Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 237-424-2 | CAS number: 13780-06-8
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Toxicity to reproduction
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- reproductive toxicity, other
- Remarks:
- Reproductive Assessment by Continuous Breeding (RACB) study
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 19 May 1988 - 10 April 1989
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- test procedure in accordance with generally accepted scientific standards and described in sufficient detail
- Remarks:
- Study conducted according to the NTP RACB test protocol, and to GLP. The range of reproductive parameters was not as extensive as that indicated by current guidelines.
Data source
Referenceopen allclose all
- Reference Type:
- publication
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 1 990
- Report date:
- 1990
- Reference Type:
- review article or handbook
- Title:
- Re-evaluation of potassium nitrite (E 249) and sodium nitrite (E 250) as food additives.
- Author:
- EFSA
- Year:
- 2 017
- Bibliographic source:
- EFSA Journal 15(6):4786
- Report date:
- 2017
Materials and methods
Test guideline
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: NTP Reproductive Assessment by Continuous Breeding (RACB) protocol
- Version / remarks:
- [See below for a brief description of the methods.]
- Deviations:
- no
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- The RACB protocol consists of four related tasks, not all of which are necessarily performed for a given compound. These tasks include Task 1, dose finding: Task 2, continuous breeding phase: Task 3, identification of the affected sex: and Task 4, offspring assessment. Task 1 is conducted to determine suitable doses for the continuous breeding phase. The test chemical is administered for 14 consecutive days and the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) is estimated. Task 2 is designed to determine the effect of the estimated MTD and two lower dose levels on fertility and reproduction. In this phase, treatment is continued for 18 weeks (1 week prior to cohabitation, 14 weeks of cohabitation, and 3 weeks thereafter). If the fertility is significantly affected, Task 3 (a crossover mating trial) is conducted' to determine whether the male, female or both sexes are affected. Task 4 is designed to evaluate reproductive performance in the offspring (second generation) from the final Task 2 litters. If the fertility in the first generation animals (Task 2) is significantly affected, Task 4 is performed using second generation animals from the control and all three dose groups. If the overall response during Task 2 is negative, Task 4 is performed using second generation animals from the control and high dose groups only. At the conclusion of both Tasks 3 and 4, experimental animals are necropsied: the liver, kidneys, testes, epididymides, prostate, and seminal vesicles with coagulating glands are weighed and fixed for possible histopathologic evaluation. In addition, vaginal smears are prepared for 12 consecutive days prior to necropsy to check the effect on the estrous cycle. For male mice, sperm are studied in detail to evaluate the effect on sperm density, sperm motility, and sperm head morphology.
In the present study, Task 3 was not conducted because sodium nitrite treatment had no adverse effect on fertility and/or reproduction. - GLP compliance:
- yes
- Limit test:
- no
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- Sodium nitrite
- EC Number:
- 231-555-9
- EC Name:
- Sodium nitrite
- Cas Number:
- 7632-00-0
- Molecular formula:
- HNO2.Na
- IUPAC Name:
- sodium nitrite
- Test material form:
- solid: crystalline
Constituent 1
Test animals
- Species:
- mouse
- Strain:
- other: Swiss CD-1
- Remarks:
- Albino mice
- Details on species / strain selection:
- No data
- Sex:
- male/female
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Charles River Breeding Laboratories, Inc. (Kingston, NY for Task 1 and Portage, MI for Task 2 due to availability within the necessary time constraints)
- Females (if applicable) nulliparous and non-pregnant: no data
- Age at study initiation: (P) 11 wks for Task 2 (8 wks for Task 1 and 11 wks for Task 1 repeats); (F1) 3 wks for Task 4
- Weight at study initiation: (P) Males: 27.60-28.76 g (week 1); Females: 24.04-24.58 g (week 1); (F1) Males: 9.92-11.25 g (range of average pup weight at weaning); Females: 9.17-10.67 g (range of average pup weight at weaning)
- Fasting period before study: no data
- Housing: solid bottom polycarbonate cages with SaniChip bedding and stainless steel wire lids (2/cage for Task 1; bredding pairs or individually for Task 2)
- Use of restrainers for preventing ingestion (if dermal): not applicable
- Diet (e.g. ad libitum): rodent meal pellets (NIH-07 diet) ad libitum
- Water (e.g. ad libitum): distilled water ad libitum
- Acclimation period: 2 weeks (Tasks 1 and 2)
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 23 ± 2°C
- Humidity (%): no data
- Air changes (per hr): no data
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 10/14
IN-LIFE DATES: From: 19 May 1988 To: 10 April 1989
Administration / exposure
- Route of administration:
- oral: drinking water
- Vehicle:
- water
- Details on exposure:
- PREPARATION OF DOSING SOLUTIONS: The dose formulations were prepared at least every 3 weeks by mixing sodium nitrite with deionized drinking water on a weight-to-volume basis. Each dose level was independently formulated.
