Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Repeated dose toxicity: inhalation

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
short-term repeated dose toxicity: inhalation
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
From 2014-03-07 to 2015-03
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: GLP Guideline study

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
2015
Report date:
2015

Materials and methods

Test guidelineopen allclose all
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 412 (Subacute Inhalation Toxicity: 28-Day Study)
Deviations:
no
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
EU Method B.8 (Subacute Inhalation Toxicity: 28-Day Study)
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)
Limit test:
no

Test material

Constituent 1
Reference substance name:
Reaction products of 12-hydroxyoctadecanoic acid with ethane-1,2-diamine and hexane-1,6-diamine and 1,3-phenylenedimethanamine
EC Number:
700-825-2
Molecular formula:
Not applicable (UVCB substance).
IUPAC Name:
Reaction products of 12-hydroxyoctadecanoic acid with ethane-1,2-diamine and hexane-1,6-diamine and 1,3-phenylenedimethanamine
Test material form:
solid: particulate/powder
Remarks:
migrated information: powder

Test animals

Species:
rat
Strain:
Wistar
Sex:
male/female
Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Harlan (UK) Ltd.
- Age at study initiation:60 to 66 days
- Weight at study initiation: 217 to 261 g (males) and 153 to 188 g (females)
- Fasting period before study:no
- Housing: The animals were housed five of one sex per cage
- Diet: Ad libitum, standard rodent diet (Rat and Mouse n°1 Maintenance Diet). This diet contained no added antibiotic or other chemotherapeutic or prophylactic agent.
- Water: Ad libitum, potable water taken from the public supply.
- Acclimation period: 10 days

ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature: 19 to 23°C
- Humidity: 40 to 70%
- Air changes (per hr):Each animal room was supplied with filtered fresh air, which was passed to atmosphere and not re-circulated.
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12 h continuous light and 12 h continuous dark/24 h.

Administration / exposure

Route of administration:
inhalation: dust
Type of inhalation exposure:
nose only
Vehicle:
air
Remarks on MMAD:
MMAD / GSD: The Mass Median Aerodynamic Diameter (MMAD) of the test atmosphere of all groups was in the range of 1.3-1.6 µm with Geometric Standard Deviation (GSD) of 2.52-2.75.
Details on inhalation exposure:
GENERATION OF TEST ATMOSPHERE / CHAMBER DESCRIPTION
- Exposure apparatus: flow through nose only chamber. This system was an aluminium alloy construction comprising a base unit, three animal exposure sections and a top section.
- Method of holding animals in test chamber: Rats were held in polycarbonate tubes with their snouts protruding from the end of the tubes into the exposure chamber.
- Source and rate of air: From in-house compressed air system(breathing quality), Generator flow: 19L/minute - Supplementary flow: 10-60 L/minute
- System of generating particulates/aerosols: Wright Dust Feed mechanism designed to produce and maintain atmospheres of dust by suspending material scraped from the surface of a compressed powder in a stream of dry air. The concentrations of dust were altered by changing the gear ratio (and therefore the speed of rotation of the compressed powder towards the scraper blade) of the mechanism.
- Temperature, humidity, pressure in air chamber:
Temperature was measured using an electronic thermometer inserted into the inhalation chamber. The mean chamber temperatures were all within expected ranges (22.2; 22.2; 22.4 and 22.0 °C for controls, low, mid and high-dosed groups).
Humidity and pressure in air chamber were not reported.
- Air flow rate: Airflow to Wright dust Feed was 19 L/minute for all groups. Supplementary airflows were 10, 60, 10 and 10 L/minute for the control, low, mid and high-dose groups respectively.
- Method of particle size determination: Particle size analysis of generated atmospheres was performed using a 6-stage cascade impactor (Marple 296). Samples were collected at least once during each week of exposure for each concentration tested. Samples were also collected from a vacant animal exposure port (animals breathing zone). The collection substrates and the backup filter were weighed before and after sampling and the weight of test item, collected at each stage, was calculated by this difference. The total amount collected for each stage was used to determine the cumulative amount below each cut-off point size. In this way, the proportion (%) of aerosol less than < 0.42, 0.76, 1.27, 2.86, 4.9 and 8.0 µm (aerodynamic diameter) was calculated. From this data, the Mass Median Aerodynamic Diameter (MMAD), and Geometric Standard Deviation (GSD) were calculated.
- Treatment of exhaust air: Extract airflow was drawn by in-house vacuum system at a flow rate of 30, 80, 30 and 30 L/minute for the control, low, mid and high-dose groups respectively. the airflow was filtered locally.

