Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: - | CAS number: -
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Description of key information
Skin irritation:
Target: Reaction mass of (4RS,4aRS,8RS,8aRS)-4-ethyl-8,8a-dimethyloctahydro-1(2H)-naphthalenone and (±)-(4RS,4aSR,8SR,8aSR)-4-ethyl-8,8a-dimethyloctahydro-1(2H)-naphthalenone and (±)-(4RS,4aSR,8RS,8aSR)-4-ethyl-8,8a-dimethyloctahydro-1(2H)-naphthalenone: Skin irritant.
Read-across: source data: Reaction mass of (4RS,4aRS,8RS,8aRS)-4-ethyl-8-methyloctahydronaphthalen-1(2H)-one and (4RS,4aSR,8SR,8aRS)-4-ethyl-8-methyloctahydronaphthalen-1(2H)-one and (4RS,4aSR,8SR,8aSR)-4-ethyl-8-methyloctahydronaphthalen-1(2H)-one: Skin irritant, OECD TG 404, 2014.
Read-across justification document available in Section 13.2.
Eye irritation, in vitro: not eye irritating, OECD TG 438, 2021
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Skin irritation / corrosion
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- skin irritation: in vivo
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 23-09-2013 To: 31-12-2013
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: Guideline study performed under GLP. All relevant validity criteria were met with acceptable devations
- Remarks:
- To facilitate scoring, treated skin areas were re-clipped at least 3 hours before the observations ; this may inadvertently enhance scoring observations due to potential abrasion of the skin. The OECD TG 404 guideline specifies pre-exposure clipping only. Additionally, there was some indications that the test item was not fully removed after 4 hours exposure. This would lead to increased potential for classification due to enhancement of response observations.
- Justification for type of information:
- Information as to the availability of the in vivo study is provided in 'attached justification'.
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 404 (Acute Dermal Irritation / Corrosion)
- Deviations:
- yes
- Remarks:
- Deviation: to facilitate scoring, treated skin areas were re-clipped before the observations. Additionally, some indications that the test item was not fully removed post 4-hour exposure. This would lead to increased potential for classification.
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method B.4 (Acute Toxicity: Dermal Irritation / Corrosion)
- Deviations:
- yes
- Remarks:
- see above
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EPA OPPTS 870.2500 (Acute Dermal Irritation)
- Deviations:
- yes
- Remarks:
- see above
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: Japanese Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries (JMAFF), 12 Nousan, Notification No 8147, November 2000
- Deviations:
- yes
- Remarks:
- see above
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Remarks:
- inspected: March 2013 ; signature: May 2013
- Species:
- rabbit
- Strain:
- New Zealand White
- Remarks:
- Hsdlf: NZW
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Recognised Supplier
- Age at study initiation: 12 to 24 weeks
- Weight at study initiation: 2574 to 2753 g
- Housing: Individually housed in cages with perforated floors, with shelters and cage enrichment including wooden sticks
- Diet (ad libitum): Global Diet 2030 (Recognised Supplier); provided ad libitum (approximately 100 g per day)
- Water (ad libitum): mains drinking water, ad libitum
- Acclimation period: at least 5 days
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 21.0 ± 3.0
- Humidity (%): 40 to 70
- Air changes (per hr): at least 15
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12 h light / 12 h dark
IN-LIFE DATES: From: 23-09-2013 To: 31-12-2013 - Type of coverage:
- semiocclusive
- Preparation of test site:
- clipped
- Vehicle:
- unchanged (no vehicle)
- Controls:
- no
- Amount / concentration applied:
- TEST MATERIAL
- Amount applied: 0.5 mL.
- Concentration (if solution): Not applicable.
VEHICLE
- Amount applied: Not applicable. - Duration of treatment / exposure:
- 4 hours
- Observation period:
- 72 hours (initial observation); additional observations are made daily up to Days 7 and 14 to assess the reversibility of skin reactions (as appropriate).
- Number of animals:
- 3 males
- Details on study design:
- TEST SITE
- Area of exposure: Dorsal (2 cm x 3 cm metalline patch secured with adhesive tape)
- % coverage: Not reported
- Type of wrap if used: metalline patch secured with adhesive tape and elastic bandage
REMOVAL OF TEST SUBSTANCE
- Washing (if done): Yes
- Time after start of exposure: Four hours after the application, the dressing was removed and the skin cleaned of residual test item using tap water and watery ethanol (50%v/v). Note: that a sticky residue was reported at the 1 hour observation, indicating incomplete removal.
