Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 262-634-6 | CAS number: 61167-58-6
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Genetic toxicity in vitro
Description of key information
Ames test (similar to OECD 471): negative in S. typhimurium strains TA 98, TA 100, TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 1538 and E. coli WP2 uvrA with and without metabolic activation
Chromosome aberration test (according to OECD 473): negative in Chinese hamster V79 cells with and without metabolic activation
HPRT test (according to OECD 476): negative in Chinese hamster V79 cells with and without metabolic activation
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in mammalian cells
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 23 Feb - 25 Jul 2017
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 476 (In Vitro Mammalian Cell Gene Mutation Test)
- Version / remarks:
- adopted Jul 2016
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method B.17 (Mutagenicity - In Vitro Mammalian Cell Gene Mutation Test)
- Deviations:
- not specified
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EPA OPPTS 870.5300 - In vitro Mammalian Cell Gene Mutation Test
- Deviations:
- not specified
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Remarks:
- Hessisches Ministerium für Umwelt, Klimaschutz, Landwirtschaft und Verbraucherschutz, Wiesbaden, Germany
- Type of assay:
- other: in vitro gene mutation study in mammalian cells
- Target gene:
- HPRT locus
- Species / strain / cell type:
- Chinese hamster lung fibroblasts (V79)
- Details on mammalian cell type (if applicable):
- CELLS USED
- Source of cells: Laboratory for Mutagenicity Testing, Technical University, Darmstadt, Germany
- Suitability of cells: The V79 cell line has been used successfully in in vitro experiments for many years.
- Methods for maintenance in cell culture: Thawed stock cultures were propagated at 37 °C with 1.5% carbon dioxide in 76 cm² plastic flasks and sub-cultured once or twice weekly.
- Modal number of chromosomes: 22
- Normal cell cycle time: 12 - 16 h
MEDIA USED
- Type and identity of media: MEM (minimal essential medium) containing Hank’s salts supplemented with 10% foetal bovine serum (FBS), neomycin (5 μg/mL) and amphotericin B (1%).
- Properly maintained: Yes
- Periodically checked for Mycoplasma contamination: Yes
- Periodically checked for karyotype stability: Yes - Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- co-factor supplemented post-mitochondrial fraction (S9 mix), prepared from the livers of rats treated with phenobarbital/β-naphthoflavone
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- Pre-experiment for toxicity:
With and without S9 mix: 7.8, 15.6, 31.3, 62.5, 125, 250, 500 and 1000 µg/mL (4 h)
The following concentrations were selected in the main experiments for the mutagenicity testing:
Experiment I
Without S9 mix: 0.98, 1.96, 3.91, 7.83 µg/mL (4 h)
With S9 mix: 0.98, 1.96, 3.91, 7.83, 15.65 µg/mL (4 h)
Experiment II (repeat experiment)
With S9 mix: 0.98, 1.96, 3.91, 7.83, 15.65 µg/mL (4 h)
Experiment III
Without S9 mix: 0.98, 1.96, 3.91, 7.83 µg/mL (4 h)
With S9 mix: 0.98, 1.96, 3.91, 7.83, 15.65 µg/mL (4h) - Vehicle / solvent:
- - Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: DMSO
- Justification for choice of solvent: The solvent was chosen to its solubility properties and its relative non-toxicity to the cell cultures on request of the sponsor. - Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- 7,12-dimethylbenzanthracene
- ethylmethanesulphonate
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- METHOD OF APPLICATION: in medium
- Cell density at seeding: Approximately 1.2 x 10E07 cells/mL
DURATION
- Exposure duration: 4 h with and without metabolic activation
- Expression time (cells in growth medium): Approximately 7 days
- Selection time (if incubation with a selection agent): About 8 days
SELECTION AGENT (mutation assays): 11 µg/mL 6-thioguanine
STAIN: 10% methylene blue in 0.01% KOH solution
NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: Duplicates each in 3 independent experiments
DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY
- Method: cloning efficiency - Evaluation criteria:
- A test item is classified as clearly positive if it induces a significant and concentration-related increase of the mutant frequency exceeding the historical solvent control range.
When a test item cannot be classified as clearly positive, additional experiments will be performed to establish the biological relevance of the result.
A test item producing a reproducible concentration-related increase of the mutant frequency above the historical solvent control range is considered to be mutagenic in this system.
