Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Description of key information

Skin Corrosion - in vitro

Petroleum Resins (Kendex 0897) is considered non-corrosive to skin in the Reconstructed Human Epidermis (RHE) Test Method.

Skin Irritation - in vitro

Petroleum Resins (Kendex 0897) is considered non-irritant to skin in the Reconstructed human Epidermis (RhE) Test Method.

Eye Irritation - in vitro

Petroleum Resins (Kendex 0897) showed no effects on the cornea of the bovine eye after 10 minutes of treatment. The calculated IVIS is 0.57.

Key value for chemical safety assessment

Skin irritation / corrosion

Link to relevant study records

Referenceopen allclose all

Endpoint:
skin irritation: in vitro / ex vivo
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
19. Mar. 2018 to 23. Mar. 2018
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 439 (In Vitro Skin Irritation: Reconstructed Human Epidermis Test Method)
Version / remarks:
OECD Guideline for the Testing of Chemicals, Version 439, adopted 28. July 2015, “In Vitro Skin Irritation: Reconstructed Human Epidermis Test Method”
Deviations:
no
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
EU Method B.46 (In Vitro Skin Irritation: Reconstructed Human Epidermis Model Test)
Version / remarks:
Commission Regulation (EU) No. 640/2012 amending Regulation (EC) No. 761/2009, Annex III, EU method B.46 “IN VITRO SKIN IRRITATION: RECONSTRUCTED HUMAN EPIDERMIS MODEL TEST”, adopted 06. Jul. 2012
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)
Specific details on test material used for the study:
No further details specified in the study report
Test system:
human skin model
Source species:
human
Cell type:
non-transformed keratinocytes
Cell source:
other: not specified
Source strain:
not specified
Details on animal used as source of test system:
Specification
The test system is a commercially available EpiDermTM-Kit, procured by MatTek.
The EpiDermTM tissue consists of human-derived epidermal keratinocytes which have been cultured to form a multi-layered, highly differentiated model of the human epidermis.
It consists of organized basal, spinous and granular layers, and a multi-layered stratum corneum containing intercellular lamellar lipid layers representing main lipid classes analogous to those found in vivo. The EpiDermTM tissues are cultured on specially prepared cell culture inserts.

Origin
EpiDermTM tissues were procured from MatTek In Vitro Life Science Laboratories, Bratislava.
Designation of the kit: EPI-200-SIT
Day of delivery: 20. Mar. 2018
Batch no.: 25887
Justification for test system used:
In accordance with test guidelines
Vehicle:
unchanged (no vehicle)
Details on test system:
Pre - Tests
Nylon mesh compatibility
The test item was tested for possible reaction with the nylon mesh, which is used to ensure sufficient contact with the tissue surface. 30 μL of the test item were pipetted onto a nylon mesh on a microscope slide.
No reaction with the nylon mesh was visible after an exposure time of 1 hour.

Assessment of Coloured or Staining Test Items
It was tested whether the test item develops a colour without MTT addition. 30 μL test item were given in a test tube with 0.3 mL H2O demin. and incubated at 37 ± 1°C and 5.0 ± 0.5% CO2 for 1 hour.
The resulting solution was colourless, therefore no binding capacity had to be tested.

Assessment of Direct Reduction of MTT by the Test Item
The test item was tested for the ability of direct MTT reduction. To test for this ability, 30 μL test item were added to 1 mL of MTT solution and the mixture was incubated in the dark at 37 ± 1°C and 5.0 ± 0.5% CO2 for 1 hour. Untreated MTT medium was used as control.
The MTT solution did not change its colour within 1 hour. Therefore, direct MTT reduction by the test item had not taken place and no data correction was necessary.

Pre-Incubation of Tissues
All working steps were performed under sterile conditions. For each treatment group (negative control, test item and positive control) a 6-well-plate was prepared with 0.9 mL assay medium in 3 of the 6 wells (upper row). The tissues were inspected for viability. Then, the tissues were transferred into the wells, which contain medium by using sterile forceps and placed into the incubator at 37 ± 1°C and 5 ± 0.5% CO2 for 1 hour.
After 1 hour pre-incubation, the other 3 wells of each plate (lower row) were filled with fresh assay medium (0.9 mL). Every tissue was transferred into a well of the lower row. All 6-well-plates were set into the incubator at 37 ± 1°C and 5.0 ± 0.5% CO2 for 18 hours 55 minutes.

