Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 415-510-2 | CAS number: 145703-76-0
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Skin sensitisation
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- skin sensitisation, other
- Remarks:
- in vivo (guinea pig maximisation test)
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- from August 10 to September 16, 1993
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: Test conducted according to internationally accepted guidelines.
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 1 994
- Report date:
- 1994
Materials and methods
Test guidelineopen allclose all
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method B.6 (Skin Sensitisation)
- Version / remarks:
- (1992)
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 406 (Skin Sensitisation)
- Version / remarks:
- (1981)
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- The study refers also to the publication: 'Allergic contact dermatitis in the guinea pig: identification of contact allergenes'; Magnusson B. and Kligman A.M., 1970
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Type of study:
- guinea pig maximisation test
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- Red GS 3848
- IUPAC Name:
- Red GS 3848
- Test material form:
- solid: particulate/powder
- Remarks:
- migrated information: powder
Constituent 1
In vivo test system
Test animals
- Species:
- guinea pig
- Strain:
- Himalayan
- Sex:
- female
- Details on test animals and environmental conditions:
- Test animalsSource: BRL Ltd., Basel, SwitzerlandAge at study initiation: approx. 9 weeksWeight at study initiation: 343 - 484 gHousing: 2 animals per cageDiet: ad libitumWater: ad libitumAcclimation period: 5 days before start of the treatmentEnvironmental conditionsTemperature: 21 °CHumidity: 55 %Air changes: 15 per hourPhotoperiod: 12 hours artificial fluorescent light
Study design: in vivo (non-LLNA)
Inductionopen allclose all
- Route:
- intradermal and epicutaneous
- Vehicle:
- other: water or physiological saline
- Concentration / amount:
- Preliminary studyintradermal: 5 % w/w in distilled waterEpidermal: 50 % w/w in distilled waterEpidermal: 5 %, 10 %, 25 % and 50 % w/w in distilled waterMain studyInductionI) intradermal: 1 % w/w in physiological salineII) epidermal: 50 % w/w in distilled waterChallenge and re-challengeEpidermal: 50 %, 25 % and 10 % w/w in distilled water
Challengeopen allclose all
- Route:
- epicutaneous, occlusive
- Vehicle:
- other: water or physiological saline
- Concentration / amount:
- Preliminary studyintradermal: 5 % w/w in distilled waterEpidermal: 50 % w/w in distilled waterEpidermal: 5 %, 10 %, 25 % and 50 % w/w in distilled waterMain studyInductionI) intradermal: 1 % w/w in physiological salineII) epidermal: 50 % w/w in distilled waterChallenge and re-challengeEpidermal: 50 %, 25 % and 10 % w/w in distilled water
- No. of animals per dose:
- 20.
- Details on study design:
- Preliminary studyIntradermal 5 % w/w in water (1 animal)Epidermal 50 % w/w in water (same animal as above)Epidermal 50 %, 25 %, 10 % and 5 % w/w in water (4 animals)Main studyA. Induction exposure (intradermal and epidermal)No. of exposures: 2Days of induction: day 1 and day 8Test groups: test substance in physiological saline (intradermal) or water (epidermal)Control group: physiological saline (intradermal) or water (epidermal)Site: clipped scapular region Duration (epidermal): 48 hoursConcentrations: 1 % (intradermal) and 50 % (epidermal)B. Challenge and re-challenge exposure (epidermal)No. of exposures: 2Days of challenge: day 22 and day 28Duration of exposure: 24 hoursTest groups: test substance in water Control group: test substance in waterSite: clipped and shaved flank (challenge); contralateral shaved flank (re-challenge)Concentrations: 50 %, 25 % and 10 %Evaluation: 24 and 48 hours after removal of the dressing
- Positive control substance(s):
- yes
- Remarks:
- formaldehyde
Results and discussion
- Positive control results:
- Skin reaction to the second challenge with formaldehydeconc. of formaldehyde 0.2 %0.1 %0.05 %0%experimental animals with skin reaction121160control animals with skin reaction1210Although skin reactions were observed in experimental and control animals in response to all three concentrations, it was clearly noted that a higher number of experimental animals showed a skin reaction than control animals and an higher degree of skin reaction in a few experimental animals in response to the three concentrations tested. A similar difference was noted on the first challenge skin sites and at histopathology examination. Therefore, it can be concluded that a clear sensitisation effect had occurred.