TEST ATMOSPHERE
- Brief description of analytical method used: The actual concentration of generated atmospheres was measured gravimetrically at regular intervals during an exposure by pulling a suitable, known volume of test atmosphere, from the exposure chamber, through a glass fibre filters. Sampling was performed at least three times during each exposure and for each dose-group.Samples were collected from a vacant animal exposure port (animals breathing zone). The difference in the pre- and post-sampling weights, divided by the volume of atmosphere sampled, was equal to the actual achieved test atmosphere concentration.
In addition, the aerosol concentrations measured by gravimetric analysis were checked by a chemical analysis once every week. High Performance Liquid Chromatography with UV detection analytical method was used.

- Samples taken from breathing zone: yes, samples were collected from a vacant animal exposure port.

VEHICLE (if applicable)
- none
Analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
yes
Details on analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
The exposure concentrations were monitored during each exposure by gravimetrical analysis of the test item deposited on a sampling filter. Once every week, the gravimetric analysis was coupled to analytical analysis by HPLC with UV detection to check the accuracy of the gravimetric method.
The mean achieved concentrations were 8.11; 39.6 and 219 µg/L and corresponded to 113; 110 and 122% of the target concentrations respectively. The mean exposure concentrations measured by chemical and gravimetric analysis correlated well.
Duration of treatment / exposure:
4 weeks
Frequency of treatment:
5 days / week
Doses / concentrationsopen allclose all
Remarks:
Doses / Concentrations:
7.2, 36, 180 µg/L
Basis:
other: target
Remarks:
Doses / Concentrations:
8.11, 39.6, 219 µg/L
Basis:
analytical conc.
No. of animals per sex per dose:
3 groups, each comprising 5 male and 5 female rats received the test substance at target exposure levels of 7.2, 36 or 180 µg/L. A similarly constituted Control group received air only, at the same operating conditions as the high dose group.
Control animals:
yes, sham-exposed
Details on study design:
- Dose selection rationale:
In a previously conducted two-week repeated dose inhalation toxicity study, rats were exposed 5 days/week, 6 hours/day to 0.0691, 0.298 or 1.55 mg/L (69.1, 298 or 1550 μg/L ) of the test substance. Histopathological treatment related findings were evident in the lungs and tracheobronchial lymph nodes at all exposure levels. These findings were of minimal severity and were not considered to be adverse.
In another study with a similar compound, adverse respiratory tract histopathological findings were apparent at 21.2 and 101 µg/L following 13 weeks of exposures; the NOAEL in that study was 3.30 µg/L.
Considering the results from the previous studies and the likely progression of lung changes following exposure to the test substance over a longer duration, a high exposure level targeted at 180 μg/L was selected and was anticipated to induce treatment related changes similar to those previously seen but was expected to be tolerated for 4 weeks. Target exposure levels of 36 and 7.2 μgL were selected for the intermediate and low groups respectively to identify a no-observed adverse effect level and to explore any possible dose relationship.
Positive control:
none

Examinations

Observations and examinations performed and frequency:
CAGE SIDE OBSERVATIONS: Yes
- Time schedule: Cages were inspected daily for evidence of ill-health amongst the occupants.
Any deviation from normal was recorded at the time in respect of nature and severity, date and time of onset, duration and progress of the observed condition, as appropriate.
During the acclimatisation period, observations of the animals and their cages were recorded at least once per day.