Treatment
One plate (3 tissues) was used as negative control; each tissue was treated with 30 μL DPBS buffer, a nylon mesh was added in order to ensure sufficient contact with the tissue surface.
One plate was used as positive control; each tissue was treated with 30 μL 5% SDSsolution, a nylon mesh was added in order to ensure sufficient contact with the tissue surface.
One plate was used for treatment with the test item. 30 μL test item were applied, and a nylon mesh was added in order to ensure sufficient contact with the tissue surface.
Tissues were dosed in 1-minute-intervals. After dosing the last tissue, all plates were transferred into the incubator for 35 minutes at 37 ± 1°C and 5.0 ± 0.5% CO2.
1 hour after the first application, the inserts were removed from the plates using sterile forceps and rinsed immediately in 1-minute-intervals.
After rinsing, each tissue was blotted with sterile cellulose tissue and then transferred into a new 6-well-plate with fresh assay medium (0.9 mL).
Then, the tissues were set in the incubator for 23 hours 25 minutes at 37 ± 1°C and 5.0 ± 0.5% CO2.

Medium Renewal
After post-incubation, the tissues were removed from the incubator and shaken for 5 minutes (120 rpm). 0.9 mL assay medium were filled in the lower row of the 6-wellplate.
Then the inserts were transferred into the lower row of the 6-well-plate and set into the incubator for 19 hours 15 minutes for post-incubation at 37 ± 1°C and 5.0 ± 0.5% CO2.

MTT Assay
After a total incubation time of 42 hours 40 minutes, a 24-well-plate was prepared with 300 μL freshly prepared MTT-solution in each well. The tissues were blotted on the bottom and then transferred into the 24-well-plate. Then the 24-well-plate was set into the incubator for 3 hours at 37 ± 1°C and 5.0 ± 0.5% CO2.
After this time, the MTT-solution was aspirated and replaced by DPBS buffer. This was then aspirated, too, and replaced several times.
At last, each insert was thoroughly dried and set into the empty, pre-warmed 24-well-plate.
Into each well, 2 mL isopropanol were pipetted, taking care to reach the upper rim of the insert. The plate was then shaken (120 rpm) for 2 hours at room temperature.
After 2 hours, the inserts were pierced with an injection needle, taking care that all colour was extracted. The inserts were then discarded and the content of each well was thoroughly mixed in order to achieve homogenisation.
From each well, two replicates with 200 μL solution (each) were pipetted into a 96-wellplate which was read in a plate spectrophotometer at 570 nm.
Control samples:
yes, concurrent negative control
yes, concurrent positive control
Amount/concentration applied:
30 μL test item was applied
Duration of treatment / exposure:
1 hour
Duration of post-treatment incubation (if applicable):
Then, the tissues were set in the incubator for 23 hours 25 minutes at 37 ± 1°C and 5.0 ± 0.5% CO2.
Number of replicates:
3 tissues per test system (test item, negative control, positive control)
Irritation / corrosion parameter:
% tissue viability
Run / experiment:
Test Item
Value:
108.4
Vehicle controls validity:
not applicable
Negative controls validity:
valid
Positive controls validity:
valid
Other effects / acceptance of results:
The mean value of relative tissue viability of the test item was increased to 108.4% after the treatment. This value is above the threshold for skin irritation (50%). Therefore, the test item is considered as non-irritant to skin. All validity criteria were met.
Values for negative control and for positive control were within the range of historical data of the test facility.
Therefore, the experiment is considered valid.

Measured Values

As blank, the optical density of isopropanol was measured in 8 wells of the 96-well-plate.

The measured values and their mean are given in the following table:

Absorbance values blank isopropanol (OD 570 nm)

Replicate

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

Mean

Absorbance

0.039

0.038

0.040

0.040

0.039

0.038

0.040

0.039

0.039

 

The absorbance values of negative control, test item and positive control are given in the following table:

Absorbance Values negative control, test item and positive control (OD 570 nm)

Designation

Measurement

Negative Control

Petroleum Resins (Kendex 0897)

Positive Control

Tissue 1

1

1.314

1.269

0.072

2

1.484

1.344

0.072

Tissue 2

1

1.512

1.645

0.071

2

1.477

1.607

0.073

Tissue 3

1

1.187

1.470

0.071

2

1.230

1.540

0.071

 

From the measured absorbances, the mean of each tissue was calculated, subtracting the mean absorbance of isopropanol as given in table 9.1-a. The mean of the three tissues was also calculated.

