Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 680-798-0 | CAS number: 886577-76-0
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Skin sensitisation
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- skin sensitisation, other
- Remarks:
- The available in vitro data meets the data requirements for this endpoint, as the 2 available in vitro tests allow classification and risk assessment according to 8 .3 of Annex 7 of Regulation (EC) No. 1907/2006.
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- weight of evidence
- Study period:
- 06 - 27 Oct 2016
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 2 016
- Report date:
- 2016
Materials and methods
Test guideline
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: OECD Guideline 442E (In Vitro Skin Sensitisation: human Cell Line Activation Test)
- Version / remarks:
- Jul 2016
- Deviations:
- yes
- Remarks:
- cytotoxicity measurement and estimation of the CV75 value of the dose finding assay was performed by XTT test, measuring the standard absorbance (OD) of a XTT cleavage product
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Remarks:
- Hessisches Ministerium für Umwelt, Klimaschutz, Landwirtschaft und Verbraucherschutz, Wiesbaden, Germany
- Type of study:
- activation of dendritic cells
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- 2-isocyanato-2-methyl-3-(prop-2-enoyloxy)propyl prop-2-enoate
- Cas Number:
- 886577-76-0
- Molecular formula:
- C11H13NO5
- IUPAC Name:
- 2-isocyanato-2-methyl-3-(prop-2-enoyloxy)propyl prop-2-enoate
- Test material form:
- liquid
Constituent 1
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- STABILITY AND STORAGE CONDITIONS OF TEST MATERIAL- Storage condition of test material: At room temperature
In vitro test system
- Details on the study design:
- TEST CELL LINE- Source: ATCC, #TIB-202; Stocks of the THP-1 cell line were stored in liquid nitrogen in the cell bank of Envigo CRS GmbH, Germany- Passage number: 11 - 14 (XTT test); 17 - 18 (h-CLAT)CELL CULTURE CONDITIONS- Type and identity of media: RPMI-1640 supplemented with 10% (v/v) FBS, 100 U/mL penicillin, 100 µg/mL streptomycin, 0.05 mM 2-mercaptoethanol, 4.5 g/L glucose, 1% (v/v) sodium pyruvate and 1% (v/v) L-glutamine- Temperature (°C): 37 ± 1.5- CO2 (%): 5.0 ± 0.5The following information relates to details on XTT:The XTT test is a method to investigate the cytotoxicity of a test substance. The test is based on the cleavage of the yellow tetrazolium salt, sodium 3'-(1-phenylaminocarbonyl)-(3,4 - tetrazolium)-bis-(4–methoxy-6-nitro)-benzenesulfonic acid hydrate (XTT), to form an orange water soluble formazan dye by dehydrogenase activity in active mitochondria. Two independent cytotoxicity experiments were performed with different cell cultures and on different days to obtain a reliable concentration showing 75% cell viability (CV75).CONTROLSNegative Control- Substance: culture mediumVehicle control- Substance: dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO)- Concentration: 0.2%EXPOSURE CONDITIONS- Exposure duration: 24 ± 1 hTEST CONCENTRATIONS- Justification for top dose: The test substance was soluble in DMSO up to and including 125 μg/mL.0.98, 1.95, 3.91, 7.81, 15.63, 31.25, 62.5 and125 μg/mLNUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: 3 samples per dose groups were tested in two independent experimentsMEASUREMENT- Device: microplate reader (Versamax Molecular Devices)- Wavelength: 450 nm- Reference wavelength: 690 nmEVALUATION CRITERIAA decrease in number of living cells results in a decrease in the overall activity of mitochondrial dehydrogenases in the sample. This decrease directly correlates to the amount of orange formazan formed, as monitored by the absorbance. The relative absorbance as compared with the solvent control is calculated using the formula:Relative absorbance [%] = 100 x [(mean absorbance test substance) - (absorbance blank)] / [(mean absorbance vehicle control) - (absorbance blank)]To calculate the concentration of test substance needed to reduce the relative absorbance to 75% of the vehicle control (CV75) the following formula is used:CV75 = Conc. > 75 - ([(Conc. > 75) - (Conc. < 75)] x [(% > 75) - 75] / [(% > 75) - (% < 75)])a) Conc. > 75: max. measured concentration with the % of vehicle control > 75%b) Conc. < 75: min. measured concentration with the % of vehicle control < 75%c) % > 75: relative absorbance at a) in %d) % < 75: relative absorbance at b) in %ACCEPTANCE CRITERIAThe XTT test is