Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Endpoint:
acute toxicity: dermal
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
supporting study
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
other: Body responsible for the test
Title:
Unnamed

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
EU Method B.3 (Acute Toxicity (Dermal))
GLP compliance:
yes
Limit test:
yes

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
-
EC Number:
441-810-8
EC Name:
-
Cas Number:
116313-85-0
Molecular formula:
C7H5NO5
IUPAC Name:
3,4-dihydroxy-5-nitrobenzaldehyde

Test animals

Species:
rat
Strain:
Sprague-Dawley

Administration / exposure

Type of coverage:
semiocclusive
Duration of exposure:
24 h

Results and discussion

Mortality:
Male: 2000 mg/kg bw; Number of animals: 5; Number of deaths: 0
Female: 2000 mg/kg bw; Number of animals: 5; Number of deaths: 0
Clinical signs:
other: Signs of toxicity related to dose levels: During the test period no signs of systemic toxicity were observed. The bodyweight development was as expected.
Gross pathology:
Effects on organs: No abnomalities were found.
Other findings:
Signs of toxicity (local): Yellowish discolouring of the test area was found in all animals 1 to 4 days p.a. which prevented an assessement of
erythema. During this period no signs of oedema were found.
Desquamation were observed at the treatment areas of 4 males and 4 females 3 to 6 days p.a.. Yellowish discolouring were observed from day 5 but this did not have any effect in the assessment of the erythema.

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
not classified
Remarks:
Migrated information Criteria used for interpretation of results: EU