Mean Absorbance Values

Designation

Negative Control

Petroleum Resins (Kendex 0897)

Positive Control

Mean – blank (tissue 1)

1.360

1.268

0.033

Mean – blank (tissue 2)

1.456

1.587

0.033

Mean – blank (tissue 3)

1.170

1.466

0.032

Mean of the three tissues

1.329

1.440

0.033

 

Comparison of Tissue Viability

For the test item and the positive control, the following percentage values of tissue viability were calculated in comparison to the negative control:

% Tissue Viability

Designation

Petroleum Resins (Kendex 0897)

Positive Control

% Tissue viability (tissue 1)

95.4%

2.5%

% Tissue viability (tissue 2)

119.4%

2.5%

% Tissue viability (tissue 3)

110.3%

2.4%

% Tissue viability (mean)

108.4%

2.5%

± SD of mean tissue viability (%)

12.1%

0.0%

 

Validity and Acceptability

Validity criteria and results are stated in the following table:

Validity

Criterion

Demanded

Found

OD of negative control

≥ 0.8 and ≤ 2.8

1.3

% tissue viability of positive control SDS

≤ 20% of negative control

2.5%

SD of mean viability of the tissue replicates (%)

≤ 18%

11.0% (negative control)

0.0% (positive control)

12.1% (test item)

 

Historical Data

Parameter

Negative Control

(OD)

Positive Control

(% OD compared to Negative Control)

Substance

DPBS buffer

Sodium Dodecyl Sulphate Solution 5%

Mean

1.829

4.6%

Standard deviation

0.319

3.2%

Range

0.476 – 2.471

1.7 – 17.1%

Study 18012205G840

1.329

2.5%

 

Interpretation of results:
GHS criteria not met
Conclusions:
The test item Petroleum Resins (Kendex 0897) is considered as non-irritant to skin.
After the treatment, the mean value of relative tissue viability was increased to 108.4%.
This value is above the threshold for skin irritation (50%).
The optical density of the negative control was well within the required acceptability criterion of 0.8 ≤ mean OD ≤ 2.8.
The positive control has met the acceptance criterion too, for thus ensuring the validity of the test system.
Variation within replicates was within the accepted range for negative control, positive control and test item (required: ≤ 18%).
For these reasons, the result of the test is considered valid.
Executive summary:

Title of Study: Determination of Skin Irritation Potential of Petroleum Resins (Kendex 0897) in the Reconstructed human Epidermis (RhE) Test Method following EU-Method B.46 and OECD 439

 

Findings and Results:

One valid experiment was performed.

Three tissues of the human skin model EpiDermTM were treated with Petroleum Resins (Kendex 0897) for 60 minutes.

The test item was applied directly to each tissue and spread to match the tissue size (0.63 cm2; as indicated by the supplier).

DPBS-buffer was used as negative control and 5% SDS solution was used as positive control.

After treatment with the negative control, the mean absorbance value was within the required acceptability criterion of 0.8 ≤ mean OD ≤ 2.8, OD was1.3. The positive controlshowed clear irritating effects. The mean value of relative tissue viability was reduced to2.5% (required:20%).

The variation within the tissue replicates of negative control, positive control and test itemwas acceptable (required: ≤18%).

 

After the treatment with the test item, the mean value of relative tissue viability was increased to 108.4%. This value is above the threshold for skin irritation potential (50%).

Test items that induce values above the threshold of 50% are considered non-irritant to skin.

 

Therefore, Petroleum Resins (Kendex 0897) is considered non-irritant to skin in the Reconstructed human Epidermis (RhE) Test Method.

Endpoint:
skin corrosion: in vitro / ex vivo
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
23. Apr. 2018 to 26. Apr. 2018
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 431 (In Vitro Skin Corrosion: Reconstructed Human Epidermis (RHE) Test Method)
Version / remarks:
OECD Guidelines for the Testing of Chemicals Part 431, adopted 29. Jul. 2016 “In vitro Skin Corrosion: reconstructed human epidermis (RHE) test method”
Deviations:
no
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
EU Method B.40 (In Vitro Skin Corrosion: Transcutaneous Electrical Resistance Test (TER))
Version / remarks:
Commission Regulation (EU) No.440/2008, EU-Method B.40 BIS. “IN VITRO SKIN CORROSION: HUMAN SKIN MODEL TEST“ dated 30. May 2008
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)
Specific details on test material used for the study:
No further details specified in the study report.
Test system:
human skin model
Source species:
human
Cell type:
non-transformed keratinocytes
Cell source:
other: Not specified
Source strain:
not specified
Details on animal used as source of test system:
Specification
The test system is a commercially available EpiDermTM-Kit, procured by MatTek.
The EpiDermTM tissue consists of human-derived epidermal keratinocytes which have been cultured to form a multi-layered, highly differentiated model of the human epidermis.
It consists of organized basal, spinous and granular layers, and a multi-layered stratum corneum containing intercellular lamellar lipid layers arranged in patterns analogous to those found in vivo. The EpiDermTM tissues are cultured on specially prepared cell cultures inserts.

