Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Description of key information

Oral (gavage) combined repeated dose and reproduction/developmental screening study, subacute, daily dose levels of 30, 100 and 300 mg/kg bw/day, Rat (Wistar strain): NOAEL = 30 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received) (male/female) - (GLP, OECD Guideline 422)

Key value for chemical safety assessment

Repeated dose toxicity: via oral route - systemic effects

Link to relevant study records
Reference
Endpoint:
short-term repeated dose toxicity: oral
Remarks:
combined repeated dose toxicity study with reproduction / developmental toxicity screening
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
09.6.2015-29.2.2016
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study
Remarks:
The study was performed according to the recommended Guidelines (OECD Guidelines for Testing of Chemicals, No.422: “Combined Repeated Dose Toxicity Study with the Reproduction/Developmental Toxicity Screening Test” (adopted 22 March 1996)) and GLP. The study was also designed to be compatible with Commission Regulation (EC) No 440/2008 of 30 May 2008 laying down test methods pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH). Deviations from the study plan are not considered to have affected the integrity or validity of the study or the results obtained.
Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
reference to same study
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 422 (Combined Repeated Dose Toxicity Study with the Reproduction / Developmental Toxicity Screening Test)
Version / remarks:
Adopted 22 March 1996
Deviations:
yes
Remarks:
No analysis was carried out to determine the stability of the test item formulation. The concentration of test item in the formulations was determined using a gravimetric technique. Deviations from the target range for relative humidity.
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)
Remarks:
Certificate is as an attachement to the study report
Limit test:
no
Species:
rat
Strain:
Wistar
Details on species / strain selection:
Wistar Han™:RccHan™:WIST strain rats. The rat was selected for this study as it is a readily available rodent species historically used in safety evaluation studies and is acceptable to appropriate regulatory authorities.
Sex:
male/female
Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Harlan Laboratories UK Ltd., Oxon, UK.
- Age at study initiation: Approximately 12 weeks
- Weight at study initiation: males 314-345 g, females 168-216 g
- Fasting period before study: No fasting
- Housing: Initially, all animals were housed in groups of three in solid floor polypropylene cages with stainless steel mesh lids and softwood flake bedding. During the pairing phase, animals were transferred to polypropylene grid floor cages suspended over trays lined with absorbent paper on a one male: one female basis within each dose group. Following evidence of successful mating, the males were returned to their original cages. Mated females were housed individually during gestation and lactation in solid floor polypropylene cages with stainless steel mesh lids and softwood flakes.
- Diet (e.g. ad libitum): Pelleted diet (Rodent 2018C Teklad Global Certified Diet, Harlan Laboratories U.K Ltd., Oxon, UK.), free access to food
- Water (e.g. ad libitum): Tap water, free access to water
- Acclimation period: 8 days

ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 19 to 25 °C
- Humidity (%): 30 to 70% with deviations from the target range up to 94.06%
- Air changes (per hr): 15
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12/12
Route of administration:
oral: gavage
Details on route of administration:
The test item and control substance (Arachis oil BP) were administered daily by gavage using a stainless steel cannula attached to a disposable plastic syringe.
Vehicle:
arachis oil
Details on oral exposure:
PREPARATION OF DOSING SOLUTIONS:
The test item was prepared at the appropriate concentrations as a suspension in Arachis oil BP. Due to the complex nature of the test item and its limited solubility in organic and aqueous media, a substance specific quantitative method of analysis could not be developed and no stability determined. The test item was formulated within two hours of it being applied to the test system; it is assumed that the formulation was stable for this duration. Formulations were prepared daily. The concentration of test item in the formulations was determined using a gravimetric technique.

VEHICLE
- Justification for use and choice of vehicle (if other than water): Arachis oil BP was used because the test item did not dissolve/suspend in distilled water.
- Concentration in vehicle: 0, 6, 20 and 60 mg/mL
- Amount of vehicle (if gavage): 5 mL/kg treatment volume. The volume of test and control item administered to each animal was based on the most recent scheduled body weight and was adjusted at weekly intervals.

Analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
yes
Remarks:
Samples of the test item formulation were analyzed gravimetrically for the concentration of the test item.
Details on analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
Due to the complex nature of the test item and its limited solubility in organic and aqueous media, a substance specific quantitative method of analysis could not be developed. The concentration of test item in the formulations was determined using a gravimetric technique. Therefore formulations were prepared daily and dosed within two hours of preparation.

Samples of the test item formulation were taken and analyzed for concentration of the test item. The results indicate that the prepared formulations were within 99% to 109% of the nominal concentration. Thus the required content limit of +/- 10% with reference to the nominal content was met. The results indicate the accurate use of the test item and Arachis Oil BP as vehicle during the study. The formulations were found to be homogeneously prepared. The analytical procedure had acceptable recoveries of test item in the vehicle. The method of analysis was validated and proven to be suitable for use.
Duration of treatment / exposure:
The test item was administered by gavage to groups of rats for up to eight weeks (including a two week pre-pairing phase, pairing, gestation and early lactation for females).
Frequency of treatment:
The test item was administered daily.
Dose / conc.:
0 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received)
Remarks:
m/f
Dose / conc.:
30 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received)
Remarks:
m/f
Dose / conc.:
100 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received)
Remarks:
m/f
Dose / conc.:
300 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received)
Remarks:
m/f
No. of animals per sex per dose:
Control group (vehicle alone): 12 males, 12 females
Dose level 30 mg/kg bw/day: 12 males, 12 females
Dose level 100 mg/kg bw/day: 12 males, 12 females
Dose level 300 mg/kg bw/day: 12 males, 12 females
For further details, see Table 1 in 'Any other information on results incl. tables'.
Control animals:
yes, concurrent vehicle
Details on study design:
- Dose selection rationale: The dose levels were chosen based on the results of previous toxicity work (CsTreat fourteen day repeated dose oral (gavage) range-finding toxicity study in the rat, see Attached background material).

In the range-finding toxicity study, the test item was administered by gavage to three groups, each of three male and three female Wistar Han™:RccHan™:WIST strain rats, for fourteen consecutive days, at dose levels of 250, 500 and 1000 mg/kg bw/day. A control group of three males and three females was dosed with vehicle alone (Arachis oil BP). Clinical signs, body weight development, food consumption and water intake were monitored during the study. All animals were subjected to gross necropsy examination at termination.

Results:
Mortality -There were no unscheduled deaths on the study.

Clinical Observations - At 1000 mg/kg bw/day, one male showed clinical signs of dehydration, decreased respiratory rate, emaciation, hunched posture and tiptoe gait on Day 15 of the study. This appeared to be an isolated incident as no other animal from this dosage or from other dosage groups.

Body Weight - Reduction in body weight gains was evident in animals of either sex treated with 1000 and 500 mg/kg bw/day when compared to controls. Actual body weight losses were evident in these animals of either sex between Days 1 and 4 and continued in 1000 mg/kg bw/day males during the second week of treatment. Recovery in body weight gain was evident in females from Day 4 onwards. Males treated with 250 mg/kg bw/day, showed no obvious effects on body weight gain, and females at this level appear to be unaffected by treatment.

Food Consumption - At 500 and 1000 mg/kg bw/day, mean food consumption and food conversion efficiency for males was lower than control throughout the study. For males at 250 mg/kg bw/day, there were no consistent differences from control in food intake that indicated an effect of treatment. For females, food consumption did not indicate any obvious effect of treatment at 250, 500 or 1000 mg/kg bw/day throughout the study. However food conversion efficiency at 1000 mg/kg bw/day was lower between Days 1-4. Recovery was evident thereafter an no such effect was evident at 250 mg/kg bw/day.

Water Consumption - There was no obvious effect on water consumption in animals of either sex treated at 1000, 500 or 250 mg/kg bw/day. There were incidences where males treated with 1000 mg/kg bw/day showed an increase in water consumption during the treatment period.

Necropsy - At 1000 mg/kg bw/day, all males showed reddened discolouration in the glandular region in the stomach and one male showed blue coloured stomach contents. No similar findings were found in females treated with 1000 mg/kg bw/day or animals of either sex at 500 or 250 mg/kg bw/day.

The oral administration of the test itemt to rats by gavage, at dose levels of 250, 500 and 1000 mg/kg bw/day, resulted in a reduction in body weight gain and food consumption at 1000 and 500 mg/kg bw/day. Macroscopic abnormalities were also evident in 1000 mg/kg bw/day. Based on the results from this study a dose level of 300 mg/kg bw/day was considered to be suitable as a high dose level for the OECD 422 study together with 30 and 100 mg/kg bw/day as the low and intermediate dose levels, respectively.


- Rationale for animal assignment: The animals were randomly allocated to treatment groups using a stratified body weight randomization procedure and the group mean body weights were then determined to ensure similarity between the treatment groups. Animals were paired on a 1 male: 1 female basis within each dose group.

- Section schedule rationale (if not random): The tissues from five selected control and 300 mg/kg bw/day dose group animals and any animals dying during the study were prepared as paraffin blocks, sectioned and stained for subsequent microscopic examination. Adult males were killed on Day 43 or Day 44. Surviving adult females were killed on Day 5 post partum. Any females which failed to achieve pregnancy or produce a litter were killed on or after Day 25 post coitum.


Positive control:
No positive control
Observations and examinations performed and frequency:
CAGE SIDE OBSERVATIONS: No

DETAILED CLINICAL OBSERVATIONS: Yes
- Time schedule: Daily clinical observations. All animals were examined for overt signs of toxicity, ill-health and behavioral change immediately before dosing, soon after dosing, and one hour after dosing (except for females during parturition where applicable).

During the lactation phase, daily clinical observations were performed on all surviving offspring. Pregnant females were allowed to give birth and maintain their offspring until Day 5 post partum. Clinical signs were also recorded during this period.

BODY WEIGHT: Yes
- Time schedule for examinations: Individual body weights were recorded on Day 1 (prior to dosing) and then weekly for males until termination and weekly for females until pairing. During pairing phase females were weighed daily until mating was confirmed. Body weights were then recorded for females on Days 0, 7, 14 and 20 post coitum, and on Days 1 and 4 post partum. Body weights were also recorded at terminal kill.

FOOD CONSUMPTION:
- During the pre-pairing period, weekly food consumption was recorded for each cage of adults. This was continued for males after the mating phase. For females showing evidence of mating, food consumption was recorded for the periods covering post coitum Days 0-7, 7-14 and 14-20. For females with live litters, food consumption was recorded on Days 1 and 4 post partum.