DETAILED CLINICAL OBSERVATIONS: Yes
- Time schedule: Daily during Weeks 1 to 4 of treatment, detailed observations were recorded at the following times in relation to dose administration:
* Pre-exposure observation
* As each animal is returned to its home cage
* As late as possible in the working day

BODY WEIGHT: Yes
- Time schedule for examinations:The weight of each animal was recorded one week before treatment commenced (Day -7), on the day that treatment commenced (Day 1), twice weekly throughout the study and before necropsy.

FOOD CONSUMPTION: Yes
-The weight of food supplied to each cage, that remaining and an estimate of any spilled was recorded for the week before treatment started (Week -1), and each week throughout the treatment. From these records the mean weekly consumption per animal (g/animal/week) was calculated for each cage.

FOOD EFFICIENCY: No

WATER CONSUMPTION: No

OPHTHALMOSCOPIC EXAMINATION: No

HAEMATOLOGY: Yes
- Time schedule for collection of blood: During Week 4 of treatment and before dosing for all study animals.
- Anaesthetic used for blood collection: isoflurane
- Animals fasted: Yes, overnight withdrawal of food.
- How many animals: 40.
- Parameters examined: Haematocrit (Hct), Haemoglobin concentration (Hb), Erythrocyte count (RBC), Reticulocyte count (RETA), Mean cell haemoglobin (MCH), Mean cell haemoglobin concentration (MCHC), Mean cell volume (MCV), Total white cell count (WBC), Differential WBC count including Neutrophils (N), Lymphocytes (L), Eosinophils (E), Basophils (B), Monocytes (M), Large unstained cells (LUC), Platelet count (Plt), Prothrombin time (PTP) and Activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT).

CLINICAL CHEMISTRY: Yes
- Time schedule for collection of blood: During Week 4 of treatment and before dosing for all study animals.
- Animals fasted: Yes, overnight withdrawal of food.
- How many animals: 40
- Parameters examined: Alkaline phosphatase (ALP), Alanine aminotransferase (ALT), Aspartate aminotransferase (AST), Total bilirubin (Bili), Urea, Creatinine (Creat), Glucose (Gluc), Total cholesterol (Chol), Triglycerides (Trig), Sodium (Na), Potassium (K), Chloride (Cl), Calcium (Ca), Inorganic phosphorus (Phos), Total protein (Total Prot) and Albumin (Alb).

URINALYSIS: No

NEUROBEHAVIOURAL EXAMINATION: No
Sacrifice and pathology:
All study animals were sacrificed following 4 weeks of exposures.
GROSS PATHOLOGY: Yes
All animals were subject to a detailed necropsy. All external features and orifices were examined visually. Any abnormality in the appearance or size of any organ and tissue (external and cut surface) was recorded.
HISTOPATHOLOGY: Yes
The following tissues were examined for all study animals of Groups 1 (Control) and 4 (219 µg/L) sacrificed on completion of the 4-week treatment period:
Adrenals - cortex and medulla
Brain - cerebellum, cerebrum and midbrain
Heart - included auricular and ventricular regions
Kidneys - included cortex, medulla and papilla regions
Larynx - 5 sections
Liver - section from two main lobes
Lungs - section from all major lobes, to include bronchi
Nasal turbinates -4 levels including nasal cavity, paranasal sinuses, nasopharynx and nasopharynx duct and nasal associated lymphoid tissue
Oesophagus
Ovaries
Seminal vesicles
Spinal cord - transverse and longitudinal section at the cervical, lumbar and thoracic levels
Spleen
Stomach - included keratinised, glandular and antrum in sections
Testes
Thymus
Thyroid - included parathyroids in section where possible
Trachea - including bifurcation
Uterus - uterine body with cervix section
In addition:
- all mediastinal lymph nodes showing macroscopic abnormality were examined,
- Lungs, larynx, trachea (including bifurcation), nasal turbinates and tracheobronchial lymph nodes were examined for all study animals of groups 2 (8.11 µg/L) and 3 (39.6 µg/L).
Other examinations:
- HAEMATOLOGY, BONE MARROW:
Bone marrow smears were prepared immediately following death on completion of the scheduled treatment period. The smears from all animals of Groups 1 (Control) and 4 (219 µg/L) were examined to assess the cellularity, distribution and morphology of the marrow. The smears from animals of the intermediate and low dose groups were not examined.