Origin
EpiDermTM tissues were procured from MatTek In Vitro Life Science Laboratories, Bratislava.
Designation of the kit: EPI-200-SCT
Day of delivery: 24. Apr. 2018
Batch: 28600
Justification for test system used:
In accordance with the test guideline
Vehicle:
unchanged (no vehicle)
Details on test system:
Pre-Tests
Nylon mesh compatibility
First, the test item was tested for possible reaction with the nylon mesh which is used to ensure sufficient contact with the tissue surface. 50 μL of the liquid test item were brought onto a nylon mesh on a microscope slide. No reaction with the mesh was visible after 1 hour incubation at room temperature.

Assessment of Coloured or Staining Test Items
It was tested whether the test item develops a colour without MTT addition. 50 μL of the test item were given in a test tube with 0.3 mL demineralised water and incubated at 37 ± 1°C and 5.0 ± 0.5% CO2 for 1 hour.
The resulting solution was colourless, therefore no binding capacity had to be tested.

Assessment of Direct Reduction of MTT by the Test Item
The test item was also tested for the ability of direct MTT reduction. To test for this ability, 50 μL of the test item were added to 1 mL of MTT solution and the mixture was incubated in the dark at 37 ± 1°C and 5.0 ± 0.5% CO2 for 1 hour. Untreated MTT solution was used as control.
The MTT solution did not change its colour within 1 hour. Therefore, direct MTT reduction had not taken place and no data correction was necessary.

Preparations
On the day of the start of the experiment, the MTT concentrate was thawed. The concentrate was diluted with the assay medium directly before use.
The tissue plate was brought out of the fridge 1 hour before the treatment.
The assay medium was warmed in the water bath to 37 ± 1°C.

Description of the Method
Four 6-well-plates were prepared with 0.9 mL assay medium in each well. The inserts containing the tissues were transferred to the wells using sterile forceps and the 6-well-plates were set into the incubator at 37 ± 1°C and 5.0 ± 0.5% CO2 for 1 hour (pre-incubation).
For each experiment (“3 minutes” and “1 hour”), one 24-well-plate was prepared as holding plate. 12 wells of each plate were filled with 300 μL assay medium, the other 12 with 300 μL MTT solution. One additional plate was left empty. The plates were stored in the incubator at 37 ± 1°C and 5.0 ± 0.5% CO2.
For each experiment (“3 minutes” and “1 hour”), two 6-well-plates for the assay were used.
After pre-incubation, the assay medium was replaced by fresh assay medium and the test was started, using two wells as negative control with 50 μL demineralised water, two wells as positive controls with 50 μL potassium hydroxide solution and two other wells for testing the test item.
The liquid test item was applied without preparation (50 μL).
At the start of each experiment (application of negative controls), a stop watch was started.
After the respective incubation time (“3 minutes” and “1 hour”) at 37 ± 1°C and 5.0 ± 0.5% CO2, the inserts were removed from the plates using sterile forceps. The inserts were thoroughly rinsed with DPBS, blotted with sterile cellulose tissue and set into the respective holding plate, using the wells containing assay medium. After transfer of all inserts, they were immediately moved to the wells containing MTT medium, blotting the bottom with cellulose tissue again before setting the insert into the MTT well. The tissues were incubated with MTT solution for 3 hours at 37 ± 1°C and 5.0 ± 0.5% CO2.
After this time, the MTT solution was aspirated and replaced by DPBS. This was then aspirated too, and replaced several times. At last, each insert was thoroughly dried and set into the empty, pre-warmed 24-well-plate. Into each well, 2 mL isopropanol were pipetted, taking care to reach the upper rim of the insert. The plate was then shaken for 2 hours at room temperature.
Afterwards, the inserts were pierced with an injection needle, taking care that all colour was extracted. The inserts were then discarded and the content of each well was thoroughly mixed in order to achieve homogenisation.
From each well, three replicates with 200 μL solution (each) were pipetted into a 96-wellplate which was read in a plate spectrophotometer at 570 nm.
Control samples:
yes, concurrent negative control
yes, concurrent positive control
Amount/concentration applied:
The liquid test item was applied without preparation (50 μL).
Duration of treatment / exposure:
3 minutes and 1 hour
Duration of post-treatment incubation (if applicable):
The tissues were incubated with MTT solution for 3 hours
Number of replicates:
For each experiment (“3 minutes” and “1 hour”), two 6-well-plates for the assay were used (two wells as negative control with 50 μL demineralised water, two wells
as positive controls with 50 μL potassium hydroxide solution and two other wells for testing the test item.)
Irritation / corrosion parameter:
% tissue viability
Run / experiment:
3 minutes treatment
Value:
97.9
Vehicle controls validity:
not applicable
Negative controls validity:
valid
Positive controls validity:
valid
Irritation / corrosion parameter:
% tissue viability
Run / experiment:
1 hour treatment
Value:
85.5
Vehicle controls validity:
not applicable
Negative controls validity:
valid
Positive controls validity:
valid
Other effects / acceptance of results:
Assessment and Validity
Corrosivity of the Test Item
The mean value of relative tissue viability of the test item was reduced to 97.9% after 3 minutes treatment. This value is above the threshold for corrosivity (50%). After 1 hour treatment, the mean value of relative tissue viability of the test item was reduced to 85.5%, lying above the threshold for corrosivity (15%). Therefore, the test item is considered as non-corrosive to skin.