FOOD EFFICIENCY:
- Food efficiency (the ratio of body weight change/dietary intake) was calculated retrospectively for males throughout the study period (with the exception of the mating phase) and for females during the pre-pairing phase. Due to offspring growth and milk production, food efficiency could not be accurately calculated during gestation and lactation.

WATER CONSUMPTION: Yes
- Time schedule for examinations: Water intake was observed daily by visual inspection of water bottles for any overt changes.

OPHTHALMOSCOPIC EXAMINATION: No

HAEMATOLOGY: Yes
- Time schedule for collection of blood: Hematological investigations were performed on five males and five females selected from surviving test and control groups prior to termination (Day 42 for males and Day 4 post partum for females).
- Anaesthetic used for blood collection: No data
- Animals fasted: No
- How many animals: 10
- Parameters examined: Hemoglobin (Hb), Erythrocyte count (RBC), Hematocrit (Hct), Erythrocyte indices (mean corpuscular hemoglobin (MCH), mean corpuscular volume (MCV), mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration (MCHC)), Total leukocyte count (WBC), Differential leukocyte count (neutrophils (Neut), lymphocytes (Lymph), monocytes (Mono), eosinophils (Eos), basophils (Bas)), Platelet count (PLT), Reticulocyte count (Retic) (Methylene blue stained slides were prepared but reticulocytes were not assessed). Prothrombin time (CT) was assessed by ‘Innovin’ and Activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) was assessed by ‘Actin FS’.

CLINICAL CHEMISTRY: Yes
- Time schedule for collection of blood: Blood chemical investigations were performed on five males and five females selected from surviving test and control groups prior to termination (Day 42 for males and Day 4 post partum for females).
- Animals fasted: No
- How many animals: 10
- Parameters examined: Urea, Calcium (Ca++), Glucose, Inorganic phosphorus (P), Total protein (Tot.Prot.), Aspartate aminotransferase (ASAT), Albumin, Alanine aminotransferase (ALAT), Albumin/Globulin (A/G) ratio (by calculation), Alkaline phosphatase (AP), Sodium (Na+), Creatinine (Creat), Potassium (K+), Total cholesterol (Chol), Chloride (Cl-), Total bilirubin (Bili), Bile acids

URINALYSIS: No

NEUROBEHAVIOURAL EXAMINATION: Yes
- Time schedule for examinations: Prior to the start of treatment and at weekly intervals thereafter, all animals were observed for signs of functional/behavioral toxicity. Functional performance tests were also performed on five selected males from each dose level, and five females from groups 1 to prior to termination, together with an assessment of sensory reactivity to various stimuli.

- Battery of functions tested: Forelimb/Hindlimb grip strength, motor activity and sensory reactivity to auditory, visual and
proprioceptive stimuli (Grasp response, Touch escape, Vocalization, Pupil reflex, Toe pinch, Blink reflex, Tail pinch, Startle reflex, Finger approach)

-Behavioral Assessments (Parameters observed: Gait, Hyper/Hypothermia, Tremors, Skin color, Twitches, Respiration, Convulsions , Palpebral closure, Bizarre/Abnormal/Stereotypic behavior, Urination, Salivation , Defecation, Pilo-erection, Transfer arousal, Exophthalmia, Tail elevation, Lachrymation)

Sacrifice and pathology:
GROSS PATHOLOGY: Yes
All adult animals and offspring, including those dying during the study, were subjected to a full external and internal examination, and any macroscopic abnormalities were recorded.

The following organs were dissected free from fat and weighed before fixation from five selected males and five selected females from each dose group: Adrenals, Prostate, Brain, Seminal vesicles, Epididymides, Spleen, Heart, Testes, Kidneys, Thymus, Liver, Thyroid (weighed post-fixation with Parathyroid), Ovaries, Uterus (weighed with Cervix), Pituitary (post fixation)

The following tissues were weighed from all remaining animals: Prostate, Seminal vesicles, Epididymides, Testes, Ovaries, Uterus (weighed with Cervix), Pituitary (post fixation)

HISTOPATHOLOGY: Yes
Samples of the following tissues were removed from five selected males and five selected females from each dose group:
Adrenals, Muscle (skeletal), Aorta (thoracic), Ovaries, Bone & bone marrow (femur including stifle joint), Pancreas, Bone & bone marrow (sternum), Pituitary, Brain (including cerebrum, cerebellum and pons), Prostate, Caecum, Rectum, Coagulating gland, Salivary glands (submaxillary), Colon, Sciatic nerve, Duodenum, Seminal vesicles, Epididymides, Skin, Esophagus, Spinal cord (cervical, mid-thoracic and lumbar), Eyes, Gross lesions, Spleen, Heart, Stomach, Ileum (including peyer’s patches), Thyroid/parathyroid, Jejunum, Trachea, Kidneys, Testes, Liver, Thymus, Lungs (with bronchi), Urinary bladder, Lymph nodes (mandibular and mesenteric), Uterus/Cervix, Mammary gland, Vagina.

The tissues from five selected control and 300 mg/kg bw/day dose group animals and any animals dying during the study were prepared as paraffin blocks, sectioned and stained for subsequent microscopic examination.

Samples of the following tissues were preserved from all remaining animals: Ovaries, Pituitary, Prostate, Coagulating gland, Seminal vesicles, Epididymides, Gross lesions, Testes, Uterus/Cervix, Mammary gland, Vagina

Of these tissues from the remaining control and 300 mg/kg bw/day animals and animals which did not achieve a pregnancy were also processed.

In addition, sections of testes from all control and 300 mg/kg bw/day males were also stained and examined. Detailed qualitative examination of the testes was undertaken.
Other examinations:
Reproductive performance, offspring viability, clinical signs of offspring, offspring body weight and gross pathology of offspring were also examined to determine toxicity to reproduction and development: reported in Endpoint study record 7.8.1 Toxicity to reproduction.001 (see field "Cross-reference to same study").
Statistics:
Where considered appropriate, quantitative data was subjected to statistical analysis to detect the significance of intergroup differences from control; statistical significance was achieved at a level of p<0.05. Statistical analysis was performed on the following parameters:

Grip Strength, Motor Activity, Body Weight, Body Weight Change, Food Consumption during gestation and lactation, Pre-Coital Interval, Gestation Length, Litter Size, Litter Weight, Sex Ratio, Corpora Lutea, Implantation Sites, Implantation Losses, Viability Indices, Offspring Body Weight, Offspring Body Weight Change, Offspring Surface Righting, Hematology, Blood Chemistry, Absolute Organ Weights, Body Weight-Relative Organ Weights.

Data were analyzed using the decision tree from the ProvantisTM Tables and Statistics Module. Data not analyzed by the Provantis data capture system were assessed separately using the R Environment for Statistical Computing. For a more detailed description of the statistical analysis performed, see the field "Any other information on materials and methods incl. tables".
Clinical signs:
effects observed, treatment-related
Description (incidence and severity):
There were no adverse clinical signs in females treated with 300 mg/kg bw/day up to Day 38 (around the time of parturition), or in the remaining animals of either sex throughout the study (see Table 2 in 'Any other information on results incl. tables').

On Day 38, clinical signs of hypothermia, decreased respiratory rate, diarrhoea, hunched posture, and/or pilo-erection were apparent in some females treated with 300 mg/kg bw/day and were considered to be due to difficulty in parturition. The surviving females from this group were terminated prematurely.

There were sporadic instances of staining of fur by test item in some of the females receiving 300 mg/kg bw/day during Weeks 5 and 6. One male each treated with 100 or 30 mg/kg bw/day showed signs of noisy respiration on sporadic days. One male treated with 100 mg/kg bw/day showed staining around the eye on Days 1 to 4. These observations were considered to be isolated incidents and of no toxicological significance.
Mortality:
mortality observed, treatment-related
Description (incidence):
On Day 38 of the study when the first set of females was due to litter, two females treated with 300 mg/kg bw/day and one female treated with 100 mg/kg bw/day were found dead; there were no prior adverse clinical signs for these early decedents. A further female treated with 300 mg/kg bw/day showed signs of difficulty during parturition including hypothermia, hunched posture, pilo-erection and was later terminated on the same day. At necropsy the two females found dead from the 300 mg/kg bw/day dose group had dead pups inside the uterus with one of the females showing enlarged adrenal glands. The remaining female from this dose group that was killed in extremis had eleven live pups within the uterus. The macroscopic findings for this female consisted of yellow colored contents in caecum, colon, duodenum, ileum and jejunum and enlarged adrenal glands.

The early decedent from the 100 mg/kg bw/day dose gr up had completed parturition but 6/14 pups were found dead. There were, however no macroscopic findings at necropsy for the offspring. Some of the remaining pregnant females treated with 300 mg/kg bw/day also showed signs of deterioration and difficulty during parturition and it was decided to terminate all surviving females from this dose group on Day 38; of these, one was found to be non-pregnant, two hadsuccessfully delivered live offspring and six had dead fetuses in the uterus.

There were no further unscheduled deaths on the study. For results in tabular form, see Table 2 in 'Any other information on results incl. tables'.
Body weight and weight changes:
effects observed, treatment-related
Description (incidence and severity):
Males treated with 300 mg/kg bw/day, showed statistically significant reductions in group mean body weight gains throughout the study excluding the final week of dosing. Males treated with 100 mg/kg bw/day also showed instances of reduced body weight gains achieving statistical significance in Weeks 2 and 5. Overall body weight gain in both groups was reduced when compared to controls (approximately 29% and 42 % at 100 or 300 mg/kg bw/day, respectively). Group mean body weight gains in males given 30 mg/kg bw/day were generally similar to controls.

During the pre-pairing phase, females treated with 300 or 100 mg/kg bw/day showed slightly lower group mean body weight gains than controls although not attaining statistical significance. The group mean body weight gains for these females during gestation Days 14 to 20 were also lower than controls in a dose related manner achieving statistical significance. This resulted in reduced cumulative body weight gains over Days 0 to 20 gestation and reduced body weights on Day 20 of gestation; statistical significance was achieved at 300 mg/kg bw/day. A reduction in body weight gain was also evident during lactation in females treated with 100 mg/kg bw/day but without attaining statistical significance; there was a high degree of inter-individual variation and this observation was considered likely to be incidental. There was no effect on body weight gains during pre-pairing, gestation or lactation phases of the study for females treated with 30 mg/kg bw/day.

