Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 479-940-2 | CAS number: 613246-75-6
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
Administrative data
Link to relevant study record(s)
- Endpoint:
- short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 2005-03-09 to 2005-06-17
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 202 (Daphnia sp. Acute Immobilisation Test)
- Version / remarks:
- April 13th 2004
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method C.2 (Acute Toxicity for Daphnia)
- Version / remarks:
- July 31st 1992
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Analytical monitoring:
- no
- Remarks:
- Analysis of substance concentration technically not feasible because of the rapid hydrolysis of the test item and its degradation products.
- Vehicle:
- yes
- Details on test solutions:
- As the test item is poorly water soluble a "water accommodated fraction" ( WAF) was prepared by weighing of the nominal load 100 mg/L, adding the corresponding amount of dilution water and stirring for 24 hours instead of shaking. The resulting solution was left to stand for 15 minutes, then the lower phase was taken for the test.
- Test organisms (species):
- Daphnia magna
- Details on test organisms:
- TEST ORGANISM
- Common name: water flea
- Strain: Berlin
- Source: Umweltbundesamt Berin; bred in the LAUS GmbH throughout the year
- Age at study initiation (mean and range, SD): 0 - 24 h
- Feeding during test: No
ACCLIMATION
- Acclimation period: 30 min
- Acclimation conditions: same as test
- Type and amount of food: green algae
- Health during acclimation: No mortality observed during acclimatisation. - Test type:
- semi-static
- Water media type:
- freshwater
- Limit test:
- no
- Total exposure duration:
- 48 h
- Hardness:
- 2.502 mmol/L
- Test temperature:
- 20 ± 2°C
- pH:
- 7.8 - 8.4
- Dissolved oxygen:
- > 7.4 mg/L
- Nominal and measured concentrations:
- Nominal loading rates used for the WAF:
Test 1: 0, 100 mg/L (test item was shaken during preparation)
Test 2: 0, 100 mg/L (test item was stirred during preparation)
Test 3: 0, 22, 46, 100, 220, 460 mg/L - Details on test conditions:
- TEST SYSTEM
- Test vessel: beaker
- Material, size, headspace, fill volume: glass, nominal volume 50 mL, tall shape
- No. of organisms per vessel: 5
- No. of vessels per concentration: 4
- No. of vessels per control: 4
TEST MEDIUM / WATER PARAMETERS
- Source/preparation of dilution water: drinking waterwith an enrichment of certain minerals (as demanded in the guidelines)
- Total organic carbon: 0.82 mg/L
- Pesticides: <0.1 µg/L
- Chlorine: 12.5 mg/L
- Conductivity: 249 µS/cm
- Culture medium different from test medium: no
- Intervals of water quality measurement:
OTHER TEST CONDITIONS
- Adjustment of pH: none
- Photoperiod: none
EFFECT PARAMETERS MEASURED: Check of Immobility after 24h and 48h.
TEST CONCENTRATIONS
- Spacing factor for test concentrations: 5 concentrations in a geometric series
- Preparation finding study
- Test concentrations: in both (test 1 and 2) a concentration of 0, 100 mg/L was used.
- Results used to determine the conditions for the definitive study:
Test 1: Immobilization of the daphnia was probably caused by the oily film which could be seen on the surface. During the shaking period for the preparation of the WAF, an emulsion was produced. This emulsion couldn't be separated by membrane filtration and during the test, the unsolved part of the test item rose to the surface. The effect on the daphnia can be stated as a physical effect. Therefore the experiment was repeated, but the test solution was prepared by stirring instead of shaking.
Test 2: The daphnia were immobilized caused by a thin oily film on the surface. Concerning the observed immobility values, a difference could be noticed between 24 and 48 hours. After 24 hours the medium was renewed. Based on the results, the third experiment was performed under the same conditions with five concentrations in a geometric series. - Reference substance (positive control):
- yes
- Remarks:
- potassium dichromate
- Key result
- Duration:
- 48 h
- Dose descriptor:
- EL50
- Effect conc.:
- 350 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- mobility
- Duration:
- 24 h
- Dose descriptor:
- EL50
- Effect conc.:
- > 460 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- mobility
- Duration:
- 24 h
- Dose descriptor:
- EL100
- Effect conc.:
- > 460 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- mobility
- Duration:
- 24 h
- Dose descriptor:
- NOELR
- Effect conc.:
- 460 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- mobility
- Duration:
- 48 h
- Dose descriptor:
- EL50
- Effect conc.:
- > 460 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- mobility
- Duration:
- 48 h
- Dose descriptor:
- NOELR
- Effect conc.:
- 100 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- mobility
- Details on results:
- As no analytical method exists for the test item and because of the immediate hydrolysis of the test item, it was planned to analyse the product of hydrolysis 2,2-Dimethyl-3-lauroyloxy-propanal. But this product is not stable as well. As it can be seen from the tests with TOC-determination, the soluble part is too low to be determined as TOC. Therefore no analytical determination of the test item in the test solutions was possible and the biological results were based on the nominal concentrations.