- ORGAN WEIGHTS:
The following organs, taken from each animal killed after 4 weeks of treatment were weighted: Adrenals, Brain, Heart, Kidneys, Liver, Lungs with mainstem bronchi, Spleen, Testes and Thymus.
Bilateral organs were weighed together. Organ weights were also adjusted for terminal bodyweight, using the weight recorded before necropsy.
Statistics:
All analyses were carried out using the individual animal as the basic experimental unit.
# The following sequence of statistical tests was used for bodyweight, organ weight and clinical pathology:
A parametric analysis was performed if Bartlett's test for variance homogeneity was not significant at the 1% level. The F1 approximate test was applied. If the F1 approximate test was not significant at the 1% level, Williams' test was applied. If the F1 approximate test was significant, suggesting that the dose response was not monotone, Dunnett's test was performed instead.
A non-parametric analysis was performed if Bartlett's test was still significant at the 1% level following both logarithmic and square-root transformations. The H1 approximate test was applied. If the H1 approximate test was not significant at the 1% level, Shirley's test was applied. If the H1 approximate test was significant, suggesting that the dose-response was not monotone, Steel's test was performed instead.
For pathology if 75% of the data (across all groups) were the same value, for example c, Fisher’s Exact tests were performed. Treatment groups were compared using pairwise comparisons of each dose group against the control both for i) values c, as applicable.
# For organ weight data, analysis of covariance was performed using terminal bodyweight as covariate, unless non-parametric methods were applied.

Results and discussion

Results of examinations

Clinical signs:
no effects observed
Mortality:
no mortality observed
Body weight and weight changes:
no effects observed
Food consumption and compound intake (if feeding study):
no effects observed
Food efficiency:
not examined
Water consumption and compound intake (if drinking water study):
not examined
Ophthalmological findings:
not examined
Haematological findings:
effects observed, treatment-related
Clinical biochemistry findings:
effects observed, treatment-related
Urinalysis findings:
not examined
Behaviour (functional findings):
not examined
Organ weight findings including organ / body weight ratios:
effects observed, treatment-related
Gross pathological findings:
effects observed, treatment-related
Histopathological findings: non-neoplastic:
effects observed, treatment-related
Histopathological findings: neoplastic:
not examined
Details on results:
CLINICAL SIGNS AND MORTALITY
There were no mortalities and no test article-related clinical signs during the study.

BODY WEIGHT AND WEIGHT GAIN
There were no treatment related effects on body weight and weight gain.
A weight loss occurred on Day 25 for all groups, including control and was due to overnight food withdrawal before the blood sampling procedures for haematology and blood chemistry on Day 24.

FOOD CONSUMPTION
There were no treatment related changes on food consumption.

HAEMATOLOGY
Higher group mean neutrophil counts were evident for females exposed to 39.6 µg/L and both sexes exposed to 219 µg/L, up to 1.52X and 2.5X control for males and females, respectively. The neutrophil count was dose-dependently increased in females.
Lower group mean lymphocyte counts were evident in males exposed to 219 µg/L compared with control (0.77X control). In treated females, there was a decrease without exposure relationship in mean lymphocyte counts when compared with control (0.75X, 0.66X and 0.79X for animals exposed to 8.11, 39.6 or 219 µg/L, respectively).
All other differences between the control and treated groups, were minor or were confined to one sex and were therefore attributed to normal biological variation.

