Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 225-795-3 | CAS number: 5081-87-8
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Eye irritation
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- eye irritation: in vitro / ex vivo
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 2005-10-27 to 2005-10-28
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- comparable to guideline study with acceptable restrictions
- Remarks:
- Study was conducted according to INVITTOX protocol no. 98 "Bovine Corneal Opacity and Permeability Assay" and Bovine Corneal Opacity and Permeability Assay (BCO-P) SOP of Microbiological Associates Ltd., UK without deviations.
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 2 005
- Report date:
- 2005
Materials and methods
Test guidelineopen allclose all
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: INVITTOX protocol no. 98 "Bovine Corneal Opacity and Permeability Assay
- Deviations:
- no
- Remarks:
- The testing facility indicated that the protocol was followed without deviations.
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: Bovine Corneal Opacity and Permeability Assay (BCO-P) SOP of Microbiological Associates Ltd., UK.
- Deviations:
- no
- Remarks:
- The testing facility indicated that the protocol was followed without deviations.
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- not applicable
- GLP compliance:
- no
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- 3-(2-chloroethyl)(1H,3H)quinazoline-2,4-dione
- EC Number:
- 225-795-3
- EC Name:
- 3-(2-chloroethyl)(1H,3H)quinazoline-2,4-dione
- Cas Number:
- 5081-87-8
- Molecular formula:
- C10H9ClN2O2
- IUPAC Name:
- 3-(2-CHLOROETHYL)QUINAZOLINE-2,4(1H,3H)-DIONE
- Details on test material:
- - Name of test material (as cited in study report): T001201
- Substance type: white to beige powder
- Physical state: powder
- Analytical purity: no data
- Purity test date: no data
- Lot/batch No.: 00464885RT001201G1A251
- Expiration date of the lot/batch: no data
- Stability under test conditions: no data
- Storage condition of test material: room temperature (range of 20 ± 5 °C), light protected
- Other:
Solubility:
Water: < 0.09 g/L
Methanol: 10 g/L
Dichloromethane: 10.2 g/L
Acetone: 26.7 g/L
Ethanol: 7.9 g/L
2-propanol: 1.3 g/L
N,N-Dimethylformamide: 290 g/L
Constituent 1
Test animals / tissue source
- Species:
- other: freshly isolated bovine cornea
- Strain:
- other: not applicable
- Details on test animals or tissues and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Freshly isolated bovine eyes were collected from the abattoir. Abattoir Basel, Schlachthofstrasse 55, CH-4055 Basel, Switzerland.
After excess tissue was removed from the excised eyes, they were stored at room temperature in Hank's balanced salt solution containing penicillin/streptomycin and then transported for further preparations. The eyes were delivered the day before treatment, and the isolated corneas were stored overnight in a preservation medium in a refrigerator.
- Preparation of corneas:
All eyes were carefully examined macroscopically for defects. Those presenting defects such as vascularization, pigmentation, opacity and scratches were discarded. Each cornea was dissected from the eye using scalpel and rounded scissors. A rim of about 2 - 3 mm of tissue (sclera) was left for stability and handling of the isolated cornea. All corneas used in the experiment were collected in complete medium essential medium (cMEM) and were checked finally with a view box for defects listed before.
Since the bovine eyes were delivered in the afternoon, corneas were stored in a preservation medium overnight in a refrigerator at about 4°C. The preservation medium was composed of Medium 199 supplemented with L-glutamine, Na-bicarbonate and Taurine. Shortly before use, Dextran was added.
Each cornea was mounted in a cornea holder with the endothelial side against the sealing ring (O-ring) of the posterior part of the holder. The cornea was gently flattened over the O-ring but stretching had to be avoided. After the anterior part of the holder was positioned on the top of the cornea and fixed in place with screws, both compartments of the holder were filled with cMEM. The posterior compartment had to be filled first to return the cornea to its natural convex position. Care must be taken to assure no air bubbles were present within the compartments.
For equilibration, the corneas in the holder were incubated for about one hour at 32°C ± 2°C in a water-bath. During the whole experiment, cornea holders and medium were maintained in a water-bath at 32°C ± 2°C
Test system
- Vehicle:
- physiological saline
- Controls:
- other: negative (physiological saline) and positive (20% imidazole, dissolved in saline) control
- Amount / concentration applied:
- TEST MATERIAL
- Amount(s) applied (volume or weight with unit): 0.75 mL
- Concentration (if solution): 20% suspension in saline
VEHICLE
- Amount(s) applied (volume or weight with unit): 0.75 mL
POSITIVE CONTROL
- Amount(s) applied (volume or weight with unit): 0.75 mL
- Concentration (if solution): 20% imidazole, dissolved in saline - Duration of treatment / exposure:
- 240 min
- Observation period (in vivo):
- At the end of the incubation period, the medium was removed from both compartments, and replaced by fresh cMEM, and the basal opacity was determined (t0min). For the measurement, the posterior compartment was plugged while the anterior compartment remained unplugged.
- Number of animals or in vitro replicates:
- Group 1 (negative control): 3 corneas
Group 2 (positive control): 3 corneas
Group 3 (test item): 3 corneas - Details on study design:
- REMOVAL OF TEST SUBSTANCE
- Washing (if done): After the test substance was rinsed off from the application side by changing cMEM solution several times until precipitates of the test substance could be observed no longer, fresh cMEM was replaced in both compartments and the opacity was measured (t240min).