Two concentrations (220, 460 mg/L) showed toxicity between 0 and 100% immobilization. No animals were immobilized in the control.
Because of the immediate hydrolysis, no water solubility could be determined. The calculated value (following EPA-calculation) is much smaller than 1 mg/L. The water solubility of the product of hydrolysis is below 1 mg/L. Therefore it can be stated that the determined effects are definitely above the limit of water solubility and the "worst case" was tested. The effects were probably caused by physical effects of the unsolved parts of the test item. - Results with reference substance (positive control):
- Biological results of the reference item including validity criteria for the reference substance:
• The 24h-EC50 of K2C2O7 should lie between 0.6 and 2.1 mg/L.
The 24h-EC50 of K2Cr2O7 was determined as 1.9 mg/L.
• Immobilization in the controls may not exceed 10 %.
Immobilization in the controls was 0 %.
• The concentration of dissolved oxygen at the end of the test must be at least 3 mg/L .
The lowest concentration of dissolved oxygen at the end of the test was 8.2 mg/L.
All validity criteria are met. - Validity criteria fulfilled:
- yes
- Conclusions:
- Sika Härter LJ was tested for toxicity to aquatic freshwater invertebrates in a 48h-semi-static test according to EU method C.2 revealing an EL50 of 350 mg/L and a NOELR of 100 mg/L.
- Executive summary:
Sika Härter LJ was assessed in a GLP-compliant short term toxicity study to aquatic invertebrates according to EU method C.2 and OECD guideline 202. Three experiments were performed. As the test item is poorly water soluble, the “water-accommodated fraction” (WAF) was used in the first experiment. This was done by weighing of the nominal load 100 mg/L, adding the corresponding amount of dilution water and shaking vigorously for 24 hours. The resulting solution was filtrated through 0.45 μm filters. Ten daphnia were exposed to the test item for 48 hours in a static test system. All daphnia were immobilized on the surface after 24 hours. Immediately after the beginning of the test, an oily film on the surface was observed, which was assumed to be responsible for the immobilization, and potentially due to hydrolysis.
In the second experiment, the WAF was prepared by weighing of the nominal load 100 mg/L, adding the corresponding amount of dilution water and stirring for 24 hours instead of shaking. The resulting solution was left to stand for 15 minutes, then the lower phase was taken for the test. Ten daphnia were exposed to the test item for 48 hours in a semi-static test system with medium renewal after 24 hours. After 24 hours, 30 % of the daphnia were immobilized on the surface, after 48 hours none of the daphnia were immobilized. The TOC of the test solution was measured after 30 minutes of stirring and after the 24 hour
stirring period. The TOC lay in a range between 0.1 and 4.7 mg/L. Based on the results of these experiments, a third experiment was performed in the same fashion as the second experiment using five concentrations between 22 and 460 mg/L.
Twenty daphnia were exposed to the test item for 48 hours in a semi-static test system with medium renewal after 24 hours. After 24 and 48 hours, the immobilized daphnia were counted. Two concentrations showed toxicity between 0 and 100% immobilization. No animals were immobilized in the control. As no analytical method exists for the test item and because of the immediate hydrolysis of the test item, it was planned to analyse the product of hydrolysis 2,2-Dimethyl-3-lauroyloxypropanal. But this product is not stable as well. As it can be seen from the tests with TOC-determination, the soluble part is too low to be determined as TOC. Therefore no analytical determination of the test item in the test solutions was possible and the biological results were based on the nominal concentrations. Two concentrations (220, 460 mg/L) showed toxicity between 0 and 100% immobilization. No animals were immobilized in the control. The 48h EL50 was determined at 350 mg/L and the 48h NOEC at 100 mg/L.
Because of the immediate hydrolysis, no water solubility could be determined. The calculated value (following EPA-calculation) is much smaller than 1 mg/L. The water solubility of the product of hydrolysis is below 1 mg/L. Therefore it can be stated that the determined effects are definitely above the limit of water solubility and the “worst case” was tested. The effects were probably caused by physical effects of the unsolved parts of the test item. The study is considered valid.
