Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 939-396-3 | CAS number: -
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Skin sensitisation
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- skin sensitisation: in vivo (LLNA)
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 12 February - 03 March 2014
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
Cross-referenceopen allclose all
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- reference to same study
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- reference to other study
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 2 015
- Report date:
- 2015
Materials and methods
Test guidelineopen allclose all
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 429 (Skin Sensitisation: Local Lymph Node Assay)
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method B.42 (Skin Sensitisation: Local Lymph Node Assay)
- Deviations:
- no
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- Not applicable
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Remarks:
- 10 January 2013
- Type of study:
- mouse local lymph node assay (LLNA)
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- cis-α,α,4-trimethylcyclohexanemethanol
- EC Number:
- 230-795-1
- EC Name:
- cis-α,α,4-trimethylcyclohexanemethanol
- Cas Number:
- 7322-63-6
- Molecular formula:
- C10H20O
- IUPAC Name:
- cis-2-(4-methylcyclohexyl)propan-2-ol
- Reference substance name:
- trans-α,α,4-trimethylcyclohexanemethanol
- EC Number:
- 225-844-9
- EC Name:
- trans-α,α,4-trimethylcyclohexanemethanol
- Cas Number:
- 5114-00-1
- Molecular formula:
- C10H20O
- IUPAC Name:
- trans-2-(4-methylcyclohexyl)propan-2-ol
- Reference substance name:
- cis-4-isopropyl-1-methylcyclohexanol
- Cas Number:
- 3901-95-9
- Molecular formula:
- C10H20O
- IUPAC Name:
- cis-4-isopropyl-1-methylcyclohexanol
- Reference substance name:
- trans-4-isopropyl-1-methylcyclohexanol
- Cas Number:
- 3901-93-7
- Molecular formula:
- C10H20O
- IUPAC Name:
- trans-4-isopropyl-1-methylcyclohexanol
- Reference substance name:
- Non identified impurities
- Molecular formula:
- Not applicable
- IUPAC Name:
- Non identified impurities
- Test material form:
- liquid
- Details on test material:
- Batch No. MP8 du 29/10/2013
Purity: 98.8% (sum of the 4 main constituents)
Name of the test item (as cited in the study report): DIHYDROTERPINEOL MULTICONSTITUENT
IUPAC Name of the test item: Reaction mass of cis-2-(4-methylcyclohexyl) propan-2-ol and trans-2-(4-methylcyclohexyl) propan-2-ol and
cis- 4-isopropyl-1-methylcyclohexanol and trans- 4-isopropyl-1-methylcyclohexanol
Synonym: Reaction mass of cis-α,α-4-trimethyl-cyclohexanemethanol and trans-α,α-4-trimethyl-cyclohexanemethanol and cis-1-methyl-4-(1-methylethyl)-cyclohexanol and trans-1-methyl-4-(1-methylethyl)-cyclohexanol
Physical state: colourless – slightly amber liquid
Storage Conditions: +2°C to +8°C, under nitrogen and protected from light
Expiry Date: 28 October 2015
Constituent 1
Constituent 2
Constituent 3
Constituent 4
impurity 1
In vivo test system
Test animals
- Species:
- mouse
- Strain:
- other: CBA/J
- Sex:
- female
- Details on test animals and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Janvier, Le Genest-Saint-Isle, France.
- Age at study initiation: Preliminary test - Approximately 10 weeks; Main test - Approximately 8 weeks
- Weight at study initiation: Preliminary test - 21.3 g (20.4-22.5 g); Main test - 19.7 g (18.0-22.1 g)
- Housing: Animals were housed by group of two (preliminary test) or four (main test) in polycarbonate cages (Tecniplast 1145T, 435 cm2) containing autoclaved sawdust (SICSA, Alfortville, France). In the main test, on Day 6 before the 3H-TdR injections, the animals were housed in disposable crystal polystyrene cages (22.0 cm x 8.5 cm x 8.0 cm).