A test item producing no reproducible concentration-related increase of the mutant frequency above the historical solvent control range is considered to be non-mutagenic in this system. - Statistics:
- A linear regression was performed using a validated test script of "R", a language and environment for statistical computing and graphics (p<0.05), to assess a possible dose dependent increase of mutant frequencies. The number of mutant colonies obtained for the groups treated with the test item were compared to the solvent control groups. A trend is judged as significant whenever the p-value (probability value) is below 0.05.
A t-Test was performed using a validated test script of “R”, a language and environment for statistical computing and graphics, whenever the mutation frequency at a test point exceeded the 95% confidence interval. Again a t-test is judged as significant if the p-value (probability value) is below 0.05.
However, both, biological relevance and statistical significance were considered together. - Key result
- Species / strain:
- Chinese hamster lung fibroblasts (V79)
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Remarks:
- Experiment I: ≥ 3.9 µg/mL without metabolic activation; Experiment III: ≥ 3.9 µg/mL with and without metabolic activation
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- TEST-SPECIFIC CONFOUNDING FACTORS
- Effects of pH: The pH-value was determined in culture medium of the solvent control and at the maximum concentration of the pre-experiment without metabolic activation and was 7.51 and 7.52, respectively.
- Effects of osmolality: The osmolarity [mOsm] was determined in culture medium of the solvent control and at the maximum concentration of the pre-experiment without metabolic activation and was 399 and 381, respectively.
- Precipitation: Precipitation was observed macroscopically and microscopically at the end of treatment (4 h) prior to the removal of the test substance at 15.6 μg/mL in the absence and presence of metabolic activation.
RANGE-FINDING/SCREENING STUDIES: A pre-test was performed in order to determine the toxicity of the test substance. The pre-experiment was performed in the presence and absence (4 h treatment) of metabolic activation. The test substance was tested at concentrations between 7.8 μg/mL and 1000.0 μg/mL. The highest concentration of the pre-experiment was chosen due to precipitation observed in the pre-test on solubility. Relevant cytotoxic effects indicated by a relative cloning efficiency of 50% or below were observed at 125.0 μg/mL in the presence and absence of metabolic activation following 4 hours treatment.
HISTORICAL CONTROL DATA (with ranges, means and standard deviation and confidence interval (e.g. 95%)
- Positive historical control data: The positive control values were within the range of the historical control data (please refer to Table 1 under "any other information on material and methods incl. tables").
- Negative (solvent/vehicle) historical control data: The negative and solvent control values were within the range of the historical control data (please refer to Table 1 under "any other information on material and methods incl. tables").
A linear regression analysis (least squares) was performed to assess a possible dose dependent increase of mutant frequencies. No significant dose dependent trend of the mutation frequency indicated by a probability value of <0.05 was determined in any of the main experiments.
In experiment I, the 95% confidence interval was exceeded at 3.91 μg/mL in culture II in the absence of metabolic activation (please refer to Table 2 under "any other information on results incl. tables"). In experiment II, the 95% confidence interval was very slightly exceeded at 7.83 μg/mL and 15.65 μg/mL in culture I (please refer to Table 3 under "any other information on results incl. tables").
A t-test evaluating the data of both parallel cultures at the data points exceeding the 95% confidence interval showed only a significant response in experiment I at 3.91 μg/mL without metabolic activation. The other data points exceeding the 95% confidence interval at 7.83 μg/mL and 15.65 μg/mL in experiment II showed no significant response in a t-test. Since the significant difference was only detected at an intermediate concentration and no dose dependent trend was found no biological relvance can be stated for this effect. - Conclusions:
- Interpretation of results: negative
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 30 Jul - 25 Oct 1982
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- comparable to guideline study
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 471 (Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay)
- Version / remarks:
- adopted in 1997
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- no
- Type of assay:
- bacterial reverse mutation assay
- Target gene:
- his operon; trp operon
- Species / strain / cell type:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98 and TA 100
- Species / strain / cell type:
- S. typhimurium TA 1538
- Species / strain / cell type:
- E. coli WP2 uvr A
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- cofactor supplemented S9 mix, prepared from the livers of rats treated with polychlorinated biphenyls.
