period (in vivo):
- Eyes were examined before testing and at 24, 48 and 72 hours and at 4 and 7 days; any with persistent changes were examined again on day 10 and if needed also on day 15.
- Number of animals or in vitro replicates:
- 6 rabbits
- Details on study design:
- STUDY DESIGN
0.1 mL the test material was applied into the right eye of each of 6 animals.
TREATMENT
In accordance with OECD 405 (1981). The test substance is placed in the conjunctival sac of one eye of each animal after gently pulling the lower lid away from the eyeball. The lids are then gently held together for about one second. The other eye serves as control.
REMOVAL OF TEST SUBSTANCE
-Washing: No
SCORING SYSTEM
The primary occular irritation potential of the testing material was assessed with procedure of Draize, H.J. "Appraisal of the Safety of chemicals in foods, drugs and cosmetics", Assoc. of food and drug officials of the U.S., Austin, Texas (1959).
OBSERVATIONS
- Irritation: The eyes of each animal were examined approximately 24, 48 and 72 hours and 4 and 7 days after instillation of the test substance. The irritation scores and a description of all other (local) effects were recorded. Additionally at 24 hours and 7 days, the eyes were examined with fluorescein stain under an UV light. Any persistent changes on day 7 were re-evaluated on day 10 using a hand held opthalmoscope and the fluorescein method. The irritation was assessed according to Draize as laid down in OECD 405 (1981).
Results and discussion
In vivo
Resultsopen allclose all
- Irritation parameter:
- cornea opacity score
- Basis:
- other: mean of 6 animals
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 1.5
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- other: fully reversible 1 on day 7, 3 on day 10, 1 on day 15, 1 judged irreversible at day 10
- Remarks on result:
- other: mean score per animal: 1.33/2/1/1/2/1.66
- Irritation parameter:
- iris score
- Basis:
- other: mean of 6 animals
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0.39
- Max. score:
- 2
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 7 days
- Remarks on result:
- other: mean score per animal: 0/0.33/0/0.66/0.66/0.66
- Irritation parameter:
- conjunctivae score
- Basis:
- other: mean of 6 animals
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 1.61
- Max. score:
- 3
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 7 days
- Remarks on result:
- other: mean score per animal: 1.33/2/1.33/1/2/2
- Irritation parameter:
- chemosis score
- Basis:
- other: mean of 6 animals
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0.89
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 7 days
- Remarks on result:
- other: mean score per animal: 0.66/0/0/1/2/1.66
- Irritant / corrosive response data:
- All six animals developed opacity of the cornea within 24 hours after being dosed. Three rabbits had iritis at 48 hours and four at 72 hours. By Day 7 iritis had subsided in all rabbits and opacity had cleared in one eye. One rabbit had developed pannus. By Day 10 two rabbits still had opacity. In one there were ghost vessels and slight scarring adjudged irreversible. The second animal was retained until Day 15 at which time the opacity had cleared and the Draize score was 0.
