Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Endpoint:
sensitisation data (humans)
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
11/2008
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
2008
Report date:
2008

Materials and methods

Type of sensitisation studied:
skin
Study type:
study with volunteers
Test guideline
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
other: Repeated Insult Patch Test
Deviations:
no
Principles of method if other than guideline:
To determine the irritation and/or sensitization potential of the test article after repeated application under semi-occlusive patch test conditions to the skin of human subjects
GLP compliance:
not specified
Remarks:
GCP: Good Clinical Practice

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
Heptyl undec-10-enoate
EC Number:
268-850-7
EC Name:
Heptyl undec-10-enoate
Cas Number:
68141-27-5
Molecular formula:
C18H34O2
IUPAC Name:
heptyl undec-10-enoate
Test material form:
liquid

Method

Type of population:
general
Ethical approval:
confirmed and informed consent free of coercion received
Subjects:
- Number of subjects exposed: 51
- Sex: male and female
- Age: between 18 and 70
- Race: no data
- Demographic information: no data
- Other:
Each subject was assigned a permanent CRL identification number. All subject signed an Informed
Consent Form in compliance with 21 CFR Part 50: "Protection of Human Subjects" and a HIPAA
Authorization Form in compliance with 45 CFR Part 160 and 164. All subject completed a Subject Prof
ile/Medical History Form provided by Clinical Research Laboratories, Inc. prior to the study (Subject
Demographics - Appendix I). Subject who met the following criteria were impaneled:
- Male and Female panelists between the ages of 18 and 70
- Subjects who have completed a Panelist Profile/Medical History
- Subjects who are in general good health as determined by a Panelist Profile/Medical History
- Subjects who do not exhibit any skin diseases that might be confused with a skin reaction from the
test material
- Subjets who agree to avoid exposure of the test sites to the sun and to refrain from visits to tanning
salons during the course of the study
- Subject willing to sign an Informed Consent Form in conformance with 21 CFR Part 50: "Protection
of Human Subjects"
- Females who are not pregnant or lactating
- Subjects who demonstrate dependability and intelligence in following directions
- Subjects who are not currently using systemic or topical corticosteroids, anti-inflammatory drugs or
antihistamines
- Subjects who do not exhibit skin disorder, sunburn, scars, excessive tatoos, etc. in the test area
Clinical history:
The subjects did not exhibit any physical or dermatological condition that would have precluded application of the test article.
Route of administration:
dermal
Details on study design:
See test method in report attached

Results and discussion

Results of examinations:
This study was initiated with 56 subjects. 5 subjects discontinued study participation for reasons unrelated to the test material. A total of 51 subjects completed the study.
Individual dermal scores recorded during the Induction and Challenge Phase appear in table 1 (report attached)

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Conclusions:
Based on the test population of 51 subjects and under the conditions of this study, the test material identified as caprylohydroxamic acid did not demonstrate a potential for eliciting dermal irritation or sensitization.
Executive summary:

An RIPT test has been performed with material heptyl undecylenate. Based on the test population of 51 subjects and under the conditions of this study, the test material identified as caprylohydroxamic acid did not demonstrate a potential for eliciting dermal irritation or sensitization.