OBSERVATION TIME POINTS
(indicate if minutes, hours or days): 1 hour, 4 hours, 24 hours, 48 hours and 72 hours. Additional observations daily up to 7 or 14 days, as appropriate
SCORING SYSTEM: Draize Scale:
- Method of calculation:
Erythema and eschar formation:
No erythema .......................................................................................................................... 0
Very slight erythema (barely perceptible) ............................................................................... 1
Well-defined erythema ........................................................................................................... 2
Moderate to severe erythema................................................................................................. 3
Severe erythema (beet redness) *.......................................................................................... 4
*. Where signs of necrosis or corrosion (injuries in depth) prevent erythema scoring, the
maximum grade for erythema (= 4) is given.
Oedema formation:
No oedema ............................................................................................................................ 0
Very slight oedema (barely perceptible) ................................................................................. 1
Slight oedema (edges of area well-defined by definite raising) ............................................... 2
Moderate oedema (raised approximately 1 millimeter) ........................................................... 3
Severe oedema (raised more than 1 millimeter and extending beyond the area of exposure) 4 - Irritation parameter:
- erythema score
- Basis:
- mean
- Remarks:
- n = 3
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 2.47
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- not fully reversible within: 14 days
- Remarks on result:
- positive indication of irritation
- Irritation parameter:
- edema score
- Basis:
- mean
- Remarks:
- n = 3
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 3.43
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- not fully reversible within: 14 days
- Remarks on result:
- positive indication of irritation
- Irritation parameter:
- erythema score
- Basis:
- animal #1
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 2
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- not fully reversible within: 14 days
- Irritation parameter:
- edema score
- Basis:
- animal #1
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 4
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- not fully reversible within: 14 days
- Irritation parameter:
- erythema score
- Basis:
- animal #2
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 2.7
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- not fully reversible within: 14 days
- Irritation parameter:
- edema score
- Basis:
- animal #2
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 3
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- not fully reversible within: 14 days
- Irritation parameter:
- erythema score
- Basis:
- animal #3
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 2.7
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- not fully reversible within: 14 days
- Irritation parameter:
- edema score
- Basis:
- animal #3
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 3.3
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- not fully reversible within: 14 days
- Irritant / corrosive response data:
- Moderate to severe erythema and moderate or severe oedema in the treated skin areas of the three rabbits, which remained present until termination (after 14 days). Reduced flexibility of the skin was noted for one animal at 72 hours and 7 Days after exposure. Scaliness and/or bald skin were noted for all animals 7 days after exposure, and persisted until termination.
- Other effects:
- All males showed expected gain in body weight during the study.
- Interpretation of results:
- Category 2 (irritant) based on GHS criteria
- Remarks:
- Criteria used for interpretation of results: EU
- Conclusions:
- Under the conditions of this study, the test item is considered to be irritating to the skin.
- Executive summary:
The study was performed to OECD TG 404, EU Method B.4, US EPA OPPTS 870.2500 and Japan (JMAFF) 12 Nousan, Notification No 8147 guidelines to assess the primary skin irritancy potential of the test item in accordance with GLP in New Zealand White rabbits. The test item was applied sequentially. Three rabbits were exposed for 4-hour by semi-occluded application of the test item to the intact clipped skin with 0.5 mL test item introduced under a 2 cm x 3 cm semi-occlusive patch. The patch was secured in position with adhesive tape and elasticated bandage. After exposure to the test item the patches were removed and individual dose sites were scored at approximately 1, 24, 48, and 72 hours. Treated sites were reclipped at least 3 hours before observations.Sticky remnants of the test item were present on the skin on Day 1.Moderate to severe erythema and moderate or severe oedema in the treated skin areaswhich remained present until termination (after 14 days). Reduced flexibility of the skin was noted for one animal at 72 hours and 7 Days after exposure. Scaliness and/or bald skin were noted for all males 7 days after exposure, and persisted until termination. Under the conditions of the study, the test item is considered to be a skin irritant.
Applicant assessment indicates: to facilitate scoring, treated skin areas were re-clipped at least 3 hours before the observations ; this may inadvertently enhance scoring observations due to potential abrasion of the skin. The OECD TG 404 guideline specifies pre-exposure clipping only. Additionally, there was some indications that the test item was not fully removed after 4 hours exposure. Whilst this may not of invalidated the study conclusions, this would lead to highly conservative conclusion due to increased potential for classification due to enhancement of response observations.
Under the conditions of the study, the test item is considered to be irritating to skin, category 2.