Validity
The criterion for optical density of the negative control (≥ 0.8 and ≤ 2.8) was fulfilled: optical density was 1.5 (3 minutes) resp. 1.5 (1 hour).
The positive control showed clear corrosive effects. The criterion for the viability of the 1 hour experiment, expressed as % of the negative control (< 15%), was fulfilled, too.
The mean value of relative tissue viability was 4.6 %
Values for negative control and for positive control were within the range of historical data of the test facility.
Therefore the experiment is considered valid.

DISCUSSION
The test item is considered non-corrosive to skin.
After 3 minutes treatment, the mean value of relative tissue viability of the test item was decreased to 97.9% This value is well above the threshold for corrosivity (50%). After 1 hour treatment the mean value of relative tissue viability of the test item was reduced to 85.5%. This value is well above the threshold for corrosivity (15%).
The values of the negative control met the required acceptability criterion of mean OD ≥ 0.8 and ≤ 2.8 for both treatment intervals, thus showing the quality of the tissues.
The positive control has met the validity criterion too, thus ensuring the validity of the test system.
For these reasons, the result of the test is considered valid.

Measured Values

As blank, the optical density of isopropanol was measured in 12 wells of the 96-well plate. The measured values and their mean are given in the following table:

Absorbance values blank isopropanol (OD 570 nm)

Replicate

1

2

3

4

5

6

Mean 0.038

Absorbance

0.040

0.037

0.038

0.039

0.037

0.037

Replicate

7

8

9

10

11

12

Absorbance

0.040

0.037

0.036

0.039

0.037

0.037

 

The absorbance values of negative control, test item and positive control are given in the following table:

Absorbance Values (OD 570 nm)

Incubation

Negative Control

Test item

Positive Control

 

Tissue 1

Tissue 2

Tissue 1

Tissue 2

Tissue 1

Tissue 2

3 min

1.564

1.563

1.531

1.537

0.402

0.381

1.637

1.535

1.536

1.580

0.409

0.378

1.653

1.527

1.547

1.555

0.403

0.377

1 h

1.515

1.594

1.308

1.325

0.103

0.103

1.504

1.589

1.383

1.311

0.108

0.110

1.527

1.617

1.385

1.309

0.097

0.118

 

From the measured absorbances, the mean absorbance of isopropanol (given above) was subtracted. The corrected mean and relative standard deviation (RSD) of the two tissues were calculated.

Mean Absorbance Values of the 3 Minutes Experiment

Designation

Negative Control

Test Item

Positive Control

Mean – blank

(tissue 1)

1.580

1.500

0.367

Mean – blank

(tissue 2)

1.504

1.520

0.341

Mean of the two tissues

1.542

1.510

0.354

RSD

3.5%

0.9%

5.2%

 

Mean Absorbance Values of the 1 h Experiment

Designation

Negative Control

Test Item

Positive Control

Mean – blank

(tissue 1)

1.478

1.321

0.065

Mean – blank

(tissue 2)

1.562

1.277

0.074

Mean of the two tissues

1.520

1.299

0.069

RSD

3.9%

2.4%

8.9%

 

Comparison of Tissue Viability

For the test item and positive control, the following percentage values of mean tissue viability were calculated in comparison to the mean of the negative controls:

% Tissue Viability

Test Item

Positive Control

Incubation

97.9%

22.9%

3 min

8.5%

4.6%

1 h

 

HISTORICAL DATA

In the following table, the means of the negative controls and positive controls of all performed experiments up to 22. Feb. 2018 are stated and compared with the values which were found in this study.

Historical Data

Parameter

Optical Density Negative Control

Optical Density Negative Control

% Tissue Viability Positive Control

% Tissue Viability Positive Control

Incubation Time

3 min.

1 h

3 min.

