Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Genetic toxicity: in vivo

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
in vivo mammalian germ cell study: cytogenicity / chromosome aberration
Remarks:
Type of genotoxicity: chromosome aberration
Type of information:
migrated information: read-across based on grouping of substances (category approach)
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
no data available
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: Well documented publication with some restriction: material and methods not described in detail

Data source

Referenceopen allclose all

Reference Type:
publication
Title:
Effect of chlorophyllin on mercuric chloride-induced clastogenicity in mice.
Author:
Ghosh, A.K.; et al.
Year:
1991
Bibliographic source:
Food and Chemical Toxicology, 29(11):777–779.
Reference Type:
publication
Title:
Mammalian in vivo cytogenetic assay. Analysis of chromosome aberrations in bone marrow cells.
Author:
Preston, R.J.; et al.
Year:
1987
Bibliographic source:
Muatation Research 189, 157-165

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
equivalent or similar to guideline
Guideline:
other: Mamallian in vivo cytogenetic assays. Analysis of chromosome aberrations in bone marrow cells. (Preston, R.J.; et al., 1987, Mutation Research 189: 157-165)
Deviations:
not specified
GLP compliance:
no
Type of assay:
chromosome aberration assay

Test material

Constituent 1
Reference substance name:
Mercury chloride
EC Number:
231-430-9
EC Name:
Mercury chloride
Cas Number:
7546-30-7
IUPAC Name:
mercury dichloride
Constituent 2
Reference substance name:
Mercury dichloride
EC Number:
231-299-8
EC Name:
Mercury dichloride
Cas Number:
7487-94-7
IUPAC Name:
mercury dichloride
Details on test material:
- Name of test material (as cited in study report): mercury chloride
- Molecular formula (if other than submission substance): HgCl2
- Physical state: solid
No further details are given.

Test animals

Species:
mouse
Strain:
Swiss
Sex:
male
Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Swiss albino inbred mice were obtained from the Departmental animals house.
- Age at study initiation: 8-10 weeks
- Weight at study initiation: 25-28 g
- Housing: in cages
- Diet: standard diet
- Water: ad libitum

ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 28 +/- 2
- Humidity (%): 60 +/- 5
- Photoperiod: 12 hours dark/light cycle
No further details are given.

Administration / exposure

Route of administration:
oral: gavage
Vehicle:
Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: distilled water
Details on exposure:
No further information available.
Duration of treatment / exposure:
single treatment
Frequency of treatment:
once
Post exposure period:
Animals were killed 24 hours after exposure.
Doses / concentrationsopen allclose all
Remarks:
Doses / Concentrations:
3.0 mg/kg body weight
Basis:
nominal in water
2.2 mg/kg bw Hg
Remarks:
Doses / Concentrations:
6.0 mg/kg body weight
Basis:
nominal in water
4.4 mg/kg bw Hg
Remarks:
Doses / Concentrations:
12.0 mg/kg body weight
Basis:
nominal in water
8.9 mg/kg bw Hg
No. of animals per sex per dose:
5 animals were used for each dose.
Control animals:
yes
Positive control(s):
Cyclophosphamide:
- Justification for choice of positive control(s): according to the followed guideline
- Route of administration: intraperitoneal
- Doses / concentrations: 25 mg/kg body weight

Examinations

Tissues and cell types examined:
Bone marrow
Details of tissue and slide preparation:
CRITERIA FOR DOSE SELECTION:
- Doses were equivalent to 1/40, 1/20 and 1/10 of the LD50 determined in the strain of mice used.

TREATMENT AND SAMPLING TIMES ( in addition to information in specific fields): no further details.

DETAILS OF SLIDE PREPARATION:
- Bone marrow chromosomes were prepared following a standard protocol: colchicine (4 mg/kg body weight; i.p.), hypotonic (1% sodium citrate), fixative (1:3 glacial acetic acid/ethanol) and flame drying.
- The slides were stained in diluted Giemsa stain.

METHOD OF ANALYSIS:
- 50 perfect metaphase plates were scored randomly per animal for chromosomal aberrations, and 1000 cells were scored for the mitotic index.
- All aberrations (chromatid gap, chromosome gap, chromatid break, chromosome break and rearrangement) were considered equal, irrespective of the number of events involved.
- The results are expressed as percentages of aberrant metaphase cells excluding gaps (%DC), and numbers of aberrations per cell excluding gaps (CA/cell).
Evaluation criteria:
no data
Statistics:
For all statistical analyses, the level of significance was established at P<0.05. A one-tailed trend test was performed to observe the effects of HgCl2. A one-way ANOVA test followed by Duncan's multiple range test was carried out to detect significant differences among different treatment protocols. Student's t-test was used to compare the mitotic index in the different sets of experiments.

Results and discussion

Test results
Sex:
male
Genotoxicity:
positive
Remarks:
HgCl2 at dose of 3, 6 and 12 mg/kg bw increased the frequency of CA (chromatid and isochromatid gaps, chromatid breaks). The number and percentage of damaged cells as well as the CA per cell were dose-dependently increased.
Toxicity:
yes
Remarks:
The mitotic indices were significantly and dose related decreased over the dose range investigated.
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Negative controls validity:
not examined
Positive controls validity:
valid
Additional information on results:
No further details on results are available.

Any other information on results incl. tables

Table: Total chromosomal aberrations recorded following oral treatment of mice with mercury chloride.

Concentration

[mg/kg body weight]

Total chromosomal aberrations

DC%

(mean ± SEM)

CA/cell

(mean ± SEM)

Mitotic index

(mean ± SD)

G’

G*

B’

B*

RR

DC

0

3

0

2

0

0

2

0.80 ± 0.49

0.008 ± 0.004

4.34 ± 0.11

3

18

1

9

0

1

10

4.0 ± 0.89

0.04 ± 0.008

3.78 ± 0.39§*

6

19

5

12

0

1

13

5.2 ± 1.01

0.052 ± 0.01

2.52 ± 0.19**

12

23

2

16

0

2

18

7.2 ± 0.79

0.072 ± 0.007

1.9 ± 0.48***

Positive control (25 mg/kg bw)

39

2

282

2

15

109

43.6 ± 9.53

1.188 ± 0.343

1.76 ± 0.44***

G’ and G* = chromatid and isochromatid gaps, respectively; B’ and B* = chromatid and chromosome breaks, respectively; RR = chromosomal arrangement; DC = damaged cells; SEM = standard error of the mean; SD = standard deviation.

§ = significant positive dose response obtained (P<0.001, one-tailed trend test).

* = indicates significant reductions in mitotic index compared with the negative control (* = P<0.05; ** = P<0.01 and *** = P<0.001; Student’s t-test).

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Conclusions:
Interpretation of results (migrated information): positive
Under the described test conditions and according to the given information the test substance mercury chloride showed mutagenic activity in the chromosome aberration test at all dose levels investigated.
Executive summary:

To evaluate the potential of mercury chloride to induce chromosome aberration in bone marrow cells, male mice were treated once with three different doses of the substance (per oral). The results showed that HgCl2 at dose levels of 3, 6 and 12 mg/kg bw ( 2.2, 4.4 and 8.9 mg/kg bw/d Hg) increased the frequency of chromosomal aberrations (chromatid and isochromatid gaps, chromatid breaks). The number and percentage of damaged cells as well as the chromosomal aberrations per cell were dose-dependently increased. The mitotic indices were significantly and dose related decreased over the dose range investigated.