For results in tabular form, see Tables 3 and 4 in 'Any other information on results incl. tables'.
Food consumption and compound intake (if feeding study):
effects observed, treatment-related
Description (incidence and severity):
Not a feeding study. However, during the pre-pairing phase, food consumption for both sexes was comparable to controls. Any differences from controls were generally not dose related and were considered to be incidental. For males treated with 300 or 100 mg/kg bw/day, the last two weeks of treatment showed a slight reduction in food intake with the corresponding females also showing a dose related reduction in food intake during gestation Days 14 to 20. Food consumptions for males and females treated with 30 mg/kg bw/day was comparable to controls.

For results in tabular form, see Table 5 in 'Any other information on results incl. tables'.
Food efficiency:
effects observed, treatment-related
Description (incidence and severity):
Males treated with 300 or 100 mg/kg bw/day, generally showed lower food conversion efficiency throughout the study when compared to controls. Food conversion efficiency was lower than controls for the corresponding females during Week 1 of pre-pairing phase and remained low for the 300 mg/kg bw/day females during Week 2. There was no effect of treatment at 30 mg/kg bw/day on food conversion efficiency for animals of either sex.

For results in tabular form, see Table 6 in 'Any other information on results incl. tables'.
Water consumption and compound intake (if drinking water study):
no effects observed
Description (incidence and severity):
Not a drinking study. However, visual inspection of water residues did not indicate any effect of treatment on water intake throughout the study.
Ophthalmological findings:
not examined
Haematological findings:
effects observed, treatment-related
Description (incidence and severity):
Due to the early termination of females treated with 300 mg/kg bw/day hematology parameters were not assessed for these females.

All treated animals showed a dose related increase in levels of hemoglobin, hematocrit and erythrocyte count which was statistically significant. The majority of individual values for males treated with 300 or 100 mg/kg bw/day were above the background control ranges, whereas most animals treated with 30 mg/kg bw/day had individual values within the background control ranges. At all dose levels males also showed statistically significantly lower mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentrations in relation to controls. There was no dose relationship and all individual values were within the background control ranges with the corresponding values in females also being similar to controls.

Reticulocytes in females treated with 30 and 100 mg/kg bw/day were statistically significantly higher when compared to controls. Some females treated with 100 mg/kg bw/day showed individual values that were above the background control ranges.

Treated males from 100 and 300 mg/kg bw/day dose groups showed a dose related reduction in platelet count which was statistically significant. Individual values for males treated with 300 mg/kg bw/day were above the background control ranges, whereas males treated with the 100 mg/kg bw/day showed individual values within the background control ranges. The corresponding females also showed a lower platelet count when compared to controls but
without any dose relationship or attaining statistical significance.

Females treated with 100 mg/kg bw/day showed a statistically significant reduction in lymphocytes count. All individual values were within background control ranges; and the corresponding values in males were comparable to controls.

For results in tabular form, see Table 7 in 'Any other information on results incl. tables'.
Clinical biochemistry findings:
no effects observed
Description (incidence and severity):
There were no changes of toxicological significance up to a dose level of 300 mg/kg bw/day in males and up to a dose level of 100 mg/kg bw/day in females (see Table 8 in 'Any other information on results incl. tables').

At 300 and 100 mg/kg bw/day, males showed a statistically significant increase in levels of bile acid and aspartate aminotransferase and a statistically significant reduction in cholesterol and bilirubin when compared to controls. Although these differences were dose related, the majority of individual values were within the background control ranges.

Males treated with 300 mg/kg bw/day showed a statistically significant reduction in total protein, albumin and calcium concentrations when compared to controls. There was also a statistically significant increase in levels of chloride concentration. There was no dose relationship for any of these parameters and with the exception of chloride concentration most individual values for the remaining parameters were within the background control ranges. Females treated with 30 or 100 mg/kg bw/day also showed a non dose related increase in chloride levels with 2/5 of the latter females showing individual values that exceeded the background control ranges.
Urinalysis findings:
not examined
Behaviour (functional findings):
no effects observed
Description (incidence and severity):
There were no treatment-related effects detected in the behavioral parameters measured in males up to a dose level of 300 mg/kg bw/day and in females up to a dose level of 100 mg/kg bw/day.

There were no treatment-related changes in the functional performance in males up to a dose level of 300 mg/kg bw/day and in females up to a dose level of 100 mg/kg bw/day.

There were no treatment-related changes in sensory reactivity in males up to a dose level of 300 mg/kg bw/day and in females up to a dose level of 100 mg/kg bw/day.
Immunological findings:
not examined
Organ weight findings including organ / body weight ratios:
effects observed, treatment-related
Description (incidence and severity):
Adrenals: Females treated with 30 or 100 mg/kg bw/day showed a dose-related statistically significant increase in adrenal weights relative to terminal body weight. The relationship for absolute weights was not clear with females treated with 30 mg/kg bw/day showing a marginal but statistically significant reduction in absolute weight but females receiving 100 mg/kg bw/day showing an increase. The majority of the individual values were within the background control ranges.

Liver: Females treated with 30 mg/kg bw/day, showed a dose-related statistically significant increase in liver weight in relation to body weight. The relationship for absolute weights was less clear with females treated with 100 mg/kg bw/day showing a statistically significant reduction in absolute weight whilst an increase was evident at 30 mg/kg bw/day. The majority of the individual values were within the background control ranges.

Kidneys: Males treated with 300 or 100 mg/kg bw/day showed a dose-related statistically significant reduction in kidney weight both absolute and relative to terminal body weight. The majority of the individual values were within the background control ranges.

Prostate: Males treated with 300 mg/kg bw/day showed a statistically significant reduction in prostate weight both absolute and relative to terminal body weights. The majority of the individual values were within the background control ranges.

Seminal Vesicles: Males treated with 300 or 100 mg/kg bw/day showed a statistically significant reduction in seminal vesicle weight both absolute and relative to terminal body weight. A dose relationship was apparent for absolute weights. The majority of individual values were within the background control ranges.

For results in tabular form, see Table 9 in 'Any other information on results incl. tables'.
Gross pathological findings:
effects observed, treatment-related
Description (incidence and severity):
Premature Decedents
At 300 mg/kg bw/day, two females were found dead and one was killed in extremis around the time of parturition (day 38 of dosing). Of these, Female 95 (found dead) showed enlarged adrenals whilst Female 91 (killed in extremis) had enlarged adrenals and yellow colored contents in the caecum, colon, duodenum, ileum and jejunum.

The remaining females treated with 300 mg/kg bw/day were also terminated prematurely on Day 38. All these females had black colored contents in the stomach with some animals also showing yellow discoloration or sloughing of the glandular or non glandular region of the stomach. The presence of black and/or yellow colored contents in other parts of the mottled appearing liver.

There were no macroscopic findings for the female treated with 100 mg/kg bw/day that was found dead on Day 38.

Terminal Sacrifice
There were no treatment-related macroscopic findings at terminal necropsy for males up to a dose level of 300 mg/kg bw/day and females for females up to a dose level of 100 mg/kg bw/day.

At scheduled termination, one male treated with 300 and 30 mg/kg bw/day and one female treated with 100 and 30 mg/kg bw/day was shown to have reddened lungs at necropsy. At 30 mg/kg bw/day, one male showed small epididymides and small testes. One female showed one malformed kidney being smaller in size, misshaped and pale. These findings were considered incidental.

For results in tabular form, see Table 10 in 'Any other information on results incl. tables'
Neuropathological findings:
no effects observed
Description (incidence and severity):
Histopathological findings, including examination of the brain (incl. cerebrum, cerebellum and pons): no findings were noted relating to the brains of the test animals which could be related to treatment with the test item (see attached Illustration in section "Overall remarks, attachments").

Organ weight findings, including the brains: no findings were noted relating to the brains of the test animals which could be related to treatment with the test item (see Table 9 in 'Any other information on results incl. tables').
Histopathological findings: non-neoplastic:
effects observed, treatment-related
Description (incidence and severity):
There were several findings that were considered to be of toxicological significance (see attached Illustration in section "Overall remarks, attachments").

The following treatment related microscopic abnormalities were detected:

Premature Decedents
Gastrointestinal tract: There was minimal to moderate ulceration present in the glandular area of the stomach in 10/12 females treated with 300 mg/kg bw/day. There was inflammatory change present in one or more areas of the intestines, most pronounced in the caecum in 7/12 of these females.

Thymus, Spleen and Lymph Nodes: Lymphoid depletion or lymphocytolysis was present in the thymus, spleen and lymph nodes of up to 10/12 females. There was an increase in hematopoiesis in the spleen of some females.

Bone marrow (sternum): Decreased cellularity was present in the bone marrow (sternum) of 5/12 animals.

Adrenal glands: 5/12 females treated with 300 mg/kg bw/day showed cortical hypertrophy in the adrenal gland.

Liver: Hepatocellular atrophy (presenting as a diffuse change with homogenous, deeply staining cells without normal lobular pattern often concentrated in the centrilobular area occasionally giving the appearance of periportal enlargement) was present in 10/12 animals. Periportal fat-type vacuolation was also present in one female, hematopoiesis present in 3/12 females.

A further one female treated with 100 mg/kg bw/day had given birth but was found dead. This animal also showed similar changes in the liver, stomach, intestines, bone marrow and lymphoid system.

Terminal Sacrifice
Spleen: An increase in the amount of hematopoiesis in the spleen of all treated males and the change in males treated with 30 mg/kg bw/day was equivocal.

Thymus: Thymic lymphoid depletion was present in one female treated with 100 mg/kg bw/day but was not present in females treated with 30 mg/kg bw/day.

Bone marrow (sternum): An increased cellularity in the bone marrow (sternum) of all treated males and the change in males treated with 30 mg/kg bw/day were equivocal.

Adrenal glands: Minimal cortical hypertrophy in the adrenal gland was present in one female treated with 30 mg/kg bw/day and two females treated with 100 mg/kg bw/day.

Liver: Hepatocellular atrophy was present three females treated with 100 mg/kg bw/day; these findings were low grade changes and did not occur in females treated with 30 mg/kg bw/day.

There were no changes in the stomach, intestines or mesenteric lymph node of females treated with 30 or 100 mg/kg bw/day.