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- 10, 50, 100, 500, 1000 and 5000 µg/plate
- Vehicle / solvent:
- - Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: DMSO
- Justification for choice of solvent/vehicle: Due to the limited solubility of the test substance in water, DMSO was selected as the vehicle. - Untreated negative controls:
- no
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- 9-aminoacridine
- 2-nitrofluorene
- N-ethyl-N-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine
- benzo(a)pyrene
- methylmethanesulfonate
- other: 2 aminoanthracene: +S9: 2 or 80 µg/plate for TA1535 and WP2uvrA
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- METHOD OF APPLICATION: preincubation
DURATION
- Preincubation period: 20 min
- Exposure duration: 2 days
NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: 2 replicants each in 2 indepentend experiments - Evaluation criteria:
- A test compound to be characterized as positive in the reverse mutation test has to fulfill the following requirements:
1) Revertant colonies induced by the test compound are over twice more than those induced spontaneously (control),
2) Increase of revertant colonies induced by the test compound has a dose-response relationship, and
3) The results indicate a reproducibility - Statistics:
- Mean values were calculated.
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- other: TA100, TA1535, TA98, TA1537, TA1538 and WP2uvrA
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity, but tested up to precipitating concentrations
- Remarks:
- ≥ 1000 µg/plate with and without metabolic activation
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not examined
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- TEST-SPECIFIC CONFOUNDING FACTORS
- Precipitation: Precipitation of the test substance was observed at 1000 µg/plate and above in all tester strains with and without metabolic activation. - Conclusions:
- Interpretation of results: negative
- Endpoint:
- in vitro cytogenicity / chromosome aberration study in mammalian cells
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 23 Mar - 05 Jul 2017
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 473 (In Vitro Mammalian Chromosome Aberration Test)
- Version / remarks:
- adopted Jul 2016
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EPA OPPTS 870.5375 - In vitro Mammalian Chromosome Aberration Test
- Deviations:
- not specified
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Remarks:
- Hessisches Ministerium für Umwelt, Klimaschutz, Landwirtschaft und Verbraucherschutz, Wiesbaden, Germany
- Type of assay:
- other: in vitro chromosome aberration study in mammalian cells
- Target gene:
- Not applicable
- Species / strain / cell type:
- Chinese hamster lung fibroblasts (V79)
- Details on mammalian cell type (if applicable):
- CELLS USED
- Source of cells: Labor für Mutagenitätsprüfungen (LMP), Technical University Darmstadt, Darmstadt, Germany
- Suitability of cells: The V79 cell line has been used successfully for many years in in vitro experiments.
- Doubling time: Approximately 13 hours
- Methods for maintenance in cell culture: Thawed stock cultures were propagated at 37 °C with 1.5% carbon dioxide in 80 cm² plastic flasks and sub-cultured twice a week.
- Modal number of chromosomes: 22 ± 1
- Normal (negative control) cell cycle time:
MEDIA USED
- Type and identity of media: MEM (minimal essential medium) containing Hank’s salts, glutamine and Hepes (25 mM), and supplemented with penicillin/streptomycin (100 U/mL/100 μg/mL) and 10 % (v/v) fetal bovine serum (FBS).
- Properly maintained: Yes
- Periodically checked for Mycoplasma contamination: Yes
- Periodically checked for karyotype stability: Yes - Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- cofactor supplemented post-mitochondrial fraction (S9 mix), prepared from the livers of rats treated with phenobarbital/β-naphthoflavone.
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- Pre-experiment for toxicity:
Experiment I:
4 h treatment with and without metabolic activation: 0.58, 1.2, 2.3, 4.6, 9.3, 18.5, 37.0, 111, 333 and 1000 µg/mL
Experiment IIA:
18 h treatment without metabolic activation: 0.03, 0.07, 0.14, 0.28, 0.56, 1.1, 2.2, 4.4, 13.3 and 40.0 µg/mL
Experiment IIB:
18 h treatment without metabolic activation: 0.5, 1.0, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0 and 5.0 µg/mL
The following concentrations were selected in the main experiments for the microscopic analyses:
Experiment I
4 h treatment without metabolic activation: 0.58, 1.2 and 2.3 µg/mL
4 h treatment with metabolic activation: 0.58, 1.2, 2.3 and 4.6 µg/mL
Experiment II
18 h treatment without metabolic activation: 2.0, 2.5 and 3.0 µg/mL - Vehicle / solvent:
- - Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: DMSO
- Justification for choice of solvent/vehicle: The solvent was chosen due to its solubility properties and its relative non-toxicity to the cell cultures. - Untreated negative controls:
- no
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- cyclophosphamide
- ethylmethanesulphonate
- Remarks:
- Each batch of S9 was routinely tested for its capability to activate the known mutagens benzo[a]pyrene and 2-aminoanthracene in the Ames test.