Reference
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- adverse effect observed (irritating)
Eye irritation
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- eye irritation: in vitro / ex vivo
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 06-11-2020 to 23-02-2021
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Remarks:
- Also conducted according to GLP.
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 438 (Isolated Chicken Eye Test Method for Identifying i) Chemicals Inducing Serious Eye Damage and ii) Chemicals Not Requiring Classification for Eye Irritation or Serious Eye Damage)
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Species:
- chicken
- Strain:
- other: ROSS 308
- Details on test animals or tissues and environmental conditions:
- SOURCE OF COLLECTED EYES
- Source: Recognised supplier (documented in the full study report)
- Number of animals: Not reported.
- Characteristics of donor animals (e.g. age, sex, weight): ca. 7 weeks old (typically) and 2.5 kg.
- Storage, temperature and transport conditions of ocular tissue (e.g. transport time, transport media and temperature, and other conditions): Freshly isolated heads from ca. 7 weeks old donors were collected from the abattoir and transported at ambient temperature. After collection, the heads were inspected for appropriate quality and wrapped with tissue paper moistened with saline, then placed in a plastic box which was closed (4-5 heads per box). The heads were received at the test facility and processed within 2 hours of collection by the test facility. After removing the head from the plastic box, it was put on soft paper. The eyelids were carefully cut away with scissors, avoiding damaging the cornea. One small drop of 2% (w/v) fluorescein solution was applied onto the cornea surface for a few seconds and subsequently rinsed off with 20 mL physiological saline. Then the fluorescein-treated cornea was examined with a hand-held slit lamp or slit lamp microscope, with the eye in the head, to ensure that the cornea was not damaged (i.e. fluorescein retention and corneal opacity scores ≤ 0.5). If the cornea was in good condition, the eyeball was carefully removed from the orbit. The eye was placed onto damp paper and the nictitating membrane was cut away with other connective tissue. The prepared eyes were kept on the wet papers in a closed box so that the appropriate humidity was maintained. Eyes were then clamped in the superfusion apparatus and then re-examined to ensure good condition. Then the eyes were acclimatised for 45 to 60 minutes at (32±1.5°C).
- Time interval prior to initiating testing: <24 hours. Eyes were prepared for testing immediately on same day arrival within 2 hours of colection.
- indication of any existing defects or lesions in ocular tissue samples: None.
- Indication of any antibiotics used: None reported. - Vehicle:
- unchanged (no vehicle)
- Controls:
- yes, concurrent positive control
- yes, concurrent negative control
- Amount / concentration applied:
- TEST MATERIAL
- Amount(s) applied (volume or weight with unit): 0.03 ml (or 30 µL of the test item)
- Concentration (if solution): undiluted
VEHICLE
- Amount(s) applied (volume or weight with unit): Not applicable.
- Concentration (if solution): Not applicable.
- Lot/batch no. (if required): Not applicable.
- Purity: Not applicable. - Duration of treatment / exposure:
- The test item remained for an exposure period of 10 seconds and was then rinsed from eye using 20 µL of physiological saline solution.
Controls (both negative and positive controls) were similarly applied to the cornea in the negative and positive control groups respectively. - Observation period (in vivo):
- Treated eyes were evaluated prior to treatment and at 30, 75, 120, 180 and 240 minutes (±5 minutes) after the eyes had been rinsed with the physiological saline.
- Number of animals or in vitro replicates:
- Triplicate (n=3)
- Details on study design:
- SELECTION AND PREPARATION OF ISOLATED EYES
:
Freshly isolated heads from ca. 7 weeks old donors were collected from the abattoir and transported at ambient temperature. After collection, the heads were inspected for appropriate quality and wrapped with tissue paper moistened with saline, then placed in a plastic box which was closed (4-5 heads per box). The heads were received at the test facility and processed within 2 hours of collection by the test facility. After removing the head from the plastic box, it was put on soft paper. The eyelids were carefully cut away with scissors, avoiding damaging the cornea. One small drop of 2% (w/v) fluorescein solution was applied onto the cornea surface for a few seconds and subsequently rinsed off with 20 mL physiological saline. Then the fluorescein-treated cornea was examined with a hand-held slit lamp or slit lamp microscope, with the eye in the head, to ensure that the cornea was not damaged (i.e. fluorescein retention and corneal opacity scores ≤ 0.5). If the cornea was in good condition, the eyeball was carefully removed from the orbit. The eye was placed onto damp paper and the nictitating membrane was cut away with other connective tissue. The prepared eyes were kept on the wet papers in a closed box so that the appropriate humidity was maintained. Eyes were then clamped in the superfusion apparatus and then re-examined to ensure good condition. Then the eyes were acclimatised for 45 to 60 minutes at (32±1.5°C).