There were no test item-related microscopic findings in the testes, including following the qualitative examination of the stages of spermatogenesis in the testes (no test item-related abnormalities in the integrity of the various cell types present within the different stages of the sperm cycle) or following the evaluation of the uterus or evaluation of follicles and corpora lutea in the ovaries.
Histopathological findings: neoplastic:
not specified
Other effects:
no effects observed
Description (incidence and severity):
See field "Cross-reference": results on reproductive performance, offspring viability, clinical signs of offspring, offspring body weight and gross pathology of offspring reported in endpoint study record 7.8.1 Toxicity to reproduction.001. No obvious adverse effects observed that would lead to the classification of the substance with regard to reproductive toxicity.
Dose descriptor:
NOAEL
Effect level:
30 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received)
Based on:
test mat.
Sex:
male/female
Basis for effect level:
other: overall effects
Critical effects observed:
yes
Lowest effective dose / conc.:
100 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received)
System:
haematopoietic
Organ:
other: haematopoietic tissues
Treatment related:
yes
Dose response relationship:
yes
Relevant for humans:
yes
Critical effects observed:
yes
Lowest effective dose / conc.:
100 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received)
System:
hepatobiliary
Organ:
liver
Treatment related:
yes
Dose response relationship:
not specified
Relevant for humans:
yes
Critical effects observed:
yes
Lowest effective dose / conc.:
300 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received)
System:
gastrointestinal tract
Organ:
other: gastrointestinal tract
Treatment related:
yes
Dose response relationship:
not specified
Relevant for humans:
yes

Table 1. Allocation of animals to treatment groups

Treatment Group Dose Level Treatment Volume Concentration Animal Numbers
(mg/kg bw/day) (mL/kg) (mg/mL) Male Female
Control 0 5 0

12

(1-12)

12

(13-24)

Low 30 5 6

12

(25-36)

12

(37-48)

Intermediate 100 5 20

12

(49-60)

12 (61-72)
High 300 5 60

12 (73-84)

12 (85-96)

The numbers in parentheses ( ) show the individual animal numbers allocated to each treatment

group.

Table 2. Summary Incidence of Daily Clinical Observations

Day Numbers Relative to Start Date
Group 1 Group 2 Group 3 Group 4
0(Control) 30 mg/kg bw/day 100 mg/kg bw/day 300 mg/kg bw/day
Sex: Male
Scheduled kill
Number of Animals 12 12 12 12
Days from - to  43 44 43 44 43 44 43 44
Staining around the eyes
Number of Animals . . 1 .
Days from - to  . . 1 4 .
Noisy respiration
Number of Animals . 1 1 .
Days from - to  . 35 39 34 35 .
Sex: Female 
Littering
Number of Animals 1 1 . .
Days from - to  40 40 39 39 . .
Not Observed Due to Littering
Number of Animals 1 1 . 1
Days from - to  40 40 39 39 . 37 37
Killed (SD/NACWO Request)
Number of Animals . . . 9
Days from - to  . . . 38 38
Killed `in extremis'
Number of Animals . . . 1
Days from - to  . . . 38 38
Scheduled kill
Number of Animals 12 12 11 .
Days from - to  42 45 42 45 42 54 .
Found dead
Number of Animals . . 1 2
Days from - to  . . 38 38 38 38
Decreased respiratory rate
Number of Animals . . . 3
Days from - to  . . . 38 38
Pilo-erection
Number of Animals . . . 4
Days from - to  . . . 38 38
Hypothermia
Number of Animals . . . 1
Days from - to  . . . 38 38
Hunched posture
Number of Animals . . . 4
Days from - to  . . . 38 38
Fur stained by test material
Number of Animals . . . 4
Days from - to  . . . 30 37
Diarrhoea
Number of Animals . . . 4
Days from - to  . . . 38 38

. No data available

Table 3. Group Mean Body Weight Values

Body Weights (g)
Day Numbers Relative to Start Date
Group (Sex) 1 8 15 22 29 36 43
1(M) Mean 329.8 339.6 352.2 361.3 374.3 388.4 395.3
S.D. 5.0 9.4 12.7 16.6 19.2 21.5 24.7
N 12 12 12 12 12 12 12
2(M) Mean 330.8 339.6 349.1 357.9 371.6 383.8 393.3
S.D. 6.6 9.0 12.3 12.8 16.4 18.2 19.2
N 12 12 12 12 12 12 12
3(M) Mean 326.1 333.6 341.4 347.7 361.1 368.8 372.4
S.D. 9.1 13.0 14.5 18.0 19.9 22.5 23.1
N 12 12 12 12 12 12 12
4(M) Mean 327.4 329.3 335.8 337.3 346.0 349.6 354.7
S.D. 6.1 7.0 10.3 12.9 14.5 17.8 19.1
N 12 12 12 12 12 12 12
1(F) Mean 199.3 208.1 217.2
S.D. 9.2 11.4 12.8
N 12 12 12
2(F) Mean 192.3 200.5 210.3
S.D. 9.0 10.6 9.2
N 12 12 12
3(F) Mean 192.2 199.3 206.1
S.D. 8.9 9.7 12.1
N 12 12 12
4(F) Mean 191.6 197.7 204.3
S.D. 12.8 11.7 10.2
N 12 12 12
Day Numbers
Gestation Lactation
0 7 14 20 1 4
1(F) Mean 219.3 241.3 271.2 332.1 249.0 259.7
S.D. 13.0 14.8 18.4 26.0 18.3 15.7
N 12 12 12 12 11 11
2(F) Mean 213.1 236.9 264.6 324.0 240.6 253.0
S.D. 13.0 13.6 19.7 32.6 11.4 16.2
N 11 11 11 11 10 10
3(F) Mean 210.2 232.8 260.8 310.5 235.7 242.4
S.D. 12.9 12.8 12.9 17.2 18.0 16.8
N 11 11 11 11 10 10
4(F) Mean 204.5 226.9 256.0 292.2** # #
S.D. 13.5 17.2 17.4 23.4
N 11 11 11 9

Dose Levels:

Group 1: 0 (Control), Group 2: 30 mg/kg bw/day, Group 3: 100 mg/kg bw/day, Group 4: 300 mg/kg bw/day

# = females terminated on Day 38 of the study

M Male

F Female

S.D. Standard deviation

N Number of animals/litters

* Significantly different from control group p<0.05

** Significantly different from control group p<0.01

Table 4. Group Mean Body Weight Gains

Increase in Body Weight (g)
Day Numbers Relative to Start Date
Abs %
Gain Gain
Group From: 1 8 15 22 29 36 1 1
(Sex) To: 8 15 22 29 36 43 43 43
1(M) Mean 9.8 12.6 9.1 13.0 14.2 6.8 65.5 19.8
S.D. 6.0 5.4 7.9 3.5 3.8 5.2 21.7 6.4
N 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12
2(M) Mean 8.8 9.5 8.8 13.7 12.2 9.6 62.6 18.9
S.D. 4.4 7.9 5.5 5.6 3.2 4.7 16.0 4.7
N 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12
3(M) Mean 7.5 7.8* 6.3 13.4 7.7** 3.7 46.3 14.2
S.D. 4.8 5.1 6.6 4.4 3.8 5.6 17.5 5.2
N 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12
4(M) Mean 1.9** 6.4* 1.5** 8.8* 3.6** 5.1 27.3 8.3
S.D. 4.4 4.7 5.7 3.7 5.3 4.6 14.7 4.4
N 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12
Group From: 1 8 1 1
(Sex) To: 8 15 15 15
1(F) Mean 8.8 9.1 17.8 8.9
S.D. 4.6 6.3 5.3 2.4
N 12 12 12 12
2(F) Mean 8.3 9.8 18.1 9.5
S.D. 5.6 5.7 5.6 3.0
N 12 12 12 12
3(F) Mean 7.2 6.8 13.9 7.2
S.D. 4.1 6.2 6.1 3.1
N 12 12 12 12
4(F) Mean 6.1 6.7 12.8 6.8
S.D. 4.4 4.5 6.4 3.6
N 12 12 12 12
Increase in Body Weight (g) Cumulative Body Weight Change (g)
Days Days
Gestation Lactation Gestation
Group From: 0 7 14 1 0 0
(sex) To: 7 14 20 4 14 20
1(F) Mean 22.0 29.8 60.9 10.7 51.8 112.8
S.D. 5.0 6.6 9.4 8.1 8.7 16.4
N 12 12 12 11 12 12
2(F) Mean 23.8 27.7 59.4 12.4 51.5 110.9
S.D. 5.5 7.6 16.7 12.8 11.5 26.3
N 11 11 11 10 11 11
3(F) Mean 22.6 28.0 49.7* 6.7 50.6 100.4
S.D. 4.5 3.3 10.9 7.0 5.7 10.4
N 11 11 11 10 11 11
4(F) Mean 22.4 29.1 37.6** # 51.5 88.9*
S.D. 6.6 4.5 11.4 5.0 14.0
N 11 11 9 11 11

Dose Levels:

Group 1: 0 (Control), Group 2: 30 mg/kg bw/day, Group 3: 100 mg/kg bw/day, Group 4: 300 mg/kg bw/day

# = females terminated on Day 38 of the study

M Male

F Female

S.D. Standard deviation

N Number of animals/litters

* Significantly different from control group p<0.05

** Significantly different from control group p<0.01

Table 5. Group Mean Food Consumptions

Day Numbers Relative to Start Date
Group From: 1 8 29 36
(Sex) To: 8 15 36 43
1(M) Mean 17.9 18.0 19.6 19.5
N 12 12 12 12
2(M) Mean 18.1 18.1 19.7 19.2
N 12 12 12 12
3(M) Mean 16.7 16.2 17.6 16.4
N 12 12 12 12
4(M) Mean 16.9 17.7 16.9 16.2
N 12 12 12 12
Group From: 1 8#
(Sex) To: 8 15
1(F) Mean 15.2 15.4
N 12 12
2(F) Mean 16.1 13.9
N 12 9
3(F) Mean 17.2 14.7
N 12 6
4(F) Mean 13.8 14.2
N 12 12
Day Numbers
Gestation Lactation
Group From: 0 7 14 1
(Sex) To: 7 14 20 4
1(F) Mean 18.8 22.0 23.6 23.0
S.D. 1.1 2.3 2.8 6.0
N 12 12 12 9
2(F) Mean 19.0 22.1 22.7 24.7
S.D. 2.1 3.2 2.6 5.9
N 11 11 11 10
3(F) Mean 18.2 21.4 21.8 17.4
S.D. 1.4 1.7 2.4 4.1
N 11 11 11 9
4(F) Mean 18.4 21.1 17.9*** ¤
S.D. 2.4 2.7 2.5
N 11 10 8

Food Consumption = g/animal/day.