VEHICLE
- Justification for use and choice of vehicle (if other than water): not applicable
- Concentration in vehicle: not applicable
- Purity: no data - Details on mating procedure:
- - M/F ratio per cage: 1/1 (breeding pair)
- Length of cohabitation: 98 days
- Proof of pregnancy: vaginal plug (Task 4 only)
- Further matings after two unsuccessful attempts: not applicable
- After successful mating each pregnant female was caged (how): no data - Analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
- yes
- Details on analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
- An aliquot of each formulation, the control, and the bulk chemical were sent to Research Triangle Institute for reference analysis during week 1 of Task 1, weeks 1, 6, 10, and 14 of Task 2 and weeks 20 and 28 for Task 4.
- Duration of treatment / exposure:
- 105 days (P generation); not specified (F1 generation)
- Frequency of treatment:
- Continuously
- Details on study schedule:
- In Task 4 (offspring assessment), the last litter from Task 2 was reared, weaned, and kept to sexual maturity (74 ± 10 days) while housed by sex (maximum 2/cage) and receiving the same treatment as P0 animals. At sexual maturity, a male and female from different litters within the same treatment group were cohabited for 7 days and then housed singly until delivery.
Doses / concentrationsopen allclose all
- Dose / conc.:
- 0.06 other: % (w/v)
- Remarks:
- Equivalent to approximately 131 mg/kg bw/day (P0 males) and 123 mg/kg bw/day (P0 females).
- Dose / conc.:
- 0.12 other: % (w/v)
- Remarks:
- Equivalent to approximately 273 mg/kg bw/day (P0 males) and 254 mg/kg bw/day (P0 females).
- Dose / conc.:
- 0.24 other: % (w/v)
- Remarks:
- Equivalent to approximately 437 mg/kg bw/day (P0 males) and 412 mg/kg bw/day (P0 females).
- Dose / conc.:
- 0.24 other: % (w/v)
- Remarks:
- Equivalent to approximately 433 mg/kg bw/day (P1 males) and 556 mg/kg bw/day (P1 females).
- No. of animals per sex per dose:
- 20
- Control animals:
- yes, concurrent vehicle
- Details on study design:
- - Dose selection rationale: Doses for Task 2 were anicipated to be selected on the basis of a preliminary study (Task 1) so that the highest dose will be expected not to depress weight gain by more than 10% and will permit >90% survival. However, to avoid dehydration and methamoglobinemia, 0.24% was chosen as the high dose in Task 2. The middle dose is selected to produce little or no systemic toxicity, while the low dose is designed to be a "no-effect level".
- Rationale for animal assignment (if not random): All study animals were individually identified and assigned to treatment groups using a stratified randomisation procedure based on body weights.