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- METHOD OF APPLICATION: in medium
- Cell density at seeding: 4 x 10E04 cells/mL
DURATION
- Exposure duration: 4 and 18 h
- Fixation time (start of exposure up to fixation or harvest of cells): 18 h
SPINDLE INHIBITOR (cytogenetic assays): 0.2 µg/mL colcemid
STAIN (for cytogenetic assays): Giemsa
NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: Duplicates each in 2 independent experiments
METHODS OF SLIDE PREPARATION AND STAINING TECHNIQUE USED: The cells were treated on the slides in the chambers with hypotonic solution (0.4 % KCl) for 20 min at 37 °C. After incubation in the hypotonic solution the cells were fixed with a mixture of methanol and glacial acetic acid (3+1 parts, respectively). The slides were stained with Giemsa, mounted after drying and covered with a cover slip. All slides were labeled with a computer-generated random code to prevent scorer bias.
NUMBER OF METAPHASE SPREADS ANALYSED PER DOSE: Parallel cultures were treated at each concentration; 500 metaphases per culture were scored, 1000 in total.
DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY
- Method: mitotic index (1000 cells per culture were scored), relative increase in cell counts (RICC)
RICC = (Increase in number of cells treated cultures (final - starting)) / (Increase in number of cells in control cultures (final - starting)) x 100
Cytotoxicity [%] = 100 – RICC
OTHER EXAMINATIONS:
- Determination of polyploidy: The number of polyploid cells in 500 metaphase cells per culture (% polyploid metaphases) was evaluated. - Evaluation criteria:
- A test substance is classified as non-clastogenic if:
a. none of the test concentrations exhibits a statistically significant increase compared with the concurrent negative control,
b. there is no concentration-related increase when evaluated with an appropriate trend test,
c. all results are inside the distribution of the historical negative control data (95% confidence interval)
A test substance is classified as clastogenic if all of the following criteria are met:
a. at least one of the test concentrations exhibits a statistically significant increase compared with the concurrent negative control,
b. the increase is dose-related when evaluated with an appropriate trend test,
c. any of the results are outside the distribution of the historical negative control data (95% confidence interval)
Please refer to "any other information on materials and methods incl. tables" . - Statistics:
- The statistical significance is confirmed by the Fisher’s exact test (modified) (p < 0.05) using a validated test script of “R”, a language and environment for statistical computing and graphics.
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- Chinese hamster lung fibroblasts (V79)
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Remarks:
- Experiment I (4 h): ≥ 4.6 and ≥ 2.3 µg/mL with and without metabolic activation, respectively; Experiment IIB (18 h): ≥ 3.0 µg/mL without metabolic activation
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- TEST-SPECIFIC CONFOUNDING FACTORS
- Effects of pH: The pH was determined in the solvent control and the maximum concentration without metabolic activation. The pH was under both treatment conditions 7.4 in Experiment I and Experiment IIB and 7.3 in Experiment IIA, respectively.
- Effects of osmolality: The osmolarity [mOsm] was determined in culture medium of the solvent control and at the maximum concentration of Experiment I without metabolic activation and was 479 and 468, respectively.
- Precipitation: In the pre-test for toxicity, precipitation of the test item in the absence of S9 mix was observed microscopically at 18.5 μg/mL and above and by the unaided eye at 37.0 μg/mL and above. Precipitation of the test item in the presence of S9 mix was observed microscopically at 37.0 μg/mL and above and by the unaided eye at 111 μg/mL and above.
RANGE-FINDING/SCREENING STUDIES: A preliminary cytotoxicity test was performed to determine the concentrations to be used in the main experiment. Using reduced cell numbers as an indicator for toxicity in Experiment I, clear toxic effects were observed after 4 hours treatment with 2.3 μg/mL and above in the absence of S9 mix and with 4.6 μg/mL and above in the presence of S9 mix. Considering the toxicity data of Experiment I, 40.0 μg/mL (without S9 mix) were chosen as top concentration in Experiment IIA. This experiment was repeated with a top dose of 5.0 μg/mL (Exp. IIB) due to lack of evaluable concentrations in a cytotoxic range.
HISTORICAL CONTROL DATA (with ranges, means and standard deviation and confidence interval (e.g. 95%)
- Positive historical control data: The positive control values were within the range of the historical control data (please refer to "any other information on material and methods incl. tables").