Dose Levels:

Group 1: 0 (Control), Group 2: 30 mg/kg bw/day, Group 3: 100 mg/kg bw/day, Group 4: 300 mg/kg bw/day

# = due to technician error cages 16, 21 and 24 have been excluded from group means

¤ = data unavailable due to early termination of level

M Male

F Female

S.D. Standard deviation

N Number of animals/litters

*** Significantly different from control group p<0.001

Table 6. Food Efficiency

Day Numbers Relative to Start Date
Group From: 1 8 29 36
(Sex) To: 8 15 36 43
1(M) Mean 7.8 9.9 10.3 4.9
N 12 12 12 12
2(M) Mean 7.0 7.4 8.8 7.1
N 12 12 12 12
3(M) Mean 6.5 6.8 6.2 3.1
N 12 12 12 12
4(M) Mean 1.5 5.2 2.9 4.4
N 12 12 12 12
Group From: 1 8
(Sex) To: 8 15
1(F) Mean 8.3 8.2
N 12 12
2(F) Mean 7.7 10.1
N 12 9
3(F) Mean 6.0 8.2
N 12 6
4(F) Mean 6.3 6.7
N 12 12

Dose Levels:

Group 1: 0 (Control), Group 2: 30 mg/kg bw/day, Group 3: 100 mg/kg bw/day, Group 4: 300 mg/kg bw/day

M Male

F Female

S.D. Standard deviation

N Number of animals/litters

Table 7. Group Mean Hematological Values

Group (sex) Hb RBC Hct MCH MCV MCHC WBC Neut Lymph Mono Eos Bas CT PLT APTT Retics
g/dl 10^12/l % pg fl g/dl 10^9/l 10^9/l 10^9/l 10^9/l 10^9/l 10^9/l Seconds 10^9/l Seconds %
1(M) Mean 16.50 8.562 46.62 19.28 54.44 35.42 6.84 0.970 5.814 0.000n 0.056 0.000n 8.76 545.4 13.92 4.04
S.D. 0.62 0.251 1.96 0.40 1.32 0.38 1.34 0.288 1.419 0.000 0.077 0.000 0.27 80.8 1.51 0.62
N 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
2(M) Mean 18.14* 9.548** 52.60** 19.00 55.10 34.46* 7.58 1.562 5.976 0.000n 0.044 0.000n 8.92 525.2 15.16 4.86
S.D. 1.20 0.563 3.56 0.87 2.03 0.45 2.65 0.956 1.770 0.000 0.060 0.000 0.69 61.7 2.50 0.88
N 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
3(M) Mean 21.68** 11.254** 63.18** 19.28 56.18 34.34* 6.14 0.970 5.110 0.000n 0.038 0.000n 9.66 457.2* 15.66 4.32
S.D. 1.02 0.675 3.25 0.48 1.05 0.38 0.80 0.370 0.778 0.000 0.036 0.000 0.82 22.2 1.69 0.41
N 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
4(M) Mean 22.84** 11.944** 65.94** 19.14 55.22 34.62* 7.86 0.892 6.934 0.000n 0.034 0.000n 9.70 376.4** 13.94 4.74
S.D. 1.17 0.586 3.17 0.60 1.44 0.40 0.84 0.380 1.162 0.000 0.076 0.000 0.91 102.7 1.15 0.58
N 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
1(F) Mean 13.32 6.976 39.26 19.12 56.34 33.94 6.58 1.488 5.092 0.000n 0.000n 0.000n 8.48 908.2 12.86 6.58
S.D. 0.75 0.470 2.45 0.75 2.35 0.26 1.01 0.744 0.306 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.50 170.3 1.63 0.84
N 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
2(F) Mean 14.84* 7.668* 43.92* 19.36 57.26 33.80 6.32 2.218 4.104 0.000n 0.000n 0.000n 8.24 797.8 13.08 8.24**
S.D. 1.25 0.707 4.07 0.24 0.15 0.34 3.44 2.110 1.359 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.50 124.0 1.13 0.54
N 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
3(F) Mean 16.44** 8.268** 48.80** 19.86 59.02 33.66 5.36 1.882 3.478* 0.000n 0.000n 0.000n 8.16 757.0 14.12 9.74**
S.D. 0.76 0.111 2.56 0.79 2.60 0.48 2.17 0.896 1.295 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.24 91.8 0.44 0.89
N 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5

5

Dose Levels: Group 1 - 0 (Control), Group 2 - 30 mg/kg bw/day, Group 3 - 100 mg/kg bw/day, Group 4 - 300 mg/kg bw/day

M Male

F Female

S.D. Standard deviation

N Number of animals/litters

n Data not appropriate for statistical analysis

* Significantly different from control group p<0.05

** Significantly different from control group p<0.01

Parameters measured on potassium EDTA - treated blood:

Hemoglobin (Hb)

Total erythrocyte count (RBC)

Hematocrit (Hct)

Erythrocyte indices - Mean Corpuscular Hemoglobin (MCH), Mean Corpuscular Volume (MCV), Mean Corpuscular Hemoglobin Concentration (MCHC)

Total leukocyte count (WBC)

Differential leukocyte count - Neutrophils (Neut), Lymphocytes (Lymph), Monocytes (Mono), Eosinophils (Eos), Basophils (Bas) Platelet count (PLT)

Reticulocyte count (Retics)

Parameters measured on citrate-treated blood:

Prothrombin time (CT)

Activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT)

Table 8. Group Mean Blood Chemical Values

Group (Sex) Urea Glucose Tot. Prot. Albumin A/G Na+ K+ Cl- Ca++ P ASAT ALAT AP Creat Chol Bili Bile Acid
mg/dl mg/dl g/dl g/dl Ratio mmol/l mmol/l mmol/l mmol/l mmol/l IU/l IU/l IU/l mg/dl mg/dl mg/dl μmol/l
1(M) Mean 47.0 160.6 7.024 3.74 1.158 148.0 4.216 102.6 2.730 2.20 72.2 48.6 138.0 0.742 96.0 0.136 5.70
S.D. 3.0 31.3 0.553 0.11 0.122 2.0 0.248 1.5 0.097 0.31 7.8 6.0 26.5 0.056 26.3 0.040 1.01
N 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
2(M) Mean 43.6 155.8 6.932 3.76 1.182 148.4 4.372 103.8 2.666 1.84 84.8 51.0 147.4 0.776 87.8 0.110 8.36
S.D. 8.8 18.6 0.400 0.11 0.077 0.9 0.547 1.1 0.079 0.21 13.6 6.1 23.3 0.070 13.0 0.038 2.70
N 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
3(M) Mean 43.4 120.0* 7.418 3.90 1.112 148.4 4.396 103.0 2.734 2.06 96.4* 53.2 172.4 0.768 71.6** 0.084* 11.30**
S.D. 4.3 15.3 0.328 0.16 0.070 3.0 0.353 1.2 0.112 0.63 16.2 6.6 50.4 0.042 1.5 0.046 2.60
N 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
4(M) Mean 41.8 160.0 5.840** 3.20** 1.234 148.8 4.688 106.8** 2.520** 1.66 112.8** 57.2 136.2 0.726 56.2** 0.016** 13.40**
S.D. 4.4 23.8 0.395 0.16 0.052 0.4 0.638 1.3 0.040 0.27 39.4 8.9 27.3 0.076 6.5 0.011 4.71
N 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
1(F) Mean 44.8 133.6 6.532 3.74 1.324 146.4 4.170 103.0 2.710 1.06 86.4 62.2 143.0 0.948 91.6 0.064 23.16
S.D. 7.1 20.3 0.648 0.37 0.040 1.5 0.116 1.9 0.154 0.57 20.2 24.7 109.0 0.236 11.1 0.015 18.00
N 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
2(F) Mean 45.4 137.0 6.256 3.48 1.252 149.2 4.338 106.8* 2.614 0.52 92.0 56.8 112.2 0.818 76.8 0.062 12.26
S.D. 11.2 12.2 0.772 0.60 0.175 3.2 0.596 3.3 0.130 0.04 34.6 13.5 25.8 0.138 19.8 0.008 11.84
N 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
3(F) Mean 52.2 132.2 6.516 3.76 1.386 147.6 4.184 106.6* 2.652 0.66 79.4 56.8 137.4 0.854 74.4 0.062 9.36
S.D. 3.6 12.4 0.365 0.18 0.057 1.5 0.445 1.7 0.171 0.42 8.3 7.8 46.3 0.068 11.1 0.008 3.47
N 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5

Dose Levels: Group 1 - 0 (Control), Group 2 - 30 mg/kg bw/day, Group 3 - 100 mg/kg bw/day, Group 4 - 300 mg/kg bw/day

M Male

F Female

S.D. Standard deviation

N Number of animals/litters

n Data not appropriate for statistical analysis

* Significantly different from control group p<0.05

** Significantly different from control group p<0.01

Parameters measured on lithium heparin treated blood:

Urea

Calcium (Ca++)

Glucose

Inorganic phosphorus (P)

Total protein (Tot.Prot.)