- Time after start of exposure: 240 minutes
- Opacity measurement:
The experiment was performed to determine an irritation effect of the test item on the corneal opacity.
The opacitometer determined changes in the light transmission passing through the corneas, and displayed a numerical opacity value. This value was recorded in a table. The opacitometer was calibrated with a standardized opaque polyester sheet as described in the manual and the opacity of each of the corneas was determined by reading each holder placed in the photoreceptor compartment for treated cornea.
After recording the basal opacity of all corneas, the mean value of all corneas was calculated. No cornea deviated from this by more than ± 3 units and no cornea was discarded. Sets of three corneas were used for treatment with the test item, the negative and positive controls, respectively.
Medium was completely removed from the anterior compartment and replaced by the test item, positive or negative control. The anterior compartment was plugged. The holder was turned to a horizontal position and slightly rotated to ensure uniform covering of the cornea with the test item and was incubated in a horizontal positioning a water-bath at 32°C ± 2°C.
- Permeability determination
To demonstrate possible treatment-induced transepithelial permeability of the cornea, the permeability test with fluorescein sodium dye was performed in a second step. Corneal permeability is quantified by measuring the amount of fluorescein sodium dye diffusing into the medium in the posterior chamber. Fresh cMEM was added to the posterior chamber and 1 mL of the fluorescein sodium dye solution, 0.5% dissolved in Dulbecco's phosphate-buffered saline, was placed in the anterior compartment after removing the medium. Corneas were incubated again in a horizontal position for about 90 minutes in a water-bath at 32°C ± 2°C. The optical density of an aliquot of the mixed medium from the posterior chamber was measured by photometry at 490 nm. The dye solution was valid for use, if a dilution stock solution containing 10 µg/mL showed an optical density (OD490) of 1.610 to 1.910.
Evaluation of results:
Opacity:
The change of opacity value of each treated cornea or positive or negative control corneas was calculated by subtracting the initial basal opacity from the post treatment opacity reading, for each individual cornea (t240min-t0min).
The average change in opacity of the negative control corneas was calculated and this value subtracted from the change in opacity of each treated cornea or positive control to obtain a corrected opacity.
The mean corrected opacity value of each treatment group was then calculated from the individual corrected opacity values of the treated corneas for each treatment condition.
Permeability:
The corrected OD490 value of each treated cornea or positive control corneas was calculated by subtracting the average negative control cornea value from the original permeability value for each cornea.
The mean corrected permeability values of each treatment group were calculated from the individual corrected permeability values of the treated corneas for each treatment condition.
In Vitro Score Calculation:
In-Vitro Score = opacity value + (15 X OD490 value)
The In-Vitro Score was calculated for each individual treatment and positive control cornea. The mean In Vitro Score value of each treated group was calculated from the individual In-Vitro Score Values:
Negative control:
In-Vitro Score = opacity value + (15 X OD490 value)
Positive control and test substance cornea:
In-Vitro Score = corrected opacity value + (15 X corrected OD490 value)
Depending on the score obtained, the test item was classified into one of the following categories:
In-Vitro Score (Proposed In-Vitro Irritation Scale):
0-3 (non eye irritant)
3.1-25 (mild eye irritant)
25.1-55 (moderate eye irritant)
55.1 -80 (severe eye irritant)
> 80.1 (very severe eye irritant)
Results and discussion
In vitro
Resultsopen allclose all
- Irritation parameter:
- in vitro irritation score
- Value:
- 1.4
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Remarks on result:
- other: SD: +/- 1.5
- Irritation parameter:
- cornea opacity score
- Value:
- 1
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Remarks on result:
- other: SD: +/- 1.2
- Irritation parameter:
- other: permeability score
- Value:
- 0.03
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Remarks on result:
- other: SD: +/-0.025
- Other effects / acceptance of results:
- mean in vitro irritancy scores (range):
negative control: 0.5 ± 1.5 (-0.8 to 2.2)
positive control: 80.9 ± 12.4
test item: 1.4 ± 1.5 (-0.3 to 2.4)
mean opacity scores (range):
negative control: 0.3 ± 1.5 (-1 to 2)
positive control (mean corrected value): 65.7 ± 6.0 (59.7 to 71.1)
test item (mean corrected value): 1.0 ± 1.2
mean permeability scores (range):
negative control: 0.014 ± 0.002 (0.013 to 0.017)
positive control (mean corrected value): 1.018 ± 0.450 (0.724 to 1.536)
test item (mean corrected value): 0.030 ± 0.025 (0.002 to 0.051)
Any other information on results incl. tables
- Before starting the permeability test, the sodium fluorescein dye solution was checked for quality. The dye solution was valid for use if the stock solution containing 10 ug/mL showed an optical density (OD490) of 1.610 to 1.910. The value found by spectroscopy was 1.643.
The test was considered valid as the positive control caused an in vitro score greater than 55.
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Interpretation of results:
- GHS criteria not met
- Conclusions:
- The test item was not considered to be an eye irritant under the given test conditions.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.