In vivo (non-LLNA)
Resultsopen allclose all
- Reading:
- rechallenge
- Hours after challenge:
- 48
- Group:
- test chemical
- Dose level:
- 50 %
- No. with + reactions:
- 2
- Total no. in group:
- 20
- Remarks on result:
- other: Reading: rechallenge. . Hours after challenge: 48.0. Group: test group. Dose level: 50 %. No with. + reactions: 2.0. Total no. in groups: 20.0.
- Reading:
- rechallenge
- Hours after challenge:
- 48
- Group:
- test chemical
- Dose level:
- 25 %
- No. with + reactions:
- 2
- Total no. in group:
- 20
- Remarks on result:
- other: Reading: rechallenge. . Hours after challenge: 48.0. Group: test group. Dose level: 25 %. No with. + reactions: 2.0. Total no. in groups: 20.0.
- Reading:
- rechallenge
- Hours after challenge:
- 48
- Group:
- test chemical
- Dose level:
- 10 %
- No. with + reactions:
- 2
- Total no. in group:
- 20
- Remarks on result:
- other: Reading: rechallenge. . Hours after challenge: 48.0. Group: test group. Dose level: 10 %. No with. + reactions: 2.0. Total no. in groups: 20.0.
Any other information on results incl. tables
Preliminary study
No signs of systemic toxicity were observed during the preliminary study. However, body-weight loss was noted in one of the five animals.
Test substance concentrations used in the main study were based on the findings in the preliminary study and in accordance with Magnusson and Kligman (1969).
Main Study - Induction
The experimental animals showed no marked erythema or oedema after the 48 hours occluded epidermal induction exposure. The treated area was discoloured red/pink by test substance, which made skin reading difficult.
Main study - Challenges - Control group
In the first challenge, five, five and three animals showed redness in response to 50 %, 25 % and 10 % test substance concentrations, respectively. One control animal also showed swelling in response to the 25 % and 10 % concentrations. Test substance treated skin sites showed a red/pink discolouration, which made skin reading difficult.
In the second challenge, only one animal showed red spots in response to the 50 %, 25 % and 10 % concentrations. Majority of test substance treated skin sites showed a red/pink discolouration, which made skin reading difficult.
Other observations
One experimental animal was found dead on day 14 without previously showing adverse clinical signs. At necropsy, the animal was found with clotted blood in the abdominal cavity. No further mortality occurred and no symptoms of systemic toxicity were observed in the animals of the main study during the study period.
The average body weight gain over the study period of experimental and control animals was similar.
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Interpretation of results:
- not sensitising
- Remarks:
- Migrated information according to the CLP Regulation (EC 1272/2008) Criteria used for interpretation of results: EU
- Conclusions:
- Taking into account the intensity of macroscopic responses and comparing these with skin reactions seen in control animals, none of experimental animals showed a positive reaction in response to any of test substance concentrations tested.Since no difference was noted microscopically in the type and incidence of the skin reactions between the experimental and control animals, it was considered that a 50 % concentration of substance induced no sensitisation reaction. Therefore, the substance is considered as non-sensitising.
- Executive summary:
Method
Guinea pig maximisation test. Preliminary study (5 animals) and main study (20 animals in the experimental group + 10 animals in the control group), female guinea pigs. In the main study, first induction(day 1) via intradermal exposure at 1 % w/w; second induction (day 8) at 50 % w/w, challenge (day 22) and rechallenge (day 28) at 50 %, 25 % and 10 % via epidermal exposure.
Result
No signs of systemic toxicity in the preliminary study.
In most of the cases, the treated area was discoloured red/pink by test substance. No marked erythema or oedema after epidermal induction exposure was seen. One experimental animal was found dead on day 14 without previously showing adverse clinical signs. At necropsy, this animal
was found with clotted blood in the abdominal cavity. No further mortality occurred and no signs of systemic toxicity were observed in the study period.
Taking into account the intensity of the macroscopic responses and comparing these with the skin reactions seen in the control animals, none of the
experimental animals showed a positive reaction in response to any of test substance concentrations tested.
Moreover, no difference was noted microscopically in the type and incidence of the skin reactions between the experimental and control animals with a 50 % test substance concentration.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.