Any other information on results incl. tables
Ocular Irritant response data (for the undiluted test substance)
Time after administration | |||||||
24 hours | 48 hours | 72 hours | Day 4 | Day 7 | Day 10 | 15 days | |
Animal number | 1/2/3/4/5/6 | ||||||
Corneal Opacity | 2/2/1/1/2/1 | 1/2/1/1/2/2 | 1/2/1/1/2/2 | 1/2/1/2/2/2 | 0/1/1/1/2/1 | -/0/0/0/1/1 | -/-/-/-/-/0 |
Cornea - Area | 3/4/4/4/4/4 | 3/4/3/4/4/4 | 3/3/3/4/4/4 | 3/3/3/4/4/4 | 0/1/1/1/4/1 | -/0/0/0/4/1 | -/-/-/-/-/0 |
Iris | 0/0/0/0/0/0 | 0/0/0/1/1/1 | 0/1/0/1/1/1 | 0/1/0/1/1/1 | 0/0/0/0/0/0 | -/0/0/0/0/0 | -/-/-/-/-/0 |
Conjunctivae | |||||||
- Redness | 2/2/2/1/2/2 | 1/2/1/1/2/2 | 1/2/1/1/2/2 | 1/2/1/1/2/2 | 0/0/0/0/0/0 | -/0/0/0/0/0 | -/-/-/-/-/0 |
- Chemosis | 1/0/0/0/2/2 | 1/0/0/1/2/2 | 0/0/0/2/2/1 | 0/0/0/2/2/1 | 0/0/0/0/0/0 | -/0/0/0/0/0 | -/-/-/-/-/0 |
- Discharge | 2/1/1/3/3/3 | 1/1/0/2/3/2 | 0/0/0/2/2/3 | 0/2/0/1/1/2 | 0/0/0/0/0/0 | -/0/0/0/0/0 | -/-/-/-/-/0 |
Control | 0/0/0/0/0/0 | 0/0/0/0/0/0 | 0/0/0/0/0/0 | 0/0/0/0/0/0 | 0/0/0/0/0/0 | -/0/0/0/0/0 | -/-/-/-/-/0 |
Weighted score | 40/46/26/28/54/34 | 21/46/17/33/59/57 | 17/39/17/35/57/57 | 17/43/17/53/55/55 | 0/5/5/5/40/5 | -/0/0/0/20/5 | -/-/-/-/-/0 |
Total | 228 | 233 | 222 | 240 | 60 | 25 | 0 |
Primary ocular irritation score | 38.00 | 38.83 | 37.00 | 40.00 | 10.00 | 4.17 | 0 |
Mean scores per animal over three timepoints (24-72 hours):
Corneal Opacity: 1.33/2/1/1/2/1.66: this means that 6/6 have a score >= 1 (CLP limit for classification as irritant, if at least in 2 of 3 animals)
Iritis: 0/0.33/0/0.66/0.66/0.66: this means that 0/6 have a score >= 1 (CLP limit for classification as irritant, if at least in 2 of 3 animals)
Redness: 1.33/2/1.33/1/2/2: this means that 3/6 animals have scores of >= 2 (CLP limit for classification as irritant, if at least in 2 of 3 animals)
Chemosis: 0.66/0/0/1/2/1.66: this means that 1/6 animals have a score of >= 2 (CLP limit for classification as irritant, if at least in 2 of 3 animals)
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Interpretation of results:
- other: Serious Eye Damage, Category 1
- Remarks:
- in accordance with EU CLP (EC 1272/2008 and its updates)
- Conclusions:
- Under the conditions of this study, the mean eye irritation scores observed in the animals following grading at 24, 48 and 72 hours indicate an eye irritation potential. However, as in one animal irreversible effects were observed, Dimeth Cyclormol is considered to cause serious eye damage.
- Executive summary:
Dimeth Cyclormol was tested in an eye irritation test in rabbits similar to OECD 405 but non-GLP and therefore scored Klimish 2. The right eye of six rabbits was treated with 0.1 ml of the undiluted test article.
Cornea opacity: Mean grade of 24, 48 and 72 hours is 1.5 (6/6 eyes scored >= 1; less than 4/6 eyes scored 3) indicating eye irritation. Opacity occurred within 24 hours after being dosed and one rabbit developed pannus. By day 10 two rabbits still had opacity. In one animal ghost vessels and slight scarring were adjudged irreversible and scoring was terminated. The opacity seen in the other animal had cleared by day 15.
Iris: Mean score during during 24 to 72 hours is 0.39 (less than 4/6 eyes scored 1). By day 7 iritis had subsided in all rabbits.
Conjuctivae: Mean score during 24 to 72 hours is 1.61 (less than 4/6 eyes scored 2).
Conjunctival chemosis: Mean score during 24 to 72 hours is 0.89 (less than 4/6 eyes scored 2).
In conclusion: Based solely on the scores the substance is an eye irritant. In view of the one animal showing irreversible effects, scar formation, the final conclusion is that the substance causes serious eye damage.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.