- Other: The last litter born during the holding period following the continuous breeding phase (Task 2) is reared by the dam until weaning, after which treatment is initiated by the same route and at the same concentration as during Task 2. These animals are used for assessment of second generation fertility (Task 4). - Positive control:
- none
Examinations
- Parental animals: Observations and examinations:
- CAGE SIDE OBSERVATIONS: Yes
- Time schedule: no data
DETAILED CLINICAL OBSERVATIONS: Yes
- Time schedule: no data
BODY WEIGHT: Yes
- Time schedule for examinations: weeks 1 (precohabitation phase of Task 2), 2, 3, 6, 8 and 10
WATER CONSUMPTION AND COMPOUND INTAKE (if drinking water study): Yes
- Time schedule for examinations: weeks 1 (precohabitation phase of Task 2), 2, 6, 8 and 10 - Oestrous cyclicity (parental animals):
- Not conducted on P0 animals. For F1 animals, vaginal smears were prepared for 12 consecutive days prior to necropsy to check the effect on the estrous cycle.
- Sperm parameters (parental animals):
- Parameters examined in F1 male parental generation: testis weight, epididymis weight, sperm count in epididymides, sperm motility and sperm morphology
- Litter observations:
- STANDARDISATION OF LITTERS
- Performed on day 4 postpartum: no data
PARAMETERS EXAMINED
The following parameters were examined in F1 offspring: number and sex of pups, live births, proportion of pups born alive, pup body weight immediately after birth
GROSS EXAMINATION OF DEAD PUPS: no
ASSESSMENT OF DEVELOPMENTAL NEUROTOXICITY: no data
ASSESSMENT OF DEVELOPMENTAL IMMUNOTOXICITY: no data - Postmortem examinations (parental animals):
- Not conducted on P0 animals.
- Postmortem examinations (offspring):
- SACRIFICE
- The F1 offspring were necropsied at the end of Task 4.
- These animals were subjected to postmortem examinations (macroscopic and/or microscopic examination) as follows:
GROSS NECROPSY: no data
HISTOPATHOLOGY / ORGAN WEIGHTS
Following the conclusion of Task 4, liver, kidneys, testes, epididymides, prostate, and seminal vesicles with coagulating glands were fixed for possible histopathologic evaluation. Organs weighed in F1 animals included liver, kidney (with adrenal glands attached), cauda epididymis, epididymis, prostate, seminal vesicles, testis and ovary. Kidney and liver from F1 animals (10/sex/group) were evaluated histologically. - Statistics:
- For Task 2 data, the Cochran-Armitage test is used to test for a dose-related trend in fertility. The number of litters and the number of live pups per litter are computed on a per fertile pair basis and then treatment group means determined. The proportion of live pups is defined as the number of pups born alive divided by the total number of pups produced by each pair. The sex ratio is expressed as the proportion of male pups born alive out of the total number of live pups born to each fertile pair. Dose group means for these parameters are tested for overall differences using the Kruskal-Wallis test and for ordered differences using Jonckheere's test. Pairwise comparisons of treatment group means are performed by applying the Wilcox-Mann-Whitney U test.
To remove the potential effect of the number of pups per litter on the average pup weight, an analysis of covariance is performed. The covariate used is average litter size, including live and dead pups. Least squares estimates of dose group means, adjusted for litter size, are computed and tested for overall equality using an F-test and pairwise equality using a t-test. To control for possible sex differences, these analyses are performed on males, females, and both sexes combined. An analysis of covariance is also used to adjust organ weights for total body weight. Unadjusted body and organ weights are analyzed using the Kruskal-Wallis and Wilcox-MannWhitney U tests. Dose-related trends are tested for by Jonckheere's test.
All body weight and feed consumption are analyzed in-house using nonparametric statistics. Group means, standard deviations, and standard errors are calculated for each dose level and for each sex. Jonckheere's test is performed to obtain evidence of any increasing or decreasing trends. Significance among dose groups is calculated using Shirley's test if trend is evident or Dunn's test if no trend is evident. - Reproductive indices:
- Fertility (number producing a litter/number of breeding pairs), litters per pair, cumulative days to litter
- Offspring viability indices:
- No data
Results and discussion
Results: P0 (first parental generation)
General toxicity (P0)
- Clinical signs:
- no effects observed
- Description (incidence and severity):
- No clinical signs of toxicity were reported.