CLINICAL CHEMISTRY
Mean phosphorus concentrations were lower in males exposed to 39.6 or 219 µg/L (as low as 0.82X ) compared with control. There was no dose relationship or similar effect in the females, this was therefore considered not to be an effect of treatment.
Compared with control, higher creatinine concentrations, not exposure related were observed in males exposed to 39.6 or 219 µg/L (1.13X control) and all treated female groups (1.24X, 1.15X and 1.12X for animals exposed to 8.11, 39.6 or 219 µg/L, respectively). The higher creatinine concentrations were not associated with any histopathological changes and, were not dose-related. They were considered to be due to normal biological variation and not a reaction to treatment with E99434.
Lower mean triglycerides were evident in males exposed to 219 µg/L, however the individual values were not consistently out of the control range, a low value for one animal lowered the group mean, and this was therefore considered not to be test article-related.
All other differences between the control and treated groups, including those that attained a degree of statistical significance were minor, lacked exposure relationship or were confined to one sex and were therefore attributed to normal biological variation.

ORGAN WEIGHTS
There was a statistical significant increase in mean lung and bronchi weights (adjusted for terminal bodyweight) in both sexes from 39.6 µg/L, (up to 1.7X and 1.9X, for males and females respectively).
All other differences between the control and treated groups, including those that attained statistical significance were minor, lacked exposure-relationship, or were confined to one sex and were therefore attributed to normal biological variation.

GROSS PATHOLOGY
Enlargement and pale appearance of the tracheobronchial lymph nodes were noted in nearly all animals receiving 39.6 or 219 µg/L. Enlargement and pale appearance of the mediastinal lymph nodes were also noted in half or more of the animals receiving 39.6 or 219 µg/L (See 7.5.2/1 Macropathology results in any other information on results incl.tables).

HISTOPATHOLOGY: NON-NEOPLASTIC
Histopathological findings related to treatment were seen in the lungs, larynx, tracheobronchial and mediastinal lymph nodes:

A variety of findings indicative of mild irritation and clearance were seen in the lungs of both sexes exposed to 39.6 or 219 µg/L. These findings included bronchiolo-alveolar hyperplasia in the terminal bronchioles and alveoli, diffuse foamy alveolar macrophages, foamy alveolar macrophages around terminal bronchioles, and eosinophilic material in the alveoli and in one female (exposed to 219 µg/L), in the bronchioles. Findings in the lung of rats given 8.11 μg/L were confined to a minimal macrophage response around the terminal bronchioles in two males and one female.

In the tracheobronchial and mediastinal lymph nodes, increased cellularity and macrophage aggregates were observed in the majority of treated rats exposed to 39.6 or 219 µg/L. These findings correlated with enlargement and pallor observed during necropsy (See 7.5.2/2 Histopathology results in any other information on results incl.tables).

OTHER FINDINGS
Bone marrow analysis:
The cellularity, distribution and morphology of the marrow was unaffected by the treatment.

Effect levels

Dose descriptor:
NOEC
Effect level:
8.11 other: µg/L air (analytical)
Based on:
test mat.
Sex:
male/female
Basis for effect level:
other: At 39.6 and 219 µg/L: -Microscopic findings observed in lungs suggestive of hyperplasia, - Changes in Haematology indicative of inflammatory reaction and consistent with the findings recorded microscopically.

Target system / organ toxicity

Critical effects observed:
not specified

Any other information on results incl. tables

7.5.2 /1 Macropathology results

Tracheobronchial and Mediastinal lymph nodes

Enlargement and/or abnormal colour (pale) of these lymph nodes was seen in the majority of animals exposed to 39.6 or 219 µg/L.


