Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 464-080-2 | CAS number: 613246-79-0
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
![](https://echa.europa.eu/o/diss-blank-theme/images/factsheets/A-REACH/factsheet/print_toxicological-information.png)
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Genetic toxicity in vitro
Description of key information
For the target substance (SIKA Hardener LTJ, CAS 613246-79) one in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria is available. The reported data of this mutagenicity assay show that, the test item did not induce gene mutations by base pair changes or frameshifts in the genome of the strains used. Therefore, Sika Hardener LTJ is considered to be non-mutagenic in this bacterial reverse mutation assay.
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
- Remarks:
- Type of genotoxicity: gene mutation
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 2004-11-26 to 2005-01-16
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 471 (Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay)
- Version / remarks:
- adopted 1997-07-21
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method B.13/14 (Mutagenicity - Reverse Mutation Test Using Bacteria)
- Version / remarks:
- cited as : 2000/32/EG, dated 2000-06-08
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EPA OPPTS 870.5100 - Bacterial Reverse Mutation Test (August 1998)
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Type of assay:
- bacterial reverse mutation assay
- Target gene:
- The Salmonella typhimurium histidine (his) reversion system measures his- to his+ reversions. The Salmonella typhimurium strains are constructed to differentiate between base pair (TA 1535, TA 100) and frameshift (TA 1537, TA 98) mutations. The Escherichia coli WP2 uvrA (trp) reversion system measures trp– to trp+ reversions. The Escherichia coli WP2 uvrA detect mutagens that cause other base-pair substitutions (AT to GC).
- Species / strain / cell type:
- E. coli WP2 uvr A
- Additional strain / cell type characteristics:
- not specified
- Species / strain / cell type:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98 and TA 100
- Additional strain / cell type characteristics:
- not specified
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- S9-Mix
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- Concentration range in the main test (with metabolic activation): 5000; 1581.14; 500; 158.11; 50; 15.81; 5.00 µg/plate.
Concentration range in the main test (without metabolic activation): 5000; 1581.14; 500; 158.11; 50; 15.81; 5.00 µg/plate - Vehicle / solvent:
- Acetone
- Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- Without metabolic activation
- Positive control substance:
- 9-aminoacridine
- Remarks:
- S. typhimurium: TA 1537
- Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- Without metabolic activation
- Positive control substance:
- sodium azide
- Remarks:
- S. typhimurium: TA 100; TA 1535
- Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- Without metabolic activation
- Positive control substance:
- 4-nitroquinoline-N-oxide
- Remarks:
- S. typhimurium: TA 98
- Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- Without metabolic activation
- Positive control substance:
- methylmethanesulfonate
- Remarks:
- E. coli WP2 uvrA
- Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- With metabolic activation
- Positive control substance:
- other: 2-aminoanthracene, 2AA
- Remarks:
- S. typhimurium: TA 100; TA 98; TA 1535; TA 1537 an d E. coli WP2 uvrA
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- - METHOD OF APPLICATION: in agar (plate incorporation); preincubation
The bacterial strains were cultured overnight in Nutrient Broth No. 2. The next day molten top agar was prepared and kept at 45 °C until further use. The test item and other components were prepared freshly and added to the overlay (45 °C). Bacteria were exposed to the test item both in the presence and absence of an appropriate metabolic activation system.
For activation part of this study instead of phosphate buffer, 0.5 mL of the S9 mix was added to each overlay tube. The entire test consisted of a non-activation and an activation test conditions each of them with negative and positive controls. For the pre-incubation method before the overlaying the test item, the bacterial culture and the S9 mix or phosphate buffer were added into appropriate tubes, provided the direct contact between bacteria and the test item. These tubes were gently mixed and incubated for 20 min at 37 °C by using a shaker. After the incubation the content of the tubes were added to the molten top agar prior to pouring onto the surface of minimal agar plates. For activation part of this study instead of phosphate buffer, 0.5 mL of the S9 mix was added to each overlay tube. The entire test consisted of a non-activation and an activation test conditions each of them with negative and positive controls. After solidification the plates were inverted and incubated at 37 °C for at least 48 h in the dark.
- NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: 3 replicates per control or concentration levels. - Evaluation criteria:
- Evaluation of experimental data
The colony numbers on the control, positive control and the test plates were determined, the mean values and appropriate standard deviations were calculated.
The Mutation Factor was calculated by dividing the mean value of the revertant counts by the mean values of the solvent control (the exact and not the rounded values were used for this calculation).
Evaluation of Results
The test is considered acceptable if for each strain:
– the bacteria demonstrate their typical responses to crystal violet and ampicillin
– the control plates without S9 mix are within the historical control data range
– corresponding background growth on both negative control and test plates occurs
–the positive controls show a distinct enhancement over the control plate
A test item is considered mutagenic if:
– a dose–related increase in the number of revertants occur and/or
– a reproducible biologically relevant positive response for at least one of the dose groups occurs in at least one strain with or without metabolic activation.
A biologically relevant increase is described as follows:
– if in strain TA 100 the number of reversions is at least twice as high when compared to the spontaneous reversion rate of the solvent control plates,
– if in strains TA 98, TA 1535, TA 1537 and Escherichia coli WP2 uvrA the number of reversions is at least three times higher as compared to the spontaneous reversion rate of the solvent control plates.
According to the OECD guidelines, the biological relevance of the results is the criterion for the interpretation of results; a statistical evaluation of the results is not regarded as necessary.
