Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Developmental toxicity / teratogenicity

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
developmental toxicity
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
1975
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: Scientifically reliable study with sufficient information for evaluation and assessment.

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
1975
Report date:
1975

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
equivalent or similar to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 414 (Prenatal Developmental Toxicity Study)
Deviations:
yes
Remarks:
application GD 6 - 15
GLP compliance:
no
Remarks:
Study performed prior to implementation of GLP
Limit test:
no

Test material

Constituent 1
Reference substance name:
6-methyl-1,2,3-oxathiazine-4(3-H)-one-2,2-dioxide potassium salt
IUPAC Name:
6-methyl-1,2,3-oxathiazine-4(3-H)-one-2,2-dioxide potassium salt
Constituent 2
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
6-methyl-1,2,3-oxathiazin-4(3H)-one 2,2-dioxide, potassium salt
EC Number:
259-715-3
EC Name:
6-methyl-1,2,3-oxathiazin-4(3H)-one 2,2-dioxide, potassium salt
Cas Number:
55589-62-3
Molecular formula:
C4H5NO4S.K
IUPAC Name:
potassium 6-methyl-2,2,4-trioxo-3,4-dihydro-1,2λ⁶,3-oxathiazin-3-ide
Constituent 3
Reference substance name:
Acesulfame potassium
IUPAC Name:
Acesulfame potassium
Test material form:
solid: crystalline
Details on test material:
- Name of test material (as cited in study report): Hoe 0-95 K
- Substance type: sweetener
- Physical state: crystalline powder
- Analytical purity: 99.8%
- Lot/batch No.: VP 528 G 511
- Stability under test conditions: stable

Test animals

Species:
rat
Strain:
Wistar
Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Central Institute for the Breeding of Laboratory Animals TNO, Zeist, The Netherlands
- Age at study initiation: adult
- Weight at study initiation: mean: 165 - 167 g
- Fasting period before study: no
- Housing: individually in wire-bottom cages
- Diet: ad libitum (standard laboratory stock diet)
- Water: ad libitum (tap water)
- Acclimation period: at least 10 days

ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): controlled
- Humidity (%): controlled
- Air changes (per hr): no data
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12 h/12 h

IN-LIFE DATES:
From: no data
To: no data

Administration / exposure

Route of administration:
oral: feed
Vehicle:
other: diet
Details on exposure:
DIET PREPARATION
- Rate of preparation of diet (frequency): no data
- Mixing appropriate amounts with (Type of food): institutute' stock diet
- Storage temperature of food: room temperature
Analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
not specified
Details on analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
Not applicable
Details on mating procedure:
- Impregnation procedure: cohoused
- If cohoused:
- M/F ratio per cage: 1:4
- Length of cohabitation: overnight, until positive vaginal smears
- Verification of same strain and source of both sexes: yes
- Proof of pregnancy: sperm in vaginal smear referred to as day 0
- Any other deviations from standard protocol: no
Duration of treatment / exposure:
Gestation days 6 - 15
Frequency of treatment:
Daily
Duration of test:
From maing until necropsy on gestation day 20.
Doses / concentrationsopen allclose all
Dose / conc.:
0 other: %
Dose / conc.:
0.3 other: %
Dose / conc.:
1 other: %
Dose / conc.:
3 other: %
No. of animals per sex per dose:
20
Control animals:
yes, plain diet
other: Positive control: Vitamin A palmitate (75000 IU/day)
Details on study design:
- Dose selection rationale: At request of sponsor based on low subchronic toxicity

Examinations

Maternal examinations:
CAGE SIDE OBSERVATIONS: Yes
- Time schedule: daily

DETAILED CLINICAL OBSERVATIONS: Yes
- Time schedule: daily

BODY WEIGHT: Yes
- Time schedule for examinations: days 0, 6, 16, 21

FOOD CONSUMPTION AND COMPOUND INTAKE (if feeding study): Yes
- Food consumption for each animal determined and mean daily diet consumption calculated as g food/kg body weight/day: No
- Compound intake calculated as time-weighted averages from the consumption and body weight gain data: No