considered to be acceptable if it meets the following criteria:- mean absorbance of the negative control is ≥ 0.5- mean viability of the vehicle control is ≥ 70%The following information relates to details on h-CLAT:The h-CLAT method is an in vitro method which quantifies changes of cell surface marker expression (CD86 and CD54) on a human cell line, THP-1 cells, following 24 h exposure to the test substance. The changes of surface marker expression are measured by flow cytometry following cell staining with fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)-labelled antibodies. The relative fluorescence intensity of surface markers compared with solvent control is calculated and used in the prediction model to discriminate between sensitisers and non-sensitisers.CONTROLSNegative Control- Substance: culture mediumVehicle control- Substance: DMSO- Concentration: 0.2%Positive control- Substance: 2,4-dinitrochlorobenzene in DMSO- Concentration: 2 and 3 μg/mLEXPOSURE CONDITIONS: The cells treated with the test substance and with the control, respectively, were pooled, equally distributed into three samples tubes and washed with FACS buffer. Thereafter, the cells were centrifuged, re-suspended and blocked with blocking solution on ice at 2 - 8 °C for approximately 15 min. After that, the cells were washed once again and stained with FITC-labelled anti CD-86, CD54 antibody or mouse IgG1 (isotype control).- Exposure duration: 24 ± 1 hTEST CONCENTRATIONS- Concentrations: 3.8, 4.5, 5.4, 6.5, 7.8, 9.3, 11.2 and 13.4 μg/mL- Justification for top dose: The highest concentration used was 1.2 × Mean CV75 of both XTT tests. The calculated mean CV75 value of both XTT tests was 11.2 μg/mL. NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: 3 samples per dose groups were tested in two independent experimentsSTAINING- Antibodies: FITC anti-CD54; FITC anti-CD86; FITC mouse IgG1 (isotype) - Temperature: 2 - 8 °C- Duration: 30 ± 5 minMEASUREMENT- Device: FACSCalibur (Becton Dick)EVALUATION CRITERIAThe relative fluorescence intensity (RFI) is used as an indicator of CD86 and CD54 expression, and is calculated as follows for each concentration:RFI (%) = [(MFI of test substance treated cells) - (MFI of test substance isotype control cells) / (MFI of vehicle control cells) - (MFI of vehicle isotype control cells)] x 100MFI: geometric mean fluorescence intensity (GeoMean)The cell viability is calculated as follows for each concentration:Cell viability (%) = (Mean cytotox of vehicle control cells) / (Mean cytotox of test substance treated cells) x 100Where the Mean cytotox is the mean of GeoMean (7-AAD) isotype control, GeoMean (7-AAD) CD54 and GeoMean (7-AAD) CD86.The test substance is tested in 2 independent runs. If the RFI of CD86 is ≥ 150% or if the RFI of CD54 is ≥ 200% in both independent run data, the test substance is considered to be a sensitizer. Otherwise it is considered to be a non-sensitizer. In case of different results in both runs, a third run has to be performed. If the RFI of CD86 is ≥ 150% at any dose in at least 2 of 3 independent run data, or if the RFI of CD54 is ≥ 200% in at least 2 of 3 independent run data, the test substance is considered to be a sensitizer. Otherwise it is considered to be a non-sensitizer.ACCEPTANCE CRITERIAThe study is considered as valid, if the following criteria are met:- Cell viability of negative control is adjusted to 100% and the cell viability of the vehicle control should be more than 90% in comparison to the negative control.- In the positive control, RFI values of both CD86 and CD54 should exceed the positive criteria (CD86 ≥ 150% and CD54 ≥ 200%) and the cell viability should be > 50%.- In the vehicle control, RFI values compared with the negative control of both CD86 and CD54 should not exceed the positive criteria (CD86 ≥ 150% and CD54 ≥ 200%).- For negative and vehicle controls, the MFI ratio of CD86 and CD54 to isotype control should be > 105%. - For the test substance resulting in negative outcome, the cell viability at the 1.2 × CV75 value should be less than 90%. If the cell viability at the 1.2 × CV75 value is more than 90% for a positive tested test substance, the data will be acceptable. If 5 mg/mL in saline, 1 mg/mL in DMSO or the highest soluble dose will be used as the maximal test concentration instead of CV75-based dose, the data for test substance are accepted independent by the cell viability.- The cell viability of at least 4 doses in each experiment should be ≥50%.
