Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Skin sensitisation

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
skin sensitisation: in vivo (LLNA)
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
2014
Report date:
2014

Materials and methods

Test guidelineopen allclose all
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 429 (Skin Sensitisation: Local Lymph Node Assay)
Deviations:
yes
Remarks:
: Deviations from the maximum level of daily mean relative humidity occured. HCD did not indicate an effect of these deviations.
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
EU Method B.42 (Skin Sensitisation: Local Lymph Node Assay)
Deviations:
yes
Remarks:
: Deviations from the maximum level of daily mean relative humidity occured. HCD did not indicate an effect of these deviations.
GLP compliance:
yes
Type of study:
mouse local lymph node assay (LLNA)

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
1-(2-benzenesulfonamidophenyl)-3-phenylurea
EC Number:
806-543-7
Cas Number:
215917-77-4
Molecular formula:
C19H17N3O3S
IUPAC Name:
1-(2-benzenesulfonamidophenyl)-3-phenylurea
Test material form:
solid: particulate/powder

In vivo test system

Test animals

Species:
mouse
Strain:
CBA
Sex:
female
Details on test animals and environmental conditions:
TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Janvier, Le Genest-Saint-Isle, France
- Age at study initiation: Young adult animals (approx. 10 weeks old)
- Weight at study initiation: variation was within ± 20% of the sex mean.
- Housing: Group housed
- Diet (e.g. ad libitum):ad libitum to pelleted rodent diet (SM R/M-Z from SSNIFF® Spezialdiäten GmbH, Soest, Germany)
- Water (e.g. ad libitum):Free access to tap water
- Acclimation period: At least 5 days

ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C):18 to 24°C
- Humidity (%):40 to 70%
- Air changes (per hr):approximately 10 room air changes/hour
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light):12-hour light/12-hour dark cycle.

IN-LIFE DATES: From: 2014-07-16 To: 2014-18-04

Study design: in vivo (LLNA)

Vehicle:
dimethylformamide
Concentration:
0, 10, 25 and 50 % (test substance w/w)
No. of animals per dose:
5
Details on study design:
RANGE FINDING TESTS:
- Two test substance concentrations were tested; a 25% and 50% concentration. The highest concentration was the maximum concentration as required in the test guidelines (50% for solids).
- Irritation: No irritation and no signs of systemic toxicity were observed in any of the animals examined.

MAIN STUDY
A. INDUCTION EXPOSURE
- No. of exposures: 3 (1 per day)
- Exposure period: Days 1-3
- Test groups: 2,3,4
- Control group: 1
- Site: Dorsal surface of both ears (25 uL/ear)
- Frequency of applications: Once per day (Each ear) at approximately the same time each day
- Concentrations: 0, 10, 25 or 50% (test substance w/w)
- Exision of the nodes was undertaken on Day 6.
Each animal was injected via the tail vein with 0.25 mL of sterile phosphate buffered saline (PBS) (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) containing 20 μCi of
3H-methyl thymidine (PerkinElmer Life and Analytical Sciences, Boston, MA, US). After approximately 5 hours animals were killed and the nodes
excised.
Positive control substance(s):
hexyl cinnamic aldehyde (CAS No 101-86-0)

Results and discussion

Positive control results:
The SI values calculated for the substance concentrations 5, 10 and 25% were 1.2, 1.4 and 4.7 respectively. An EC3 value of 17.3% was calculated
using linear interpolation. The calculated EC3 value was found to be in the acceptable range of 4.8 and 19.5%.
Based on the results, it was concluded that the Local Lymph Node Assay as performed at WIL Research Europe is an appropriate model for testing
for contact hypersensitivity.

In vivo (LLNA)

Resultsopen allclose all
Key result
Parameter:
SI
Value:
1.3
Remarks on result:
other: The SI values calculated for the substance concentrations of 10 %
Key result
Parameter:
SI
Value:
1
Remarks on result:
other:
Remarks:
The SI values calculated for the substance concentration of 25 %
Key result
Parameter:
SI
Value:
1.4
Remarks on result:
other:
Remarks:
The SI values calculated for the substance concentration of 50 %
Key result
Parameter:
other: disintegrations per minute (DPM)
Remarks on result:
other: 0%: 387 ± 55 10%: 521 ± 117 25%: 368 ± 56 50%: 541 ± 54

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
GHS criteria not met
Conclusions:
Based on these results, the test substance would not be regarded as a skin sensitizer according to the recommendations made in the test guidelines.