Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 805-172-8 | CAS number: 65646-25-5
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Eye irritation
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- eye irritation: in vitro / ex vivo
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 4th August 2015 - 5th August 2015
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 2 015
- Report date:
- 2015
Materials and methods
Test guideline
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 437 (Bovine Corneal Opacity and Permeability Test Method for Identifying Ocular Corrosives and Severe Irritants)
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- 1,2-dipropyl cyclohexane-1,2-dicarboxylate
- EC Number:
- 805-172-8
- Cas Number:
- 65646-25-5
- Molecular formula:
- C14 H24 O4
- IUPAC Name:
- 1,2-dipropyl cyclohexane-1,2-dicarboxylate
- Test material form:
- other: liquid
- Details on test material:
- Identity: CHP
Chemical name: Cyclohexane-1,2-dicarboxylic n-propyl ester
CAS number: 65646-25-5
Intended use: Chemical process regulator
Lot number: ST111209
Expiry: 31 December 2016
Appearance: Colourless liquid
Storage conditions: Room temperature ca. 20°C, in the dark,
under nitrogen gas
Purity/Assay: 98.6%
Constituent 1
Test animals / tissue source
- Species:
- other: Bovine eyes
- Strain:
- not specified
- Details on test animals or tissues and environmental conditions:
- The bovine eyes, supplied by Joseph Morris Abattoir, were excised by an abattoir employee and collected as soon after slaughter as possible (last excised at 13:15 hours, 4 August 2015).
Test system
- Vehicle:
- physiological saline
- Controls:
- not specified
- Amount / concentration applied:
- The test substance, CHP, was diluted to 10% with 0.9% saline.
- Duration of treatment / exposure:
- The test substance and the positive control were tested undiluted.
Immediately prior to treatment, the medium was removed from the anterior compartment of the holder using a pipette tip attached to a vacuum pump, taking extra care to ensure all excess liquid had been removed. Seven hundred and fifty μL (750 μL) of the test substance, positive control or negative control was introduced into the anterior part of each holder. Following application, the anterior compartment was plugged and the holder turned to a horizontal position and slightly rotated to ensure uniform distribution of the test substance over the surface of the cornea. The test substance or controls were in contact with the cornea for a total of 10 minutes (+/-30 seconds). Each holder was incubated in a horizontal position at 32°C +/- 1°C in a waterbath. - Duration of post- treatment incubation (in vitro):
- two hours +/- 10 minutes at 32°C +/- 1°C.
- Number of animals or in vitro replicates:
- Corneas were treated in triplicate with either the test substance, positive control (ethanol) or negative control (0.9% sodium chloride solution).
- Details on study design:
- Following incubation, the test substance, positive and negative controls were removed from the epithelial surface of the cornea by washing, at least three times or until the wash medium (EMEM with phenol red) was clear and there was no discolouration. The wash medium was added via the holes on the top of the holder. After each wash, the wash medium was removed using a pipette tip attached to a vacuum pump. The test substance required four washes. The anterior compartment was then filled with cMEM taking care to ensure no air bubbles were present in the compartment. Once all the air bubbles had been removed, the anterior compartment was re-plugged and the holders returned to the waterbath and incubated, in an upright position, for two hours +/- 10 minutes at 32°C +/- 1°C.
Following completion of the two hour incubation period, the medium was removed from both compartments and replaced with fresh cMEM. The posterior compartment was re-plugged and the opacity of each cornea measured and recorded. The opacity values obtained at this stage were used in calculating the final In Vitro Irritancy Score.
Throughout the assay the corneas were examined for opaque spots or other irregularities. The sodium fluorescein stock solution (4 mg/mL) was thawed prior to commencing the permeability incubation. Following the final opacity measurement, the medium was removed from the anterior compartment of the holder. One mL (1 mL) of the sodium fluorescein solution was added to the anterior compartment using a micropipette.
Following addition of the sodium fluorescein solution to the anterior side of the holder, the compartment was plugged and the corneas incubated in a horizontal position at 32°C ± 1°C for 90 ± 5 minutes in a waterbath. Following incubation, the medium in the posterior compartment was mixed by drawing approximately 2.5 mL gently up and down a 5 mL syringe, with a needle attached, three times. An aliquot of the mixed medium from the posterior compartment was removed and transferred to a 1 cm path length cuvette. A spectrophotometer was adjusted to read at 490 nm (OD490) and a sample of cMEM read (OD = 0.062).
The positive control should elicit an In Vitro Irritancy Score that falls within two standard deviations of the historical mean for the laboratory. The negative control mean opacity change value should be ≤3.0 and the permeability mean value ≤0.1.
Results and discussion
In vitro
Results
- Irritation parameter:
- in vitro irritation score
- Value:
- 0.3
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Interpretation of results:
- GHS criteria not met
- Conclusions:
- The test substance, CHP, elicited an In Vitro Irritancy Score of 0.3 ± 0.6 and was predicted to have a classification of No Category according to the UN GHS.
- Executive summary:
The Bovine Corneal Opacity and Permeability Assay (BCOP) was performed to assess the
potential of the test substance, CHP, to cause serious eye damage. Ethanol was tested in
parallel as a positive control.
The BCOP assay is an organotypic model that uses isolated bovine corneas from freshly
slaughtered cattle as a means of assessing the potential of a test substance to cause serious
eye damage. Two endpoints, corneal opacity and permeability, were measured and combined
to give an In Vitro Irritancy Score which was used to assign an in vitro irritancy hazard
classification category for prediction of the ocular irritation potential of the test substance.
The negative and positive controls met the acceptance criteria for this assay.
The test substance, CHP, elicited an In Vitro Irritancy Score of 0.3 ± 0.6 and was predicted to
have a classification of No Category according to the UN GHS
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.