Results and discussion
In vitro / in chemico
Resultsopen allclose all
- Key result
- Run / experiment:
- other: 24 h incubation
- Parameter:
- other: relative fluorescence intensity of CD54 (%)
- Value:
- 200
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Key result
- Run / experiment:
- other: 24 h incubation
- Parameter:
- other: relative fluorescence intensity of CD86 (%)
- Value:
- 150
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Other effects / acceptance of results:
- ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON CYTOTOXICITY:XTT testCytotoxic effects were observed following incubation with the tested concentrations ≥ 15.63 µg/mL). The viability of the cells was reduced to 50.17 and 31.55%, respectively, in both XTT tests. The calculated mean CV75 value of both XTT tests was 11.2 µg/mL. ACCEPTANCE OF RESULTS:- Acceptance criteria met for vehicle control: yes, the RFI values of the solvent control compared with the medium control was 119.6% (first run) and 113.3% (second run) for CD54 and 87.6% (first run) and 116.9% (second run) for CD86, and thus fulfilled the acceptance criteria. The MFI ratio was determined in both runs and was 151.4% and 159.4%, respectively, for Medium CD54, 220.2% and 176.2%, respectively, for Medium CD86, 169.2% and 170.8%, respectively, for MDSO CD54 and 218.4% and 193.8%, respectively, for DMSO CD86.- Acceptance criteria met for positive control: The RFI values of the positive control (2 and 3 µg/mL, respectively) for CD86 (230.1 and 294.5%, respectively) and CD54 (230.1 and 391.4%, respectively) exceeded the positive criteria (CD86 >150% and CD54 >200%) and the cell viability was >50%. Please refer to Table 3 and 4 under "Any other information on results incl. tables).
Any other information on results incl. tables
Table 1: Results of the first XTT test
Concentration [µg/mL] | Mean absorbance * | Blank | Absorbance in % of vehicle control ** | |
Negative control | Cell culture medium | 0.673± 0.037 | 0.185 | 102.83 |
Vehicle control | DMSO (0.2%) | 0.669 ± 0.051 | 0.195 | 100.00 |
Test substance | 0.98 | 0.679 ± 0.023 | 0.194 | 102.18 |
1.95 | 0.710 ± 0.036 | 0.195 | 108.40 | |
3.91 | 0.758 ± 0.037 | 0.193 | 119.09 | |
7.81 | 0.805 ± 0.049 | 0.195 | 128.42 | |
15.62 | 0.467 ± 0.017 | 0.229 | 50.17 | |
31.25 | 0.331 ± 0.017 | 0.126 | 43.33 | |
62.5 | 0.223 ± 0.015 | 0.184 | 8.24 | |
125 | 0.190 ± 0.010 | 0.179 | 2.17 |
*: mean absorbance (absolute) of 7 wells
** relative absorbance
Table 2: Results of the second XTT test
Concentration [µg/mL] | Mean absorbance * | Blank | Absorbance in % of vehicle control ** | |
Negative control | Cell culture medium | 0.939± 0.027 | 0.193 | 106.65 |
Vehicle control | DMSO (0.2%) | 0.887 ± 0.033 | 0.187 | 100.00 |
Test substance | 0.98 | 1.035 ± 0.032 | 0.201 | 119.31 |
1.95 | 0.970 ± 0.038 | 0.194 | 110.88 | |
3.91 | 0.976 ± 0.030 | 0.192 | 112.06 | |
