Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Environmental fate & pathways

Biodegradation in water: screening tests

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Link to relevant study record(s)

Referenceopen allclose all

Endpoint:
biodegradation in water: ready biodegradability
Type of information:
read-across from supporting substance (structural analogue or surrogate)
Adequacy of study:
key study
Justification for type of information:
Please refer to the justification for grouping of substances provided in IUCLID section 13.
Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
read-across source
Parameter:
% degradation (DOC removal)
Value:
50
Sampling time:
7 d
Parameter:
% degradation (DOC removal)
Value:
55
Sampling time:
14 d
Parameter:
% degradation (DOC removal)
Value:
54
Sampling time:
21 d
Parameter:
% degradation (DOC removal)
Value:
55
Sampling time:
27 d
Parameter:
% degradation (DOC removal)
Value:
54
Sampling time:
28 d
Interpretation of results:
other: not readily biodegradable
Conclusions:
A biodegradation result of 54% in 28 days was determined in a reliable study conducted according to an appropriate test protocol, and in compliance with GLP.
Endpoint:
biodegradation in water: ready biodegradability
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
1994-08-31 to 1994-11-02
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
EU Method C.4-A (Determination of the "Ready" Biodegradability - Dissolved Organic Carbon (DOC) Die-Away Test)
GLP compliance:
yes
Oxygen conditions:
aerobic
Inoculum or test system:
activated sludge, non-adapted
Details on inoculum:
The inoculum employed in the test was activated sludge from the Marl - Ost municipal sewage treatment plant. It was taken off on 1994-09-07 and centrifugated for 15 min at 3000 rpm. The supernatant was rejected and the sludge resuspended with mineral medium (washing). After another centrifugation step 15 min at 3000 rpm, the sludge was resuspended. The content of the dry matter in the inoculum used was 3.45 g/l. The determination of suspended solids was carried out before the inoculum. During this time the sludge had to be aerated by aerating tube. The content of the suspended solids in the test batches was 27.6 mg/l.
Duration of test (contact time):
28 d
Initial conc.:
11.2 mg/L
Based on:
DOC
Parameter followed for biodegradation estimation:
DOC removal
Details on study design:
Vessels: 2000 ml conial flasks with loose aluminium foil closure

Test batches:
2 flasks containing test substance (11.2 mg DOC/l after 3h) and inoculum
2 flasks without test substance, but with inoculum (= blank batch)
2 flasks containing control subsatnce (sodium benzoate: 10.8 mg DOC/l after 3 hours) and inoculum

Method:
Addition of inoculum corresponding to a dry matter content of 27.6 mg/test medium.
Filling up with about 2 l mineral medium.
30 ml/l test substance stock solution (20 ml/l control substance stock solution) were added to the test vessels.
The batches were filled up to 2.5 l with mineral medium.
From this batches two times 1000 ml were put into 2000 ml Erlenmeyer flasks.
The loosely covered flasks were incubated at 21.9 to 22.2 °C in the dark on a mechanical shaker for 28 days.
Reference substance:
benzoic acid, sodium salt
Parameter:
% degradation (DOC removal)
Value:
50
Sampling time:
7 d
Parameter:
% degradation (DOC removal)
Value:
55
Sampling time:
14 d
Parameter:
% degradation (DOC removal)
Value:
54
Sampling time:
21 d
Parameter:
% degradation (DOC removal)
Value:
55
Sampling time:
27 d
Parameter:
% degradation (DOC removal)
Value:
54
Sampling time:
28 d
Details on results:
Results with reference substance:
98% DOC decrease after 7 days
99% DOC decrease after 14 days
100% DOC decrease after 21 days
99% DOC decrease after 27 days
99% DOC decrease after 28 days

DOC measurements of the test item

 

 

DOC concentration after n days (mg/l)

 

Flask no.

 

O h (C0)

3h (C3)

7

14

21

27

28

Test batches

(Mineral

medium +

test item +

inoculum)

1

a1

13.58

13.59

7.53

6.16

6.43

6.78

6.83

a2

13.32

14.13

7.41

6.31

6.43

7.02

6.74

Ca (t) =

(a1 + a2) /2

13.45

13.86

7.47

6.24

6.43

6.90

6.79

2

b1

12.25

13.78

7.04

6.74

6.62

6.28

6.61

b2

12.30

13.38

7.00

6.77

6.67

6.37

6.80

Cb (t) =

(b1+ b2) /2

12.28

13.58

7.02

6.76

6.65

6.33

6.71

Blank batches

(Mineral

medium

+

inoculum)

1

c1

0.52

0.36

0.61

0.50

0.43

0.60

0.62

c2

0.56

0.39

0.54

0.44

0.42

0.65

0.62

Cc (t) =

(c1 + c2) /2

0.54

0.38

0.58

0.47

0.43

0.63

0.62

2

d1

0.49

0.36

0.70

0.53

0.49

0.60

0,62

d2

0.44

0.41

0.68

0.49

0.49

0.61

0.59

Cd (t) 0

(d1 + d2) /2

0.47

0.39

0.69

0.51

0.49

0.61

0.61

 

Cbl(t)=Cc(t)+Cd(t)/2

0.51

0.39

0.64

0.49

0.46

0.62

0.62

 

Validity criteria fulfilled:
yes
Interpretation of results:
other: not readily biodegradable
Conclusions:
A biodegradation result of 54% in 28 days was determined in a reliable study conducted according to an appropriate test protocol, and in compliance with GLP.