- Negative (solvent) historical control data: The solvent control values were within the range of the historical control data (please refer to "any other information on material and methods incl. tables"). - Conclusions:
- Interpretation of results: negative
Referenceopen allclose all
Table 1: Toxicity data
Concentration [µg/mL] | Cloning efficiency [%] | |
- S9 | + S9 | |
0 (DMSO) | 100 | 100 |
7.8 | 101.3 | 90.6 |
15.6 P | 94.4 | 91.0 |
31.3 P | 80.0 | 80.3 |
62.5 P | 61.6 | 56.7 |
125 P | 34.4 | 28.8 |
250 P | 20.6 | 17.0 |
500 P | 13.3 | 9.0 |
1000 P | 47.0 | 19.6 |
Table 2: Summary of Experiment I (4 h, without metabolic activation)
Concentration [µg/mL] | Cloning efficiency [%] Culture I |
Mutation colonies per 10E06 cells Culture I |
Cloning efficiency [%] Culture II |
Mutation colonies per 10E06 cells Culture II |
95% confidence intervall |
Medium | 154.1 | 21.1 | 76.2 | 19.6 | 1.7 - 30.2 |
DMSO | 100 | 13.4 | 100 | 11.2 | 1.7 - 30.2 |
0.98 | 80.2 | 14.5 | 81.1 | 20.6 | 1.7 - 30.2 |
1.96 | 68.9 | 29.1 | 77.5 | 21.4 | 1.7 - 30.2 |
3.91 | 24.0 | 16.1 | 28.2 | 55.6 | 1.7 - 30.2 |
7.83 | 11.1 | 16.0 | 9.8 | 19.7 | 1.7 - 30.2 |
15.65 P | 5.4 | n.r. | 5.3 | n.r. | 1.7 - 30.2 |
31.3 P | 0.7 | # | 0.0 | # | 1.7 - 30.2 |
EMS | 91.3 | 262.0 | 74.3 | 851.6 | 1.7 - 30.2 |
P: Precipitation (visible at the beginning and at the end of treatment)
# culture was not continued due to exceedingly severe cytotoxic effects
n.r.: not reported, due to unacceptable cytotoxicity
EMS: ethylmethane sulfonate
Table 3: Summary of Experiment II (4 h, with metabolic activation)
Concentration [µg/mL] | Cloning efficiency [%] Culture I |
Mutation colonies per 10E06 cells Culture I |
Cloning efficiency [%] Culture II |
Mutation colonies per 10E06 cells Culture II |
95% confidence intervall |
Medium | 114.2 | 22.5 | 77.3 | 26.6 | 2.0 – 29.4 |
DMSO | 100.0 | 17.4 | 100.0 | 29.3 | 2.0 – 29.4 |
0.98 | 104.7 | 28.4 | 88.7 | 15.1 | 2.0 – 29.4 |
1.96 | 124.6 | 16.7 | 79.5 | 18.9 | 2.0 – 29.4 |
3.91 | 111.6 | 22.5 | 72.3 | 21.1 | 2.0 – 29.4 |
7.83 | 91.1 | 29.6 | 71.3 | 26.8 | 2.0 – 29.4 |
15.65 P | 111.0 | 31.2 | 71.0 | 17.1 | 2.0 – 29.4 |
31.3 P | 102.2 | ## | 65.4 | ## | 2.0 – 29.4 |
DMBA | 93.2 | 187.8 | 57.0 | 152.3 | 2.0 – 29.4 |
P: Precipitation (visible at the beginning and at the end of treatment)
## culture was not continued to avoid analysis of too many precipitating concentrations
DMBA: 7,12-dimethylbenz(a)anthracene
Table 4: Summary of Experiment III (4 h, with and without metabolic activation)
Concentration [µg/mL] | Cloning efficiency [%] Culture I |
Mutation colonies per 10E06 cells Culture I |
Cloning efficiency [%] Culture II |
Mutation colonies per 10E06 cells Culture II |
95% confidence intervall |
without metabolic activation | |||||
Medium | 101.1 | 11.5 | 122.2 | 12.4 | 1.7 - 30.2 |
DMSO | 100.0 | 16.1 | 100.0 | 17.9 | 1.7 - 30.2 |
0.98 | 72.1 | 14.3 | 107.1 | 13.5 | 1.7 - 30.2 |
1.96 | 48.1 | 29.3 | 91.7 | 17.1 | 1.7 - 30.2 |
3.91 | 25.8 | 16.0 | 43.2 | 21.7 | 1.7 - 30.2 |
7.83 | 17.4 | 24.0 | 33.0 | 17.6 | 1.7 - 30.2 |
15.65 P | 3.6 | n.r. | 7.7 | n.r. | 1.7 - 30.2 |
31.3 P | 1.3 | # | 4.5 | # | 1.7 - 30.2 |
EMS | 81.2 | 133.6 | 108.1 | 159.4 | 1.7 - 30.2 |
with metabolic activation | |||||
Medium | 117.9 | 13.2 | 142.2 | 20.5 | 2.0 – 29.4 |