7.81 | 0.788 ± 0.027 | 0.193 | 84.99 | |
15.62 | 0.416 ± 0.026 | 0.195 | 31.55 | |
31.25 | 0.421 ± 0.030 | 0.176 | 35.04 | |
62.5 | 0.201 ± 0.011 | 0.174 | 3.86 | |
125 | 0.196 ± 0.007 | 0.172 | 3.54 |
*: mean absorbance (absolute) of 7 wells
** relative absorbance
Table 3: Results of the first h-CLAT run
Concentration [µg/mL] | Antibody | RFI [%] | Cell viability [%] | |
Negative control | Cell culture medium | CD 54 | 100.0 | 100.0 |
CD86 | 100.0 | |||
Vehicle control | DMSO (0.2%) | CD 54 | 100.0 | 100.0 |
CD86 | 100.0 | |||
Positive control | DNBC (2.0 µg/mL) | CD 54 | 221.1 * | 70.5 |
CD86 | 230.1 * | |||
DNBC (3.0 µg/mL) | CD 54 | 391.4 * | 69.3 | |
CD86 | 294.5 * | |||
Test substance | 3.8 | CD 54 | 168.8 | 86.7 |
CD86 | 162.6 * | |||
4.5 | CD 54 | 219.5 * | 88.6 | |
CD86 | 207.3 * | |||
5.4 | CD 54 | 267.2 * | 80.2 | |
CD86 | 219.2 * | |||
6.5 | CD 54 | 232.8 * | 68.1 | |
CD86 | 235.2 * | |||
7.8 | CD 54 | 246.9 * | 70.3 | |
CD86 | 220.5 * | |||
9.3 | CD 54 | 222.7 * | 68.2 | |
CD86 | 228.8 * | |||
11.2 | CD 54 | 235.9 * | 49.2 | |
CD86 | 302.7 * | |||
13.4 | CD 54 | 203.1 * | 37.4 | |
CD86 | 320.1 * |
*: RFI value of CD86 or CD54 exceeded the criteria for a positive response (CD86 ≥ 150% and CD54 ≥ 200%).
Table 4: Results of the second h-CLAT run
Concentration [µg/mL] | Antibody | RFI [%] | Cell viability [%] | |
Negative control | Cell culture medium | CD 54 | 100.0 | 100.0 |
CD86 | 100.0 | |||
Vehicle control | DMSO (0.2%) | CD 54 | 100.0 | 100.0 |
CD86 | 100.0 | |||
Positive control | DNBC (2.0 µg/mL) | CD 54 | 294.1 * | 74.7 |
CD86 | 460.0 * | |||
DNBC (3.0 µg/mL) | CD 54 | 380.1 * | 76.4 | |
CD86 | 483.9 * | |||
Test substance | 3.8 | CD 54 | 147.1 | 88.0 |
CD86 | 145.6 | |||
4.5 | CD 54 | 139.7 | 92.8 | |
CD86 | 132.2 | |||
5.4 | CD 54 | 152.9 | 89.8 | |
CD86 | 168.9 * | |||
6.5 | CD 54 | 164.7 | 84.8 | |
CD86 | 138.3 | |||
7.8 | CD 54 | 210.3 * | 73.3 | |
CD86 | 191.7 * | |||
9.3 | CD 54 | 246.3 * | 71.1 | |
CD86 | 236.7 * | |||
11.2 | CD 54 | 245.6 * | 66.9 | |
CD86 | 260.0 * | |||
13.4 | CD 54 | 246.3 * | 44.6 | |
CD86 | 350.0 * |
*: RFI value of CD86 or CD54 exceeded the criteria for a positive response (CD86 ≥ 150% and CD54 ≥ 200%).
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Interpretation of results:
- other: positive according to OECD 442E
- Remarks:
- the results of this study as a stand-alone study are not suitable for classification according to CLP/EU GHS criteria; the results may be used for classification purposes in a weight of evidence approach.
- Conclusions:
- Under the conditions of the Human Cell Line Activation Test the test substance increased the expression of CD54 and CD86 associated with the process of activation of monocytes and dendritic cells. Based on this result, the h-CLAT prediction is considered positive for skin sensitisation.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.