- Dermal irritation (if dermal study):
- not examined
- Mortality:
- mortality observed, non-treatment-related
- Description (incidence):
- 4, 1 and 2 animals died during the study (Task 2) in the low, mid and high dose groups, respectively. There were three mortalities in the control group.
- Body weight and weight changes:
- effects observed, non-treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- Body weights for males in the treated groups were always within 10% of the corresponding control values. For females, body weights varied with gestation but were generally within 10% of the control values.
- Food consumption and compound intake (if feeding study):
- not examined
- Food efficiency:
- not examined
- Water consumption and compound intake (if drinking water study):
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- Water consumption was significantly lower during weeks 1, 2, 6, and 14 in the 0.24% group and week 2 in the 0.12% group.
- Ophthalmological findings:
- not examined
- Haematological findings:
- not examined
- Clinical biochemistry findings:
- not examined
- Urinalysis findings:
- not examined
- Behaviour (functional findings):
- not examined
- Immunological findings:
- not examined
- Organ weight findings including organ / body weight ratios:
- not examined
- Histopathological findings: non-neoplastic:
- not examined
- Histopathological findings: neoplastic:
- not examined
Reproductive function / performance (P0)
- Reproductive function: oestrous cycle:
- not examined
- Reproductive function: sperm measures:
- not examined
- Reproductive performance:
- effects observed, non-treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- All of the pairs were fertile in both control and treatment groups. 95% of the breeding pairs in the control and 0.12% groups and 100% of the pairs in the 0.06 and 0.24% groups delivered 4 litters each. [Data from pairs in which one or both partner(s) died during cohabitation were excluded.]
The reproductive performance of breeding pairs receiving sodium nitrite was similar to the control pairs with respect to all endpoints (average number of litters per pair, live pups per litter (male, female, or combined), proportion and sex of pups born alive, live pup weights (male, female, or combined), and adjusted live pup weights). The response was negative when the combined data for all litters were analysed as well as when values for each litter were analysed independently. The cumulative days to litter, dam weights at delivery, and dam weights at final litter were also not affected by sodium nitrite treatment.
Details on results (P0)
Effect levels (P0)
open allclose all
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Remarks:
- fertility and reproductive parameters
- Effect level:
- 437 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Sex:
- male
- Basis for effect level:
- other: No reproductive effects seen at highest tested dose
- Remarks on result:
- other: This value was established by EFSA following a recent review of the data.
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Remarks:
- fertility and reproductive parameters
- Effect level:
- 412 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Sex:
- female
- Basis for effect level:
- other: No reproductive effects seen at highest tested dose
- Remarks on result:
- other: This value was established by EFSA following a recent review of the data.
Target system / organ toxicity (P0)
- Critical effects observed:
- not specified
Results: P1 (second parental generation)
General toxicity (P1)
- Clinical signs:
- not examined
- Dermal irritation (if dermal study):
- not examined
- Mortality:
- not examined
- Body weight and weight changes:
- no effects observed
- Description (incidence and severity):
- Body weights for treated F1 parental animals at weaning and during study weeks 28-30 were very similar to control values.
The group mean values for male terminal body weights were almost identical for control and treated animals. Female body weights were unaffected by sodium nitrite treatment. - Food consumption and compound intake (if feeding study):
- not examined
- Food efficiency:
- not examined
- Water consumption and compound intake (if drinking water study):
- no effects observed
- Description (incidence and severity):
- Water consumption values during the week of cohabitation were similar for control and treated animals.
- Ophthalmological findings:
- not examined
- Haematological findings:
- not examined
- Clinical biochemistry findings:
- not examined
- Urinalysis findings:
- not examined
- Behaviour (functional findings):
- not examined
- Immunological findings:
- not examined
- Organ weight findings including organ / body weight ratios:
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- In males, there were also no significant differences with respect to liver, kidneys, epididymis, prostate, seminal vesicles, and right testis weights, though the absolute right cauda epididymal weights were significantly reduced by 9% in the 0.24% group; relative organ weights were similar for control and treated animals. Female absolute liver, kidneys, and ovary weights were not affected by sodium nitrite treatment; a small increase in relative kidney weight was apparent.