WATER CONSUMPTION AND COMPOUND INTAKE (if drinking water study): No
- Time schedule for examinations:

POST-MORTEM EXAMINATIONS: Yes
- Sacrifice on gestation day 21
- Organs examined: complete necropsy
- organ weights: ovaries
Ovaries and uterine content:
The ovaries and uterine content was examined after termination: Yes
Examinations included:
- Gravid uterus weight: Yes
- Number of corpora lutea: Yes
- Number of implantations: Yes
- Number of early resorptions: Yes
- Number of late resorptions: Yes
- Other:
- pre-/post implantation loss
Fetal examinations:
- External examinations: Yes: all per litter
- Soft tissue examinations: Yes: third per litter
- Skeletal examinations: Yes: two third per litter
- Head examinations: No data
Statistics:
Student's t-test: mean maternal body weights, mean food consumption, mean litter data
Chi-square test: skeletal and visceral anomalies
Indices:
Pre-/post-implantation loss,
Historical control data:
Yes

Results and discussion

Results: maternal animals

General toxicity (maternal animals)

Clinical signs:
no effects observed
Dermal irritation (if dermal study):
not examined
Mortality:
no mortality observed
Body weight and weight changes:
no effects observed
Food consumption and compound intake (if feeding study):
no effects observed
Food efficiency:
no effects observed
Water consumption and compound intake (if drinking water study):
not examined
Ophthalmological findings:
not examined
Haematological findings:
not examined
Clinical biochemistry findings:
not examined
Urinalysis findings:
not specified
Behaviour (functional findings):
no effects observed
Immunological findings:
not examined
Organ weight findings including organ / body weight ratios:
no effects observed
Gross pathological findings:
no effects observed
Neuropathological findings:
not examined
Histopathological findings: non-neoplastic:
not examined
Histopathological findings: neoplastic:
not examined

Maternal developmental toxicity

Number of abortions:
no effects observed
Pre- and post-implantation loss:
effects observed, non-treatment-related
Description (incidence and severity):
A decreased in the number of live foetuse/litter in the low (0.3%) dose group only which was attributed to an increased number of embryonal resoptions in two dams. However, this low number of live foetuses/litter is within the normal range of control findings. it did not occurr in the high dose group.
Total litter losses by resorption:
effects observed, non-treatment-related
Description (incidence and severity):
An increased number of embryonal resoptions in two dams in the low dose group within the normal range in controls. However, this low number of live foetuses/litter was within the normal range of control findings. It did not occurr in the high dose group.
Early or late resorptions:
not specified
Dead fetuses:
no effects observed
Changes in pregnancy duration:
not specified
Changes in number of pregnant:
not specified
Details on maternal toxic effects:
Maternal toxic effects:no effects

Details on maternal toxic effects:
Not applicable

Effect levels (maternal animals)

Key result
Dose descriptor:
NOAEL
Effect level:
> 30 000 ppm (nominal)
Based on:
test mat.
Basis for effect level:
other: lack of maternal toxicity

Maternal abnormalities

Abnormalities:
no effects observed

Results (fetuses)

Fetal body weight changes:
no effects observed
Description (incidence and severity):
The foetal weight increased with increasing feeding level and slightly higher but not significantly highter than the controls.
Reduction in number of live offspring:
not specified
Changes in sex ratio:
not specified
Changes in litter size and weights:
no effects observed
Changes in postnatal survival:
no effects observed
External malformations:
no effects observed
Skeletal malformations:
no effects observed
Visceral malformations:
no effects observed
Details on embryotoxic / teratogenic effects:
Embryotoxic / teratogenic effects:no effects

Details on embryotoxic / teratogenic effects:
Not applicable

Effect levels (fetuses)

Key result
Dose descriptor:
NOAEL
Effect level:
3 other: %
Based on:
test mat.
Sex:
male/female
Basis for effect level:
other: no effects

Fetal abnormalities

Key result
Abnormalities:
no effects observed

Overall developmental toxicity

Key result
Developmental effects observed:
no

Any other information on results incl. tables

Summary of data:

 

Parameter/Concentration % (diet)

 

0

 

0.3

 

1.0

 

3.0

Vit. A

75000 IU/rat/day

Number of females mated

 

20

 

20

 

20

 

20

 

11

Number of females pregnant

 

18

 

16

 

17

 

13

 

8

Number of females with live fetuses

18

16

17

13

5

Number of live fetuses

185

141

170

131

31

Mean number of live fetuses/ litter

10

8.8**

10

10

5...

