Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Acute Toxicity: oral

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
acute toxicity: oral
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: Study performed according to basic scientific principles, study report provides only summary of data, with no/very few tables with data from individual animals. There were discrepancies between the study report and the abstract (Ito, 1986).

Data source

Referenceopen allclose all

Reference Type:
publication
Title:
Safety of anticorrosives in building water-pipe methal inhibitors sodium polyphosphate and sodium metasilicate.
Author:
Ito, R. et al.
Year:
1986
Bibliographic source:
Toxicol. Lett. 31 (Suppl. P1-28), 44
Reference Type:
publication
Title:
Safety of the metal scavengers sodium metasilicate and sodium polyphosphate.
Author:
Saiwai, K. et al.
Year:
1980
Bibliographic source:
Internal Report Toho University
Reference Type:
review article or handbook
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
2004
Report date:
2004

Materials and methods

Principles of method if other than guideline:
Standard acute oral toxicity
GLP compliance:
no
Test type:
standard acute method
Limit test:
no

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
Disodium metasilicate
EC Number:
229-912-9
EC Name:
Disodium metasilicate
Cas Number:
6834-92-0
Molecular formula:
H2O3Si.2Na Soluble Silicates Category
IUPAC Name:
disodium oxosilanediolate
Details on test material:
SOURCE: Not reported
PURITY: Not reported
IMPURITY/ADDITIVE/ETC.: Not reported
ANY OTHER INFORMATION: Sodium metasilicate was administered as a 10% solution.

Test animals

Species:
mouse
Strain:
other: T23-48:ddy
Sex:
male/female
Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
TEST ORGANISMS: 
- Source: Sankyo Laboratory Service 
- Age: 4 weeks

Administration / exposure

Route of administration:
oral: unspecified
Vehicle:
not specified
Details on oral exposure:
- Volume administered or concentration: 0.05-0.19 ml/10g for males, 0.05-0.14 ml/10g for females
Doses:
500-1920.8 mg/kg (males), 500-1372 mg/kg (females)
Control animals:
not specified
Details on study design:
- Post dose observation period: seven days

EXAMINATIONS: mortality, clinical symptoms, histopathology

Results and discussion

Effect levelsopen allclose all
Sex:
male/female
Dose descriptor:
LD50
Effect level:
770 - 820 mg/kg bw
Sex:
female
Dose descriptor:
LD50
Effect level:
661.5 - 896.3 mg/kg bw
Sex:
male
Dose descriptor:
LD50
Effect level:
666.7 - 1 008.6 mg/kg bw
Remarks on result:
other: 66.7-1087.6 mg/kg is reported in Ito, 1986

Any other information on results incl. tables

MORTALITY: 
- Time of death: 4 hrs - 5 days

CLINICAL SIGNS:

2 minutes after administration males and females became lethargic and had a hunched posture. Tear flow increased with dose level. Surviving animals recovered within 2-4 days. The animals that died were lethargic, did
not react to external stimuli, had hanging eyelids, paralysis of hind legs, clonicity and tonic cramps, followed by cyanosis and respiratory paralysis.


NECROPSY FINDINGS: 

the following symptoms increased with increasing dose: localised bleeding in the mucous membranes of the "glandular stomach", duodenum, mucous membranes of the central part of the "small gut", capillary dilation,
rarefaction of the stomach lining, clear liver lobules, faded colour of the liver rim, redness of the gall. Animals
dosed 1372 mg/kg and above had bleeding and inflammation extending from the "glandular stomach"to the central part of
the "small gut". In surviving animals the liver lobules looked slightly clearer and the spleen showed slight rubefaction, compared to control group animals.


POTENTIAL TARGET ORGANS: stomach, liver, gut.

Applicant's summary and conclusion