Summary of findings in the tracheobronchial and mediastinal lymph nodes for animals killed after 4 weeks of treatment

Group/sex

1M

2M

3M

4M

1F

2F

3F

4F

Exposure level (µg/L)

0

8.11

39.6

219

0

8.11

39.6

219

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Tracheobronchial LN enlarged

0

0

4

5

0

0

5

4

Tracheobronchial LN abnormal colour (pale)

0

0

5

4

0

0

4

3

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Number of animals examined

5

5

5

5

5

5

5

5

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Mediastinal LN enlarged

0

0

3

3

0

0

4

3

Mediastinal LN abnormal colour (pale)

0

0

4

3

0

0

4

3

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Number of animals examined

5

5

5

5

5

5

5

5

 

7.5.2 /2 Histopathology results

Lungs

Summary of treatment related findings in the lungs for animals killed after 4 weeks of treatment

Group/sex

1M

2M

3M

4M

1F

2F

3F

4F

Exposure level (µg/L)

0

8.11

39.6

219

0

8.11

39.6

219

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Hyperplasia, bronchiolo-alveolar, terminal bronchioles

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Minimal

0

0

0

2

0

0

0

3

Total

0

0

0

2

0

0

0

3

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Hyperplasia, bronchiolo-alveolar, alveoli

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Minimal

0

0

4

2

0

0

2

0

Slight

0

0

0

2

0

0

2

5

Total

0

0

4

4

0

0

4

5

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Alveolar macrophages, foamy, diffuse

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Minimal

0

0

2

2

0

0

4

0

Slight

0

0

3

3

0

0

1

5

Total

0

0

5

5

0

0

5

5

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Macrophages, foamy, terminal bronchioles

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Minimal

0

2

2

0

0

1

3

0

Slight

0

0

1

0

0

0

0

0

Total

0

2

3

0

0

1

3

0

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Eosinophilic material, alveoli

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Minimal

0

0

0

0

0

0

3

0

Slight

0

0

0

2

0

0

1

0

Moderate

0

0

0

3

0

0

0

5

Total

0

0

0

5

0

0

4

5

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Eosinophilic material, terminal bronchioles

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Minimal

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

1

Total

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Number of tissues examined

5

5

5

5

5

5

5

5

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Tracheobronchial lymph nodes

Summary of treatment related findings in the tracheobronchial lymph nodes for animals killed after   4 weeks of treatment

Group/sex

1M

2M

3M

4M

1F

2F

3F

4F

Exposure level (µg/L)

0

8.11

39.6

219

0

8.11

39.6

219

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cellularity increased, Generalised

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Minimal

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

2

Slight

0

0

3

4

0

0

4

1

Total

0

0

3

4

0

0

4

3

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Aggregates, macrophages

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Minimal

0

0

5

4

0

0

4

3

Total

0

0

5

4

0

0

4

3

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Number of tissues examined

5

5

5

5

5

5

5

4

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Mediastinal lymph nodes

Summary of treatment related findings in the tracheobronchial lymph nodes for animals killed after 4 weeks of treatment

Group/sex

1M

2M

3M

4M

1F

2F

3F

4F

Exposure level (µg/L)

0

8.11

39.6

219

0

8.11

39.6

219

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cellularity increased, Generalised

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Minimal

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

1

Slight

0

0

3

2

0

0

3

0

Moderate

0

0

0

1

0

0

0

0

Total

0

0

3

3

0

0

3

1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Aggregates, macrophages

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Minimal

0

0

4

4

0

0

3

3

Total

0

0

4

4

0

0

3

3

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Number of tissues examined

0

0

4

5

0

0

4

3

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Conclusions:
The test article was administered by snout-only inhalation administration, for 6 hours a day, 5 days a week, for 4 weeks at achieved aerosol concentrations of 8.11, 39.6 or 219 µg/L.
In the lungs, higher concentrations of the test article produced bronchioloalveolar hyperplasia in the terminal bronchioles and alveoli which are a common site for hyperplastic and inflammatory findings in rat inhalation studies. There were also increased macrophages and eosinophilic material in the alveoli and terminal bronchioles. These findings were indicative of mild irritation. They correlated with the elevation of plasma neutrophils in the lack of any abnormalities in bone marrow and with the dose-dependent increase in lungs and bronchi weight. Higher concentrations of the test article also resulted in increased cellularity and macrophage aggregates in the tracheobronchial and mediastinal lymph nodes. These findings correlated with enlargement and pallor observed at necropsy .They were considered a likely secondary response to the increased influx of macrophages clearing the test material from the terminal airways and alveolar spaces and trafficking to the local draining lymph nodes.
At 8.11 μg/L, a minimal macrophage response around the terminal bronchioles was noted in two males and one female. These findings were considered to be the result of the normal physiological response following inhalation of particulate matter, and given the low incidence and severity, and their focal nature , they were considered to be non-adverse.
On the basis of these findings, the exposure level of 8.11 µg/L was therefore considered to represent the no observed adverse effect level (NOAEL) for this study.
Executive summary:

