Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Skin irritation / corrosion

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
skin irritation: in vivo
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
comparable to guideline study with acceptable restrictions

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
1981
Report date:
1981

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
other: Appraisal of the Safety of Chemicals in Foods, Drugs and Cosmetics, Division of Pharmacology, FDA, Hautgiftigkeit nach Draize (1959)
Deviations:
not specified
GLP compliance:
no

Test material

Constituent 1
Reference substance name:
Vernetzer HC
IUPAC Name:
Vernetzer HC
Test material form:
solid: particulate/powder
Remarks:
migrated information: powder
Details on test material:
Vernetzer HC is the former name of BRUGGOLEN® C20.
BRUGGOLEN® C20 is a mixture of 80% N,N'-hexane-1,6-diylbis(hexa-hydro-2-oxo-1H-azepine-1-carboxamide with 20% epsilon-Caprolactam.

Test animals

Species:
rabbit
Strain:
New Zealand White

Test system

Type of coverage:
occlusive
Preparation of test site:
shaved
Vehicle:
water
Controls:
no
Duration of treatment / exposure:
24 hours
Observation period:
72 hours
Number of animals:
8

Results and discussion

In vivo

Results
Irritation parameter:
overall irritation score
Basis:
mean
Time point:
other: after 24h and after 72h; mean value is determined
Score:
0
Max. score:
0
Reversibility:
other: not applicable, no irritation occured

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
not irritating
Remarks:
Migrated information Criteria used for interpretation of results: other: FDA
Conclusions:
The test item has not to be classified as "irritant".
Executive summary:

The test item has not to be classified as "irritant".