Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Genetic toxicity: in vitro

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
in vitro cytogenicity / micronucleus study
Remarks:
Determination of the mutagenic potential of Pentyl valerate with the "In Vitro Mammalian Chromosomal Aberraton Test" following OECD 473 and EU B.10
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
28. Apr. 2017
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
2017
Report date:
2017

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 473 (In Vitro Mammalian Chromosome Aberration Test)
Deviations:
yes
Remarks:
uncritical
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)
Remarks:
certified by Landesamt für Umwelt, Wasserwirtschft und Gewerbeaufsicht, Kaiser-Friedrich-Str. 7, D-55116 Mainz, Germany
Type of assay:
in vitro mammalian cell micronucleus test

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
Pentyl valerate
EC Number:
218-528-7
EC Name:
Pentyl valerate
Cas Number:
2173-56-0
Molecular formula:
C10H20O2
IUPAC Name:
pentyl valerate
Test material form:
liquid

Method

Target gene:
chromosomal aberration
Species / strain
Species / strain / cell type:
lymphocytes:
Details on mammalian cell type (if applicable):
Donors: Young, adult, healthy humans
Additional strain / cell type characteristics:
other: the blood of one donor revealed a fragile site at chromosome 16 (fra(16)(q?22)). This was not included in the assessment of mutagenicity
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Metabolic activation system:
S9-Mix
Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
pre-experiment (cytotoxicity test):1.72/0.86/0.43/0.22/0.11 mg/ml (concentrations in the experiment)
experiment 1 (cytotoxicity test): without metabolic activation: 125/100/75/50/25/13 µg/ml, with metabolic activation: 1.72/0.86/0.43/0.22/0.11 mg/ml
experiment 2 (aberration assay): without metabolic activation: 100/50/13 µg/ml
Vehicle / solvent:
ethanol
Controls
Untreated negative controls:
yes
Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
yes
Positive controls:
yes
Positive control substance:
cyclophosphamide
ethylmethanesulphonate
Remarks:
ethyl methanesulphonate (experiment without metabolic activation), cyclophosphamide (experiment with metabolic activation)
Details on test system and experimental conditions:
Human peripheral blood lymphocytes were stimulated to divide by addition of phytohaemagglutinin and exposed to the test substance with and without metabolic activation by S9-Mix. Metaphase cells were obtained by arresting cell divison by Colcemid (R) and slides were prepared. Then these metaphase cells were examined for chromosomal damage visually by the Zeiss microscopes and the automatic slide scanning system Metafer by MetaSystems. The mitotic index was calculated. 3 valid experiments were performed: Pre-experiment (4h exposure, without metabolic activation), experiment 1 (4h, exposure, with and without metabolic activation), experiment 2 (25h exposure, without metabolic activation). 3 tests were invalid.(too high cytotoxicity, solvent control positive, no results obtained).
Rationale for test conditions:
This study was performed in order to evaluate the mutagenic potential of the test substance according to OECD 473
Evaluation criteria:
Acceptability: Controls are within the range of historical control data, no positive (mutagenic) result ist found in any experiment, an adequate number of cells is analysable, criteria for cell proliferation is fulfilled.
Classification: No significant or concentration-released chromosomal aberration is found: The test substance is not mutagenic
Statistics:
300 metaphases (150 per replicate) were scored for cytogenetic damage. The number of aberrant cells in each treatment was compared with the solvent control value using Fisher's exact test or chi-sqaure-test atn the 5% level (p<0.05).

Results and discussion

Test results
Key result
Species / strain:
lymphocytes:
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
cytotoxicity
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Untreated negative controls validity:
valid
Positive controls validity:
valid
Remarks on result:
other: high cytotoxicity, but no mutagenic potential found in this experiment

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Conclusions:
Test item showed high cytotoxicity, but no mutagenic potential found in this experiment