Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Eye irritation

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
eye irritation: in vivo
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
weight of evidence
Study period:
9 May 1977 - 31 May 1977
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: Test was conducted according to methods similar to OECD guideline 405 and was performed pre-GLP. A concise description of the protocol is available and results are reported clearly.

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
1977
Report date:
1977

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
equivalent or similar to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 405 (Acute Eye Irritation / Corrosion)
Deviations:
yes
Remarks:
no OECD scoring system was used
GLP compliance:
no
Remarks:
performed pre-GLP.

Test material

1
Reference substance name:
Essential oil obtained from the fruits of Litsea cubeba (Lour.) Pers. by distillation
EC Number:
943-438-6
Cas Number:
90063-59-5
IUPAC Name:
Essential oil obtained from the fruits of Litsea cubeba (Lour.) Pers. by distillation
Test material form:
liquid

Test animals / tissue source

Species:
rabbit
Strain:
not specified
Details on test animals or tissues and environmental conditions:
TEST ANIMALS
- Age at study initiation: 9 weeks

Test system

Vehicle:
unchanged (no vehicle)
Controls:
no
Amount / concentration applied:
TEST MATERIAL
- Amount(s) applied: 0.1 ml
- Concentration: 100%
Duration of treatment / exposure:
Single dose / continuous exposure (no washing)
Observation period (in vivo):
Up to 7 days
Number of animals or in vitro replicates:
3
Details on study design:
REMOVAL OF TEST SUBSTANCE
- Washing: Not performed

SCORING SYSTEM: Opacity, corneal swelling, chemosis, discharge, iritis, pannus and discomfort were checked in the treated animals on specific timepoints after instillation (up to recovery). No detailed information available. It is therefore not possible to derive scores from this study that can be directly related to the OECD scoring system. Expert judgment has to be used to evaluate the results with regard to the current classification criteria.

Results and discussion

In vivo

Resultsopen allclose all
Irritation parameter:
cornea opacity score
Basis:
animal: #1, #2, #3
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
> 0 - < 1
Max. score:
4
Reversibility:
fully reversible within: 7 days
Remarks on result:
positive indication of irritation
Remarks:
affecting 25-75% of corneal surface
Irritation parameter:
iris score
Basis:
animal: #1, #2, #3
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Remarks on result:
no indication of irritation
Irritation parameter:
conjunctivae score
Basis:
animal: #1, #2, #3
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Remarks on result:
no indication of irritation
Irritation parameter:
chemosis score
Remarks:
% swelling
Basis:
animal: #1, #2, #3
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
> 10 - < 59
Max. score:
100
Reversibility:
fully reversible within: 7 days
Remarks on result:
positive indication of irritation
Remarks:
slight to moderate
Irritant / corrosive response data:
Litsea cubeba caused slight to moderate corneal lesions in two animals affecting between 25-75% of the corneal surface. These lesions were associated with slight to moderate corneal swelling. Opacity effects were also noted in two animals, but maximum grade was not >1. All animals developed slight to moderate conjunctivitis. All animals recovered within 7 days.

Any other information on results incl. tables

All three animals showed some irritating effects in the first days after exposure. Betwee day 2 and 7 after exposure recovery was completed in all animals. Reporting of the results was not in line with the current classification criteria and therefore have to be extrapolated based on expert judgement.

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
other: Not irritating
Remarks:
based on the criteria outlined in 1272/2008/EC (CLP)
Conclusions:
Under the conditions of this study, Litsea cubeba oil was found to induce slight to moderate conjunctivitis in all test animals, but recovery was completed within 7 days. These results were extrapolated to the current classification criteria based on expert judgement. It was concluded that the test substance does not need to be classified for eye irritation based on the criteria outlined in 1272/2008/EC (CLP).
Executive summary:

An eye irritation study according to similar methods as described in OECD guideline 405 was performed with test substance Litsea cubeba essential oil. An amount of 0.1 ml of the undiluted test substance was instilled in one eye of three rabbits (no washing performed). Opacity, corneal swelling, chemosis, discharge, iritis, pannus and discomfort were checked in the treated animals on specific timepoints after instillation (15 minutes, 1 day, 2 days, 3 days and 7 days).

Litsea cubeba essential oil caused slight to moderate corneal lesions in two animals affecting between 25-75% of the corneal surface. These lesions were associated with slight to moderate corneal swelling. Opacity effects were also noted in two animals (not above 1). All animals developed slight to moderate conjunctivitis. All animals recovered within 7 days.

Under the conditions of this study, Litsea cubeba essential oil was found to induce slight to moderate conjunctivitis in all test animals, but recovery was completed within 7 days. These results were extrapolated to the current classification criteria based on expert judgement. It was concluded that the test substance does not need to be classified for eye irritation based on the criteria outlined in 1272/2008/EC (CLP).