1 h

Mean

1.933

1.886

24.7%

11.3%

Standard Deviation

0.268

0.219

6.7%

4.0%

Range

1.197 – 3.077

1.377 – 2.571

9.6 – 57.3%

4.1 – 24.2%

Study 18012205G820

1.542

1.520

22.9%

4.6%

 

Interpretation of results:
GHS criteria not met
Conclusions:
Petroleum Resins (Kendex 0897) is considered non-corrosive to skin in the Reconstructed Human Epidermis (RHE) Test Method.
Executive summary:

Determination of Skin Corrosion Potential of Petroleum Resins (Kendex 0897) in the Reconstructed Human Epidermis (RHE) Test Method following OECD Guideline 431 and EU Method B.40-BIS

 

Findings and Results:

One valid experiment was performed.

Two tissues of the human skin model EpiDermTM were treated with the test item Petroleum Resins (Kendex 0897) for 3 minutes and 1 hour, respectively. The test item was applied to each tissue and spread to match the tissue size.

Demineralised water was used as negative control, 8 M KOH was used as positive control.

After treatment, the respective substance was rinsed from the tissues. Then, cell viability of the tissues was evaluated by addition of MTT, which can be reduced to a blue formazan. Formazan production was evaluated by measuring the optical density (OD) of the resulting solution.

 

After treatment with the negative control, the absorbance values were within the requiredacceptability criterion of mean OD ≥ 0.8 and ≤ 2.8 for both treatment intervals thus showing the quality of the tissues. The OD was 1.5 (3 minutes experiment) and 1.5 (1 hour experiment).

The positive control showed clear corrosive effects for both treatment intervals. The mean relative tissue viability value was reduced to 4.6 % for the 1 hour treatment.

After 3 minutes treatment with the test item, the mean value of relative tissue viability was reduced to 97.9 %. This value is above the threshold for corrosion potential (50%). After 1 hour treatment, the mean value of relative tissue viability was reduced to 85.5 %. This value, too, is above the threshold for corrosion potential (15%).

 

Therefore, Petroleum Resins (Kendex 0897) is considered non-corrosive to skin in the Reconstructed Human Epidermis (RHE) Test Method.

Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no adverse effect observed (not irritating)

Eye irritation

Link to relevant study records
Reference
Endpoint:
eye irritation: in vitro / ex vivo
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
15. Mar. 2018
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 437 (Bovine Corneal Opacity and Permeability Test Method for Identifying i) Chemicals Inducing Serious Eye Damage and ii) Chemicals Not Requiring Classification for Eye Irritation or Serious Eye Damage)
Version / remarks:
OECD Guideline for the Testing of Chemicals, Method No. 437, adopted 09. Oct. 2017: “Bovine Corneal Opacity and Permeability Test Method for Identifying i) Chemicals Inducing Serious Eye Damage and ii) Chemicals Not Requiring Classification for Eye Irritation or Serious Eye Damage”
Deviations:
no
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
other: OECD Guideline 160
Version / remarks:
OECD Guideline for the Testing of Chemicals, Series on Testing and Assessment No. 160: “GUIDANCE DOCUMENT ON “THE BOVINE CORNEAL OPACITY AND PERMEABILITY (BCOP) AND ISOLATED CHICKEN EYE (ICE) TEST METHODS: COLLECTION OF TISSUES FOR HISTOLOGICAL EVALUATION AND COLLECTION OF DATA ON NON-SEVERE IRRITANTS”; 25. Oct. 2011
Deviations:
no
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
EU method B.47 (Bovine corneal opacity and permeability test method for identifying ocular corrosives and severe irritants)
Version / remarks:
Commission Regulation (EU) 2017/735 amending Regulation (EC) No. 440/2008, EU Method B.47 Bovine Corneal Opacity and Permeability Test Method for Identifying (i) Chemicals Inducing Serious Eye Damage and (ii) Chemicals Not Requiring Classification for Eye Irritation or Serious Eye Damage, adopted 14. Feb. 2017
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)
Specific details on test material used for the study:
No further details specified in the study report.
Species:
cattle
Strain:
not specified
Details on test animals or tissues and environmental conditions:
Specification
Species Bos primigenius Taurus (fresh bovine corneas)

