Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Repeated dose toxicity: dermal

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
short-term repeated dose toxicity: dermal
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
March 06, 1972
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
study well documented, meets generally accepted scientific principles, acceptable for assessment

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
1972
Report date:
1972

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
no guideline followed
Principles of method if other than guideline:
A study was conducted to determine the short term repeated dose dermal toxicity of the test substance following application of 1 mL/kg bw (i.e., equivalent to 0.8 mg/kg bw/day) and 4 mL/kg bw (i.e., equivalent to 3.2 mg/kg bw/day) of the test solution in rabbits for 20 days.
GLP compliance:
no
Limit test:
no

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
Miristalkonium chloride
EC Number:
205-352-0
EC Name:
Miristalkonium chloride
Cas Number:
139-08-2
Molecular formula:
C23H42N.Cl
IUPAC Name:
N-benzyl-N,N-dimethyltetradecan-1-aminium chloride
impurity 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
Dimethyl(tetradecyl)amine
EC Number:
204-002-4
EC Name:
Dimethyl(tetradecyl)amine
Cas Number:
112-75-4
Molecular formula:
C16H35N
IUPAC Name:
n,n-dimethyltetradecan-1-amine
impurity 2
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
N,N-Dimethyltetradecan-1-amine--hydrogen chloride (1/1)
Cas Number:
2016-47-9
Molecular formula:
C16H36ClN
IUPAC Name:
N,N-Dimethyltetradecan-1-amine--hydrogen chloride (1/1)
Test material form:
solid
Remarks:
Powder
Specific details on test material used for the study:
8 oz jar containing a white powder
Lot no.: 263-S
Test substance: Myristyl dimethyl benzyl ammonium chloride
Purity: 99.1%
Dilution of 800 ppm in water was made, based on a 100% active material and used in test

Test animals

Species:
rabbit
Strain:
not specified
Sex:
male/female

Administration / exposure

Type of coverage:
occlusive
Vehicle:
water
Details on exposure:
TEST SITE
- Area of exposure: Backs and flanks
- % coverage: 10% of total body area
- Type of wrap if used: Rubberized fabric
- Time intervals for shavings or clipplings: Hair was clipped from their backs and flanks. One half of each test area was abraded as required, while the remainder was left intact

REMOVAL OF TEST SUBSTANCE
- Washing (if done): No washing
- Time after start of exposure: 27 days

TEST MATERIAL
- Amount(s) applied (volume or weight with unit): 1 mL/kg (0.8 mg/kg bw/day) and 4 mL/kg (3.2 mg/kg bw/day)
- Constant volume or concentration used: Yes
Analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
not specified
Details on analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
Dose groups:
1 mL/kg = 0.8 mg/kg bw/day
4 mL/kg = 3.2 mg/kg bw/day
Duration of treatment / exposure:
20 d
Frequency of treatment:
once a day
No. of animals per sex per dose:
1 animal per sex per dose
Control animals:
yes

Examinations

Observations and examinations performed and frequency:
Food, fluid intake, excretions, behavior and appearance of the animals were observed daily. The animals were weighed, as required. Blood and urine studies were performed at the beginning of the test, at the 20 d interval end prior to autopsy.
Sacrifice and pathology:
At autopsy, gross findings were made and tissues retained for histological examination.

Results and discussion

Results of examinations

Clinical signs:
not examined
Dermal irritation:
effects observed, treatment-related
Description (incidence and severity):
Minimal erythema was observed in the treated rabbits on day 5, with minimal edema evident on day 9 in the animals receiving the larger dose. In the same group the erythema became more pronounced on day 11, and persisted with minimal edema at those levels through the rest of the treatment interval. At the lower dose level (1 mL/kg bw) minimal hyperemia showed occasional correction with no edema. On day 15 in the same group hyperemia increased slightly in intensity, but became minimal on day 19 and remained that way to day 21. Minimal edema was observed in the 1 mL/kg bw animals on day 17 through the end of treatment. In the control rabbits minimal hyperemia was observed in the rabbits from day 11 through day 21. All rabbits showed complete recovery of dermal irritation within 4 days after cessation of treatment.
Mortality:
not examined
Body weight and weight changes:
no effects observed
Description (incidence and severity):
Weights increases were normal.
Food consumption and compound intake (if feeding study):
no effects observed
Description (incidence and severity):
Food intake was all within normal parameters at all times.
Food efficiency:
not examined
Water consumption and compound intake (if drinking water study):
no effects observed
Description (incidence and severity):
Water intake was all within normal parameters at all times.
Ophthalmological findings:
not examined
Haematological findings:
no effects observed
Description (incidence and severity):
Hematology studies were all within normal parameters at all times.
Clinical biochemistry findings:
not examined
Urinalysis findings:
not examined
Description (incidence and severity):
Urine analysis studies were all within normal parameters at all times.
Behaviour (functional findings):
no effects observed
Description (incidence and severity):
At no time did any of the rabbits manifest abnormal behavior or appearance.
Immunological findings:
not examined
Organ weight findings including organ / body weight ratios:
not examined
Gross pathological findings:
no effects observed
Description (incidence and severity):
Gross findings at autopsy were not significant.
Neuropathological findings:
not examined
Histopathological findings: non-neoplastic:
no effects observed
Description (incidence and severity):
The histological findings in the treated rabbits were identical to those in the controls.
Histopathological findings: neoplastic:
not examined

