Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Key value for chemical safety assessment

Genetic toxicity in vitro

Description of key information

Not mutagenic

Link to relevant study records
Reference
Endpoint:
in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
Remarks:
Type of genotoxicity: gene mutation
Type of information:
other: read across from similar substance
Adequacy of study:
key study
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: see 'Remark'
Remarks:
Study well documented, test procedure in accordance with OECD 471 methods, meets generally accepted scientific principles, acceptable for assessment. GLP guideline study with acceptable restrictions (E. coli WP2 uvrA or S. typhimurium TA 102 missing).
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 471 (Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay)
GLP compliance:
yes
Type of assay:
bacterial reverse mutation assay
Species / strain / cell type:
S. typhimurium, other: TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 1538, TA 98, TA 100
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Metabolic activation system:
Aroclor-induced rat liver S-9 mix
Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
10.0; 100.0; 333.3; 1000.0; and 5000.0 µg/plate
Vehicle / solvent:
- Vehicle/solvent used: A. dest.- Justification for choice of solvent/vehicle: The solvent was chosen because of its solubility properties.
Untreated negative controls:
yes
Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
yes
Positive controls:
yes
Remarks:
W/o S-9: 10 µg/plate sodium azide (TA 1535, Ta 100), 50 µg/plate 4-NOPD (TA 1537, TA 1538, TA 98); w/ S-9: 10 µg/plate 2-AA (all strains)
Details on test system and experimental conditions:
METHOD OF APPLICATION: in agar (plate incorporation)NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: The assay was performed in two independent experiments, using identical procedures, both with and without liver microsomal activation. Each concentration, including the controls, was tested in triplicate.DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY: Toxicity of the test article may be evidenced by a reduction in the number of spontaneous revertants, a clearing of the bacterial background lawn, or by degree of survival of treated cultures.
Evaluation criteria:
The generally accepted conditions for the evaluation of the results are:- corresponding background growth on both negative control and test plates- normal range of spontaneous reversion rates.A test article is considered as positive if either a significant dose-related increase in the number of revertants or a significant and reproducible increase for at least one test concentration is induced.A test article producing neither a significant dose-related increase in the number of revertants nor a significant and reproducible positive response at any one of the test points is considered non-mutagenic in this system.A test article is considered as mutagen if in strain TA 100 the number of reversions is at least twice as high and in strains TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 1538, and TA 98 it is at least three times higher as compared to the spontaneous reversion rate.Also, a dose-dependent increase in the number of revertants is regarded as an indication of possibly existing mutagenic potential of the test article regardless whether the highest dose induced the above described enhancement factors or not.
Species / strain:
S. typhimurium, other: TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 1538, TA 98, TA 100
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
no cytotoxicity nor precipitates, but tested up to recommended limit concentrations
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Untreated negative controls validity:
valid
Positive controls validity:
valid
Additional information on results:
RANGE-FINDING/SCREENING STUDIES:To evaluate the toxicity of the test article a pre-study was performed with strains TA 98 and TA 100. The plates with the test article showed normal background growth up to 5000.0 µg/plate in strain TA 98 and TA 100, respectively. According to the dose selection criteria, the test article was tested at the following concentrations: 10.0; 100.0; 333.3; 1000.0; and 5000.0 µg/plate.ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON CYTOTOXICITY:In both experiments no toxic effects, normally evidenced by a reduction in the number of revertants, occurred in the test groups with and without metabolic activation in all strains used. The plates incubated with the test article showed normal background growth up to 5000.0 µg/plate with and without S9 mix in all strains used.
Conclusions:
Interpretation of results (migrated information):negativeUnder the experimental conditions reported, the test article did not induce point mutations by base pair changes or frameshifts in the genome of the strains used. Therefore, the test article is considered to be non-mutagenic in this Salmonella typhimurium reverse mutation assay.
Executive summary:

The study followed OECD guideline 471 (1981) and the principles of GLP. In the presence and absence of rat liver S-9 microsomal activation system and at doses of up to 5000 μg/plate, S. typhimurium strains TA 98, TA 100, TA 1535, TA 1537 and TA 1538 did not show an increased number of revertant colonies. In addition, there was no indication of toxicity to bacteria. Therefore, no evidence of a mutagenic potential was associated with the test substance. The purity of the test item was 94.6%. A. dest. was used as a vehicle.

Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no adverse effect observed (negative)

Genetic toxicity in vivo

Description of key information

Not mutagenic

Link to relevant study records
Reference
Endpoint:
in vivo mammalian somatic cell study: cytogenicity / erythrocyte micronucleus
Remarks:
Type of genotoxicity: chromosome aberration
Type of information:
other: read across from similar substance
Adequacy of study:
weight of evidence
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
reference to same study
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 474 (Mammalian Erythrocyte Micronucleus Test)
Deviations:
not specified
GLP compliance:
not specified
Type of assay:
micronucleus assay
Species:
mouse
Strain:
NMRI
Sex:
male/female
Route of administration:
oral: unspecified
Vehicle:
in 1 % carboxymethylcellulose
Remarks:
Doses / Concentrations:
5000 mg/kg
Basis:
nominal conc.
No. of animals per sex per dose:
5/sex/group
Positive control(s):
Cyclophosphamide
Tissues and cell types examined:
Bone marrow samples were scored for polychromatic erythrocytes containing micronuclei at 24, 48 and 72 hours post-dosing.
Sex:
male/female
Genotoxicity:
negative
Toxicity:
yes
Remarks:
some cytotoxicity
Negative controls validity:
not valid
Positive controls validity:
valid
Conclusions:
Interpretation of results (migrated information): negative
Under experimental conditions substance did not appear to induce micronuclei.
Executive summary:

Substance was investigated for its potential to induce micronuclei in polychromatic erythrocytes in mouse bone marrow. NMRI mice (5/sex/group) were given the test substance (in 1% carboxymethylcellulose) as a single oral dose at 5000 mg/kg. Bone marrow samples were scored for polychromatic erythrocytes containing micronuclei at 24, 48 and 72 hours post-dosing. The ratio of polychromatic to normochromatic erythrocytes indicated some cytotoxicity at the dose level used. However, the number of cells with micronuclei in the tested animals was similar that in control animals. Cyclophosphamide was used as a positive control.

Additional information

On the base of results of the tests performed on similar substances both on in vitro and on in vivo, Direct Orange 26 can be considered not mutagen.

Justification for classification or non-classification

According to CLP regulation (EC1272/2008) Direct Orange 26 is not classified for genetic toxicity.