Aspartate aminotransferase (ASAT)

Albumin

Alanine aminotransferase (ALAT)

Albumin/Globulin (A/G) ratio (by calculation)

Alkaline phosphatase (AP)

Sodium (Na+)

Creatinine (Creat)

Potassium (K+)

Total cholesterol (Chol)

Chloride (Cl-)

Total bilirubin (Bili)

Bile acids

Table 9. Group Mean Organ Weights with Corresponding Relative (% of Body Weight) Organ Weights

MALES FEMALES
0 30 100 300 0 30 100 300
Control mg/kg bw/day Control mg/kg bw/day
Terminal Bodyweight Mean (g) 395.8 393.8 374.5 355.3 259.7 252.9 241.1
S.D. 25.3 19.7 23.3 18.9 16.5 17.1 16.4
N 12 12 12 12 12 12 11
Adrenals Mean (g) 0.07022 0.07550 0.07516 0.07210 0.09590 0.09510* 0.10672**
S.D. 0.01231 0.00859 0.01068 0.01696 0.01396 0.01500 0.02918
N 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
Mean (%) 0.018 0.019 0.020 0.021 0.035 0.038* 0.045**
S.D. 0.004 0.001 0.002 0.004 0.004 0.005 0.009
N 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
Brain (Including Cerebrum,
Cerebellum And Pons)
Mean (g) 1.97200 1.92486 1.99846 1.92282 1.85840 1.72084 1.73108
S.D. 0.10215 0.15308 0.10167 0.13286 0.06758 0.07946 0.05395
N 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
Mean (%) 0.511 0.481 0.536 0.550 0.682 0.700 0.742
S.D. 0.023 0.019 0.045 0.037 0.031 0.046 0.044
N 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
Epididymides Mean (g) 1.48781 1.48413 1.45452 1.41631
S.D. 0.14906 0.30587 0.10444 0.19569
N 12 12 12 12
Mean (%) 0.376 0.376 0.390 0.398
S.D. 0.037 0.075 0.040 0.044
N 12 12 12 12
Heart Mean (g) 1.24044 1.30996 0.96188 1.06524 0.94754 0.90450 0.89762
S.D. 0.14610 0.20342 0.10404 0.21239 0.17241 0.17023 0.06659
N 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
Mean (%) 0.320 0.328 0.258 0.304 0.347 0.365 0.384
S.D. 0.025 0.045 0.034 0.052 0.058 0.053 0.026
N 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
Kidneys Mean (g) 2.60834 2.25078 2.12342* 1.88502* 1.69866 1.56786 1.61864
S.D. 0.61941 0.19761 0.08122 0.23142 0.18732 0.15490 0.25860
N 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
Mean (%) 0.676 0.565 0.570* 0.540* 0.624 0.636 0.690
S.D. 0.161 0.066 0.052 0.067 0.079 0.058 0.075
N 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
Liver Mean (g) 12.9290 11.9379 11.9103 11.8279 11.2310 11.3161* 11.1483*
S.D. 1.26107 0.84340 1.00069 1.17351 0.58563 1.67927 2.00872
N 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
Mean (%) 3.352 2.989 3.184 3.383 4.121 4.579* 4.738*
S.D. 0.366 0.144 0.162 0.300 0.233 0.524 0.539
N 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
Ovaries Mean (g) 0.11010 0.11668 0.11234
S.D. 0.01937 0.02418 0.02442
N 11 10 10
Mean (%) 0.042 0.046 0.047
S.D. 0.007 0.008 0.011
N 11 10 10
Pituitary Mean (g) 0.01174 0.01297 0.01155 0.01067 0.01667 0.01669 0.01461
S.D. 0.00248 0.00234 0.00202 0.00197 0.00228 0.00512 0.00174
N 12 12 12 11 11 9 10
Mean (%) 0.003 0.003 0.003 0.003 0.006 0.006 0.006
S.D. 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.002 0.001
N 12 12 12 11 11 9 10
Prostate Mean (g) 0.68968 0.63371 0.60710 0.51978**
S.D. 0.11748 0.16226 0.14203 0.08947
N 12 12 12 12
Mean (%) 0.174 0.161 0.162 0.147**
S.D. 0.024 0.039 0.035 0.027
N 12 12 12 12
Seminal Vesicles Mean (g) 1.94050 1.84904 1.59451* 1.50923*
S.D. 0.55025 0.33359 0.55241 0.30269
N 12 12 12 12
Mean (%) 0.494 0.471 0.426* 0.426*
S.D. 0.149 0.089 0.141 0.087
N 12 12 12 12
Spleen Mean (g) 0.70462 0.78266 0.76826 0.77962 0.68320 0.73588 0.64726
S.D. 0.08802 0.16750 0.09232 0.03436 0.08846 0.09501 0.06136
N 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
Mean (%) 0.182 0.196 0.205 0.223 0.251 0.298 0.277
S.D. 0.020 0.044 0.017 0.012 0.036 0.031 0.025
N 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
Testes Mean (g) 3.56021 3.50226 3.54632 3.54373
S.D. 0.30975 0.83156 0.56755 0.27723
N 12 12 12 12
Mean (%) 0.901 0.887 0.950 0.998
S.D. 0.075 0.204 0.164 0.062
N 12 12 12 12
Thymus Mean (g) 0.34894 0.31898 0.39868 0.39736 0.31312 0.22936 0.24802
S.D. 0.11172 0.11676 0.11450 0.07675 0.06041 0.06198 0.06618
N 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
Mean (%) 0.089 0.079 0.108 0.114 0.115 0.094 0.107
S.D. 0.025 0.027 0.035 0.023 0.024 0.028 0.031
N 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
Thyroid/Parathyroid Mean (g) 0.02074 0.02100 0.01874 0.01930 0.02228 0.02204 0.02000
S.D. 0.00456 0.00604 0.00646 0.00523 0.00562 0.00428 0.00317
N 5 5 5 4 5 5 5
Mean (%) 0.005 0.005 0.005 0.005 0.008 0.009 0.009
S.D. 0.001 0.002 0.002 0.001 0.002 0.002 0.001
N 5 5 5 4 5 5 5
Uterus & Cervix Mean (g) 0.69819 0.62455 0.71666
S.D. 0.13221 0.12797 0.30585
N 11 10 10
Mean (%) 0.266 0.246 0.295
S.D. 0.042 0.050 0.121
N 11 10 10

S.D. Standard deviation

N Number of animals/litters

* Significantly different from control group p<0.05

** Significantly different from control group p<0.01

Table 10. Summary Incidence of Necropsy Findings

MALES
Removal Reason: SCHEDULED KILL 0 30 100 300
(Control) mg/kg bw/day
Number of Animals Examined: 12 12 12 12
Group:  (1) (2) (3) (4)
Epididymides;
Submitted  (12) (12) (12) (12)
No Visible Lesions  12 11 12 12
Small 0 1 0 0
Lungs (With Bronchi);
Submitted  (12) (12) (12) (12)
No Visible Lesions  12 11 12 11
Reddened 0 1 0 1
Testes;
Submitted  (12) (12) (12) (12)
No Visible Lesions  12 11 12 12
Small 0 1 0 0
FEMALES
Removal Reason: SCHEDULED KILL 0 30 100
(Control) mg/kg bw/day
Number of Animals Examined: 12 12 11
Group:  (1) (2) (3)
Kidneys;
Submitted  (12) (12) (11)
No Visible Lesions  12 11 11
Malformed 0 1 0
Lungs (With Bronchi);
Submitted  (12) (12) (11)
No Visible Lesions  12 11 10
Reddened 0 1 1
Uterus & Cervix;
Submitted  (12) (12) (11)
No Visible Lesions  12 11 11
Damaged On Removal 0 1 0
FEMALES
Removal Reason: FOUND DEAD 100 300
mg/kg bw/day
Number of Animals Examined: 1 2
Group:  (3) (4)
Adrenals; 
Submitted  (1) (2)
No Visible Lesions  1 1
Enlarged 0 1
FEMALES
Removal Reason: KILLED (AT SD/NACWO REQUEST) 300
mg/kg bw/day
Number of Animals Examined: 9
Group:  (4)
Adrenals; 
Submitted  (9)
No Visible Lesions  9
Caecum;
Submitted  (9)
No Visible Lesions  7
Coloured Contents; black 2
Duodenum;
Submitted  (9)
No Visible Lesions  8
Coloured Contents; yellow 1
Ileum (Including Peyers Patches);
Submitted  (9)
No Visible Lesions  7
Coloured Contents; black 1
Coloured Contents; yellow 1
Jejunum;
Submitted  (9)
No Visible Lesions  8
Coloured Contents; yellow 1
Liver;
Submitted  (9)
No Visible Lesions  8
Mottled Appearance 1
Lungs (With Bronchi);
Submitted  (9)
No Visible Lesions  8
Reddened 1
Spleen;
Submitted  (9)
No Visible Lesions  8
Small 1
Stomach;
Submitted (9)
No Visible Lesions
0
Coloured Contents; black
9
Discolouration; yellow; glandular region
1
Discolouration; yellow; non-glandular region
1
Sloughing; glandular region 1
FEMALES
Removal Reason: KILLED IN EXTREMIS 300
mg/kg bw/day
Number of Animals Examined: 1
Group:  (4)
Adrenals; 
Submitted  (1)
No Visible Lesions  0
Enlarged 1
Caecum;
Submitted  (1)
No Visible Lesions  0
Coloured Contents; yellow 1
Colon;
Submitted  (1)
No Visible Lesions  0
Coloured Contents; yellow 1
Duodenum;
Submitted  (1)
No Visible Lesions  0
Coloured Contents; yellow 1
Ileum (Including Peyers Patches);
Submitted  (1)
No Visible Lesions  0
Coloured Contents; yellow 1
Jejunum;
Submitted  (1)
No Visible Lesions  0
Coloured Contents; yellow 1
Conclusions:
The oral administration of the substance to rats by gavage, at dose levels of 30, 100 and 300 mg/kg bw/day resulted in the premature termination or early death of all females around the time of parturition at 300 mg/kg bw/day. One female given 100 mg/kg bw/day was also found dead shortly after completing parturition. These deaths were considered to be treatment-related with histopathological changes in the gastrointestinal tract considered to be the primary cause along with secondary changes to the liver, adrenals and lympho-reticular system at the point of parturition when the intrinsic stress on these females was notably increased. The surviving animals of either sex treated with 100 mg/kg bw/day and males given 300 mg/kg bw/day showed adverse changes in the hematology profile which were associated with toxicologically significant alterations in the spleen and sternal bone marrow.

The dose level of 30 mg/kg bw/day was considered to be the ‘No Observed Adverse Effect Level’ (NOAEL) for systemic toxicity in animals of either sex.

Based on a toxicological interpretation of all the results, the substance is classified with regard to specific target organ toxicity - repeated exposure, with the classification STOT-RE Cat 2: H373 (May cause damage to organs through prolonged or repeated exposure). Classification of the substance is appropriate based on the dose levels 100 and 300 mg/kg bw/day, where mortality at the time of parturition associated with gastrointestinal toxicity and secondary stress-related responses as well as dose-related changes in the haematopoietic system and the liver were observed. The haematopoietic tissues and the liver are suggested as the targets rather than a single organ. At higher doses the gastrointestinal tract is also considered a target.
Executive summary:

Introduction

The study was designed to investigate the systemic toxicity and potential adverse effects of the test item on reproduction and is designed to be compatible with the requirements of the OECD Guidelines for Testing of Chemicals No. 422 “Combined

Repeated Dose Toxicity Study with the Reproduction/ Developmental Toxicity Screening Test” and with Commission Regulation (EC) No 440/2008 of 30 May 2008.

