Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Specific investigations: other studies

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
biochemical or cellular interactions
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
supporting study
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
study well documented, meets generally accepted scientific principles, acceptable for assessment

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
other company data
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
2021
Report date:
2021

Materials and methods

Principles of method if other than guideline:
Two complementary and independent approaches to assess surface reactivity: Ferric Reduction Ability in Serum (FRAS) assay and the standardized Electron Paramagnetic Resonance with Spin Trap (EPR:DMPO).
GLP compliance:
no
Type of method:
other: in chemico
Endpoint addressed:
repeated dose toxicity: inhalation

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
N,N'-phenylene-1,4-bis[4-[(2,5-dichlorophenyl)azo]-3-hydroxynaphthalene-2-carboxamide]
EC Number:
223-460-6
EC Name:
N,N'-phenylene-1,4-bis[4-[(2,5-dichlorophenyl)azo]-3-hydroxynaphthalene-2-carboxamide]
Cas Number:
3905-19-9
Molecular formula:
C40H24Cl4N6O4
IUPAC Name:
N,N'-phenylene-1,4-bis[4-[(2,5-dichlorophenyl)azo]-3-hydroxynaphthalene-2-carboxamide]
Test material form:
solid
Specific details on test material used for the study:
Purity: 99.4 %
Red powder

Administration / exposure

Details on study design:
It is referred to the attached study report.

Results and discussion

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Conclusions:
The authors employed two complementary and independent approaches to assess surface reactivity, namely the Ferric Reduction Ability in Serum (FRAS) assay and the standardized Electron Paramagnetic Resonance with Spin Trap (EPR:DMPO). The pigment did not induce oxidative damage significantly above the blank control and is considered as passive in the FRAS assay. Also in the complementary EPR assay, Pigment Red 166 induced a reactivity that is compatible with or below the blank control and are classified as passive.