- Gross pathological findings:
- not specified
- Neuropathological findings:
- not examined
- Histopathological findings: non-neoplastic:
- no effects observed
- Description (incidence and severity):
- The incidence and severity of microscopic lesions in the kidney and liver were similar in control and treated animals.
- Histopathological findings: neoplastic:
- not examined
Reproductive function / performance (P1)
- Reproductive function: oestrous cycle:
- no effects observed
- Description (incidence and severity):
- There were no apparent effects on estrual cyclicity or the average estrous cycle length in treated F1 parental females.
- Reproductive function: sperm measures:
- no effects observed
- Description (incidence and severity):
- In F1 parental males, epididymal sperm motility, sperm count, and percentage of abnormal sperm were unaffected by sodium nitrite treatment.
- Reproductive performance:
- no effects observed
- Description (incidence and severity):
- Mating and fertility indices in the control and treated groups were essentially the same. The reproductive performance of second generation (F1) fertile pairs was also not affected for any of the endpoints (number of live F2 pups per litter, proportion of pups born alive, sex of pups born alive, live pup weights, and adjusted pup weights).
Details on results (P1)
Effect levels (P1)
open allclose all
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Remarks:
- fertility and reproductive performance
- Effect level:
- 433 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Sex:
- male
- Basis for effect level:
- other: No reproductive effects seen at highest tested dose
- Remarks on result:
- other: This value was established by EFSA following a recent review of the data.
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Remarks:
- fertility and reproductive performance
- Effect level:
- 556 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Sex:
- female
- Basis for effect level:
- other: No reproductive effects seen at highest tested dose
- Remarks on result:
- other: This value was established by EFSA following a recent review of the data.
Target system / organ toxicity (P1)
- Critical effects observed:
- not specified
Results: F1 generation
General toxicity (F1)
- Clinical signs:
- no effects observed
- Description (incidence and severity):
- No clinical signs of toxicity were reported.
- Dermal irritation (if dermal study):
- not examined
- Mortality / viability:
- mortality observed, non-treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- The proportion of F1 pups born alive in the final Task 2 litters and the postnatal survival to age 21 days were not affected by sodium nitrite consumption.
- Body weight and weight changes:
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- Live male and female pups weights were significantly lower in the 0.24% group on days 7, 14, and 21. The decreases in pup weights were dose-related but the differences were significant at the high dose only. Whether this represents a direct toxic effect of sodium nitrite or is secondary to maternal dehydration cannot be determined from these data.
- Food consumption and compound intake (if feeding study):
- not examined
- Food efficiency:
- not examined
- Water consumption and compound intake (if drinking water study):
- not examined
- Ophthalmological findings:
- not examined
- Haematological findings:
- not examined
- Clinical biochemistry findings:
- not examined
- Urinalysis findings:
- not examined
- Sexual maturation:
- not examined
- Organ weight findings including organ / body weight ratios:
- not examined
- Gross pathological findings:
- not examined
- Histopathological findings:
- not examined
Developmental neurotoxicity (F1)
- Behaviour (functional findings):
- not examined
Developmental immunotoxicity (F1)
- Developmental immunotoxicity:
- not examined
Details on results (F1)
Effect levels (F1)
open allclose all
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Remarks:
- developmental toxicity
- Generation:
- F1
- Effect level:
- 437 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Sex:
- male
- Basis for effect level:
- other: No reproductive or developmental effects seen at highest tested dose
- Remarks on result:
- other: This value was established by EFSA following a recent review of the data.
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Remarks:
- developmental toxicity
- Generation:
- F1
- Effect level:
- 412 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Sex:
- female
- Basis for effect level:
- other: No reproductive or developmental effects seen at highest tested dose
- Remarks on result:
- other: This value was established by EFSA following a recent review of the data.