Methods

The test item was administered by gavage to three groups, each of twelve male and twelve female Wistar Han™:RccHan™:WIST strain rats, for up to eight weeks (including a two week pre-pairing phase, pairing, gestation and early lactation for females), at dose levels of 30, 100 and 300 mg/kg bw/day. A control group of twelve males and twelve females was dosed with vehicle alone (Arachis oil BP).

On Day 38, two females and one female treated with 300 and 100 mg/kg bw/day respectively, were found dead and an additional female treated with 300 mg/kg bw/day was killed in extremis after showing clinical signs during parturition. The remaining females treated with 300 mg/kg bw/day showed further signs of deterioration and difficulty during parturition, and were terminated early on welfare grounds.

Pairing of animals within each dose group was undertaken on a one male: one female basis within each treatment group on Day 15 of the study, with females subsequently being allowed to litter and rear their offspring to Day 5 of lactation.

Clinical signs, behavioral assessments, body weight change and food and water consumption were monitored during the study. Extensive functional observations were performed on five selected males from each dose group after the completion of the pairing phase, and for five selected parental females from each surviving dose group on Day 4 post partum. Hematology and blood chemistry were evaluated prior to termination on five selected males and females from each surviving dose group.

Adult males were terminated on Day 43 or 44, followed by the termination of all surviving females and offspring on Day 5 post partum. Any surviving female which did not produce a pregnancy was terminated on or after Day 25 post coitum. All animals were subjected to a gross necropsy examination and histopathological evaluation of selected tissues was performed.

Results

Adult Responses

Mortality - Two females treated with 300 mg/kg bw/day were found dead around the time of parturition whilst another female was killed in extremis due to clinical signs associated with difficulty in parturition. Another female from 100 mg/kg bw/day dose group was found dead shortly after completing parturition.

Some of the remaining females treated with 300 mg/kg bw/day also showed signs of deterioration and difficulty during parturition and therefore all the females from this dose group were terminated earlier than scheduled (Day 38 of dosing). These deaths were considered to be treatment-related. There were no further unscheduled deaths on the study.

Clinical Observations - There were no clinical signs of toxicity related to the test item in females treated with 300 mg/kg bw/day up to Day 38 (around the time of parturition) or in the remaining animals of either sex throughout the study. On Day 38, clinical signs were evident in females treated with 300 mg/kg bw/day. These included hypothermia, decreased respiratory rate, diarrhoea, hunched posture, pilo-erection and fur staining and were deemed to be due to difficulty in parturition.

Behavioral Assessment - There were no treatment-related effects at any dose level.

Functional Performance - Tests There were no treatment-related changes in the functional performance.

Sensory Reactivity Assessments - There were no treatment-related changes in sensory reactivity.

Body Weight - Males treated with 300 mg/kg bw/day, showed a statistically significant reduction in group mean body weight gains throughout the study excluding the final week. During Weeks 2 and 5 of treatment, males treated with 100 mg/kg bw/day also showed a statistically significant reduction in group mean body weight gain when compared to controls. Overall body weight

gain in both groups was reduced when compared to controls and this finding was considered to be adverse.

During the pre-pairing phase, females treated with 300 or 100 mg/kg bw/day showed lower group mean body weight gains although not attaining statistical significance. The group mean body weight gains during gestation Days 14 to 20 for these females were lower than controls. The overall effects on body weight development for females treated with 300 mg/kg bw/day were deemed to be adverse. There was no adverse effect on body weight gains during lactation for females treated with 30 mg/kg bw/day.

Food Consumption - During the pre-pairing phase food consumption for both sexes were comparable to controls. For males treated with 300 or 100 mg/kg bw/day, the last two weeks of treatment showed a slight reduction in food intake. Food intake for females treated with 300 or 100 mg/kg bw/day during gestation Days 14 to 20 also showed achieving statistical significance for the former.

Males treated with 300 or 100 mg/kg bw/day generally showed lower food conversion efficiency throughout the study when compared to controls. Food conversion efficiency for the corresponding females was lower than controls during Week 1 of pre-pairing phase and remained low for the 300 mg/kg bw/day females during Week 2. For 30 mg/kg bw/day animals food conversion efficiency was comparable with controls, where measured.

Water Consumption - Visual inspection of water residues did not indicate any effect of treatment on water intake throughout the study.

Laboratory Investigations

Due to the early termination of females treated with 300 mg/kg bw/day the hematology and blood chemical parameters were not assessed for these females.

Hematology - At all dose levels, hematology evaluations identified increases in hemoglobin, erythrocyte counts hematocrit, reticulocyte counts (females only) and reduced mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration (males only). Animals of either sex treated with 100 mg/kg bw/day and males receiving 300 mg/kg bw/day showed an increase in lymphocytes count. Taking into consideration the associated histopathology alterations, the hematology changes at 100 mg/kg bw/day were considered to be of toxicological significance.

Blood Chemistry - There were no changes of toxicological significance up to a dose level of 300 mg/kg bw/day in males and up to a dose level of 100 mg/kg bw/day in females.

Pathology

Necropsy - Early decedents: At 300 mg/kg bw/day, some females that were found dead or killed prematurely showed findings of enlarged adrenals, black color contents in the stomach, caecum and ileum and/or yellow color contents in the duodenum, ileum and jejunum. One female had discolored yellow glandular region in the stomach and sloughing of the glandular region. One other female had a mottled appearance of the liver, reddened lungs, a small spleen, and the stomach was discolored yellow on the non glandular region. These findings were considered to be related to treatment.

Terminal Sacrifice: At scheduled termination, one male treated with 300 and 30 mg/kg bw/day and one female each treated with 100 and 30 mg/kg bw/day was shown to have reddened lungs at necropsy. At 30 mg/kg bw/day, one male shown to have small epididymides and testes. One female was shown to have one malformed kidney, being smaller in size, misshapen and pale. These

findings were considered to be incidental and not related to treatment.

Organ Weights - Females treated with 30 or 100 mg/kg bw/day showed a dose-related statistically significant increase in adrenal weights relative to terminal body weight. The relationship for absolute weights was not clear with females treated with 30 mg/kg bw/day showing a marginal but statistically significant reduction in absolute weight but females receiving 100 mg/kg bw/day

showing an increase. The majority of the individual values were within the background control ranges.

There was no histological correlation with the reduced weights in the prostate or seminal vesicles at 300 or 100 mg/kg bw/day and, as the weights were within background ranges this may be linked to the overall body weight reduction. There were no toxicological significant effects were detected in males or females treated with 30 mg/kg bw/day.

Histopathology - Premature Decedents: Minimal to moderate ulceration was present in the glandular area of the stomach in 10/12

animals. Inflammatory change was present in one or more areas of the intestines, most pronounced in the caecum in 7/12 animals. Of these animals 5/12 showed cortical hypertrophy in the adrenal gland.

Hepatocellular atrophy; (presenting as a diffuse change with homogenous, deeply staining cells without normal lobular pattern often concentrated in the centrilobular area occasionally giving the appearance of periportal enlargement) was present in 10/12 animals. Periportal fattype vacuolation was present in one animal.

Hematopoiesis was present in 3/12 animals. Lymphoid depletion or lymphocytolysis was present in the thymus, spleen and lymph nodes of up to 10/12 animals. There was an increase in hematopoiesis in the spleen of some animals. Decreased cellularity was present in the bone marrow (sternum) of 5/12 animals. A further one 100 mg/kg bw/day female had given birth but was found dead. This animal also showed similar changes in the liver, stomach, intestines, bone marrow and lymphoid system. These findings were considered to be of toxicological significance.

Terminal Sacrifice: There was an increase in the amount of hematopoiesis in the spleen and an increased cellularity in the bone marrow (sternum) of all groups treated with the test item when compared to control animals. The change in males treated with 30 mg/kg bw/day was equivocal.

Minimal cortical hypertrophy in the adrenal gland was present in 1/5 and 2/5 females treated with 30 or 100 mg/kg bw/day; respectively. There was hepatocellular atrophy in the liver in 3/5 females treated with 100 mg/kg bw/day. These were low grade changes and did not occur in females treated with 30 mg/kg bw/day.

Thymic lymphoid depletion was present in one female treated with 100 mg/kg bw/day but was not present in females treated with 30 mg/kg bw/day. There were no changes in the stomach, intestines or mesenteric lymph node of females treated with 100 or 30 mg/kg bw/day.

There were no test item-related microscopic findings in the testes, including following the qualitative examination of the stages of spermatogenesis in the testes (no test item-related abnormalities in the integrity of the various cell types present within the different stages of the sperm cycle) or following the evaluation of the uterus or evaluation of follicles and corpora lutea in the ovaries.

Conclusion

The oral administration of CsTreat to rats by gavage, at dose levels of 30, 100 and 300 mg/kg bw/day resulted in the premature termination or early death of all females around the time of parturition at 300 mg/kg bw/day. One female given 100 mg/kg bw/day was also found dead shortly after completing parturition. These deaths were considered to be treatment-related with histopathological changes in the gastrointestinal tract considered to be the primary cause along with secondary changes to the liver, adrenals and lympho-reticular system at the point of parturition when the intrinsic stress on these females was notably increased. The surviving animals of either sex treated with 100 mg/kg bw/day and males given 300 mg/kg bw/day showed adverse changes in hematology profile which were associated with toxicologically significant alterations in the spleen and sternal bone marrow.

A dose level of 30 mg/kg bw/day was therefore considered to be the ‘No Observed Adverse Effect Level’ (NOAEL) for systemic toxicity in animals of either sex. Based on toxicological interpretation of all the results, the substance is classified with regard to specific target organ toxicity - repeated exposure, with the classification STOT-RE Cat 2: H373 (May cause damage to organs through prolonged or repeated exposure). The haematopoietic tissues and the liver are suggested as the targets rather than a single organ. At higher doses the gastrointestinal tract is also considered a target.

Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
adverse effect observed
Dose descriptor:
NOAEL
30 mg/kg bw/day
Study duration:
subacute
Species:
rat
Quality of whole database:
The study is a GLP compliant and was performed by following the recommended method (OECD Guideline for Testing of Chemicals No 422 “Combined
Repeated Dose Toxicity Study with the Reproduction/ Developmental Toxicity Screening Test” (1996)). The study was also designed to be compatible with Commission Regulation (EC) No 440/2008 of 30 May 2008. Deviations from the study plan are not considered to have affected the scientific purpose or integrity of the study or the results obtained. The study has a Klimisch score of 1.
System:
other: Targets: the haematopoietic system and the liver, at higher doses the gastrointestinal tract
Organ:
other: Haematopoietic tissues and the liver, at higher doses the gastrointestinal tract

Repeated dose toxicity: inhalation - systemic effects

Link to relevant study records
Reference
Endpoint:
short-term repeated dose toxicity: inhalation
Data waiving:
exposure considerations
Justification for data waiving:
other:
Justification for type of information:
JUSTIFICATION FOR DATA WAIVING

In accordance with column 2 of REACH Annex VIII, the most appropriate route of administration, having regard to the likely route of human exposure, should be selected for the short-term repeated dose toxicity study (required in section 8.6.1). Testing by inhalation route was not deemed appropriate, as the calculated vapour pressure of the substance is very low (less than 1.2 x 10^-9 Pa), and the particle size of the substance is so large that it excludes any likely exposure through inhalation. This route of exposure is therefore not relevant for the substance. Instead, the study is performed for the oral route and documented in the IUCLID endpoint 7.5.1.
Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
data waiving: supporting information
Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
data waiving: supporting information
Critical effects observed:
not specified
Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no study available

Repeated dose toxicity: inhalation - local effects

Link to relevant study records
Reference
Endpoint:
short-term repeated dose toxicity: inhalation
Data waiving:
exposure considerations
Justification for data waiving:
other:
Justification for type of information:
JUSTIFICATION FOR DATA WAIVING

In accordance with column 2 of REACH Annex VIII, the most appropriate route of administration, having regard to the likely route of human exposure, should be selected for the short-term repeated dose toxicity study (required in section 8.6.1). Testing by inhalation route was not deemed appropriate, as the calculated vapour pressure of the substance is very low (less than 1.2 x 10^-9 Pa), and the particle size of the substance is so large that it excludes any likely exposure through inhalation. This route of exposure is therefore not relevant for the substance. Instead, the study is performed for the oral route and documented in the IUCLID endpoint 7.5.1.
Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
data waiving: supporting information
Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
data waiving: supporting information
Critical effects observed:
not specified
Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no study available

Repeated dose toxicity: dermal - systemic effects

Link to relevant study records
Reference
Endpoint:
short-term repeated dose toxicity: dermal
Data waiving:
exposure considerations
Justification for data waiving:
other:
Justification for type of information:
JUSTIFICATION FOR DATA WAIVING

In accordance with column 2 of REACH Annex VIII, the most appropriate route of administration should be selected for the short-term repeated dose toxicity study (required in section 8.6.1). In the acute dermal toxicity studies for the substance there were no signs of dermal irritation or of systemic toxicity. No adverse effects were observed. The substance is not classified as acutely toxic via the skin. The results from the skin sensitisation, corrosion and irritation studies were negative.

Although the molecular mass of the substance (349 g/mol) might enable skin penetration, there are no other relevant physico-chemical properties that would suggest potential for a significant rate of absorption through the skin. The substance is available for absorption via the oral route but unlikely to be available for absorption via the dermal route. The substance is very stable, inorganic and insoluble. The pH of the substance is neutral. The dermal route of exposure is therefore not deemed most appropriate for the substance. Instead, the study is performed for the oral route and documented in the IUCLID endpoint 7.5.1.
Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
data waiving: supporting information
Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
data waiving: supporting information
Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
data waiving: supporting information
Critical effects observed:
not specified
Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no study available

Repeated dose toxicity: dermal - local effects

Link to relevant study records
Reference
Endpoint:
short-term repeated dose toxicity: dermal
Data waiving:
exposure considerations
Justification for data waiving:
other:
Justification for type of information:
JUSTIFICATION FOR DATA WAIVING

In accordance with column 2 of REACH Annex VIII, the most appropriate route of administration should be selected for the short-term repeated dose toxicity study (required in section 8.6.1). In the acute dermal toxicity studies for the substance there were no signs of dermal irritation or of systemic toxicity. No adverse effects were observed. The substance is not classified as acutely toxic via the skin. The results from the skin sensitisation, corrosion and irritation studies were negative.

Although the molecular mass of the substance (349 g/mol) might enable skin penetration, there are no other relevant physico-chemical properties that would suggest potential for a significant rate of absorption through the skin. The substance is available for absorption via the oral route but unlikely to be available for absorption via the dermal route. The substance is very stable, inorganic and insoluble. The pH of the substance is neutral. The dermal route of exposure is therefore not deemed most appropriate for the substance. Instead, the study is performed for the oral route and documented in the IUCLID endpoint 7.5.1.
Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
data waiving: supporting information
Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
data waiving: supporting information
Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
data waiving: supporting information
Critical effects observed:
not specified
Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no study available

Mode of Action Analysis / Human Relevance Framework

Treatment-related adverse effects were observed in the study regarding repeated dose toxicity. Based on a toxicological interpretation of all the results, the substance is classified with regard to specific target organ toxicity - repeated exposure, with the classification STOT-RE Cat 2: H373 (May cause damage to organs through prolonged or repeated exposure).

It is suggested that the haematopoietic tissues and the liver are the targets. At higher doses the gastrointestinal tract is also considered a target.

The oral route is considered to be the most appropriate route of exposure, based on the physical properties of the test item. The results of the study are relevant and believed to be of value in predicting the likely toxicity of the test item to man. The results are therefore relevant for the risk assessment, as well.

Results of the oral repeated dose reproductive screening study showed evidence to support the gastric absorption of the test item. The molecular size of the substance may also allow absorption through passive diffusion. This would suggest that the gastro-intestinal tract may provide a route of absorption, following oral administration, before entering the circulatory system via the blood.

Systemic distribution of the substance is evident from the repeated dose reproductive screening study due to the changes seen in histopathology, organs and hematology. The substance is of low water soluble so it is unlikely to be absorbed unchanged. It is not expected to bind to carrier proteins in the circulatory system, as the substance is not a skin sensitiser.

The results of the study showed some effects in the liver of rats (e.g. organ weight, hepatocellular atrophy), which can be associated with enhanced metabolism. However, review of the study suggests the hepatic changes observed are not conclusively indicative of hepatic induction but may be associated with other detoxification processes. The effects observed in the liver therefore may suggest there is potential for enhanced metabolism but do not provide strong evidence to support enhanced metabolism.

Additional information

The oral administration of the substance to rats by gavage, at dose levels of 30, 100 and 300 mg/kg bw/day resulted in the premature termination or early death of all females around the time of parturition at 300 mg/kg bw/day. One female given 100 mg/kg bw/day was also found dead shortly after completing parturition. These deaths were considered to be treatment-related with histopathological changes in the gastrointestinal tract considered to be the primary cause along with secondary changes to the liver, adrenals and lympho-reticular system at the point of parturition when the intrinsic stress on these females was notably increased. The surviving animals of either sex treated with 100 mg/kg bw/day and males given 300 mg/kg bw/day showed adverse changes in hematology profile which were associated with toxicologically significant alterations in the spleen and sternal bone marrow.

 

The dose level of 30 mg/kg bw/day was considered to be the ‘No Observed Adverse Effect Level’ (NOAEL) for systemic toxicity in animals of either sex.

 

Based on a toxicological interpretation of all the results, the substance is classified with regard to specific target organ toxicity - repeated exposure. The haematopoietic tissues and the liver are suggested as the targets rather than a single organ. At higher doses the gastrointestinal tract is also considered a target.

                              

The oral route was selected as the most appropriate route of exposure, based on the physical properties of the test item. The results of the study are believed to be of value in predicting the likely toxicity of the test item to man, and are therefore relevant for the risk assessment. In favour of the oral exposure route, the dermal and inhalation routes of exposure were not tested. Any deviations from the study plan are not considered to have affected the scientific purpose or integrity of the study or the results obtained.

As the substance is classified based on the subacute toxicity study, there is no need for a subchronic toxicity study. Furthermore, the toxicokinetic assessment of the substance does not indicate accumulation of the substance. In contrast, the effects observed in the subacute study in the livers of rats may suggest there is potential for enhanced metabolism, although there is no strong evidence to support it. A NOAEL has been identified in the subacute study. Therefore, there are no data gaps in repeated dose toxicity.


Justification for selection of repeated dose toxicity via oral route - systemic effects endpoint:
Only one study available.

Justification for selection of repeated dose toxicity inhalation - systemic and local effects endpoint:
Other justification: The inhalation route of exposure is not the most appropriate route of administration for the substance, having regard to the likely route of human exposure, as the calculated vapour pressure of the substance is very low (less than 1.2 x 10^-9 Pa), and the particle size of the substance is so large that it excludes any likely exposure through inhalation. Therefore the test for studying repeated dose toxicity through inhalation was not performed.

Justification for selection of repeated dose toxicity dermal - systemic and local effects endpoint:
Other justification: The dermal route of exposure is not the most appropriate route of administration for the substance, having regard to the likely route of human exposure. In the acute dermal toxicity studies for the test item there were no signs of systemic toxicity or of dermal irritation. The substance is not classified as acutely toxic via the skin.

Although the molecular mass of the substance (349 g/mol) does not exclude skin absorption, there are no other relevant physico-chemical properties that would suggest potential for a significant rate of absorption through the skin. The pH of the substance is neutral, therefore also not promoting skin penetration or skin injuries. The substance is very stable, inorganic and insoluble. Therefore the test for studying repeated dose toxicity through dermal exposure was not performed.

Justification for classification or non-classification

Treatment-related adverse effects were observed in the study regarding repeated dose toxicity. Based on a toxicological interpretation of all the results, the substance is classified with regard to specific target organ toxicity - repeated exposure, with the classification STOT-RE Cat 2: H373 (May cause damage to organs through prolonged or repeated exposure).

                              

Classification of the substance is appropriate based on the dose levels 100 and 300 mg/kg bw/day, where mortality at the time of parturition associated with gastrointestinal toxicity and secondary stress-related responses as well as dose-related changes in the hematopoietic system and the liver were observed. The haematopoietic tissues and the liver are suggested as the target rather than a single organ. At higher doses the gastrointestinal tract is also considered a target.