EQUILIBRATION AND BASELINE RECORDINGS:
At the end of the acclimatization period, a zero reference measurement was recorded for cornea thickness and opacity to serve as a baseline (t=0) for each individual eye. The cornea thickness of the eyes should not change by more than 5% within the -45 min and the zero time. No significant corneal thickness changes (1.8% was observed) was observed in one eye and no changes were noted in the other eyes in the experiment. All eyes were considered to be suitable for the assay.
NUMBER OF REPLICATES :
Triplicate (3) for test item, positive and negative controls.
NEGATIVE CONTROL USED : Yes.
SOLVENT CONTROL USED (if applicable) : Not applicable.
POSITIVE CONTROL USED : Benzalkonium chloride (5%).
APPLICATION DOSE AND EXPOSURE TIME : Application dose: 30 µL of the test item. Exposure time: 10 seconds.
OBSERVATION PERIOD : prior to treatment and at 30, 75, 120, 180 and 240 minutes (+/- 5 minutes) after decontaminated with physiological saline solution.
REMOVAL OF TEST SUBSTANCE
- Volume and washing procedure after exposure period: The test item and control treated eyes were rinsed additional gentle rinsing with 3x20 mL saline at ambient temperature (taking care not to damage the cornea but attempting to remove all residual test material if possible) after treatment.
- Indicate any deviation from test procedure in the Guideline : Not applicable.
METHODS FOR MEASURED ENDPOINTS:
- Corneal opacity: Microscope.
- Damage to epithelium based on fluorescein retention: Microscope.
- Swelling: measured with optical pachymeter on a slit-lamp microscope; slit-width setting: Measured with optical pachymeter on a slit-lamp microscope.
- Macroscopic morphological damage to the surface: Yes.
- Others (e.g, histopathology): Not applicable.
SCORING SYSTEM:
- Mean corneal swelling (%) : See Tables.
- Mean maximum opacity score : See Tables.
- Mean fluorescein retention score at 30 minutes post-treatment : See Tables.
DECISION CRITERIA: In accordance with Guideline OECD TG 438.
The study is considered valid, if:
• the number of eyes meets the requirement of the relevant OECD guideline,
• the negative control item results No Category,
• the positive control item results Category 1 classification.
The results from all eyes used met the quality control standards. The negative control and positive control results were within the historical data range. This study was considered to be valid. - Irritation parameter:
- cornea opacity score
- Run / experiment:
- mean (n=3)
- Value:
- 0.5
- Vehicle controls validity:
- not applicable
- Negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Remarks on result:
- other: ICE Class I
- Irritation parameter:
- fluorescein retention score
- Run / experiment:
- mean (n=3)
- Value:
- 0.33
- Vehicle controls validity:
- not applicable
- Negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Remarks on result:
- other: ICE Class I
- Irritation parameter:
- percent corneal swelling
- Run / experiment:
- mean (n=3)
- Value:
- 1.1
- Vehicle controls validity:
- not applicable
- Negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Remarks on result:
- other: value %; ICE Class I
- Other effects / acceptance of results:
- OTHER EFFECTS:
- Visible damage on test system: None reported.
DEMONSTRATION OF TECHNICAL PROFICIENCY:
The laboratory previsouly demonstrated technical proficiency of the validated method with proficiency test items (information in the public domain). Additionally, concurrent positive control and negative controls were within the current historic control range (HCD) (documented in the full study report), each meeting the validity criteria respectively.
ACCEPTANCE OF RESULTS:
- Acceptance criteria met for negative control: Yes.
- Acceptance criteria met for positive control: Yes.
- Range of historical values if different from the ones specified in the test guideline:Not applicable. Applicant assessment of the data indicates that the positive controls and negative controls were within the current historic control range (HCD) (documented in the full study report), each meeting the validity criteria respectively. - Interpretation of results:
- GHS criteria not met
- Conclusions:
- Under the conditions of this study, the test item was considered to be non-irritant.
- Executive summary:
An in vitro eye irritation study of the test item was performed in isolated chicken's eyes. The study was conducted and irritation effects of the test item were evaluated according to the OECD No. 438 guideline (25 June 2018).
