Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 231-151-2 | CAS number: 7440-42-8
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Description of key information
Sources and selection/screening of ecotoxicological data
The ecotoxicological data in this report are derived from original papers on the subject, gathered from the industry and environmental agencies, or published in international journals, and covered studies that focussed on common ecotoxicological parameters such as survival, growth and/or reproduction. All data are screened for their relevancy and reliability. Relevance concerns the appropriateness of the data for a particular hazard identification or risk characterization, while reliability is based on the inherent quality of the test method and report. Reliability is addressed through Klimisch criteria. Only the toxicity data that received a Klimisch score of 1 or 2 and that were considered relevant were used to derive the HC5,50 value, and robust summaries are included in the IUCLID database. Toxicity data that received a Klimisch score of 3 or 4 are not discussed in this document without a specific need.
Determination of whether a specific study was relevant for the environmental effects assessment of boron was based on species (standard/non-standard species), route of exposure/application, test concentrations, test substance and test duration (acute/chronic).
Reliability assessment of a study was based on factors such as GLP-compliance, description of the applicable test methods, chemical analysis of exposure concentrations, observed concentration-response relationship, test acceptability and validity criteria and finally, proper statistical endpoint derivation.
It should be noted that the potential essential effects of boron have been studied on a variety of freshwater fish, amphibians, invertebrates and plants. At lower concentrations, boron has been found to be beneficial to some freshwater organisms. Boron, for instance, is essential for nitrogen fixation in some species of algae (Smyth and Dugger, 1981), fungi and bacteria (Saiki et al., 1993; Fernandez et al., 1984), some diatoms and algae and macrophytes (Eisler, 2000). Required levels may vary, especially among plants, such that essential levels for one species may be toxic to another (Eisler, 1990). Fort et al. (1999) found that boron was nutritionally essential for reproduction and development in frogs (Xenopus laevis). Rowe et al. (1998) found that the shape of the dose-response curve in rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) and zebrafish follows the U-shaped adverse response of an essential nutrient. For both species inceasd mortality of embryos and zygotes are reported below specific B-threshold levels.
Boron does not appear to be essential for all species, however. Evaluation of essentiality in some animals is limited by the innate boron content in plant-based animal feeds.
More detailed information on each of the mentioned relevancy/reliability criteria is provided in the Background Document “Environmental effects assessment of boron”, which is attached in the technical dossier in IUCLID Section 13.
Summary of relevant acute ecotoxicity data:
Relevant information on standard fish species, invertebrates and algae was retained for classification purposes when tests were in line with accepted standard testing guidelines. An overview of the crital data is geven hereunder:
For fish, a reliable data point for boron, added to the test medium as boric acid, was a 96h-LC50 of 79.7 mg Bo/L for the fish P. promelas (Soucek et al, 2010) at pH range 7-5-8.5. This value is put forward for hazard assessment purposes. No data for other pH-ranges were identified.
For invertebrates, the following lowest reliable data point for boron (test organism: C. dubia) was a value of 119 mg B/L for pH-range 6.5-7.5 (Soucek et al, 2010), and a geometric mean (n=6) of 119 mg B/L for pH-range 7.5-8.5 (Soucek et al, 2010). No data for the pH-range 5.5-6.5.
For algae (P.subcapitata) there was one reliable acute data point, namely an 72h-EC50 of 52.4 mg B/L for the pH-range 7.5-8.5 (Hanstveit and Oldersma, 2000). No data for other pH-ranges were identified.
Summary of chronic freshwater data:
Relevant and reliable chronic no-effects values were identified for seventeen freshwater species: Micropterus salmoides, Oncorhynchus mykiss, Brachydanio rerio, Daphnia magna, Spirodella polyrhiza, Hyalella azteca, Xenopus laevis, Pimephales promelas, Ictalurus punctatus, Carassius auratus, Chironomus riparius, Brachionus calyciflorus, Rana pipiens, Selenastrum capricornutum, Anaxyrus fowleri, Ambystoma maculatum and Lampsilis silliquoidea.
No-effect levels for dissolved boron were situated between 6.3 mg Mo/L and 69.9 mg B/L, i.e., a difference of a factor of 11 between the most and least sensitive species. The zebrafish D.rerio and the amphipod H.azteca were the most sensitive trophic levels. The least sensitive species was the toad A.fowleri. A Species Sensitivity Distribution (SSD) has been developed for the assessment of boron the freshwater compartment, using the reliable species-specific chronic toxicity effect levels that have been generated in various research studies.
Summary of chronic marine data:
Relevant and reliable chronic no-effects valus were identified for twenty-five freshwater data: Limanda limanda, Menidia beryllina, Cyprinodon vareigatus, Americamysis bahia, Litopenaeus vannamei, Anthocidaris crassipina, and 19 algal species (not further specified here). However, most of these toxicity data are based on nominal values and cannot therefore be considered for PNEC derivation. Marine waters contain about 5 mg B/L, so it may be expected that marine organisms are more tolerant of boron than freshwater organisms. However, the lack of a suitable database prevents direct evaluation of this expectation.
Additional information
Overview of most sensitive species-specific K1-NOEC/EC10-values for boron in the freshwater environment
Species Name |
Species Name |
Taxa |
Added geomean NOEC/EC10(mg B/L) |
Micropterus salmoides |
Pisces – Chordata |
Mortality |
36.8 |
Oncorhynchus mykiss |
Pisces – Chordata |
Mortality |
19.2 |
Brachydanio rerio |
Pisces – Chordata |
Growth |
6.3 |
Daphnia magna |
Crustacea |
Reproduction |
13.9 |
Spirodella polyrhiza |
Higher plants |
Growth rate |
6.5 |
Hyalella azteca |
Crustacea |
Reproduction |
6.3 |
Xenopus laevis |
Amphibian – Chordata |
Mortality, growth, reproduction |
9.4 |
Pimephales promelas |
Pisces – Chordata |
Mortality |
21.3 |
Ictalurus punctatus |
Pisces – Chordata |
Mortality |
13.5 |
Carassius auratus |
Pisces – Chordata |
Mortality |
30.3 |
Chironomus riparius |
Insecta |
Emergence |
20.1 |
Brachionus calyciflorus |
Rotifera |
Reproduction |
24.6 |
Rana pipiens |
Amphibian – Chordata |
Mortality |
45.1 |
Selenastrum capricornutum |
Chlorophyta |
Growth rate |
17.5 |
Anaxyrusfowleri (former name: Bufo fowleri) |
Amphibian – Chordata |
Mortality |
69.9 |
Ambystoma maculatum |
Amphibian – Chordata |
Malformation |
24.5 |
Lampsilis silliquoidea |
Molluscs |
Biomass |
30.0 |
These data have been used for the construction of a Species Sensitivity Distribution (SSD) from which the median 5th percentile, i.e. the HC5,50% with 5%-95%-confidence interval was derived. The confidence interval is calculated using a Monte Carlo analysis on the log-normal distribution that was fitted through the 17 data points. The calculated HC5,50%-value is used for the freshwater PNEC-derivation (i.e., PNECaquatic= HC5,50%/ Assessment Factor). The value of this assessment factor depends on the uncertainty analysis that was conducted on this data set.
An in-depth discussion of the uncertainty analysis is given in the Background document “Environmental effects assessment of boron”, which is attached in the technical dossier in IUCLID Section 13. Based on this analysis - and taking sufficient conservatism into account - an Assessment Factor of 2 on the HC5,50% is put forward for the derivation of an aquatic PNEC.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.