Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 285-377-1 | CAS number: 85085-48-9 Extractives and their physically modified derivatives such as tinctures, concretes, absolutes, essential oils, oleoresins, terpenes, terpene-free fractions, distillates, residues, etc., obtained from Melaleuca alternifolia, Myrtaceae.
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Skin sensitisation
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- skin sensitisation: in vivo (non-LLNA)
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- comparable to guideline study with acceptable restrictions
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 1 989
- Report date:
- 1989
Materials and methods
Test guideline
- Qualifier:
- no guideline followed
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- - Principle of test: The test was carried out to determine whether Tea Tree Oil is a skin sensitiser, according to the Magnusson & Kligmann method (Magnusson & Kligmann 1969, 1970, Magnusson 1980).
- Short description of test conditions: Test animals were exposed intradermally and epidermally to the test material, along with an adjuvant to enhance the immune reaction. The guinea pigs were subsequently exposed to a lower concentration of the test material, and the incidence of skin reaction noted.
- Parameters analysed / observed: Erythemal reactions, signs of toxicity and abnormal behaviour. - GLP compliance:
- no
- Type of study:
- guinea pig maximisation test
- Justification for non-LLNA method:
- This study was conducted prior to development of the LLNA method and its introduction as the default in-vivo method for REACH registration.
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- Melaleuca alternifolia, ext.
- EC Number:
- 285-377-1
- EC Name:
- Melaleuca alternifolia, ext.
- Cas Number:
- 85085-48-9
- Molecular formula:
- Not applicable (a generic molecular formula cannot be provided for this specific UVCB substance).
- IUPAC Name:
- Essential oil of melaleuca alternifolia
- Test material form:
- liquid
Constituent 1
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- Batch no.: 88/375.
Purity: 100%.
In vivo test system
Test animals
- Species:
- guinea pig
- Strain:
- other: HA strain - albino
- Sex:
- not specified
- Details on test animals and environmental conditions:
- - Source: Not specified.
- Age at study initiation: Not specified.
- Weight at study initiation: 200 - 500 g.
- Housing: Not described.
- Diet: Not specified.
- Water: Not specified.
- Acclimation period: Not described.
- Environmental conditions: Not described.
Study design: in vivo (non-LLNA)
Inductionopen allclose all
- Route:
- intradermal
- Vehicle:
- other: saline / Freund's complete adjuvant
- Concentration / amount:
- 0.1 ml. 1:1:1 mixture of Tea Tree Oil, saline, and Freund's complete adjuvant.
- Adequacy of induction:
- not specified
- Route:
- intradermal
- Vehicle:
- paraffin oil
- Concentration / amount:
- 0.1 ml. 5% Tea Tree Oil in paraffin oil B.P.
- Adequacy of induction:
- not specified
- Route:
- epicutaneous, occlusive
- Vehicle:
- unchanged (no vehicle)
- Concentration / amount:
- Not specified
- Day(s)/duration:
- 48 hours
- Adequacy of induction:
- not specified
Challenge
- Route:
- epicutaneous, occlusive
- Vehicle:
- petrolatum
- Concentration / amount:
- 30% w/w test sample in petroleum jelly
- Day(s)/duration:
- 24 hours
- Adequacy of challenge:
- highest non-irritant concentration
- No. of animals per dose:
- 20 test animals and 20 control animals.
- Details on study design:
- - Induction procedure: The induction procedure consisted of 2 intradermal injections (0.1ml each) and an epidermal induction application. In the case of the epidermal induction application, the substance was applied epicutaneously over the injection sites one week after injection and held under occlusion for 48 hours.
- Induction test concentrations: One induction injection consisted of 5% Tea Tree Oil in paraffin oil B.P. The other was a 1:1:1 mixture of Tea Tree Oil, saline, and Freund's complete adjuvant. The undiluted test sample was used for the epidermal induction.
- Challenge exposure: Two weeks after the induction application, the animals were tested on one flank with the maximum subirritant concentration of the test compound in petroleum jelly (occlusive administration for 24 hours).
- Challenge concentrations: The subirritant dose used for challenge was 30% w/w test sample in petroleum jelly.
- Control: Control animals were treated with the vehcles alone during the induction period. - Challenge controls:
- The control group was challenged with the vehicle and the test compound in subirritant concentration.
- Positive control substance(s):
- no
Results and discussion
- Positive control results:
- No positive controls were used in this study.
In vivo (non-LLNA)
Resultsopen allclose all
- Reading:
- 1st reading
- Hours after challenge:
- 24
- Group:
- test chemical
- Dose level:
- Challenge: 30% w/w test sample in petroleum jelly
- No. with + reactions:
- 0
- Total no. in group:
- 20
- Clinical observations:
- None
- Remarks on result:
- no indication of skin sensitisation
- Reading:
- 1st reading
- Hours after challenge:
- 24
- Group:
- negative control
- Dose level:
- Challenge: 30% w/w test sample in petroleum jelly
- No. with + reactions:
- 0
- Total no. in group:
- 20
- Clinical observations:
- None
- Remarks on result:
- no indication of skin sensitisation
Any other information on results incl. tables
The guinea pigs appeared normal during the test period. The dermal challenge irritations did not produce irritant responses in either treated or control animals.
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Interpretation of results:
- not sensitising
- Conclusions:
- The test sample did not induce sensitization reactions after dermal challenge.
- Executive summary:
Skin sensitization studies were carried out to determine whether Tea Tree Oil (Batch 88/375) was a skin sensitizing agent in the guinea pig. The test was carried out according to the Magnusson & Kligmann maximisation method. 20 albino guinea pigs were used for the test and control experiments respectively. The induction procedure consisted of two intradermal injections and an epidermal induction application. Two weeks after the induction application, the challenge dose was applied (subirritant dose, 30% w/w test sample in petroleum jelly). All animals were observed for signs of toxicity and abnormal behaviour during the experimental period. The guinea pigs appeared normal during the test period. The test sample did not induce sensitization reactions after dermal challenge.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.