Description of key information

Biodegradation in water, screening tests: A biodegradation rate of 54 % in 28 days
Biodegradation in water, screening tests: Ethanol is readily biodegradable

Key value for chemical safety assessment

Additional information

Note: A biodegradation screening study is currently ongoing for the registered substance (i.e. triethoxy(propyl)silane (CAS 2550-02-9)). This dossier will be updated once the final study report is available.

There are no reliable ready biodegradation data available for triethoxypropylsilane, therefore good quality data for the analogue substance, trimethoxypropylsilane, have been read across. Both substances share the same silanol hydrolysis product, propylsilanetriol; the other hydrolysis products being ethanol and methanol, respectively, which are readily biodegradable.

Both triethoxypropylsilane and trimethoxypropylsilane are within a wider analogue group than the analogue groups discussed in Section 1.4. Substances within this wider analogue group,in general, exhibit no evidence of any significant biodegradation once hydrolysis and subsequent biodegradation of alkoxy/acetoxy groups has been taken into account.

This wider analogue group for the ready biodegradability endpoint consists of a number of sub-classes of substances. However, read-across is carried out between substances within the same sub-class in most cases.

Table 4.1.4 presents ready biodegradation data available for substances within the sub-class (I-2) of alkoxysilanes, silanols, acetoxysilanes and chlorosilanes, etc, where the Si part is of low-biological reactivity, once any hydrolysis is accounted for.

Table 4.1.4 Ready biodegradation data available for substances within the relevant sub-class (I-2) of chemicals

CAS

Name

Readily biodegradable? Yes/no

Result: Biodegradation after 28 day

Guideline

Reliability

Corrected % biodegradation once alkoxy/acetoxy biodegradation is accounted for

001066-40-6

Hydroxytrimethylsilane

No

0%

OECD 310

1a

0

018748-98-6

Trimethyl(octadecyloxy)silane

No

68%

OECD 301B

1a

-18

017689-77-9

Triacetoxyethylsilane

Yes

74% in 21 days

EC C4-A

1a

-1

001067-25-0

Trimethoxypropylsilane

No

54%

Annex V C4-A

1a

4

002943-75-1

Triethoxyoctylsilane

No

31.5%

OECD 301D

1a

-11

016415-13-7

Triethoxyhexadecylsilane

No

43%

MITI

1c

16

087135-01-1

1,6-Bis(trimethoxysilyl)hexane

Yes, but not meeting 10-day window

74%

OECD 301B

1a

24

None45

Mixture of 1,1- and 1,2-bis(trimethoxysilyl)ethane

Yes

93%

"Biodegradation study of chemical substances by microorganisms and the like " stipulated in "Testing Method for New Chemical Substances etc." ( Kanhogyo No.5, Yakuhatsu 615, 49Kikyoku No.392, July 13, 1974 )

1a

18

013154-25-1

Chlorotri(3-methyl-propyl)silane

No

0%

OECD 301B

1a

0

035435-21-3

Triethoxy(2,4,4-trimethylpentyl)silane

No

13%

OECD310

1a

-30

018395-30-7

Trimethoxy(2-methylpropyl)silane

No

36 - 47%

OECD 301B

1a

4

142877-45-0

Silane, trimethoxy(1,1,2-trimethylpropyl)-

No

31%

OECD 301D

1a

-2

017980-47-1

Triethoxyisobutylsilane

Yes

75%

OECD 301D

1a

15

126990-35-0

Dicyclopentyldimethoxysilane

No

12%

OECD 301C

1

-5

139147-73-2

Silane, dichlorodicyclopentyl-

No

0.8%

OECD 301D

2b

1

017865-32-6

Cyclohexyldimethoxymethylsilane

No

15-17%

OECD 301D

1a

-5

None46

t-butoxycyclopentyldimethoxysilane

No

15%

OECD 301C

1a

7

000098-12-4

Cyclohexyltrichlorosilane

No

0%

OECD 301C

1a

0

000124-70-9

Dichloro(methyl)(vinyl)silane

No

-6.78%

OECD 301A

1a

0

001067-53-4

Tris(2-methoxyethoxy)vinylsilane

Yes

89%

Annex V C4-A

1a

7

002768-02-7

Trimethoxyvinylsilane

No

51%

OECD 301F

1a

-9

 

It is therefore considered valid to read-across the results for trimethoxypropylsilane to fill the data gap for the registered substance. Additional information is given in a supporting report (PFA, 2013f) attached in Section 13 of the IUCLID 5 dossier.

A biodegradation rate of 54 % in 28 days was reported for the trimethoxypropylsilane. The results from this study are likely to reflect the biodegradation of methanol, which would biodegrade rapidly (three of the six carbons in trimethoxypropylsilane are converted to methanol in a rapid hydrolysis reaction). Propylsilanetriol is not expected to biodegrade to any significant extent. This is supported by evidence that within a category of small molecule silicon-dominated organosilicon compounds, without reactive functional groups in the side chain, there is no evidence of any significant biodegradation in ready biodegradation tests. The second hydrolysis product ethanol is known to be readily biodegradable.

The study is considered to be reliability 1 (reliable without restrictions); the read across of the result is considered to be reliability 2 (reliable with restrictions).