Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Skin sensitisation

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
skin sensitisation: in vivo (non-LLNA)
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
February 14th -March 23rd 1991
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: not in accordance With the GLP guidelines (Prior to GLP)

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
1991
Report date:
1991

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
other: BIOGIR SA Protocole SMK
Principles of method if other than guideline:
Skin sensitization , adopted from Magnusson and Kligman maximisation assay, 15 treated Guinea pigs observed at 24 and 48 h, powder substance.
GLP compliance:
yes
Type of study:
guinea pig maximisation test
Justification for non-LLNA method:
Test performed in 1991.
LLNA method (OECD 442 B) was adopted in 2010.

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
N-(1-oxooctyl)glycine
EC Number:
238-122-3
EC Name:
N-(1-oxooctyl)glycine
Cas Number:
14246-53-8
Molecular formula:
C10H19NO3
IUPAC Name:
N-(1-oxooctyl)glycine
Constituent 2
Reference substance name:
LiPACIDE CG
IUPAC Name:
LiPACIDE CG
Details on test material:
- Name of test material (as cited in study report): LIPACIDE CG
- Substance type: substance mono constituant
- Physical state: solid
- Analytical purity: 99%
- Lot/batch No.: 89303001

In vivo test system

Test animals

Species:
guinea pig
Strain:
Hartley
Sex:
not specified
Details on test animals and environmental conditions:
350g prior the test
identifying by individual picric acid
the animals received tap food and water
air conditionned: 14cycles per hour

Study design: in vivo (non-LLNA)

Inductionopen allclose all
Route:
epicutaneous, semiocclusive
Vehicle:
other: vaselin oil
Concentration / amount:
25 and 12.5%
Challengeopen allclose all
Route:
epicutaneous, semiocclusive
Vehicle:
other: vaselin oil
Concentration / amount:
25 and 12.5%
No. of animals per dose:
15
Details on study design:
RANGE FINDING TESTS:


MAIN STUDY
A. INDUCTION EXPOSURE
- No. of exposures: 30
- Exposure period: 48h
- Test groups: 15
- Control group: 15
- Site: scarified skin area
- Concentrations: 25% and 12.5%


B. CHALLENGE EXPOSURE
- No. of exposures: 30
- Day(s) of challenge: 28
- Exposure period: 24h
- Test groups: 15
- Control group: 15
- Site: scarified skin area
- Concentrations: MNIC and 1/2 MNIC
- Evaluation (hr after challenge): 24h


Challenge controls:
15 animals treated with Vaselin oil
Positive control substance(s):
yes
Remarks:
vaselin oil

Results and discussion

Positive control results:
not mentioned in the report

In vivo (non-LLNA)

Resultsopen allclose all
Reading:
1st reading
Hours after challenge:
48
Group:
test chemical
Dose level:
25%
No. with + reactions:
0
Total no. in group:
15
Clinical observations:
no reaction
Remarks on result:
other: Reading: 1st reading. . Hours after challenge: 48.0. Group: test group. Dose level: 25%. No with. + reactions: 0.0. Total no. in groups: 0.0. Clinical observations: no reaction.
Reading:
1st reading
Hours after challenge:
48
Group:
negative control
Dose level:
25%
No. with + reactions:
0
Total no. in group:
15
Clinical observations:
no reaction
Reading:
other: not performed
Group:
positive control
Dose level:
Not applicable
Clinical observations:
N/A
Remarks on result:
not measured/tested

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
not sensitising
Remarks:
Migrated information
Conclusions:
under the experimental conditions employed , the product LIPACIDE CG did not induce any macroscopic reaction which could be related to a sensitization in the albino guinea pig. The product may be therefore consiedered as hypoallergenic
Executive summary:

Test item: no animal sensitised at either concentration.

Negative controls: no animal sensitised, confirming test system specificity.