- Diet: SSNIFF R/M-H pelleted maintenance diet (SSNIFF Spezialdiäten GmbH, Soest, Germany), ad libitum
- Water: Tap water (filtered using a 0.22 µm filter), ad libitum
- Acclimation period: 6 days
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature: 22 ± 2 °C
- Humidity: 50 ± 20 %
- Air changes: Approximately 12 cycles/hour of filtered, non-recycled air
- Photoperiod: 12 h dark / 12 h light
Study design: in vivo (LLNA)
- Vehicle:
- acetone/olive oil (4:1 v/v)
- Concentration:
- Preliminary test: 10, 25, 50 and 100 %
Main test: 5, 10, 25, 50 and 100 % - No. of animals per dose:
- Preliminary test: One concentration per ear (10 and 25 % in left ear of 1 female each; 50 and 100 % in right ear of 1 female each)
Main test: 4 females/dose - Details on study design:
- PRELIMINARY TEST:
- Compound solubility: A solution was obtained at the concentration of 50 % in AOO.
- As the test item was a liquid that could be sampled using a pipette, the maximum achievable concentration was 100 %.
- A preliminary test was performed in four animals to assess the irritant potential of the test item (through ear thickness measurement). On Days 1, 2 and 3, a dose-volume of 25 μL of the appropriate dose formulation was applied to the dorsal surface of both ears (one concentration per ear), using an adjustable pipette fitted with a plastic tip.
- Irritation: Dryness of skin was noted on Day 6 in right ear of all group one females (test item at 100 %). At the concentration of 100 %, an increase in ear thickness of 16 % was noted. This slight increase in ear thickness was comprised between 10 and 25 %. The test item was then considered as slightly irritant at this concentration. However, as the acceptance limit of 25 % was not reached, this concentration was not rejected for testing on the main test. Increases in ear thickness at the lowest tested concentrations (i.e. 10, 25 and 50 %) were all below 10 %. The highest concentration retained for the main test was therefore 100 %.
MAIN STUDY
ANIMAL ASSIGNMENT AND TREATMENT:
- Animals were allocated to the groups using a computerized randomization procedure.
- Name of test method: Local Lymph Node Assay
- Criteria used to consider a positive response: The test item is considered as a skin sensitizer when the SI for a dose group is ≥ 3 together with consideration of a dose-response relationship. Other relevant criteria such as radioactivity levels and ear thickness are also taken into account to evaluate the data.
TREATMENT PREPARATION AND ADMINISTRATION: 25 µL of control and test item were applied to the dorsal surface of both ears on Days 1, 2 and 3. On Day 6, 250 µL of 0.9 % NaCl containing 20 to 21 μCi of 3H-TdR (specific activity of 20 Ci/mmol) was injected into the tail vein of each experimental mouse. Five hours later, all mice were sacrificed by an intraperitoneal injection of pentobarbital sodium followed by a cervical dislocation and the auricular lymph nodes were excised. The lymph nodes were pooled for each experimental group. A single cell suspension of auricular lymph node cell (ALNC) was prepared by mechanical disaggregation in Petri dishes using the plunger of a syringe. Cell suspensions were washed with 0.9 % NaCl and precipitated with 5 % (w/v) trichloroacetic acid (TCA) at 4 °C. 3 mL of Ultima GoldxR scintillation fluid (Packard) was added in order to measure incorporation of 3H-TdR using β-scintillation counting.
The results were expressed as disintegrations per minute (dpm) per group and as dpm/node.
Stimulation Index (SI) were calculated according to the following formula:
SI = dpm per node of the treated group / dpm per node of the vehicle control group - Positive control substance(s):
- hexyl cinnamic aldehyde (CAS No 101-86-0)
- Statistics:
- No data
Results and discussion
- Positive control results:
- The threshold positive value of 3 for the SI was reached in the positive control group (SI = 4.69). The experiment was therefore considered valid.
In vivo (LLNA)
Resultsopen allclose all
- Parameter:
- SI
- Remarks on result:
- other: Stimulation index for 5, 10, 25, 50 and 100 % were 1.29, 0.72, 0.66, 2.27 and 3.09, respectively.