DMSO | 100.0 | 33.4 | 100.0 | 15.2 | 2.0 – 29.4 |
0.98 | 116.9 | 17.6 | 138.2 | 25.7 | 2.0 – 29.4 |
1.96 | 117.1 | 6.2 | 99.8 | 18.1 | 2.0 – 29.4 |
3.91 | 86.9 | 16.9 | 147.0 | 26.8 | 2.0 – 29.4 |
7.83 | 108.8 | 25.1 | 132.4 | 25.0 | 2.0 – 29.4 |
15.65 P | 98.5 | 25.3 | 94.7 | 19.3 | 2.0 – 29.4 |
31.3 P | 15.0 | ## | 9.1 | ## | 2.0 – 29.4 |
DMBA | 97.5 | 216.6 | 118.8 | 152.6 | 2.0 – 29.4 |
P: Precipitation (visible at the beginning and at the end of treatment)
# culture was not continued due to exceedingly severe cytotoxic effects
## culture was not continued to avoid analysis of too many precipitating concentrations
n.r.: not reported, due to unacceptable cytotoxicity
EMS: ethylmethane sulfonate
DMBA: 7,12-dimethylbenz(a)anthracene
Table 1: Results of the reverse mutation test (Experiment 1)
With or without S9-Mix |
Test substance concentration |
Mean number of revertant colonies per plate |
||||||
(μg/plate) |
(average of 2 plates) |
|||||||
Base-pair substitution type |
Frameshift type |
|||||||
TA 100 |
TA1535 |
WP2uvrA |
TA98 |
TA 1537 |
TA1538 |
|||
– |
0 |
105 |
6 |
14 |
17 |
6 |
11 |
|
– |
10 |
152 |
6 |
22 |
17 |
3 |
10 |
|
– |
50 |
168 |
4 |
22 |
20 |
7 |
10 |
|
– |
100 |
173 |
4 |
19 |
15 |
9 |
9 |
|
– |
500 |
145 |
3 |
14 |
20 |
9 |
9 |
|
– |
1000 |
116 |
4 |
11 |
12 |
4 |
8 |
|
– |
5000 |
120 |
3 |
9 |
11 |
2 |
8 |
|
Positive controls, –S9 |
Name |
MMS |
ENNG |
ENNG |
2NF |
9AA |
2NF |
|
Concentrations (μg/plate) |
200 |
5 |
2 |
1 |
80 |
2 |
||
Mean No. of colonies/plate (average of 2) |
428 |
323 |
237 |
92 |
427 |
259 |
||
+ |
0 |
90 |
6 |
13 |
28 |
8 |
24 |
|
+ |
10 |
148 |
6 |
16 |
44 |
3 |
27 |
|
+ |
50 |
133 |
7 |
23 |
34 |
7 |
36 |
|
+ |
100 |
135 |
6 |
23 |
26 |
8 |
29 |
|
+ |
500 |
124 |
3 |
19 |
35 |
4 |
36 |
|
+ |
1000 |
113 |
5 |
18 |
35 |
6 |
30 |
|
+ |
5000 |
96 |
2 |
8 |
20 |
5 |
13 |
|
Positive controls, +S9 |
Name |
B(a)p |
2AA |
2AA |
B(a)p |
B(a)p |
B(a)p |
|
Concentrations (μg/plate) |
5 |
2 |
80 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
||
Mean No. of colonies/plate (average of 2) |
685 |
33 |
69 |
110 |
16 |
98 |
Table 2: Results of the reverse mutation test (Experiment 2)
With or without S9-Mix |
Test substance concentration |
Mean number of revertant colonies per plate |
||||||
(μg/plate) |
(average of 2 plates) |
|||||||
Base-pair substitution type |
Frameshift type |
|||||||
TA 100 |
TA1535 |
WP2uvrA |
TA98 |
TA 1537 |
TA1538 |
|||
– |
0 |
151 |
8 |
20 |
19 |
9 |
9 |
|
– |
10 |
136 |
2 |
10 |
13 |
7 |
11 |
|
– |
50 |
133 |
4 |
16 |
25 |
7 |
8 |
|
– |
100 |
133 |
5 |
13 |
17 |
5 |
11 |
|
– |
500 |
176 |
1 |
12 |
18 |
5 |
9 |
|
– |
1000 |
138 |
3 |
12 |
17 |
5 |
8 |
|
– |
5000 |
110 |
1 |
11 |
12 |
5 |
7 |
|
Positive controls, –S9 |
Name |
MMS |
ENNG |
ENNG |
2NF |
9AA |
2NF |
|
Concentrations (μg/plate) |
200 |
5 |
2 |
1 |
80 |
2 |
||
Mean No. of colonies/plate (average of 2) |
1280 |
1018 |
319 |
106 |
874 |
431 |
||
+ |
0 |
111 |
5 |
14 |
44 |
14 |
38 |
|
+ |
10 |
139 |
7 |
14 |
58 |
12 |
40 |
|
+ |
50 |
122 |
4 |
20 |
54 |
11 |
39 |
|
+ |
100 |
140 |
6 |
14 |
47 |
8 |
38 |
|
+ |
500 |
115 |
7 |
14 |
43 |
9 |
31 |
|
+ |
1000 |
108 |
4 |
16 |
30 |
7 |
36 |
|
+ |
5000 |
125 |
2 |
10 |
27 |
7 |
20 |
|
Positive controls, +S9 |
Name |
B(a)p |
2AA |
2AA |
B(a)p |
B(a)p |