Reference
Table 1: Immobilities in first experiment
Nominal Concentration in mg/L | Immobility 24 hours | Immobility 48 hours | ||||
abs. | in % | abs. | in % | |||
0 | 0/5 | 0/5 | 0 | - | - | - |
100 | 5/5 | 5/5 | 100 | - | - | - |
Table 2: pH and O2-values first experiment
Nominal Concentration in mg/L | pH | O2 concentration in mg/L | ||
0 h | 24 h | 0 h | 24 h | |
0 | 7.8 | 8.2 | 9.1 | 8.4 |
100 | 7.9 | 8.2 | 8.8 | 8.4 |
Table 3: Mortalities in second experiment
Nominal Concentration in mg/L | Immobility 24 hours | Immobility 48 hours | ||||
abs. | in % | abs. | in % | |||
0 | 0/5 | 0/5 | 0 | 0/5 | 0/5 | 0 |
100 | 3/5 | 0/5 | 30 | 0/5 | 0/5 | 0 |
Table 4: pH- and O2 values for second experiment
Nominal Concentration in mg/L | pH | O2 concentration in mg/L | ||||||
0 h | 24 h | 48 h | 0 h | 24 h | 48 h | |||
new | old | new | old | old | old | new | old | |
0 | 7.8 | 8.0 | 7.8 | 8.0 | 8.8 | 8.2 | 8.0 | 8.0 |
100 | 7.8 | 8.1 | 8.2 | 8.0 | 7.9 | 8.0 | 8.1 | 8.2 |
Table 5: TOC values in mg/L measured during the second experiment
Nominal concentration in mg/L | Test solution used at time | TOC concentrationin mg/L | |
30 min. stirring | 24 hours stirring | ||
100 | 0 h | 0.09 | 1.31 |
100 | 24 h | 1.41 | 4.72 |
Table 6: Immobilities during the third experiment
Nominal Concentration in mg/L | Immobility 24 hours | Immobility 48 hours | ||||||||
abs. | in % | abs. | in % | |||||||
0 | 0/5 | 0/5 | 0/5 | 0/5 | 0 | 0/5 | 0/5 | 0/5 | 0/5 | 0 |
22 | 0/5 | 0/5 | 0/5 | 0/5 | 0 | 0/5 | 0/5 | 0/5 | 1/5 | 5 |
46 | 0/5 | 0/5 | 0/5 | 0/5 | 0 | 0/5 | 0/5 | 0/5 | 0/5 | 0 |
100 | 0/5 | 0/5 | 0/5 | 0/5 | 0 | 0/5 | 0/5 | 0/5 | 0/5 | 0 |
220 | 0/5 | 0/5 | 0/5 | 0/5 | 0 | 3/5 | 3/5 | 1/5 | 2/5 | 45 |
460 | 0/5 | 0/5 | 0/5 | 0/5 | 0 | 3/5 | 1/5 | 4/5 | 3/5 | 55 |
Table 7: pH- and O2-values for the third experiment
Nominal Concentration in mg/L | pH | O2 concentration in mg/L | ||||||
0 h | 24 h | 48 h | 0 h | 24 h | 48 h | |||
new | old | new | old | old | old | new | old | |
0 | 7.8 | 8.1 | 7.8 | 8.1 | 8.0 | 8.3 | 7.9 | 7.8 |
22 | 8.3 | 8.1 | 7.9 | 8.2 | 7.8 | 8.1 | 7.8 | 8.1 |
46 | 8.3 | 8.1 | 7.8 | 8.2 | 7.7 | 8.3 | 7.6 | 8.2 |
100 | 8.3 | 8.1 | 7.8 | 8.2 | 7.7 | 8.2 | 7.4 | 8.1 |
220 | 8.4 | 8.1 | 7.9 | 8.2 | 7.8 | 8.2 | 7.4 | 8.0 |
460 | 8.4 | 8.1 | 8.0 | 8.2 | 7.4 | 8.3 | 7.5 | 8.0 |
Description of key information
Sika Härter LJ was tested for toxicity to aquatic freshwater invertebrates in a 48h-semi-static test according to EU method C.2 revealing an EC50 of 350 mg/L and a NOEC of 100 mg/L.
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Fresh water invertebrates
Fresh water invertebrates
- Dose descriptor:
- EC50
- Effect concentration:
- 350 mg/L
Additional information
Sika Härter LJ was assessed in a short term toxicity study to aquatic invertebrates according to EU method C.2 and OECD guideline 202. Twenty daphnia were exposed to the test item for 48 hours in a semi-static test system with medium renewal after 24 hours. After 24 and 48 hours, the immobilized daphnia were counted. Two concentrations (220, 460 mg/L) showed toxicity between 0 and 100% immobilization. No animals were immobilized in the control. The 48h EC50 was determined at 350 mg/L and the 48h NOEC at 100 mg/L.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.