Origin
Fresh bovine eyes were obtained from the slaughterhouse Müller Fleisch GmbH, Enzstr. 2-4, 75217 Birkenfeld, Germany, on the day of the test. The cattle were between 12 and 60 months old. The eyes were transported to the test facility in Hanks’ Balanced Salt Solution with 1% Penicillin-Streptomycin solution (Penicillin 100 U/mL, Streptomycin 100 μg/mL) in a suitable cooled container within 1 hour 5 minutes.
Vehicle:
unchanged (no vehicle)
Controls:
yes, concurrent positive control
yes, concurrent negative control
Amount / concentration applied:
750 μL test item
Duration of treatment / exposure:
Exposure time of the test item on the corneas was 10 minutes.
Number of animals or in vitro replicates:
2 hours
Details on study design:
Preparations
After having carefully cleaned and sterilised the cornea holders, they were kept in the incubation chamber at 32 ± 1 °C.
On the day of the assay, the MEM without phenol red was supplemented with sodium bicarbonate, L-glutamine and 1% fetal calf serum (= complete MEM) and stored in a water bath at 32 ± 1 °C.
The same was performed with the MEM with phenol red, but without addition of sodium bicarbonate.
After the arrival of the corneas, they were examined and only corneas which were free from damages were used. The corneas were excised with a scalpel and cut from the globe with a 2-3 mm ring of sclera around the outside. Each cornea was transferred to a cornea holder in which pre-warmed cMEM (32 ± 1 °C) without phenol red was filled. The holders were then incubated for 1 hour in the incubation chamber at 32 ± 1 °C.

Experimental Parameters
Date of treatment: 15. Mar. 2018
Incubation time: 10 min.
Negative control: HBSS
Positive control: Dimethylformamide (undiluted)

Method Description
After the initial incubation, the medium was changed and the baseline opacity for each cornea was recorded. None of the corneas showed tissue damage; therefore, all corneas were used. For each treatment group (negative control solution, test item and positive control), three replicates were used. After removal of the pre-incubation medium (cMEM without phenol red), 750 μL negative control solution, 750 μL test item and 750 mL positive control were applied to each replicate.
According to the characteristics of the test item, the following treatment procedure was performed:

Open Chamber Method
The “open chamber-method” is used for viscous substances.
In order to apply the test item, the window-locking ring and glass window of the anterior chamber was unscrewed to remove the glass disc.
750 μL of the test item and controls were given directly on the epithelium that the cornea was completely covered.
Exposure time of the test item on the corneas was 10 minutes at 32 ± 1 °C. After thorough rinsing with cMEM with phenol red and final rinsing with cMEM without phenol red, the anterior chamber was filled with cMEM without phenol red, and the corneas were stored for additional 2 hours at 32 ± 1 °C (post-incubation).
After post-incubation time, the cMEM without phenol red was renewed in both chambers.
Then, the final opacity value of each cornea was recorded.

Permeability Test
After the recording of the final opacity value, the cMEM without phenol red was removed from the front chamber, and 1 mL sodium fluorescein solution was added to the front chamber for the detection of permeability of the corneas.
For the open chamber method, a sodium fluorescein solution with a concentration of 4 mg/mL was used.
The chambers were then closed again and incubated for 90 minutes at 32 ± 1 °C. After incubation, the content of the posterior chamber was thoroughly mixed. Then, its optical density at 492 nm was measured with the microtiter plate photometer.
Irritation parameter:
in vitro irritation score
Run / experiment:
Test item
Value:
0.57
Vehicle controls validity:
not applicable
Negative controls validity:
valid
Positive controls validity:
valid
Interpretation of results:
GHS criteria not met
Conclusions:
This in vitro study was performed to assess corneal damage potential of Petroleum Resins (Kendex 0897) by quantitative measurements of changes in opacity and permeability in a bovine cornea.
The test item Petroleum Resins (Kendex 0897) was applied directly on top of the cornea of a bovine eye which previously had been incubated with cMEM without phenol red at 32 ± 1 °C for 1 hour and whose opacity had been determined. The test item was incubated on the cornea for 10 minutes at 32 ± 1 °C. After removal of the test item and 2 hours postincubation, opacity and permeability values were measured.
The test item was tested pure.
Under the conditions of this test, the test item Petroleum Resins (Kendex 0897) showed no effects on the cornea of the bovine eye. The calculated IVIS is 0.57.
Since Petroleum Resins (Kendex 0897) induced an IVIS < 3, according to OECD Guideline no. 437 (Oct. 2017), no classification is required for eye irritation or serious eye damage.
The negative control (HBSS) and the positive control (undiluted dimethylformamide) have met the validity criteria.
No observations were made which might cause doubts concerning the validity of the study outcome. The test is considered valid.
Executive summary:

Title of Study: Evaluation of Petroleum Resins (Kendex 0897) in the Bovine Corneal Opacity and Permeability (BCOP) Test Method following OECD Guideline 437 and EU Method B.47

 

Findings and Results:

This report describes the potency of chemicals to induce serious eye damage using isolated bovine corneas. The eye damage of Petroleum Resins (Kendex 0897) was tested through topical application for 10 minutes. One valid experiment was performed.

