Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Skin sensitisation

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
skin sensitisation: in vivo (non-LLNA)
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
weight of evidence
Study period:
1994
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
test procedure in accordance with national standard methods with acceptable restrictions
Remarks:
No clear description of methods, however a reference is made to the original GPMT procedure (Magnusson and Kligman, procedure similar to OECD TG 406)

Data source

Referenceopen allclose all

Reference Type:
publication
Title:
Multivariate QSAR analysis of a skin sensitization database.
Author:
Cronin MT, Basketter DA
Year:
1994
Bibliographic source:
SAR QSAR Environ Res. 1994;2(3):159-79.
Reference Type:
publication
Title:
The identification of contact allergens by animal assay. The guinea pig maximization test.
Author:
Magnusson B, Kligman AM.
Year:
1969
Bibliographic source:
J Invest Dermatol. 1969 Mar;52(3):268-76.

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
equivalent or similar to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 406 (Skin Sensitisation)
Version / remarks:
Test was performed according to Magnusson and Kligman (1969), which is also the basis for OECD TG 406
Principles of method if other than guideline:
No clear description of methods, however a reference is made to two well described standard procedure (Magnusson and Kligman, GPMT procedure similar to OECD TG 406; Goodwin and Johnson, SIAT test). All non-sensitizers were identified using the GPMT procedure.

MAGNUSSON AND KLIGMAN
Bibliographic source: J Invest Dermatol. 1969 Mar;52(3):268-76.
Name of the method: guinea pig maximization test (GPMT)
Principle of the method:
- Induction procedure: Injections are given intradermally with and without complete Freund's
Adjuvant (The final concentration of the allergen is 5% by weight provided that it can be well tolerated locally and generally) to Albino guinea pigs weighing 300-500 Grams. A row of 3 injections,
six in all, are made on each side as follows: (1) 0.1 ml of the adjuvant without the test agent, (2) 0.1 ml of test agent without adjuvant and (3) 0.1 ml of the test substance emulsified in complete adjuvant. One week later the test agent is applied topically over the injection site (The test agent in petrolatum is spread over a 2 x 4 cm patch of Whatman No. 3MM filter paper in a thick even layer or, if liquid, to saturation. The patch is covered by an overlapping impermeable, plastic adhesive tape. This in turn is firmly secured by elastic adhesive bandage (6.4 cm in width), wound around the torso of the animal. This dressing is left in place for 48 hours) .
- Challenge procedure: The animals are challenged by patch test two weeks later. The test agent is applied on a 2 x 2 cm piece of filter paper in the same fashion as for topical induction. The patch is sealed to the flank for 24 hours under a 4 cm strip.

GOODWIN AND JOHNSON
Bibliographic source: Curr Probl Dermatol. 1985;14:201-7.
Name of the method: Single injection adjuvant test (SIAT)
Principle of the method: the procedure involves a single injection of the test substance in Freund’s complete adjuvant followed 12 days later by challenge using a 6-hour occlude patch.
GLP compliance:
no
Type of study:
guinea pig maximisation test
Justification for non-LLNA method:
Test was conducted before the LLNA method became a standard procedure for in vivo skin sensitisation

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
N,N'-methylenedistearamide
EC Number:
203-657-3
EC Name:
N,N'-methylenedistearamide
Cas Number:
109-23-9
Molecular formula:
C37H74N2O2
IUPAC Name:
N,N'-methylenedistearamide
Test material form:
solid
Specific details on test material used for the study:
- Name as cited in the report: methylene distearamide

In vivo test system

Test animals

Species:
guinea pig
Strain:
not specified
Sex:
not specified
Details on test animals and environmental conditions:
TEST ANIMALS
- Weight at study initiation: 300-500 Grams (according to Magnusson and Kligman, 1969)

Study design: in vivo (non-LLNA)

Induction
Route:
intradermal and epicutaneous
Vehicle:
not specified
Challenge
Route:
epicutaneous, occlusive
Vehicle:
not specified
Concentration / amount:
Not specified
Day(s)/duration:
1 day
Details on study design:
METHODS AS DECRIBED IN MAGNUSSON AND KLIGMAN, 1969
- Induction procedure: Injections are given intradermally with and without complete Freund's Adjuvant (The final concentration of the allergen is 5% by weight provided that it can be well tolerated locally and generally) to Albino guinea pigs weighing 300-500 Grams. A row of 3 injections, six in all, are made on each side as follows: (1) 0.1 ml of the adjuvant without the test agent, (2) 0.1 ml of test agent without adjuvant and (3) 0.1 ml of the test substance emulsified in complete adjuvant. One week later the test agent is applied topically over the injection site (The test agent in petrolatum is spread over a 2 x 4 cm patch of Whatman No. 3MM filter paper in a thick even layer or, if liquid, to saturation. The patch is covered by an overlapping impermeable, plastic adhesive tape. This in turn is firmly secured by elastic adhesive bandage (6.4 cm in width), wound around the torso of the animal. This dressing is left in place for 48 hours) .
- Challenge procedure: The animals are challenged by patch test two weeks later. The test agent is applied on a 2 x 2 cm piece of filter paper in the same fashion as for topical induction. The patch is sealed to the flank for 24 hours under a 4 cm strip.

Results and discussion

In vivo (non-LLNA)

Resultsopen allclose all
Key result
Reading:
other: not specified
Group:
test chemical
Dose level:
not specified
Remarks on result:
no indication of skin sensitisation
Reading:
other: not specified
Group:
negative control
Remarks on result:
not measured/tested
Reading:
other: not specified
Group:
positive control
Remarks on result:
not measured/tested

Any other information on results incl. tables

From the scores obtained in the GPMT, chemicals may be classified qualitatively into one of four groups, i.e. non, weak, moderate or strong sensitisers. The substance under evaluation in this dossier was classified as non sensitiser.

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
study cannot be used for classification
Conclusions:
In this study performed similar to OECD 406, the substance was considered to be non-sensitising.
Executive summary:

The sensitising potential of the test substance was assessed in a guinea pig maximisation test (GPMT test) performed similar to OECD 406. During the induction procedure the test animals were given a row of 3 injections on each side (six in total) as follows: (1) 0.1 ml of the adjuvant without the test agent, (2) 0.1 ml of test agent without adjuvant and (3) 0.1 ml of the test substance emulsified in complete adjuvant. One week later the test agent is applied topically over the injection site under occlusive conditions for 48 hours. The animals were challenged by patch test two weeks later. The test agent was applied on a 2 x 2 cm piece of filter paper in the same fashion as for topical induction. The patch was sealed to the flank for 24 hours under a 4 cm strip.

In this study, the substance was considered to be non-sensitising.