A test item producing neither a dose related increase in the number of revertants nor a reproducible biologically relevant positive response at any of the test points is considered non-mutagenic in this system. - Statistics:
- The colony numbers on the control, positive control and the test plates were determined, the mean values and appropriate standard deviations were calculated.
The Mutation Factor was calculated by dividing the mean value of the revertant counts by the mean values of the solvent control (the exact and not the rounded values were used for this calculation). - Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 1537
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 98
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 100
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- E. coli WP2 uvr A
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- TEST-SPECIFIC CONFOUNDING FACTORS
Inhibitory, toxic effect of the test item was observed. The inhibitory effect of the test item manifested in reduction of revertant colony numbers compared to the spontaneous revertant colony numbers of the solvent control plates, in reduced background lawn development and in appearance of small pinpoint colonies.
No substantial increases in revertant colony numbers of any of the five test strains were observed following treatment with Sika Hardener LTJ at any concentration level, either in the presence or absence of metabolic activation (S9 mix) in the performed experiments.
There was also no tendency of higher mutation rates with increasing concentrations in the range beyond the generally acknowledged border of biological relevance in the performed experiment.
RANGE-FINDING/SCREENING STUDIES:
The toxicity of the test item was determined with strains TA 98 and TA 100 in a pre-experiment. 8 concentrations (5000.00; 2500.00; 1000.00; 316.20, 100.00, 31.62, 10.00 and 3.162 µg/plate) were tested for toxicity and mutation induction with each 3 plates in the presence and absence of metabolic activation system (S9). Cytotoxic effects of the test item were observed at both examined test strains. The test item did not show mutagenic effect on the examined bacterium strains. The number of the revertant colonies was not enhanced.
COMPARISON WITH HISTORICAL CONTROL DATA:
The revertant colony numbers of solvent control plates without S9 mix were within the historical control data range.
The reference mutagens showed a distinct increase of induced revertant colonies. - Conclusions:
- The reported data of this mutagenicity assay show that,the test item did not induce gene mutations by base pair changes or frameshifts in the genome of the strains used. Therefore, Sika Hardener LTJ is considered to be non-mutagenic in this bacterial reverse mutation assay.
- Executive summary:
A study was conducted according to OECD TG 417 and Directive 2000/32/EG. The test item was tested in two independent experiments (Initial Mutation Assay and Confirmatory Mutation Assay) at several concentrations. Each assay was conducted with and without metabolic activation (S9 mix). The concentrations, including the controls, were tested in triplicate. The following concentrations of the test item were prepared and used in experiment I based on the results obtained in the pre-experiment on toxicity:
5000.00; 1581.14; 500.00; 158.11; 50.00; 15.81; 5.00 µg/plate Inhibitory, toxic effect of the test item was observed in both experiments (I and II). The inhibitory effect of the test item manifested in reduction of revertant colony numbers compared to the spontaneous revertant colony numbers of the solvent control plates, in reduced background lawn development and in appearance of small pinpoint colonies. No substantial increases in revertant colony numbers of any of the five test strains were observed following treatment with Sika Hardener LTJ (VP) at any concentration level, either in the presence or absence of metabolic activation (S9 mix) in the performed experiments.
There was also no tendency of higher mutation rates with increasing concentrations in the range beyond the generally acknowledged border of biological relevance in the performed experiment. The revertant colony numbers of solvent control plates without S9 mix were within the historical control data range. The reference mutagens showed a distinct increase of induced revertant colonies. Therefore, Sika Hardener LTJ (VP) is considered to be non-mutagenic in this bacterial reverse mutation assay.
Reference
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (negative)
Genetic toxicity in vivo
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Additional information
A study was conducted according to OECD TG 417 and Directive 2000/32/EG. The test item was tested in two independent experiments (Initial Mutation Assay and Confirmatory Mutation Assay) at several concentrations. Each assay was conducted with and without metabolic activation (S9 mix). The concentrations, including the controls, were tested in triplicate. The following concentrations of the test item were prepared and used in experiment I based on the results obtained in the pre-experiment on toxicity:
5000.00; 1581.14; 500.00; 158.11; 50.00; 15.81; 5.00 µg/plate Inhibitory, toxic effect of the test item was observed in both experiments (I and II). The inhibitory effect of the test item manifested in reduction of revertant colony numbers compared to the spontaneous revertant colony numbers of the solvent control plates, in reduced background lawn development and in appearance of small pinpoint colonies. No substantial increases in revertant colony numbers of any of the five test strains were observed following treatment with Sika Hardener LTJ (VP) at any concentration level, either in the presence or absence of metabolic activation (S9 mix) in the performed experiments.
There was also no tendency of higher mutation rates with increasing concentrations in the range beyond the generally acknowledged border of biological relevance in the performed experiment. The revertant colony numbers of solvent control plates without S9 mix were within the historical control data range. The reference mutagens showed a distinct increase of induced revertant colonies. Therefore, Sika Hardener LTJ (VP) is considered to be non-mutagenic in this bacterial reverse mutation assay.
Justification for classification or non-classification
Based on available data the test substance was not classified and labelled for genetic toxicity according to Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 (CLP), as amended for the fifteenth time in Regulation (EU) No 2020/1182.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.
![ECHA](/o/diss-blank-theme/images/factsheets/A-REACH/factsheet/echa_logo.png)