The study procedures described in this report were based on the most recent OECD guideline.

Bovine corneas were used. They were collected from slaughtered cattle that were between 12 and 60 months old.

The test item Petroleum Resins (Kendex 0897) was applied as it is directly on top of the corneas. Each bovine eye which had been previously incubated with cMEM without phenol red at 32 ± 1 °C for 1 hour and whose opacity had been measured.

The test item was incubated on the cornea for 10 minutes 32 ± 1 °C. After removal of the test item and 2 hours post-incubation, opacity and permeability values were measured.

Hank’s Balanced Salt Solution (HBSS) was used as negative control. The negative control showed no irritating effect on the cornea and the calculated IVIS (In Vitro Irritancy Score) is 1.50.

Dimethylformamide (DMF) undiluted was used as positive control. The positive control induced serious eye damage on the cornea and was within two standard deviations of the current historical mean. The calculated IVIS is 80.32.

 

Under the conditions of this study, the test item Petroleum Resins (Kendex 0897) showed no effects on the cornea of the bovine eye after 10 minutes of treatment. The calculated IVIS is 0.57.

Since Petroleum Resins (Kendex 0897) induced an IVIS < 3, according to OECD Guideline no. 437 (Oct. 2017), no classification is required for eye irritation or serious eye damage.

Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no adverse effect observed (not irritating)

Respiratory irritation

Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no study available

Additional information

Skin Corrosion - in vitro

Two tissues of the human skin model EpiDermTM were treated with the test item Petroleum Resins (Kendex 0897) for 3 minutes and 1 hour, respectively. The test item was applied to each tissue and spread to match the tissue size.

After treatment, the substance was rinsed from the tissues. Then, cell viability of the tissues was evaluated by addition of MTT, which can be reduced to a blue formazan. Formazan production was evaluated by measuring the optical density (OD) of the resulting solution.

After 3 minutes treatment with the test item, the mean value of relative tissue viability was reduced to 97.9 %. This value is above the threshold for corrosion potential (50%). After 1 hour treatment, the mean value of relative tissue viability was reduced to 85.5 %. This value, too, is above the threshold for corrosion potential (15%).

Therefore, Petroleum Resins (Kendex 0897) is considered non-corrosive to skin in the Reconstructed Human Epidermis (RHE) Test Method.

Skin Irritation - in vitro

Three tissues of the human skin model EpiDermTM were treated with Petroleum Resins (Kendex 0897) for 60 minutes.

The test item was applied directly to each tissue and spread to match the tissue size (0.63 cm2; as indicated by the supplier).

DPBS-buffer was used as negative control and 5% SDS solution was used as positive control.

After the treatment with the test item, the mean value of relative tissue viability was increased to 108.4%. This value is above the threshold for skin irritation potential (50%).

Test items that induce values above the threshold of 50% are considered non-irritant to skin.

Therefore, Petroleum Resins (Kendex 0897) is considered non-irritant to skin in the Reconstructed human Epidermis (RhE) Test Method.

Eye irritation - in vitro

The eye damage of Petroleum Resins (Kendex 0897) was tested through topical application for 10 minutes. One valid experiment was performed.

Bovine corneas were used. They were collected from slaughtered cattle that were between 12 and 60 months old.

The test item Petroleum Resins (Kendex 0897) was applied as it is directly on top of the corneas. Each bovine eye which had been previously incubated with cMEM without phenol red at 32 ± 1 °C for 1 hour and whose opacity had been measured.

The test item was incubated on the cornea for 10 minutes 32 ± 1 °C. After removal of the test item and 2 hours post-incubation, opacity and permeability values were measured.

Hank’s Balanced Salt Solution (HBSS) was used as negative control. The negative control showed no irritating effect on the cornea and the calculated IVIS (In Vitro Irritancy Score) is 1.50.

Dimethylformamide (DMF) undiluted was used as positive control. The positive control induced serious eye damage on the cornea and was within two standard deviations of the current historical mean. The calculated IVIS is 80.32.

Under the conditions of this study, the test item Petroleum Resins (Kendex 0897) showed no effects on the cornea of the bovine eye after 10 minutes of treatment. The calculated IVIS is 0.57.

Justification for classification or non-classification

Petroleum Resins (Kendex 0897) induced values above the threshold of 50% in both the corrosion and irritation experiments using the Reconstructed human Epidermis (RHE), no classification is required under the CLP regulations for irritation or corrosion.

Since Petroleum Resins (Kendex 0897) induced an IVIS < 3, according to OECD Guideline no. 437 (Oct. 2017), no classification is required for eye irritation or serious eye damage.