Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Eye irritation

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
eye irritation: in vivo
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: Guideline study performed under GLP

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
1993
Report date:
1993

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
EPA OPP 81-4 (Acute Eye Irritation)
GLP compliance:
yes

Test material

Constituent 1
Reference substance name:
Nu-Film-P
IUPAC Name:
Nu-Film-P
Constituent 2
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
Oligomerisation products of beta-pinene
EC Number:
701-246-8
Molecular formula:
Variable (dimer = C20-H34)
IUPAC Name:
Oligomerisation products of beta-pinene
Details on test material:
Typical content of pinene oligomers 96 wt%

Test animals / tissue source

Species:
rabbit
Strain:
New Zealand White
Details on test animals or tissues and environmental conditions:
TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Ace Animals
- Weight at study initiation: ranged from 2.2 - 2.8 kg
- Housing: Test animals were housed 1/cage in suspended cages. Bedding was placed beneath the cages and was changed twice a week.
- Diet: Fresh Purina Rabbit Chow (Diet #5321) provided daily.
- Water: ad libitum
- Acclimation period: at least 1 week

Test system

Vehicle:
unchanged (no vehicle)
Controls:
other: Untreated eyes of test animals served as controls
Amount / concentration applied:
0.1 ml of test material
Duration of treatment / exposure:
A single treatment followed by observation over 3 days
Observation period (in vivo):
3 days
Number of animals or in vitro replicates:
6 animals were used in total for this study (5 males; 1 female)
Details on study design:
The test substance was introduced into the conjunctival sac after gently pulling the lower eyelid away from the eye. After instillation, the eyelids were held together for 1 second to ensure adequate distribution. The other eye was untreated.

Each treated eye was examined for irritation of the cornea, iris and conjunctiva at 1 hour post instillation and on days 1, 2, and 3. The Draize technique was used to grade ocular reactions. The eyes of all rabbits were examined with sodium fluorescein at 24 hours. In addition the general health of each animals was monitored at each observation time.

Results and discussion

In vivo

Resultsopen allclose all
Irritation parameter:
cornea opacity score
Basis:
mean
Remarks:
across 6 test animals
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
0
Remarks on result:
other: All scores zero 1h after treatment
Irritation parameter:
iris score
Basis:
mean
Remarks:
across 6 test animals
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
0
Remarks on result:
other: All scores zero 1h after treatment
Irritation parameter:
conjunctivae score
Remarks:
(conjunctival redness)
Basis:
mean
Remarks:
across 6 test animals
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0.06
Max. score:
1
Reversibility:
fully reversible
Remarks on result:
other: 1h post treatment, 4 animals showed score 1
Irritation parameter:
chemosis score
Basis:
mean
Remarks:
across 6 test animals
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
0
Remarks on result:
other: All scores zero 1h after treatment
Irritant / corrosive response data:
No corneal opacity or iritis were observed during this study. Conjunctival redness and/or discharge were observed in the treated eyes of all rabbits 1h post treatment: after 1 day only a single rabbit showed redness and all appeared normal by Day 2.
Other effects:
No abnormal systemic signs were seen during the observation period.

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
not irritating
Remarks:
Migrated information Criteria used for interpretation of results: EU
Conclusions:
Based on EU (DSD and CLP) criteria, the test substance proved non-irritating to eyes in this study