B(a)p |
|
Concentrations (μg/plate) |
5 |
2 |
80 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
||
Mean No. of colonies/plate (average of 2) |
1136 |
21 |
182 |
246 |
39 |
281 |
MMS: Methyl methane sulfate
ENNG: N-Ethyl-N-nitroso-N-guanidine
2NF: 2-Nitrofluorene
9AA: 9-Aminoacridine
B(a)p: Benzo(a)pyrene
2AA: 2-Aminoanthracene
Table 1: Summary of results
Treatment Group | Concentration [µg/mL] | Mitotic Indeces in % of control | Cytotoxicity (RICC) in % of control | Polyploid cells in % | Endomitotic cells in % | Aberrant cells in % | ||
Without S9 mix Exposure time: 4 h |
incl. gaps | excl. gaps | with exchanges | |||||
Solvent | 100.0 | 0.00 | 3.7 | 0.0 | 1.7 | 1.3 | 0.3 | |
0.58 | 77.5 | 49.10 | 1.9 | 0.0 | 1.3 | 1.0 | 0.3 | |
1.2 | 90.1 | 43.74 | 1.8 | 0.0 | 1.3 | 1.0 | 0.3 | |
2.3 | 36.9 | 51.35 | 2.2 | 0.0 | 3.0 | 2.7 | 0.3 | |
EMS (1000 µg/mL) | 52.6 | 38.09 | n.d. | n.d. | 9.7 | 9.3 # | 4.0 | |
Without S9 mix Exposure time: 18 h |
Solvent | 100.0 | 0.00 | 2.2 | 0.0 | 3.0 | 3.0 | 0.0 |
2.0 | 77.6 | 23.68 | 3.5 | 0.1 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | |
2.5 | 107.7 | 24.20 | 2.3 | 0.0 | 3.3 | 3.0 | 0.0 | |
3.0 | 101.9 | 54.31 | 2.6 | 0.0 | 3.0 | 3.0 | 0.0 | |
EMS (1000 µg/mL) | 84.6 | 42.34 | n.d. | n.d. | 14.0 | 14.0 # | 5.7 | |
With S9 mix Exposure time: 4 h |
Solvent | 100.00 | 0.00 | 4.0 | 1.4 | 3.0 | 2.7 | 0.3 |
0.58 | 113.96 | n.c. | 5.4 | 2.7 | 2.7 | 2.0 | 1.0 | |
1.2 | 66.14 | 33.86 | 5.1 | 2.1 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 0.3 | |
2.3 | 52.18 | 47.82 | 7.9 | 4.0 | 1.7 | 1.3 | 0.3 | |
4.6 | 21.38 | 78.62 | 7.2 | 3.6 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | |
CPA (1.4 µg/mL) | 63.47 | 36.53 | n.d. | n.d. | 11.3 | 10.3 # | 2.0 |
n.d.: Not determined
# Aberration frequency statistically significant higher than corresponding control values
CPA: cyclophosphamide
EMS: ethylmethanesulphonate
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (negative)
Genetic toxicity in vivo
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Additional information
Gene mutation in bacteria
A bacterial gene mutation assay with the registered substance was performed similar to OECD guideline 471 (Laboratory of Biochemistry and Toxicology Research, 1982). In two independent experiments, the S. typhimurium strains TA 98, TA 100, TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 1538 and E. coli WP2 uvrA were exposed to the test substance using the preincubation method. The test substance was examined on its mutagenic potential in the concentration range from 10 to 5000 µg/plate in two independent experiments with and without metabolic activation, respectively. No substantial increase in the mean number of revertants per plate was observed in any of the test strains compared to the control, neither in the presence nor in the absence of metabolic activation. The test substance did not show cytotoxic properties, but precipitated at 1000 µg/plate with and without metabolic activation in all tester strains. All positive and the vehicle control values showed the expected results. Under the conditions of this experiment, the registered substance did not show mutagenicity in the selected S. typhimurium and E. coli strains in the presence and absence of metabolic activation.