The cumulative toxicity of the test item was assessed when administered to Wistar rats by snout-only inhalation administration for 6 hours per day, 5 days per week, over a period of 4 weeks. The study was designated to provide a rational basis for the assessment of the toxicological risk to man.

Three groups, each comprising five male and five female rats, received the test item at target exposure levels of 7.2, 36 or 180 µg/L. A similarly constituted control group received air at the same operating conditions as the 180 µg/L group. During the study, clinical condition, body weight, food consumption, haematology (peripheral blood), haematology (bone marrow), blood chemistry,organ weight, macropathology and histopathology investigations were undertaken.

The achieved gravimetric aerosol concentrations were 8.11, 39.6 and 219 µg/L (113, 110 and 122% of the target concentrations). The Mass Median Aerodynamic Diameters for all treated groups were within the ideal range (1-3µm) for a repeat dose inhalation study.

Test article-related effects were observed in haematology at 39.6 and 219μg/L for both sexes during the treatment. Higher neutrophil counts were observed for females exposed to 39.6 µg/L and both sexes exposed to 219 µg/L. Lower group mean lymphocyte counts were evident in males exposed to 219 µg/L. In treated females, a decrease in mean lymphocyte counts without exposure relationship was observed when compared with control. No abnormalities were observed in the bone marrow thus confirming that changes in the haematology parameters were secondary to the local inflammatory effects observed in the lungs.

Lower phosphorus concentrations in males exposed to 39.6 or 219 µg/L and higher creatinine concentrations in both sexes were observed at all exposure levels. They were not associated with any histopathological changes and not dose-related and were therefore considered not to be of toxicological importance.

A statistical significant increase in mean lung and bronchi weights was observed in both sexes from 39.6 µg/L. Macroscopically enlargement and/or abnormal colour (pale) of the tracheobronchial and mediastinal lymph nodes was also seen in animals exposed to 39.6 or 219 µg/L.

Microscopically changes related to treatment with E99434 were seen in the lungs, tracheobronchial and mediastinal lymph nodes. A variety of findings indicative of mild irritation (hyperplasia) and clearance (macrophage) were seen in the lungs of both sexes exposed to 39.6 or 219 µg/L. These findings included bronchiolo-alveolar hyperplasia in the terminal bronchioles and alveoli, diffuse foamy alveolar macrophages, foamy alveolar macrophages around terminal bronchioles, and eosinophilic material in the alveoli and in one female exposed to 219 µg/L, in the bronchioles. In the tracheobronchial and mediastinal lymph nodes generalised increased cellularity and macrophage aggregates were observed in animals exposed to 39.6 or 219µg/L. These findings correlated with enlargement and pallor observed at necropsy . They were considered a likely secondary response to the increased influx of macrophages clearing the test material from the terminal airways and alveolar spaces and trafficking to the local draining lymph nodes.

At 8.11μg/L , the findings in the lungs were confined to a minimal macrophage response around the terminal bronchioles in two males and one female. These findings were considered to be a normal physiological response following inhalation of particle matter and were not adverse. The increase in macrophages correlated to the lung load with the test item and were considered to be related to pulmonary clearance.

On the basis of these findings, the exposure level of 8.11 µg/L was therefore considered to represent the no observed adverse effect level (NOAEL) for this study.