- Key result
- Parameter:
- EC3
- Remarks:
- %
- Value:
- 95
Any other information on results incl. tables
Table 7.4.1/1: Skin sensitisation – results
Treatment and concentrations |
Number of nodes per group |
dpm per group |
dpm per node |
Stimulation index (SI) |
Increase in ear thickness (% between day 1 and day 6) |
Irritation level |
EC3 value (%) |
Vehicle |
8 |
2173 |
271.63 |
- |
-4.85 |
- |
- |
Test item 5 % |
8 |
2798 |
349.75 |
1.29 |
-5.00 |
I |
95 |
Test item 10 % |
8 |
1572 |
196.50 |
0.72 |
-5.81 |
I |
|
Test item 25 % |
8 |
1425 |
178.13 |
0.66 |
-7.85 |
I |
|
Test item 50 % |
8 |
4942 |
617.75 |
2.27 |
-4.00 |
I |
|
Test item 100 % |
8 |
6708 |
838.50 |
3.09 |
-1.92 |
I |
|
HCA 25 % |
8 |
10193 |
1274.13 |
4.69 |
- |
- |
- |
dpm = disintegrations per minute
HCA = α-hexylcinnamaldehyde
I = non-irritant (increase in ear thickness < 10 %)
EC3 value = theoretical concentration resulting in a SI value of 3
Mortality and clinical signs: No unscheduled deaths or clinical signs were observed in any animals.
Body weight: The body weight change of test item-treated animals was similar to that of control animals.
Ear thickness measurements and local reactions: No local reactions were observed in any animals.
In all test item-treated groups, the increase in ear thickness was below 10 %. The test item was therefore considered as non-irritant. As the acceptance limit of 25 % was not reached at any concentrations, no bias in the results of proliferation measurements linked to an excessive irritant potential was considered.
Proliferation assay:
No significant lymphoproliferation was noted at concentrations 5, 10 and 25 %. A slight increase of the stimulation indices was noted from the concentration 50 % (SI = 2.27), reaching the threshold positive value at 100 % (SI = 3.09 %).
In the absence of local irritation, the slight significant lymphoproliferative response observed may be attributed to delayed contact hypersensitivity.
The EC3 value was equal to 95%.
Taking into account that the significant lymphoproliferation was obtained for the highest concentration, with a stimulation index equal to the positive threshold, further investigations could be considered to confirm the very weak response noted in this study.
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Interpretation of results:
- Category 1B (indication of skin sensitising potential) based on GHS criteria
- Conclusions:
- The test item is classified in category 1 and sub-category 1B according to CLP Regulation (EC) N° 1272/2008.
However, the stimulation index threshold positive value of 3 was reached only at the highest tested concentration of 100% and did not clearly exceed this threshold value. Therefore, a false positive result cannot be excluded and further experiments could be considered to confirm or to contradict the obtained results. - Executive summary:
In a local lymph node assay performed according to OECD Guideline 429 and in compliance with GLP, groups of CBA/J mice (4 females/dose) were topically applied with 25 µL of test item dihydroterpineol multiconstituent at concentrations of 5, 10, 25, 50 and 100% to the dorsal surface of both ears for three consecutive days. Vehicle control group of four females received the vehicle (acetone/olive oil (4/1; v/v)). After 2 days of resting, the proliferation of lymphocytes in the lymph node draining the application site was measured by incorporation of tritiated methyl thymidine (Day 6). The results were expressed as disintegrations per minute (dpm) per group; dpm/node and the obtained values were used to calculate Stimulation Indices (SI). Animals were observed for mortality, clinical signs and body weight during the study. The test concentrations for the main study were determined from a preliminary study (one concentration per ear (10 and 25% in left ear of 1 female each; 50 and 100% in right ear of 1 female each)).
In the main test, no unscheduled deaths and no clinical signs were observed during the observation period. Body weight of animals was unaffected by the test item treatment. No local reactions were observed in any animals. In all test item treated groups, the increase in ear thickness was below 10 %. The test item was therefore considered as non-irritant. As the acceptance limit of 25% was not reached at any concentrations, no bias in the results of proliferation measurements linked to an excessive irritant potential was considered.
The SI of the positive control was > 3 (4.69%); this experiment was therefore considered valid.
The observed SI values were 1.29, 0.72, 0.66, 2.27 and 3.09 at 5, 10, 25, 50 and 100%, respectively. The threshold positive value of 3 was reached at the concentration 100%. In the absence of local irritation, the significant lymphoproliferative response observed was attributed to delayed contact hypersensitivity. The EC3 value was equal to 95%.
Therefore, the test item is classified in category 1 and sub-category 1B according to CLP Regulation (EC) N° 1272/2008.
However, the stimulation index threshold positive value of 3 was reached only at the highest tested concentration of 100% and did not clearly exceed this threshold value. Therefore, a false positive result cannot be excluded and further experiments could be considered to confirm or to contradict the obtained results.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.