In vitro cytogenicity in mammalian cells
An in vitro mammalian chromosome aberration test was performed according to OECD guideline 473 and under GLP conditions with the registered substance, in Chinese hamster lung fibroblasts (V79) (Envigo CRS GmbH, 2017). In the first experiment, the test substance was tested up to 2.3 and up to 4.6 µg/mL for a 4-h exposure time with a 18-h fixation time in the absence and presence of metabolic activation (S9 mix). In the second experiment, the test substance was tested up to 3.0μg/mL for a 18-h continuous exposure time in the absence of S9 mix. The positive controls cyclophosphamide and ethylmethanesulphonate and the solvent control were valid and within the range of the historical control data. In the short-term treatments with and without metabolic activation and in the continuous treatment without metabolic activation, cytotoxic properties of the test substance were observed at 4.6, 2.3 and 3.0 µg/mL, respectively. The number of cells with chromosome aberrations found in the solvent control cultures was within the range of the historical control data and thus considered to be valid. Positive control chemicals, ethylmethanesulphonate and cyclophosphamide, both produced a statistically significant increase in the incidence of cells with chromosome aberrations, indicating that the test conditions were adequate and that the metabolic activation system (S9 mix) functioned properly. The test substance did not induce a statistically significant or biologically relevant increase in the number of cells with chromosome aberrations in the absence and presence of S9 mix, in either of the two independently repeated experiments. The frequency of polyploid cells and cells with endoreduplicated chromosomes were recorded. In conclusion, the registered substance is not clastogenic in Chinese lung fibroblasts under the experimental conditions described.
In vitro gene mutation in mammalian cells
An in vitro mammalian cell gene mutation assay was performed according to OECD guideline 476 and under GLP conditions with the registered substance, in Chinese hamster lung fibroblasts (V79) (Envigo CRS GmbH, 2017). The cells were treated for 4 h with and without metabolic activation (cofactor-supplemented post-mitochondrial fraction (S9 mix), prepared from the livers of male rats, treated with phenobarbital and β-naphthoflavone). Based on the results of a pre-test for toxicity, the test substance was tested in both independent experiments at 0.98, 1.96, 3.91, 7.83, 15.65 and 31.3 µg/mL with and without metabolic activation. Precipitation of the test substance was observed macroscopically and microscopically at the end of treatment (4 h) prior to the removal of the test substance at 15.6 μg/mL in the absence and presence of metabolic activation. 7,12-dimethylbenz(a)anthracene and ethylmethanesulphonate were used as positive controls with and without S9 mix, respectively. A vehicle control and a negative control (no treatment) were included. The positive and negative controls were valid and within the range of the historical control data. No biological relevant and significant increase in the mutation frequency at the HPRT locus was observed after treatment either in the absence or in the presence of S9-mix. Therefore, it was concluded that the registered substance was not mutagenic in Chinese hamster lung fibroblasts (V79) under the experimental conditions described.
Conclusion for genetic toxicity
The available data show that the registered substance is not mutagenic in bacteria and mammalian cells (Chinese hamster lung fibroblasts) in vitro, and not clastogenic in mammalian cells (Chinese hamster lung fibroblasts).
Justification for classification or non-classification
The available data on genetic toxicity with the test substance do not meet the criteria for classification according to Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008, and are therefore conclusive but not sufficient for classification.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.