Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 946-790-9 | CAS number: -
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Description of key information
Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates:
EC50 (Daphnia magna, 48 h) > 100 mg/L (nominal)
Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae:
ErC50 (Lemna minor, 7d, frond number) > 93.1 mg/L (meas. (geom. mean))*
* value of geometric mean of measured concentrations corresponds to 100 mg/L nominal concentration
Additional information
Firstly, it is worth saying that the substance is very water soluble (i.e. > 10 g/L); it has a log Kow lower than 4 (indicating a low potential for bioaccumulation) and is not rapidly degradable.
Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
A limit test was conducted to determine the acute toxicity of the test substance to Daphnia magna, according to the OECD Guideline 202 (2004) and the EU method C.2 of the Regulation EC 440/2008. The study was performed using the concentration of 100 mg/L test item (nominal). For the test concentration, 20 daphnia were exposed to the test item for 48 hours in a static test system. After 24 and 48 hours, the immobilised daphnia were counted.
The treatment showed 10% immobilisationwhich can be stated as not significant. None of the animals was immobilised in the blank control.
Potassium dichromate K2Cr2O7(CAS No. 7778-50-9) was used as positive controlin a current reference study to assure that the test conditions are reliable.
The statistical evaluation program showed that there was no significant difference between treatment and blank control.
At the beginning and at the end of the test, the content of the test item in the test solutions was determined using Photometer-determination. The concentration determined at the start of the test was 99 % of the nominal concentration. At the end of the test the determined concentration was 106 % of the nominal concentration. Therefore, the determination of the biological results was based on the nominal concentration.
The following results were determined :
48h-NOEC≥100
mg/L (nominal conc.)
48h-LOEC> 100mg/L
(nominal conc.)
24h-EC50> 100 mg/L(nominal
conc.)
48h-EC50> 100 mg/L(nominal
conc.)
Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
The study was performed in order to evaluate the toxicity of tehe test item towards Lemna minor following the OECD Guideline 221 (2006).The study was performed using 5 concentrations ranging from 1.0 to 100 mg/L (nominal concentration). Incubation time was 7 days. The frond number of each replicate was determined at the beginning, at day 2 and 5 during the test and at the end of the experiment. Additionally, the dry mass of 12 representative fronds was determined at the beginning of the experiment. At the end of the experiment the dry mass of each replicate was determined.
Growth rate µ and the yield were determined from the frond number and the drymass at the respective observation times.
Due to contamination, the lowest concentration was excluded from the evaluation. Although fewer concentrations were taken into account, the statistical significance of the results is still given.
At the start and at the end of the test, the content of the test item in the test solutions was determined using a photometric method.
The measured concentrations lay between 91 % and 103 % of the nominal concentrations at the beginning of the test and between 65 % and 129 % of the nominal concentrations at the end of the test. Therefore, the determination of the results was based on the geometric mean of the measured concentrations (cf. OECD Guideline No. 221 §47). The decrease of the test item could be explained by the inclusion of the test item in the plants. However, this is only an assumption.
The 7d-EC50s of 3,5-Dichlorophenol (1,3-Dichloro-5-hydroxybenzene, C6H4Cl2O, CAS-No. 591-35-5) were determined in a separate reference test. The EC50value of the growth rate lay within the desired range of 1.7 - 5.7 mg/L, mentioned in the paper “OECD Lemna Growth Inhibition Test, Development and ring testing of draft OECD test guideline”, Research and Development Technical Report EMA 003, page 34.
The ErC50 based on frond number for the test item was found to be > 93.1 mg/L (geom. mean corresponding to nominal concentration of 100 mg/L).
JUSTIFICATION FOR CLASSIFICATION OR NON-CLASSIFICATION
According to the CLP Regulation (EC) no. 1272/2008), Part 4: Environmental Hazards, the substances can be classified for hazardous to the aquatic environment when the following criteria are met:
A) Acute (short-term) aquatic hazard Category Acute 1: 96 hr LC50 (for fish) and/or 48 hr EC50 (for crustacea) and/or 72 or 96 hr ErC50 (for algae or other aquatic plants) ≤ 1 mg/l.
B) Long-term aquatic hazard (iii) Substances for which adequate chronic toxicity data are not available and the substance is not rapidly degradable and/or the experimentally determined BCF ≥ 500 (or, if absent, the log K ow ≥ 4).
Category Chronic 1: 96 hr LC50 (for fish) and/or 48 hr EC50 (for crustacea) and/or 72 or 96 hr ErC50 (for algae or other aquatic plants) ≤ 1 mg/L
Category Chronic 2: 96 hr LC50 (for fish) and/or 48 hr EC50 (for crustacea) and/or 72 or 96 hr ErC50 (for algae or other aquatic plants)> 1 to ≤10 mg/L
Category Chronic 3: 96 hr LC50 (for fish) and/or 48 hr EC50 (for crustacea) and/or 72 or 96 hr ErC 50 (for algae or other aquatic plants) > 10 to ≤ 100 mg/L.
The substance is not rapidly degradable and the available acute toxicity test to Daphnia magna and Lemna minor fixed effect levels that do not meet these classification criteria. Therefore, the substance is not classified for aquatic toxicity according to the CLP Regulation (EC) no. 1272/2008.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.