Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Endpoint:
acute toxicity: dermal
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
06.02.1986 to 08.02.1986
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: Guideline performed under GLP

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
1986
Report date:
1986

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
EPA OTS 798.1100 (Acute Dermal Toxicity)
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)
Test type:
standard acute method
Limit test:
no

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
-
EC Number:
429-960-2
EC Name:
-
Cas Number:
27610-48-6
Molecular formula:
C16H16O4
IUPAC Name:
2-[({6-[(oxiran-2-yl)methoxy]naphthalen-1-yl}oxy)methyl]oxirane
Details on test material:
Purity: >99%
Lot N°: B-001

Test animals

Species:
rat
Strain:
Sprague-Dawley
Sex:
male/female
Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
Equal numbers of male and female CFY (Sprague-Dawley origin) rats were obtained from Interfauna U.K. Ltd., Huntingdon, Cambridgeshire, England. They were in a weight range of 208 to 251 g prior to dosing (Day1) and approximately six to eight weeks of age. All the rats were acclimated to the experimental environment for a period of not less than 5 days prior to the start of the study.
The rats were allocatex to ages within the treatment groups. They were housed individually in metal cages with wire mesh floors. A standard laboratory rodent diet (Labsure LAD1) and water were provided ad libitum. The batch of diet used for the study was analysed for certain chemical and microbiological contaminants.
Results of routine chemical examination of water at source (Grafham Final Water) as conducted by the Anglian Water Authority, are made available toHuntingdon Research Centre.
The mean daily minimum and maximum temperatures of the animal room were 22°C and 26°C respectively and the mean daily relative humidity value was 56%. The rate of air exchange was maintained at approximately 15 air changes/hour. Lighting was controlled by means of a time switch to 12 hours artificial light in each 24 hour period.
Each animal was identified by cage number and ear punching.
Each cage was identified by a coloured label dispalying the dose level, study schedule number and the initials of the study Director.

Administration / exposure

Type of coverage:
occlusive
Vehicle:
unchanged (no vehicle)
Details on dermal exposure:
One day prior to treatment hair was removed from the dorso-lumbar region of each rat with electric clippers exposing an area equivalent to 10% of the total body surface. No shaving or chemical depilation was used.
The test substance was applied by spreading it evenly over the prepared skin. The treated area was then promptly covered with gauze which was held in place with an impermeable dressing encircled firmly around the trunk.
At the end of the 24-hours exposure period, the dressings were carefully removed and the treated area of skin decontamined by washing in alcohol and/or warm (30°-40°) water and blotting dry with absorbent paper.
Duration of exposure:
The duration of exposure is 24 hours.
Doses:
2.0 g/kg in an attempt to demonstrate the low toxicity of this treatment regime.
Study was completed by establishing the lethal threshold dose (Acute lethal dose) of the test substance.Rta were treated at dose of 0.4 and 1.0 g/kg.
No. of animals per sex per dose:
-One group of ten rats (5 males and 5 females) was dosed at 2.0 g/kg.
-Two groups of ten rats (5males and 5 females)were treated at doses of 0.4 g/kg and 1.0 g/kg.
Control animals:
no
Details on study design:
- Duration of observation period following administration: 15 or 22 days.
- Frequency of observations and weighing:
Animals were observed soon after dosing; then at frequent intervals for the remainder of Day 1.
On subsequent days the animals were observed at least once in the morning and again at the end of the experimentalday. This latter observation was at approximately 16.30 hours on week days or 11.30 hours on Saturday and Sunday. Clinical signs were recorded at each observation.
- Necropsy of survivors performed: yes
Surviving animals in the study were killed on Day 15 or 22 by cervical dislocation. All animals that died during the study and those killed on Days 15 or 22 were subjected to a macroscopic post mortem examination wich consisted of opening appearance of abnormal organs when present was recorded.
- Other examinations performed: clinical signs,Mortality,Dermal reactions body weight,Terminal autopsy.

Results and discussion

Effect levelsopen allclose all
Sex:
female
Dose descriptor:
LD50
Effect level:
< 2 000 mg/kg bw
Based on:
test mat.
Sex:
male/female
Dose descriptor:
LD50
Effect level:
> 1 000 - < 2 000 mg/kg bw
Based on:
test mat.
Mortality:
Three of the female rats dosed at 2.0 g/kg were found dead on days 8, 10 and 16. There were no deaths among the males rats at any dose level or among female rats dosed at 0.4 or 1.0 g/kg.
Clinical signs:
other: There were no clinical signs of a reaction to treatment until Day 5 or, at the lowest dose-level, until Day 9. The most common responses were: -Abnormal body carriage ( hunched posture) among rats dosed at 0.4 g/kg and in all rats given higher doses. -Pil
Gross pathology:
Autopsy of rats that died revealed geseous distension of the small and large intestines of 2 animals and single cases of abnormal fluid in the stomach and large intestine, abnormal fluid in the stomach, presence of white, raised areas on the non-glandular zone of the stomach and a small spleen.
Each of the rats that died lost more than 30% of bodyweight between tha day of dosing and death.



Other findings:
Slight or well-defined erythma was observed at the sites of application of Epiclon EXA 4032 upon removal of the occlusive dressing on Day 2.
Signs of dermal irritation became more marked until by Day 6 the majority of ratsshowed well-defined or moderate-to-severe erythema in association with slight, well-defined or moderate oedema.
Dermal inflammation resolved completely by Day 15.
A slight discolouration of the treated skin of all rats dosed at 0.4 or 1.0 g/kg was observed from Day 2 but had disappeared by Day 5.
Areas of herdening, a dry appearance of the treated skin, cracking or sloughing were observed in many animals from Day 7 but resolved before termination.

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
Category 4 based on GHS criteria
Remarks:
Migrated information
Conclusions:
In conclusion, the acute lethal dermal dose to rats of Epiclon EXA 4032 was found to be between 1.0 g/kg bodyweight and 2.0 g/kg body weight.

Executive summary:

This study was designed to assess the toxicity following a single dermal dose and to determined the LD50.

The LD50 of EPICLON EXA-4032 was determined and the experimental procedure was based on the Testing Guidelines as given in Federal Register Vol.50 N°. 188, PartII dated 27 September 1985.Section 798.1100 -Acute Dermal Toxicity.

For this experiment, a preliminary study was done to establish a dosing regimen using groups of 5 male and female rats at 1 dose levels of 2.0 g/kg bodyweight.

For the main study, a group of ten rats (five males and five females) was treated at 0.4 or 1.0 g/kg bodyweight..

The dose of the etst substance was administred to each rat by spreading (type of coverage:occlusive)

In conclusion, the acute lethal dermal dose to rats of EPICLON EXA-4032 was found to be 1.0>LD50>2.0 g/kg bodyweight.