Pre-implantation loss %

6.1

11.2

8.0

8.9

6.5

Post-implantation loss %

2.0

10.6*

7.8

3.3

64.0***

Mean ovary weight/dam (g)

0.07

0.07

0.07

0.07

0.06*

Mean empty uterus weight/dam (g)

4.03

3.63*

3.78

3.66

1.97***

Mean number of corpora lutea/dam

11.2

11.2

11.4

11.5

10.4

Mean number of implantation sites/dam

10.5

9.9

10.6

10.5

9.6

Mean number of embryonic resorption/dam

0.17

0.81*

0.35

0.38

2.4**

Mean number of fetal resorption/dam

0.06

0.19

0.24

0

3.3**

Mean number of dead fetuses/dam

0

0.06

0

0

0.1

Mean fetal weight/dam (g)

5.07

5.26

5.32**

5.42**

4.52*

Number of litters with externally visible malformed fetuses

3

0

0

1

5

Number of fetuses with externally visible malformations

3

0

0

1

19

Number of fetuses with visceral anomalies

9

-

-

8

21

Number of fetuses with skeletal anomalies

22

-

-

16

10

- = not examined, * p<0.05, ** 0.01 >p>0.001; *** p<0.001

 

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Conclusions:
Acesulfame potassium was administered to pregnant Wistar rats orally via the diet at 0, 0.3%, 1.0% and 3.0 % from implantation at gestation day (GD) 6 through GD 15 (counting from day 0 of pregnancy).

All dose levels were tolerated without maternal or developmental toxicity and especially without morphological alterations in the fetuses.

The no observed adverse effects level (NOAEL) for maternal toxicity as well as for developmental toxicity including teratogenicity was 3.0% in the diet (30000 ppm corresponding to about 1500 mg/kg bw/day) and was thus clearly above the current limit dose of 1000 mg/kg bw/day.
Executive summary:

The prenatal developmental toxicity of Acesulfame potassium was investigated in pregnant female Wistar rats. Each 20 pregnant females received dietary dose levels of 0, 0.3%, 1.0% and 3.0% from implantation at gestation day (GD) 6 through GD 15 (counting from day 0 of pregnancy). A positive control group received 75000 IU Vitamin A palmitate/day dissolved in soybean oil.

 

This study is assessed as appropriate and valid since it was performed similar to internationally accepted testing guideline and reporting, assessment and data presentation in the study report was considered as appropriate.

 

Signs of maternal toxicity did not occur and food consumption and body weight/body weight gain was not adversely affected. Increased food consumption was noted but this can not be considered as adverse effects.

The oral administration of the test substance to the dams at all 3 dose levels had no influence on the gestational parameters.

 

Signs of prenatal developmental toxicity including morphological alterations were not observed at any concentration. The mean fetal weights were slightly increased but this can not be considered as adverse effect.

 

The positive control group showed a wide range of known abnormalities and demonstrated the sensitivity of the test system.

 

Conclusion:

Acesulfame potassium administered to pregnant Wistar rats orally via the diet at 0, 0.3%, 1.0% and 3.0 % from implantation at gestation day (GD) 6 through GD 15 (counting from day 0 of pregnancy) did not lead to any maternal or developmental toxicity and especially to no morphological alterations in the fetuses.

 

The no observed adverse effects level (NOAEL) for maternal toxicity as well as for developmental toxicity including teratogenicity was 3.0% in the diet (30000 ppm corresponding to about 1500 mg/kg bw/day) and was thus clearly above the current limit dose of 1000 mg/kg bw/day.