Effect levels

open allclose all
Key result
Dose descriptor:
NOAEL
Remarks:
Sysmetic toxicity
Effect level:
ca. 3.2 mg/kg bw/day
Based on:
test mat.
Sex:
male/female
Basis for effect level:
behaviour (functional findings)
body weight and weight gain
food consumption and compound intake
gross pathology
haematology
histopathology: non-neoplastic
urinalysis
water consumption and compound intake
Key result
Dose descriptor:
LOAEL
Effect level:
ca. 0.8 mg/kg bw/day
Based on:
test mat.
Sex:
male/female
Basis for effect level:
dermal irritation

Target system / organ toxicity

Key result
Critical effects observed:
yes
Lowest effective dose / conc.:
0.8 mg/kg bw/day
System:
integumentary
Organ:
skin
Treatment related:
yes
Dose response relationship:
not specified
Relevant for humans:
not specified

Any other information on results incl. tables

Table 1: Histopathology results

Rabbit

Dose

800 ppm

Findings

1 F

1 mL/kg

As in control

2 M

1 mL/kg

As in control

3 F

4 mL/kg

As in control

4 M

4 mL/kg

As in control

5 F

4 mL/kg

Water control

6M

4 mL/kg

Water control

Dose groups:

1 mL/kg = 0.8 mg/kg bw/day

4 mL/kg = 3.2 mg/kg bw/day

 

Table 2: Dermal reactions 24 h after each set of applications

Day of treatment

 

1F

2M

3F

4M

5F*

6M*

2

Erythema

0

0

0

0

0

0

 

Edema

0

0

0

0

0

0

3

Erythema

0

0

0

0

0

0

 

Edema

0

0

0

0

0

0

4

Erythema

0

0

0

0

0

0

 

Edema

0

0

0

0

0

0

5

Erythema

0

0

0

1

0

0

 

Edema

0

0

0

0

0

0

6

Erythema

1

0

1

1

0

0

 

Edema

0

0

0

0

0

0

7

Erythema

1

0

1

1

0

0

 

Edema

0

0

0

0

0

0

8

Erythema

1

1

1

1

0

0

 

Edema

0

0

0

0

0

0

9

Erythema

1

1

1

1

0

0

 

Edema

0

0

0

1

0

0

10

Erythema

0

1

2

2

0

0

 

Edema

0

0

0

1

0

0

11

Erythema

1

1

2

2

1

1

 

Edema

0

0

0

1

0

0

12

Erythema

0

0

2

2

1

1

 

Edema

0

0

1

1

0

0

13

Erythema

0

0

2

2

1

1

 

Edema

0

0

1

1

0

0

14

Erythema

0

0

2

2

0

1

 

Edema

0

0

1

1

0

0

15

Erythema

0

0

2

2

0

1

 

Edema

0

0

1

1

0

0

16

Erythema

0

0

2

2

0

1

 

Edema

0

0

1

1

0

0

17

Erythema

0

0

2

2

0

1

 

Edema

0

0

1

1

0

0

18

Erythema

0

0

2

2

0

1

 

Edema

0

0

1

1

0

0

19

Erythema

1

1

2

2

0

1

 

Edema

1

1

1

1

0

0

20

Erythema

1

1

2

2

1

1

 

Edema

1

1

1

1

0

0

21

Erythema

1

1

2

2

1

1

 

Edema

1

1

1

1

0

0

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Conclusions:
Under study conditions, NOAEL for systemic effects and LOAEL for dermal irritation (local effect) were considered to be 3.2 mg/kg bw/day and 0.8 mg/kg bw/day respectively. 
Executive summary:

A study was conducted to determine the short term repeated dose dermal toxicity of the test substance, C14 ADBAC (Purity 99.1%), according to the procedure described in Appraisal of the Safety of Chemicals in Foods, Drugs and Cosmetics, published by the Association of Food and Drug Officials of the United States. In the study, 1 mL/kg bw (i.e., equivalent to 0.8 mg/kg bw/day) and 4 mL/kg bw (i.e., equivalent to 3.2 mg/kg bw/day) of the 800 PPM solution of the test substance were applied over 10% of the total body surface (Hair clipped back and flank) of the rabbits (one rabbit per sex per dose level) for 20 days. After each application of test substance the torsos of the test animals were wrapped with a rubberized fabric to prevent grooming by the rabbits with possible inhalation or ingestion of test product. Survivors were maintained for two weeks after the last application when all animals were autopsied, as required by the reference. Food, fluid intake, excretions, behaviour and appearance of the animals were observed daily. The animals were weighed, as required. Blood and urine studies were performed at the beginning of the test, at the 20 d interval end prior to autopsy. At autopsy, gross findings were made and tissues retained for histological examination. At no time did any of the rabbits manifest abnormal behaviour or appearance. Food and water intake, excretions, blood and urine studies were all within normal parameters at all times. Weights increases were normal. Minimal erythema was observed in the treated rabbits on day 5, with minimal edema evident on day 9 in the animals receiving the larger dose. In the same group the erythema became more pronounced on day 11, and persisted with minimal edema at those levels through the rest of the treatment interval. At the lower dose level (1 mL/kg bw = 0.8 mg/kg bw/day) minimal hyperemia showed occasional correction with no edema. On Day 15 in the same group hyperemia increased slightly in intensity, but became minimal on Day 19 and remained that way to Day 21. Minimal edema was observed in the 1 mL/kg bw animals on Day 17 through the end of treatment. In the control rabbits minimal hyperemia was observed in the rabbits from day 11 through Day 21. All rabbits showed complete recovery of dermal irritation within 4 d after cessation of treatment. Gross findings at autopsy were not significant. The histological findings in the treated rabbits were identical to those in the controls. Under study conditions, NOAEL for systemic effects and LOAEL for dermal irritation (local effect) were considered to be 3.2 and 0.8 mg/kg bw/day respectively (Luy and Frances, 1972).