After the zero reference measurements, the eyes were held in a horizontal position and the test item was applied onto the centre of the cornea such that the entire surface of the cornea was covered in all cases. After 10 seconds exposure time, the surface of the eyes was rinsed with physiological saline solution. Three eyes were treated with 30 µL test item. The three positive control eyes were treated in a similar way with 30 µL of 5% (w/v) Benzalkonium chloride solution. The negative control eye was treated with 30 µL of physiological saline (0.9% (w/v) NaCl solution). Corneal thickness, corneal opacity and fluorescein retention were measured and any morphological effects (e.g. pitting or loosening of the peithelium) were evaluated.
The results from all eyes used in the study met the quality control standards. The negative control and positive control results were within the historical control data range in experiment. Thus, the study was considered to be valid.
No significant cornea thickness change (mean = 1.1 %) was observed during the four-hour observation period on the test item treated eyes. No significant fluorescein retention change (mean = 0.33) was observed on the test item treated eyes during the observation period. No morphological effect was observed.
Based on this in vitro eye irritation assay in isolated chicken eyes, the test item was non-irritant, UN GHS classification: No Category.
Reference
Table 1.- Ocular reactions
Test Item |
|
|
|
Observation |
Value |
ICE Class |
|
Mean maximum corneal swelling at up to 75 min |
1.1% |
I |
|
Mean maximum corneal swelling at up to 240 min |
1.1% |
I |
|
Mean maximum corneal opacity change |
0.50 |
I |
|
Mean fluorescein retention change |
0.33 |
I |
|
Other Observations |
None |
||
Overall ICE Class |
3xI |
||
|
|||
Positive Control Item |
|||
Observation |
Value |
ICE Class |
|
Mean maximum corneal swelling at up to 75 min |
14.2% |
III |
|
Mean maximum corneal swelling at up to 240 min |
34.7% |
IV |
|
Mean maximum corneal opacity change |
4.00 |
IV |
|
Mean fluorescein retention change |
2.83 |
IV |
|
Other Observations |
Slight loosening of |
||
Overall ICE Class |
3xIV |
||
|
|||
Negative Control Item |
|||
Observation |
Value |
ICE Class |
|
Maximum corneal swelling at up to 75 min |
-1.6% |
I |
|
Maximum corneal swelling at up to 240 min |
-1.6% |
I |
|
Maximum corneal opacity change |
0.00 |
I |
|
Fluorescein retention change |
0.00 |
I |
|
Other Observations |
None |
||
Overall ICE Class |
3xI |
||
|
- Corneal Opacity Scores
Maximum score was 0.5 in the test item group. Maximum score was 0.0 in the negative control. In the positive control group the Maximum score was 4.0. No morphological effects were noted in the test item or negative control item treated eyes. In the positive control group, slight loosening of epithelium was observed in two eyes (2/3) at 180 minutes after the post-treatment rinse.
- Fluorescein Retention Scores
Maximum score was 0.5 in the test item group. In the negative control maximum score was 0.0 and in the positive control group the Maximum score was 4.00.
Table 2.- Individual scoring - test item
End Point | Eye Number | Time (after decontamination) | |||||
0 minutes | 30 minutes | 75 minutes | 120 minutes | 180 minutes | 240 minutes | ||
Corneal opacity | 11 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 |
12 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 | |
13 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 | |
Mean | 0.00 | 0.33 | 0.50 | 0.50 | 0.50 | 0.50 | |
ICE Class | I | ||||||
Fluorescein Retention | 11 | 0.0 | 0.5 | ||||
12 | 0.0 | 0.5 | |||||
13 | 0.5 | 0.5 | |||||
Mean difference (30 - min) | 0.33 | ||||||
ICE Class | I | ||||||
Corneal Thickness | 11 | 0.60 | 0.62 | 0.61 | 0.60 | 0.59 | 0.59 |
12 | 0.56 | 0.56 | 0.56 | 0.56 | 0.56 | 0.56 | |
13 | 0.58 | 0.58 | 0.58 | 0.58 | 0.57 | 0.57 | |
Mean | 0.58 | 0.59 | 0.58 | 0.58 | 0.57 | 0.57 | |
Mean Corneal Swelling (%) | 1.10% | 0.60% | 0.00% | -1.10% | -1.10% | ||
ICE Class | I | ||||||
ICE Classes Combined: | 3 x I | ||||||
Classification: | Category 1 |
The test was considered acceptable since the concurrent negative or vehicle/solvent items and the concurrent positive controls were identified as GHS Non Classified and GHS Category 1, respectively.
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (not irritating)
Respiratory irritation
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Additional information
Justification for classification or non-classification
The substance meets the classification criteria under Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 for skin irritation: category 2: H15: causes skin irritation.
The substance does not meet classification criteria under Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 for eye irritation.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.