Target system / organ toxicity (F1)
- Critical effects observed:
- not specified
Overall reproductive toxicity
- Reproductive effects observed:
- no
Any other information on results incl. tables
The NTP investigators concluded that, in the absence of effects on reproductive and fertility indices, sodium nitrite is not a reproductive toxicant in this strain of mouse at the dose levels tested.
The EFSA Panel reported that no reproductive and developmental effects were observed in the study (up to respective doses of 437 and 412 mg/kg bw/day for males and females). The Panel considered the effects on pup weight in the F1 generation animals secondary to the decreased maternal water consumption but noted that at higher doses an effect cannot be excluded.
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- No effect on fertility or any of the other assessed reproductive parameters was seen in an NTP continuous breeding study involving the exposure of mice to drinking water containing sodium nitrite at up to 0.24% (w/v, equivalent to approximate dose levels of 437 and 412 mg/kg bw/day for males and females, respectively) for 105 days
- Executive summary:
In an oral reproductive toxicity study, conducted according to the NTP RACB test protocol and to GLP, sodium nitrite was provided in the drinking water to Swiss CD-1 mice (20/sex/group) at 0.06, 0.12 or 0.24% (w/v; equivalent to approximate dose levels of 131, 273 or 437 mg/kg bw/day for males and 123, 254 or 412 mg/kg bw/day for females) for 105 days. The study encompassed a 7-day pre-cohabitation period followed by a 98-day cohabitation period. Control animals (40/sex) received vehicle only. The dose levels for the main test (Task 2) were established on the basis of a range-finding study (Task 1). Clinical signs, growth and water consumption, as well as a range of fertility/reproductive parameters (including litters/pair, live pups/litter and pup body weights at birth) were monitored in Task 2.
In Task 4 (offspring assessment), litters from Task 2 was reared, weaned, and kept to sexual maturity (9-12 weeks) while receiving sodium nitrite via drinking water at 0.24% (w/v; equivalent to approximate dose levels of 433 and 556 mg/kg bw/day for males and females, respectively). Fertility parameters evaluated were similar to Task 2. All F1 animals were necropsied at the end of Task 4, whereby select organs were weighed and a variety of sperm parameters were measured; estrous cyclicity was also monitored for 12 days prior to necropsy. The kidney and liver were evaluated microscopically.
In Task 2, body weights were not significantly reduced by treatment though water consumption was generally lower in the high dose group. Mortality was observed in both control and treated groups, showing no apparent trend. There were no significant effects on fertility and reproductive performance was also unaffected by treatment. At the highest tested dose level, F1 pup body weights were reduced on postnatal days 7, 14, and 21, though these had normalised by the end of the study. No effects on organ weights were observed in necropsied animals (Task 4), aside from a reduction in absolute cauda epidydimal weight (by 9% compared to controls) in males and a slight increase in relative kidney weight in females. Epidydimal sperm motility, sperm count, and percentage of abnormal sperm were also not affected by sodium nitrite treatment and there were no apparent effects on estrual cyclicity or the average estrous cycle length in treated females. Histopathological findings in liver and kidney were similar between control and treated animals. The reproductive performance of second generation (F1) fertile pairs was unaffected by treatment (NTP, 1990). [Task 3 (cross-over mating trial) was not conducted because sodium nitrite treatment had no adverse effect on fertility and/or reproduction and, as such, there was no need to determine the affected sex.]
The EFSA Panel also did not consider the decrease in cauda epidydimal weight to be evidence of reproductive toxicity and deemed the effects on F1 pup weight secondary to the decreased maternal water consumption. Respective NOAELs of 437 and 412 mg/kg bw/day were established for first-generation parental males and females, with analogous levels of 433 and 556 mg/kg bw/day for second-generation parental males and females, respectively, covering both reproductive and developmental parameters (EFSA, 2017).
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.